1. bookVolume 26 (2018): Issue 2 (April 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2284-5623
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of 6-Substituted-3(2H)- pyridazinone-2-acetyl-2- (substituted/nonsubstitutedbenzal/ acetophenone) Hydrazone Derivatives

Published Online: 17 May 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 26 (2018) - Issue 2 (April 2018)
Page range: 231 - 241
Received: 26 Oct 2017
Accepted: 08 Apr 2018
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2284-5623
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Aim: In vitro antibacterial activity of 6-substituted-3(2H)-pyridazinone-2-acetyl-2-(substituted/nonsubstitutedbenzal/ acetophenone) hydrazone derivatives were tested in common species causing hospital-acquired infections. Material and Method: Antimicrobial activities of the compounds were performed by determining minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value against four Gram-positive, five Gram-negative and four Candida species fungi. Modified serial microdilution method was carried out. Reference strains of American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) were used. Results: In general, eleven compounds exhibited considerable activity. Comparatively, compound 3 exhibited strong activity against Enterobacter hormaechei and 5, 11 were the most active against Acinetobacter baumannii at 31.25 μg/mL. Compounds 1,2,3,4,8 and 10 were found to be as active as positive control ampicillin trihidrate against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. On the other hand, compounds 1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10 and 11 showed strong antifungal activitiy as much as fluconazole against Candida tropicalis. Compound 1 was mostly active against Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis. It was also revealed that the antifungal activity of compounds 1, 6, 7, 8 and 9 were higher than the others. Compound 1 and 8 exhibited the best activity against Candida glabrata and Candida parapsilosis respectively. Conclusions: All tested compounds showed better activity against Gram-negative bacteria and yeast than Gram-positive bacteria. These compounds may be considered as alternative antimicrobial agents in the treatment of multiple drug resistant Gram-negative, Gram-positive bacteria and fungal pathogens. Especially, we suggested that Compound 1 and 8 might be a promising candidate of new antifungal agents

Keywords

1. Nolte O. Antimicrobial resistance in the 21st century: a multifaceted challenge. Protein Pept Lett 2014; 21:330-5. DOI: 10.2174/0929866511320666010610.2174/0929866511320666010624164264Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Thabit Ak, Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. Antimicrobial resistance: impact on clinical and economic outcomes and the need for new antimicrobials. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015;16(2):159-77. DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2015.99338110.1517/14656566.2015.99338125496207Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. MacCarthy MW, Kontoyiannis DP, Cornely OA, Perfect JR, Walsh TJ. Novel Agents and Drug Targets to Meet the Challenges of Resistant Fungi. J Infect Dis 2017;216:474-83. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix13010.1093/infdis/jix13028911042Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Rai M, Ingle AP, Pandit R, Paralikar P, Gupta I, Chaud MV, Dos Santos CA. Broadenin the spectrum of small-molecule antibacterials by metallic nanoparticles to overcome microbial resistance. Int J Pharm 2017;532:139-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.12710.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.12728870767Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Ibrahim HM, Behbehani H, Elnagdi MH. Approaches towards the synthesis of a novel class of 2-amino- 5-arylzonicotinate, pyridazinone and pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine derivatives as potent antimicrobial agents. Chem Cent J 2013;7(1):123. DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-12310.1186/1752-153X-7-123375145323867062Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Singh J, Sharma D, Bansal R. Pyridazinone:an attractive lead for ant-inflamatory and analgesic drug discovery. Future Med Chem 2017;9(1):95-127. DOI: 10.4155/fmc-2016-019410.4155/fmc-2016-019427957866Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Jaballah MY, Serya RT, Abouzid K. Pyridazinone Based Scaffods as Privileed Structures in anti-cancer Therapy. Drug Res (Stuttg) 2017;67(3):138-48. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-11999210.1055/s-0042-11999228073115Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Asif M. A mini review on biological activities pf pyridazinone derivatives as antiulcer, antisecretory, antihistamin and particularly against histamine H3R. Mini Rev Med Chem 2015;14(3):1093-103. DOI: 10.2174/1 389557514666141127143133Search in Google Scholar

9. Sukuroglu M, Onkol T, Onurdag FK, Akalin G, Sahin MF. Synthesis and in vitro biological activity of new 4,6-disubstituted 3(H)-pyridazinone-acetohydrazide derivatives. Z Naturforsch C 2012;67(5-6):257-65. DOI: 10.5560/ZNC.2012.67c025710.5560/ZNC.2012.67c0257Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Bansal R, Sridhar T. Pyridazin-3(2H)-ones: the versatile pharmacophore of medicinal significance. Med Chem Res 2013;22:2539-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00044- 012-0261-1Search in Google Scholar

11. Purohit DM, Shah VH. Novel method for synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of 2-aroyl-6-hydroxy/chloro/ hydrazino/carboxymethoxy-3(2H)-pyridazinones. Heterocycl Commun 1997;3 (3):267-272. DOI: 10.1515/HC.1997.3.3.26710.1515/HC.1997.3.3.267Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Islam M, Siddiqui AA, Rajesh R. Synthesis antitubercular, antifungal and antibacterial activities of 6-susbtituted phenyl-2-(3’-substituded phenyl pyridazin- 6’-yl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyridazin-3-one. Acta Pol Pharm 2008;65(3):353-62.Search in Google Scholar

13. Ozcelik AB, Gokce M, Orhan I, Kaynak F, Sahin MF. Synthesis and antimicrobial, acetylcholinesterase and butyrycholinesterase inhibitory activities of novel ester and hydrazide derivatives of 3(H)-pyridazinone. Arnzeimittelforschung 2010;60(7):452-8.Search in Google Scholar

14. Sonmej M, Berber L, Akbas B. Synthesis, antibacterial and antifungal activity of some new pyridazinone metal complexes. Eur J Med Chem 2005;41:101-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2005.10.00310.1016/j.ejmech.2005.10.00316293349Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Akbas E, Berber I. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of new pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyridazin derivatives, Eur J Med Chem 2005;40:401-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech. 2004.12.00110.1016/j.ejmech.2004.12.00115804539Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Utku S, Gokce M, Aslan G, Bayram G, Ulger M, Emekdaş G et al. Synthesis and in vitro antimycobacterial activities of novel 6-substituted-3(2H)-pyridazinone- 2-acetyl-2-(substituted/nonsubstituted acetophenone) hydrazine. Turk J Chem 2011;35(2):331-9.Search in Google Scholar

17. Gokce M, Utku S, Kupeli E. Synthesis and analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities 6-substituted-3(2H)-pyridazinone- 2-acetyl-2-(p-substituted/nonsubstituted benzal) hydrazone derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 2009;44:3760-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.04.04810.1016/j.ejmech.2009.04.04819535179Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Jorgensen JH, Ferraro MJ. Antimicrobial suspectibility testing: general principles and comtemporary. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:973-80. DOI: 10.1086/513938 10.1086/5139389564485Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Woods GL, Washington JA, Antibacterial susceptibility tests: dilution and disk diffusion methods. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH, eds. Manual of clinical microbiology. 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1995:1327-41.Search in Google Scholar

20. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards For Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Second Informational Supplement. CLSI. M02-A11 and M07-A9, 2012:40-61.Search in Google Scholar

21. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf. [Last accested 1 August 2017].Search in Google Scholar

22. Lob SH, Badal RE, Hackel MA, Sahm DF. Epidemiology and antimicrobial Suspectibility of Gram-Negative Pathogens Causing Intra-abdominal Infections in Pediatrics Patients in Europe-SMART 2011-2014. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2017;6(1):72-79Search in Google Scholar

23. Akova M. Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infections. Virulence 2016;7(3):252-66. DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2016.115936610.1080/21505594.2016.1159366487163426984779Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Karlowksy JA, Hoban DJ, Hackel MA, Lob SH, Sahm DF. Resistance among Gram-negative ESKAPE pathogens isolated from hospitalized patients with intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in Latin American countries: SMART 2013-2015. Braz J Infect Dis 2017;21(3):343-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.03.00610.1016/j.bjid.2017.03.00628399424Search in Google Scholar

25. Koksal F, Yılmaz G, Unal S, Zarakolu P, Korten V, Mulazzimoglu L et al. Epidemiology and susceptibility of pathogens from SMART 2011-12 Turkey: evaluation of hospital-acquired versus community-acquired urinary tract infections and ICU- versus non-ICU-associated intra-abdominal infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017;72: 1364-72. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw57410.1093/jac/dkw57428122913Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Bernabe KJ, Langendorf C, Ford N, Ronat JB, Murphy RA. Antibiotic resistance in West Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agent 2017;17: 30274-1.Search in Google Scholar

27. Kelly AM, Mathema B, Larson EL. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the community: a scoping review. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2017;50:127-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.01210.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.012572625728647532Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Srinivasan A, Lopez-Ribot JL, Ramasubramanian AK. Overcoming antifungal resistance. Drug Discov Today Technol 2014:65-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2014.02.00510.1016/j.ddtec.2014.02.005403146224847655Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Maubon D, Garnaud C, Calandra T, Sanglard D, Cornet M. Resistance of Candida spp. to antifungal drugs in the ICU: where are we now?. Intensive Care Med 2014;40:1241-55. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3404-710.1007/s00134-014-3404-725091787Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Ben-Ami R, Olshtain-Pops K, Krieger M et al. Antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for fluconazole-resistant Candida bloodstream infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56: 2518-2523. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.05947-1110.1128/AAC.05947-11334666822314534Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Arendrup MC. Update on antifungal resistance in Aspergillus and Candida Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20 (Suppl. 6): 42-48.10.1111/1469-0691.1251324372701Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo