Emissions from 3D Printers as Occupational Environmental Pollutants

[1] Wierzbicki J., et al. Additive manufacturing technologies enabling rapid and interventional production of protective face shields and masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2020:29:1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/12629610.17219/acem/12629633001589 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Aydin A., et al. 3D printing in the battle against COVID-19. Emergent Materials 2021:4:363–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-021-00164-y10.1007/s42247-021-00164-y786867733585793 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ngo T. D., et al. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering 2018:143:172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Mardis N. J. Emerging Technology and Applications of 3D Printing in the Medical Field. Missouri Medicine 2018:368–373. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Sharma S., Goel S. A. 3D Printing and its Future in Medical World. Journal of Medical Research and Innovation 2018:3(1):e000141. https://doi.org/10.15419/jmri.14110.15419/jmri.141 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Roth G. A., et al. Potential occupational hazards of additive manufacturing. Journal of Occupational and Environmental hygiene 2019:16(5):321–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2019.159162710.1080/15459624.2019.1591627655513430908118 Search in Google Scholar

[7] The International Organization for Standardization. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015. Additive manufacturing. General principles. Terminology. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dunn K. L., et al. Reducing ultrafine particulate emission from multiple 3D printers in an office environment using a prototype engineering control. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2020:22:112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-04844-410.1007/s11051-020-04844-4845515334552386 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bernatikova S., et al. Characterization of ultrafine particles and VOCs emitted from a 3D printer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021:18(3):929–944. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1803092910.3390/ijerph18030929790856033494483 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gu J., et al. Characterization of particulate and gaseous pollutants emitted during operation of a desktop 3D printer. Environment International 2019:123:476–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.01410.1016/j.envint.2018.12.01430622073 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chan F. L., et al. Health survey of employees regularly using 3D printers. Occupational Medicine 2018:68(3):211–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqy04210.1093/occmed/kqy04229538712 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Chan F. L., et al. Emissions and health risks from the use of 3D printers in an occupational setting. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues 2020:83(7):11–19. https:/doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2020.175175810.1080/15287394.2020.175175832316869 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Afshar-Mohajer N., et al. Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer. Building and Environment 2015:93(P2):293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.01310.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.013 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Stephens B., et al. Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. Atmospheric Environment 2013:79:334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.05010.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.050 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Byrley P., et al. Particle emissions from fused deposition modeling 3D printers: Evaluation and meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment 2019:655:395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.07010.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.070835097030471608 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Jeon H., et al. Effect of nozzle temperature on the emission rate of ultrafine particles during 3D printing. Indoor Air 2019:30(2):306–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.1262410.1111/ina.1262431743481 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Davis A. Y., et al. Characterization of volatile organic compound emissions from consumer level material extrusion 3D printers. Building and Environment 2019:160:10629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.10620910.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106209 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Wojtyła S., et al. 3D printer as a potential source of indoor air pollution. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2020:17:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02444-x10.1007/s13762-019-02444-x Search in Google Scholar

[19] Stefaniak A. B., et al. Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional printer. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2017:14(7):540–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.130258910.1080/15459624.2017.1302589596740828440728 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Potter P. M., et al. VOC Emissions and Formation Mechanisms from Carbon Nanotube Composites during 3D Printing. Environmental Science and Technology 2019:53(8):4364–4370. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b0076510.1021/acs.est.9b00765653241130875473 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Azimi P., et al. Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments. Environmental Science and Technology 2016:50(3):1260–1268. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b0498310.1021/acs.est.5b0498326741485 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Floyd E. L., Wang J., Regens J. L. Fume emissions from a low-cost 3-D printer with various filaments. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene 2017:14(7):523–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.130258710.1080/15459624.2017.130258728406364 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kim Y., et al. Emissions of Nanoparticles and Gaseous Material from 3D Printer Operation. Environmental Science and Technology 2015:49(20):12044–12053. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b0280510.1021/acs.est.5b0280526402038 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Pinheiro N. D., et al. Paper-based optoelectronic nose for identification of indoor air pollution caused by 3D printing thermoplastic filaments. Analytica Chimica Acta 2021:1143:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.01210.1016/j.aca.2020.11.01233384106 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kagi N., et al. Indoor air quality for chemical and ultrafine particle contaminants from printers. Building and Environment 2007:42(5):1949–1954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.00810.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.008 Search in Google Scholar

[26] He C., Morawska L., Taplin L. Particle emission characteristics of office printers. Environmental Science and Technology 2007:41(17):6039–6045. https://doi.org/10.1021/es063049z10.1021/es063049z17937279 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Krug H. F., Wick P. Nanotoxikologie - eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung (Nanotoxicology – an interdisciplinary challenge). Angewandte Chemie 2011:123(6):1294–1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201001037 (in German)10.1002/ange.201001037 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Hashemi Habybabady R., et al. Effects of dust exposure on the respiratory health symptoms and pulmonary functions of street sweepers. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 2018:25(6):76–84. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.810.21315/mjms2018.25.6.8642257630914881 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Brändli O. Sind inhalierte Staubpartikel schädlich für unsere Lungen? (Are inhaled dust particles harmful for our lungs?) Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift 1996:126(50):2165–2174. (in German) Search in Google Scholar

[30] Yi J., et al. Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues 2016:79(11):453–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2016.116646710.1080/15287394.2016.1166467491792227196745 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Wojtyła S., Klama P., Baran T. Is 3D printing safe? Analysis of the thermal treatment of thermoplastics: ABS, PLA, PET, and nylon. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2017:14:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.128548910.1080/15459624.2017.128548928165927 Search in Google Scholar

[32] House R., Rajaram N., Tarlo S. M. Case report of asthma associated with 3D printing. Occupational Medicine 2017:67(8):652–654. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqx12910.1093/occmed/kqx12929016991 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Hodgdon T., et al. Logistics of Three-dimensional Printing: Primer for Radiologists. Academic Radiology 2017:25(1):40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.00310.1016/j.acra.2017.08.003646747729030283 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Gümperlein I., et al. Acute health effects of desktop 3D printing (FDM) using ABS and PLA materials: an experimental exposure study in human volunteers. Indoor Air 2018:28(4):611–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.1245810.1111/ina.1245829500848 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Stefaniak A. B., et al. Evaluation of emissions and exposures at workplaces using desktop 3-dimensional printers. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 2019:26(2):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2018.11.00110.1016/j.jchas.2018.11.001688988531798757 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Pavlovska I., et al. Comparison of biological markers in aerosol-weighed workplaces. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2019:21:138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4578-210.1007/s11051-019-4578-2 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Järvinen A., et al. Calibration of the new electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI+). Journal of Aerosol Science 2014:69:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.12.00610.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.12.006 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Pavlovska I., et al. Occupational exposure parameters for characterization of nanoparticulate matter toxicity: Metal versus wood processing. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2016:102:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.03.01810.1016/j.psep.2016.03.018 Search in Google Scholar

[39] NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition, ALIPHATIC ALDEHYDES: METHOD 2018 [Online]. [Assessed 20.03.2021]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/2018.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[40] United States Environmental Protection Agency: What are the Air Quality Standards for PM? [Online]. [Assessed 15.03.2021]. Available: https://www3.epa.gov/region1/airquality/pm-aq-standards.html Search in Google Scholar

[41] Government of Canada: Guidance for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in residential indoor air [Online]. [Assessed 20.03.2021]. Available: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/guidance-fine-particulate-matter-pm2-5-residential-indoor-air.html Search in Google Scholar

[42] World Health Organization: WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Copenhagen: WHO, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

[43] The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Table of IDLH values. Acetone [Online]. [Assessed 19.03.2021]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/67641.html Search in Google Scholar

[44] Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Latvia. Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 359 Darba aizsardzības prasības darba vietās (Regulation of Cabinet of Ministers No 359. Labor protection requirements at workplaces.). Latvijas Vestnesis 2009:69. (in Latvian) Search in Google Scholar

[45] Jinghai Y., et al. Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A 2016:79(11):453–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2016.116646710.1080/15287394.2016.1166467491792227196745 Search in Google Scholar

[46] Jensen A. C. Ø., et al. Nanoparticle Exposure and Workplace Measurements During Processes Related to 3D Printing of a Metal Object. Frontiers in Public Health 2020:8:778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.60871810.3389/fpubh.2020.608718772387133324605 Search in Google Scholar

[47] Mendes L., et al. Characterization of Emissions from a Desktop 3D Printer. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2017:21(1):94–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.1256910.1111/jiec.12569 Search in Google Scholar

[48] Zhoua Y., et al. Investigation of Ultrafine Particle Emissions of Desktop 3D Printers in the Clean Room. Procedia Engineering 2015:121:506–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.109910.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1099 Search in Google Scholar