[[1] Poore J., Nemecek T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 2018:360(6392):987–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq021610.1126/science.aaq021629853680]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] FAOSTAT. Pesticide use [Online]. [Accessed 24.03.2020]. Available: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/rp/visualize]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] European Commission. Study on “Strategic use of public procurement in promoting green, social and innovation policies”. Final report. Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, PWC. Brussels: Publications Office of the EU, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] McCrudden, C. Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. Natural resources forum 2004:28(4):257–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00099.x10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00099.x]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] OECD. Size of public procurement. Government at a Glance 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2015-42-en10.1787/gov_glance-2015-42-en]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Cerutti A. K., et al. Carbon footprint in green public procurement: Policy evaluation from a case study in the food sector. Journal of Food Policy 2016:58:82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.00110.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.001]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] De Schutter O. The Power of Procurement Public Purchasing in the Service of Realizing the Right to Food. United Nations Human Rights Council. Briefing Note 08, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions. Public procurement for a better environment. Brussels: European Commission, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia. Regulation No. 353 - Requirements for Green Public Procurement and Procedures for Application. Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 129, 30.06.2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Commission Staff Working Document. EU green public procurement criteria for food, catering services and vending machines. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Lee P. et al. Revision of the EU GPP criteria for Food procurement and Catering services. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2791/099130]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Renda A., et al. The uptake of green public procurement in the EU27. Annexes. Centre for European Policy Studies, College of Europe. Brussels: CEPS, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Polikarpova I., et al. Multi-Criteria Analysis to Select Renewable Energy Solution for District Heating System. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):101–109. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-008210.2478/rtuect-2019-0082]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Filippini R., et al. Sustainable school food procurement: What factors do affect the introduction and the increase of organic food? Journal of Food Policy 2018:76:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.03.01110.1016/j.foodpol.2018.03.011]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Pekal A. Market analysis of organic foods in the Nordic and Baltic countries. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, 2020.10.6027/TN2019-540]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Survey of recognition of environmental labels in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania. Unpublished market research. NORSTAT, 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Smith J., et al. Balancing competing policy demands: The case of sustainable public sector food procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016:112:249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.06510.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.065]Search in Google Scholar