Organic versus Conventional Agriculture: Comparison of Economic and Environmental Sustainability

[1]Murawska A., Goryńska-Goldmann E. Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Agricultural and Industrial Sectors – Change Trends, Economic Conditions, and Country Classification: Evidence from the European Union. Agriculture 2023:13(7):1354. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071354 Search in Google Scholar

[2]European Commission. A European Green Deal | European Commission, 2019. [Online]. [Accessed: 19.04.2021]. Available: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en#policy-areas Search in Google Scholar

[3]European Commission. CAP Strategic Plans - European Commission, 2023. [Online]. [Accessed: 19.11.2024]. Available: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/cap-my-country/cap-strategic-plans_en Search in Google Scholar

[4]Gancone A., Viznere R., Kaleja D., Pubule J., D Blumberga. Towards Climate Neutrality via Sustainable Agriculture in Soil Management. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):535–547. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0041 Search in Google Scholar

[5]European Court of Auditors. Common Agricultural Policy and climate – Half of EU climate spending but farm emissions are not decreasing. 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[6]Mirescu L. The European Green Deal: moving to action Opportunities and challenges for the European citizens. Integrating the green deal targets into the common agricultural policy. [Online]. [Accessed 10.08.2022]. Available: www.iedonline.eu Search in Google Scholar

[7]European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A Farm to Fork Strategy for A Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-friendly Food System. Brussels, 2020. [Online]. [Accessed 09.08.2022]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0381 Search in Google Scholar

[8]European Commission: Directorate-General for Climate Action, Bognar J., Lam L., Forestier O., Finesso A. et al., Pricing agricultural emissions and rewarding climate action in the agri-food value chain. Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2834/200 Search in Google Scholar

[9]Paura L., Berzina L., Degola L., Aplocina E., Kairisa D., Jonkus D., Skiste O. Trends in milk yield productivity and emissions from the dairy sector in Latvia. Agronomy Research 2023:21(3):1254–1265. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.23.047 Search in Google Scholar

[10]Latviàs National Inventory Report. [Online]. [Accessed 10.08.2022]. Available: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lv/eu/mmr/art07_inventory/ghg_inventory/envzzvjlq/index_html?&page=2 Search in Google Scholar

[11]Reaching 25% organic land with the right knowledge – Priorities for the new Organic Action Plan and the Horizon Europe Work Programmes FAO. [Online]. [Accessed 02.12.2024]. Available: https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1617913/Search in Google Scholar

[12]Ondrasek G. et al. Land Resources in Organic Agriculture: Trends and Challenges in the Twenty-First Century from Global to Croatian Contexts. Agronomy 2023:13(6):1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061544 Search in Google Scholar

[13]Bathaei A., Štreimikienė D. A Systematic Review of Agricultural Sustainability Indicators. Agriculture 2023:13(2):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020241 Search in Google Scholar

[14]Cristache S. E., Vuţă M., Marin E., Cioacă S. I., Vuţă M. Organic versus Conventional Farming – A Paradigm for the Sustainable Development of the European Countries. Sustainability 2018:10(11):4279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114279 Search in Google Scholar

[15]Kelly E., Latruffe L., Desjeuc Y., Ryan M., Uthes S., Diazabakana A., Dillon E., Finn J. Sustainability indicators for improved assessment of the effects of agricultural policy across the EU: Is FADN the answer? Ecological Indicators 2018:89:903–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.053 Search in Google Scholar

[16]European Commission. Latvia – Final updated NECP 2021–2030 (submitted in 2024). [Online]. [Accessed 13.11.2024]. Available: https://commission.europa.eu/publications/latvia-final-updated-necp-2021-2030-submitted-2024_en Search in Google Scholar

[17]EU’s organic farming area reaches 14.7 million hectares. [Online]. [Accessed 02.12.2024]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220222-1 Search in Google Scholar

[18]Agricultural Market Brief. Organic farming in the EU. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.12.2021]. Available: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-04/agri-market-brief-20-organic-farming-eu_en.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[19]Segerkvist K. A., Hansson H., Sonesson U., Gunnarsson S. Research on Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Dairy Farming: A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature. Sustainability 2020:12(14):5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145502 Search in Google Scholar

[20]Latvijas lauksaimniecības siltumnīcefekta gāzu un amonjaka emisijas, kā arī CO2 piesaistes (aramzemēs un zālājos) robežsamazinājuma izmaksu līkņu (MACC) pielāgošana izmantošanai lauksaimniecības, vides un klimata politikas veidošanā (33,870 EUR) [Adjustment of the marginal reduction cost curves (MACC) of Latvian agricultural greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions, as well as CO2 sequestration (arable land and grassland) for use in the development of agricultural, environmental and climate policy (33,870 EUR). [Online]. [Accessed 25.04.2024]. Available: https://petijumi.mk.gov.lv/node/3748 (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[21]European Union – Cereal Yield (kg Per Hectare) – 2024 Data 2025 Forecast 1961–2022 Historical. [Online]. [Accessed 16.04.2024]. Available: https://tradingeconomics.com/european-union/cereal-yield-kg-per-hectare-wb-data.html Search in Google Scholar

[22]Mansour Al-F., Jejčič V. Carbon footprint of conventional and organic crops production of family farms in Slovenia [Online]. [Accessed 25.04.2024]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268159548_CARBON_FOOTPRINT_OF_CONVENTIONAL_AND_ORGANIC_CROPS_PRODUCTION_ON_FAMILY_FARMS_IN_SLOVENIA Search in Google Scholar

[23]Auzins A., Leimane I., Krievina A., Morozova I., Miglavs A., Lakovskis P. Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Performance of Crop Production in Relation to Crop Rotation, Catch Crops, and Tillage. Agriculture 2023:13(8):1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081539 Search in Google Scholar

[24]Agroresursu un ekonomikas institūts. Ziņojums Lauku attīstības programmas 2014-2020 novērtēšanas ietvaros Bioloģiskās lauksaimniecības situācijas analīze un SVID [Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics. Report within the evaluation of the Rural Development Program 2014-2020 Analysis of the situation of organic agriculture and SWOT]. 2022. [Online]. [Accessed 19.11.2024]. Available: https://www.arei.lv/sites/arei/files/files/lapas/Atskaite_inov%C4%81cijas.pdf. (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[25]Latvijas Republikas Zemkopības ministrija. Latvijas lauksaimniecība [Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Latvia. Latvian agriculture]. 2021, 2022. (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[26]Zemkopības ministrija. Latvijas Kopējās lauksaimniecības politikas stratēģiskais plāns 2023.–2027. gadam [Ministry of Agriculture. Latvian Common Agricultural Policy Strategic Plan 2023–2027]. [Online]. [Accessed 19.11.2024]. Available: https://www.zm.gov.lv/lv/latvijas-kopejas-lauksaimniecibas-politikas-strategiskais-plans-2023-2027gadam Search in Google Scholar

[27]Methane emissions in the EU: the key to immediate action on climate change. European Environment Agency. [Online]. [Accessed 02.12.2024]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/methane-emissions-in-the-eu/methane-emissions-in-the-eu Search in Google Scholar

[28]Asadi A., Kalantari K., Choobchian S. Structural Analysis of Factors Affecting Agricultural Sustainability in Qazvin Province, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2013:15:11–22. Search in Google Scholar

[29]Latvijas Lauksaimniecības universitāte. Pētījuma 5. posma pārskats un gala pārskats [Agricultural University of Latvia. Study Phase 5 Review and Final Review]. 2017. (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[30]Latvijas Lauku konsultāciju un izglītības centrs. Labāka barības sagremojamība, lielāka ražība, mazāk izdalītā metāna [Latvian Rural Consultation and Education Center. Better feed digestibility, higher yield, less methane released]. [Online]. [Accessed 13.11.2024]. Available: https://new.llkc.lv/lv/nozares/lopkopiba/labaka-baribas-sagremojamiba-lielaka-raziba-mazak-izdalita-metana (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[31]Līdzsvarota lauksaimniecība [Balanced agriculture]. [Online]. [Accessed 28.11.2024]. Available: efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.lptf.lbtu.lv/sites/lptf/files/2019-08/LF_Lidzsvarota%20lauksaimnieciba_Rakstu%20krajums_2019_gatavs (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[32]Barības devas un slāpekļa emisijas [Feed rates and nitrogen emissions]. [Online]. [Accessed 29.11.2024]. Available: https://zemniekusaeima.lv/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Bar%C4%ABbas-devas-un-sl%C4%81pek%C4%BCa-emisijas_LLKC_FIN.pdf (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[33]Forage quality and feed intake effect on methane emissions from dairy farming [Online]. [Accessed 02.12.2024]. Available: https://www.iitf.lbtu.lv/conference/proceedings2015/Papers/098_Trupa.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[34]Gross A., Bromm T., Polifka S., Schierhorn F. The carbon footprint of milk during the conversion from conventional to organic production on a dairy farm in central Germany. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2022:42(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00775-7 Search in Google Scholar

[35]Karlsson J. O., Robling H., Cederberg C., Spörndly R., Lindberg M., Martiin C., Ardfors E., Tidåker P. What can we learn from the past? Tracking sustainability indicators for the Swedish dairy sector over 30 years. Agricultural Systems 2023:212:103779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103779 Search in Google Scholar

[36]Grodkowski G., Gołębiewski M., Slósarz J., Grodkowska k., et al. Organic Milk Production and Dairy Farming Constraints and Prospects under the Laws of the European Union. Animals 2023:13(9):1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091457 Search in Google Scholar

[37]Centrālā statistikas pārvalde. Visu veidu saimniecību grupējums pēc liellopu un slaucamo govju skaita gada beigās 1996–2023 [Central Statistical Office. Grouping of all types of holdings by the number of cattle and dairy cows at the end of the year 1996-2023]. [Online]. [Accessed 08.04.2024]. Available: https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/OSP_PUB/START__NOZ__LA__LAL/LAL110 (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[38]Agroresursu un ekonnomikas institūts. Stratēģijas izstrāde noturīgas un multifunkcionālas piena nozares attīstībai Latvijā [Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics. Development of a strategy for the development of a sustainable and multifunctional dairy industry in Latvia]. 2021. [Online]. [Accessed 12.04.2024]. Available: https://www.arei.lv/lv/projekti/2021/strategijas-izstrade-noturigas-un-multifunkcionalas-piena-nozares-attistibai-latvija (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[39]Lauksaimniecības datu centrs. Gada pārskati [Agricultural Data Center. Annual reports]. [Online]. [Accessed 08.04.2024]. Available: https://www.ldc.gov.lv/lv/gada-parskats (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[40]Peterson C. B., Mitloehner F. M. Sustainability of the Dairy Industry: Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Frontiers in Animal Science 2021:2:760310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2021.760310 Search in Google Scholar

[41]Centrālā statistikas pārvalde. Bioloģiskās lauksaimniecības dzīvnieku skaits 2013–2022 [Central Statistical Office. Number of animals in organic farming 2013–2022]. [Online]. [Accessed 08.04.2024]. Available: https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/OSP_PUB/START__NOZ__BL__BLL/BLL010/ (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[42]Chopin P., Mubaya C. P., Descheemaeker K., Öborn I., Bergkvist G. Avenues for improving farming sustainability assessment with upgraded tools, sustainability framing and indicators. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2021:41(2):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00674-3 Search in Google Scholar

[43]Latruffe L., Diazabakana A., Bockstaller C., Desjeux Y., Finn J., et al. Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: a review of indicators. Studies in Agricultural Economics 2016:118(3):123–130. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1624 Search in Google Scholar

[44]2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories – IPCC. [Online]. [Accessed 13.11.2024]. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/ Search in Google Scholar

[45]Magrini A., Giambona F. A Composite Indicator to Assess Sustainability of Agriculture in European Union Countries. Social Indicators Research 2022:163(3):1003–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02925-6 Search in Google Scholar

[46]Bonnet J., Coll-Martínez E., Renou-Maissant P. Evaluating Sustainable Development by Composite Index: Evidence from French Departments. Sustainability 2021:13(2):1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020761 Search in Google Scholar

[47]Pandian G. S. Composite Performance Index for Sustainability. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 2013:3(1):91–102. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-03191102 Search in Google Scholar

[48]Rahman M. M., Szabó G. A Novel Composite Index to Measure Environmental Benefits in Urban Land Use Optimization Problems. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2022:11(4):220.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11040220 Search in Google Scholar

[49]Armin Razmjoo A., Sumper A., Davarpanah A. Development of sustainable energy indexes by the utilization of new indicators: A comparative study. Energy Reports 2019:5:375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.03.006 Search in Google Scholar

[50]Hryhoruk P., Khrushch N., Grygoruk S. An Approach to Design a Composite Index of Economic Development and Identifying the Bounds of its Levels. 9^th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies, ACIT 2019 – Proceedings, 2019:48–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACITT.2019.8779918 Search in Google Scholar

[51]Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. Diet optimization for dairy cows to reduce ammonia emissions. Presented at the Research for Rural Development 2021. Annual 27^th International scientific conference proceedings, 2021:36–43. https://doi.org/10.22616/rrd.27.2021.005 Search in Google Scholar

[52]Average protein content in milk, % – Time period. [Online]. [Accessed 03.12.2024]. Available: https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__NOZ__LA__LAL/LAL050/table/tableViewLayout1/ Search in Google Scholar

[53]Brodziak A., Wajs J., Zuba-Ciszewska M., Król J., Stobiecka M., Jańczuk A. Organic versus Conventional Raw Cow Milk as Material for Processing. Animals 2021:11(10):2760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102760 Search in Google Scholar

[54]Zagorska J. The evaluation of organic milk quality [Online]. [Accessed 03.12.2024]. Available: https://studylib.net/doc/5904504/jelena-zagorska.-the-evaluation-of-organic-milk-quality.-... Search in Google Scholar

[55]Latvijas Lauku konsultāciju un izglītības centrs. Cik izmaksā zemniekiem saražot bioloģisko pienu Latvijā? [Latvian Rural Consultation and Education Center. How much does it cost farmers to produce organic milk in Latvia?]. [Online]. [Accessed 03.12.2024]. Available: https://new.llkc.lv/system/files_force/aktualitates/cik_izmaksa_zemniekiem_sarazot_biologisko_pienu_latvija.pdf?download=1 (In Latvian). Search in Google Scholar

[56]Pirlo G., Lolli S. Environmental impact of milk production from samples of organic and conventional farms in Lombardy (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:211:962–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.070 Search in Google Scholar

[57]Bux C., Lombardi M., Varese E., Amicarelli V. Economic and Environmental Assessment of Conventional versus Organic Durum Wheat Production in Southern Italy. Sustainability 2022:14(15):9143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159143 Search in Google Scholar

[58]Hietala S., Smith L., Knudsen M. T., S Kurppa., Padel S., Hermansen J. E. Carbon footprints of organic dairying in six European countries – real farm data analysis. Organic Agriculture 2015:5(2):91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-014-0084-0 Search in Google Scholar