This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978;58(1):20-24. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.58.1.20RahimtoolaSH.The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch.Circulation.1978;58(1):20-24. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.58.1.20Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Magne J, Mathieu P, Dumesnil JG, et al. Impact of prosthesispatient mismatch on survival after mitral valve replacement. Circulation. 2007;115(11):1417-1425. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631549MagneJMathieuPDumesnilJGImpact of prosthesispatient mismatch on survival after mitral valve replacement.Circulation.2007;115(11):1417-1425. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631549Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart. 2006;92(8):1022-1029. doi:10.1136/ HRT.2005.067363PibarotPDumesnilJG.Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.Heart.2006;92(8):1022-1029. doi:10.1136/HRT.2005.067363Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 1992;6(Supplement_1):S34-S38. doi:10.1093/ EJCTS/6.SUPPLEMENT_1.S34DumesnilJGYoganathanAP.Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients.European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.1992;6(Supplement_1):S34-S38. doi:10.1093/EJCTS/6.SUPPLEMENT_1.S34Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003;108(8):983-988. doi:10.1161/01. CIR.0000085167.67105.32BlaisCDumesnilJGBaillotRSimardSDoyleDPibarotP.Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement.Circulation.2003;108(8):983-988. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000085167.67105.32Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(6):589-590. doi:10.1093/EHJCI/JEW025LancellottiPPibarotPChambersJRecommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging.2016;17(6):589-590. doi:10.1093/EHJCI/JEW025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Christakis GT, Buth KJ, Goldman BS, et al. Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: A proposed standard for valve size nomenclature. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1998;66(4):1198-1203. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00758-9ChristakisGTButhKJGoldmanBSInaccurate and misleading valve sizing: A proposed standard for valve size nomenclature.Annals of Thoracic Surgery.1998;66(4):1198-1203. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00758-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Doenst T, Amorim PA, Al-Alam N, Lehmann S, Mukherjee C, Faerber G. Where is the common sense in aortic valve replacement? A review of hemodynamics and sizing of stented tissue valves. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2011;142(5):1180-1187. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.05.007DoenstTAmorimPAAl-AlamNLehmannSMukherjeeCFaerberG.Where is the common sense in aortic valve replacement? A review of hemodynamics and sizing of stented tissue valves.Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2011;142(5):1180-1187. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.05.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Durko AP, Head SJ, Pibarot P, et al. Characteristics of surgical prosthetic heart valves and problems around labeling: A document from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)—The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)—American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Valve Labelling Task Force. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(4):1041-1054. doi:10.1016/J.JTCVS.2019.04.001DurkoAPHeadSJPibarotPCharacteristics of surgical prosthetic heart valves and problems around labeling: A document from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)—The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)—American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Valve Labelling Task Force.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2019;158(4):1041-1054. doi:10.1016/J.JTCVS.2019.04.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Elefteriades JA, Ziganshin BA. Reply: Effective orifice area of prosthetic heart valves—not perfect, but still valuable. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;159(6):e330-e332. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.050ElefteriadesJAZiganshinBA.Reply: Effective orifice area of prosthetic heart valves—not perfect, but still valuable.Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2020;159(6):e330-e332. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.050Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rothbart RM, Castriz JL, Harding L V., Russo CD, Teague SM. Determination of aortic valve area by two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography in patients with normal and stenotic biprosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):817-824. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(90)90280-3RothbartRMCastrizJLHarding LV.RussoCDTeagueSM.Determination of aortic valve area by two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography in patients with normal and stenotic biprosthetic valves.J Am Coll Cardiol.1990;15(4):817-824. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(90)90280-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bray JJH, Ionescu A. Repeated echocardiographic imaging of aortic stenosis: Real-life lessons. Echocardiography. 2021;38(11):1854-1859. doi:10.1111/ECHO.15222BrayJJHIonescuA.Repeated echocardiographic imaging of aortic stenosis: Real-life lessons.Echocardiography.2021;38(11):1854-1859. doi:10.1111/ECHO.15222Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kebed K, Sun D, Addetia K, Mor-Avi V, Markuzon N, Lang RM. Measurement errors in serial echocardiographic assessments of aortic valve stenosis severity. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;36(3):471. doi:10.1007/ S10554-019-01745-ZKebedKSunDAddetiaKMor-AviVMarkuzonNLangRM.Measurement errors in serial echocardiographic assessments of aortic valve stenosis severity.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.2020;36(3):471. doi:10.1007/S10554-019-01745-ZOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Goetz LH, Schork NJ. Personalized medicine: motivation, challenges and progress. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(6):952. doi:10.1016/J. FERTNSTERT.2018.05.006GoetzLHSchorkNJ.Personalized medicine: motivation, challenges and progress.Fertil Steril.2018;109(6):952. doi:10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2018.05.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vriesendorp MD, Groenwold RHH, Herrmann HC, et al. The clinical implications of body surface area as a poor proxy for cardiac output. Structural Heart. 2021;5(6):582-587. doi:10.1080/24748706.2021.1968089VriesendorpMDGroenwoldRHHHerrmannHCThe clinical implications of body surface area as a poor proxy for cardiac output.Structural Heart.2021;5(6):582-587. doi:10.1080/24748706.2021.1968089Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vulesevic B, Kubota N, Burwash IG, et al. Size-adjusted aortic valve area: refining the definition of severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;22(10):1142. doi:10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA295VulesevicBKubotaNBurwashIGSize-adjusted aortic valve area: refining the definition of severe aortic stenosis.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging.2021;22(10):1142. doi:10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA295Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tribouilloy C, Bohbot Y, Maréchaux S, et al. Outcome implication of aortic valve area normalized to body size in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(11). doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005121TribouilloyCBohbotYMaréchauxSOutcome implication of aortic valve area normalized to body size in asymptomatic aortic stenosis.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging.2016;9(11). doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005121Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(1):149-159. doi:10.1016/j. jtcvs.2003.07.043RuelMRubensFDMastersRGLate incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2004;127(1):149-159. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.07.043Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Koch CG, Khandwala F, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Blackstone EH. Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2005;111(24):3221-3229. doi:10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.104.505248KochCGKhandwalaFEstafanousFGLoopFDBlackstoneEH.Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement.Circulation.2005;111(24):3221-3229. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.505248Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
He GW, Grunkemeier GL, Gately HL, Furnary AP, Starr A. Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59(5):1056-1062. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(95)00075-VHeGWGrunkemeierGLGatelyHLFurnaryAPStarrA.Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root.Ann Thorac Surg1995;59(5):1056-1062. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(95)00075-VOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bridges CR, Cleveland JC, Savage EB, et al. Effect of patient and prosthesis size on operative mortality after aortic valve replacement. Annual Meeting of the American Thoracic Surgery 2005.BridgesCRClevelandJCSavageEBEffect of patient and prosthesis size on operative mortality after aortic valve replacement.Annual Meeting of the American Thoracic Surgery2005.Search in Google Scholar
Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, White J, Arnold JH, Cosgrove DM. Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119(5):963-974. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70091-2MedalionBBlackstoneEHLytleBWWhiteJArnoldJHCosgroveDM.Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2000;119(5):963-974. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70091-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WRE, et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2003;126(3):783-793. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00591-9BlackstoneEHCosgroveDMJamiesonWREProsthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement.Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2003;126(3):783-793. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00591-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hanayama N, Christakis GT, Mallidi HR, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: Valve size may be irrelevant. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2002;73(6):1822-1829. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03582-8HanayamaNChristakisGTMallidiHRPatient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: Valve size may be irrelevant.Annals of Thoracic Surgery.2002;73(6):1822-1829. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03582-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
David TE. Is prosthesis-patient mismatch a clinically relevant entity? Circulation. 2005;111(24):3186-3187. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.545657DavidTE.Is prosthesis-patient mismatch a clinically relevant entity?Circulation.2005;111(24):3186-3187. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.545657Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RLJ, et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(12):1518-1529. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs003HeadSJMokhlesMMOsnabruggeRLJThe impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years.Eur Heart J.2012;33(12):1518-1529. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dayan V, Vignolo G, Soca G, Paganini JJ, Brusich D, Pibarot P. Predictors and outcomes of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(8):924-933. doi:10.1016/J. JCMG.2015.10.026DayanVVignoloGSocaGPaganiniJJBrusichDPibarotP.Predictors and outcomes of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.2016;9(8):924-933. doi:10.1016/J.JCMG.2015.10.026Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sá MPBDO, De Carvalho MMB, Sobral Filho DC, et al. Surgical aortic valve replacement and patient-prosthesis mismatch: a metaanalysis of 108 182 patients. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2019;56(1):44-54. doi:10.1093/EJCTS/EZY466SáMPBDODe CarvalhoMMBSobral FilhoDCSurgical aortic valve replacement and patient-prosthesis mismatch: a metaanalysis of 108 182 patients.European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.2019;56(1):44-54. doi:10.1093/EJCTS/EZY466Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sá MP, Jacquemyn X, Van den Eynde J, et al. Impact of prosthesispatient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data. Cardiovascular Imaging. 2023;16(3):298-310. doi:10.1016/J.JCMG.2022.07.013SáMPJacquemynXVan den EyndeJImpact of prosthesispatient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data.Cardiovascular Imaging.2023;16(3):298-310. doi:10.1016/J.JCMG.2022.07.013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ng ACT, Delgado V, Van Der Kley F, et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2-and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(1):94-102. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.885152NgACTDelgadoVVan Der KleyFComparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2-and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging.2010;3(1):94-102. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.885152Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ribeiro HB, Lerakis S, Gilard M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the TOPAS-TAVI registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(12):1297-1308. doi:10.1016/J. JACC.2018.01.054RibeiroHBLerakisSGilardMTranscatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the TOPAS-TAVI registry.J Am Coll Cardiol.2018;71(12):1297-1308. doi:10.1016/J.JACC.2018.01.054Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hahn RT, Leipsic J, Douglas PS, et al. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal transcatheter valve function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(1):25-34. doi:10.1016/J.JCMG.2018.04.010HahnRTLeipsicJDouglasPSComprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal transcatheter valve function.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.2019;12(1):25-34. doi:10.1016/J.JCMG.2018.04.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Winter MP, Zbiral M, Kietaibl A, et al. Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic valve function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19(4):361-368. doi:10.1093/EHJCI/JEX212WinterMPZbiralMKietaiblANormal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic valve function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging.2018;19(4):361-368. doi:10.1093/EHJCI/JEX212Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Okuno T, Khan F, Asami M, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with supra-annular and intra-annular prostheses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(21):2173-2182. doi:10.1016/J. JCIN.2019.07.027OkunoTKhanFAsamiMProsthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with supra-annular and intra-annular prostheses.JACC Cardiovasc Interv.2019;12(21):2173-2182. doi:10.1016/J.JCIN.2019.07.027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction Is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007;115(22):2856-2864. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681HachichaZDumesnilJGBogatyPPibarotP.Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction Is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival.Circulation.2007;115(22):2856-2864. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abbas AE, Ternacle J, Pibarot P, et al. Impact of flow on prosthesispatient mismatch following transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(8):E012364. doi:10.1161/ CIRCIMAGING.120.012364AbbasAETernacleJPibarotPImpact of flow on prosthesispatient mismatch following transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging.2021;14(8):E012364. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012364Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ternacle J, Pibarot P, Herrmann HC, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER 2 trial and registry. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021;14(13):1466-1477. doi:10.1016/J.JCIN.2021.03.069TernacleJPibarotPHerrmannHCProsthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER 2 trial and registry.Cardiovascular Interventions.2021;14(13):1466-1477. doi:10.1016/J.JCIN.2021.03.069Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2009;22(9):975-1014. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2009.07.013ZoghbiWAChambersJBDumesnilJGRecommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.2009;22(9):975-1014. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2009.07.013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chahal NS, Senior R. Severe patient-prosthesis mismatch: Compelling entity or an epiphenomenon of low flow? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(8):E012836. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.012836ChahalNSSeniorR.Severe patient-prosthesis mismatch: Compelling entity or an epiphenomenon of low flow?Circ Cardiovasc Imaging.2021;14(8):E012836. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.012836Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Valvular Spotlight: Hemodynamics: New recommendations on how to monitor patients post TAVR/SAVR. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=jba2NIahjqkValvular Spotlight: Hemodynamics: New recommendations on how to monitor patients post TAVR/SAVR.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jba2NIahjqkSearch in Google Scholar
Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation. 1996;94(8):1934-1940. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.94.8.1934NiederbergerJSchimaHMaurerGBaumgartnerH.Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.Circulation.1996;94(8):1934-1940. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.94.8.1934Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pibarot P, Garcia D, Dumesnil JG. Energy loss index in aortic stenosis: From fluid mechanics concept to clinical application. Circulation. 2013;127(10):1101-1104. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001130PibarotPGarciaDDumesnilJG.Energy loss index in aortic stenosis: From fluid mechanics concept to clinical application.Circulation.2013;127(10):1101-1104. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001130Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sankar S, Ionescu A. A non-coronary use of the pressure wire: accurate assessment of suspected prosthetic valve dysfunction. Revista Societatii de Medicina Interna. 2011;8:61-64. Accessed October 15, 2023. https://www. medicina-interna.ro/articol.php?articol=645&lang=roSankarSIonescuA.A non-coronary use of the pressure wire: accurate assessment of suspected prosthetic valve dysfunction.Revista Societatii de Medicina Interna.2011;8:61-64.Accessed October 15, 2023.https://www.medicina-interna.ro/articol.php?articol=645&lang=roSearch in Google Scholar
Tanis W, Habets J, Van Den Brink RBA, Symersky P, Budde RPJ, Chamuleau SAJ. Differentiation of thrombus from pannus as the cause of acquired mechanical prosthetic heart valve obstruction by non-invasive imaging: a review of the literature. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15(2):119-129. doi:10.1093/EHJCI/JET127TanisWHabetsJVan Den BrinkRBASymerskyPBuddeRPJChamuleauSAJ.Differentiation of thrombus from pannus as the cause of acquired mechanical prosthetic heart valve obstruction by non-invasive imaging: a review of the literature.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging.2014;15(2):119-129. doi:10.1093/EHJCI/JET127Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hein M, Schoechlin S, Schulz U, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2022;15(11):1113-1122. doi:10.1016/J.JCIN.2022.04.018HeinMSchoechlinSSchulzULong-Term Follow-Up of Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Cardiovascular Interventions.2022;15(11):1113-1122. doi:10.1016/J.JCIN.2022.04.018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sondergaard L, De Backer O, Kofoed KF, et al. Natural history of subclinical leaflet thrombosis affecting motion in bioprosthetic aortic valves. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(28):2201-2207. doi:10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHX369SondergaardLDe BackerOKofoedKFNatural history of subclinical leaflet thrombosis affecting motion in bioprosthetic aortic valves.Eur Heart J.2017;38(28):2201-2207. doi:10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHX369Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rosenhek R, Binder T, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2003;16(11):1116-1127. doi:10.1067/S0894-7317(03)00638-2RosenhekRBinderTMaurerGBaumgartnerH.Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.2003;16(11):1116-1127. doi:10.1067/S0894-7317(03)00638-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthetic heart valves. Circulation. 2009;119(7):1034-1048. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.778886PibarotPDumesnilJG.Prosthetic heart valves.Circulation.2009;119(7):1034-1048. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.778886Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dalmau MJ, González-Santos JM, López-Rodríguez J, Bueno M, Arribas A. The Carpentier-Edwards perimount magna aortic xenograft: a new design with an improved hemodynamic performance. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006;5(3):263-267. doi:10.1510/ICVTS.2005.120352DalmauMJGonzález-SantosJMLópez-RodríguezJBuenoMArribasA.The Carpentier-Edwards perimount magna aortic xenograft: a new design with an improved hemodynamic performance.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg.2006;5(3):263-267. doi:10.1510/ICVTS.2005.120352Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sharma V, Deo S V., Altarabsheh SE, Cho YH, Erwin PJ, Park SJ. Comparison of the early haemodynamics of stented pericardial and porcine aortic valves. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2015;47(1):4-10. doi:10.1093/EJCTS/EZU272SharmaVDeo SV.AltarabshehSEChoYHErwinPJParkSJ.Comparison of the early haemodynamics of stented pericardial and porcine aortic valves.European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.2015;47(1):4-10. doi:10.1093/EJCTS/EZU272Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chan J, Dimagli A, Fudulu DP, et al. Trend and early outcomes in isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in the United Kingdom. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;9:3709. doi:10.3389/FCVM.2022.1077279/BIBTEXChanJDimagliAFuduluDPTrend and early outcomes in isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in the United Kingdom.Front Cardiovasc Med.2023;9:3709. doi:10.3389/FCVM.2022.1077279/BIBTEXOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit (NACSA) 2022 Summary Report.; 2022. https://www.nicor.org.uk/adult-cardiac-surgery-surgery-audit/National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit (NACSA) 2022 Summary Report.2022.https://www.nicor.org.uk/adult-cardiac-surgery-surgery-audit/Search in Google Scholar
Ghoneim A, Bouhout I, Demers P, et al. Management of small aortic annulus in the era of sutureless valves: A comparative study among different biological options. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016;152(4):1019-1028. doi:10.1016/J.JTCVS.2016.06.058GhoneimABouhoutIDemersPManagement of small aortic annulus in the era of sutureless valves: A comparative study among different biological options.Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2016;152(4):1019-1028. doi:10.1016/J.JTCVS.2016.06.058Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tasca G, Vismara R, Mangini A, et al. Comparison of the performance of a sutureless bioprosthesis with two pericardial stented valves on small annuli: An in vitro study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(1):139-144. doi:10.1016/J. ATHORACSUR.2016.05.089TascaGVismaraRManginiAComparison of the performance of a sutureless bioprosthesis with two pericardial stented valves on small annuli: An in vitro study.Ann Thorac Surg.2017;103(1):139-144. doi:10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2016.05.089Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Meco M, Montisci A, Miceli A, et al. Sutureless perceval aortic valve versus conventional stented bioprostheses: Meta-analysis of postoperative and midterm results in isolated aortic valve replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(4). doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.006091MecoMMontisciAMiceliASutureless perceval aortic valve versus conventional stented bioprostheses: Meta-analysis of postoperative and midterm results in isolated aortic valve replacement.J Am Heart Assoc.2018;7(4). doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.006091Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pibarot P, Weissman NJ, Stewart WJ, et al. Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A PARTNER trial cohort-A analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(13):1323-1334. doi:10.1016/J. JACC.2014.06.1195PibarotPWeissmanNJStewartWJIncidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A PARTNER trial cohort-A analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol.2014;64(13):1323-1334. doi:10.1016/J.JACC.2014.06.1195Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tang GHL, Sengupta A, Alexis SL, et al. Outcomes of prosthesis-patient mismatch following supra-annular transcatheter aortic valve replacement: From the STS/ACC TVT registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(9):964-976. doi:10.1016/J.JCIN.2021.03.040TangGHLSenguptaAAlexisSLOutcomes of prosthesis-patient mismatch following supra-annular transcatheter aortic valve replacement: From the STS/ACC TVT registry.JACC Cardiovasc Interv.2021;14(9):964-976. doi:10.1016/J.JCIN.2021.03.040Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Head SJ, Çelik M, Kappetein AP. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(28):2183-2191. doi:10.1093/ EURHEARTJ/EHX141HeadSJÇelikMKappeteinAP.Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.Eur Heart J.2017;38(28):2183-2191. doi:10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHX141Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weber A, Noureddine H, Englberger L, et al. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2012;144(5):1075-1083. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.024WeberANoureddineHEnglbergerLTen-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2012;144(5):1075-1083. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Okamura H, Yamaguchi A, Nagano H, et al. Mid-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent valve. Circ J. 2012;76(2):365-371. doi:10.1253/circj.cj-11-0733OkamuraHYamaguchiANaganoHMid-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the 17-mm St.Jude Medical Regent valve. Circ J.2012;76(2):365-371. doi:10.1253/circj.cj-11-0733Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mizoguchi H, Sakaki M, Inoue K, Iwata T, Tei K, Miura T. Mid-term results of small-sized St. Jude medical regent prosthetic valves (21 mm or less) for small aortic annulus. Heart Vessels. 2013;28(6):769-774. doi:10.1007/S00380-012-0306-XMizoguchiHSakakiMInoueKIwataTTeiKMiuraT.Mid-term results of small-sized St. Jude medical regent prosthetic valves (21 mm or less) for small aortic annulus.Heart Vessels.2013;28(6):769-774. doi:10.1007/S00380-012-0306-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hering D, Piper C, Bergemann R, et al. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications following St. Jude medical valve replacement: Results of the German experience with low-intensity anticoagulation study. Chest. 2005;127(1):53-59. doi:10.1378/chest.127.1.53HeringDPiperCBergemannRThromboembolic and bleeding complications following St. Jude medical valve replacement: Results of the German experience with low-intensity anticoagulation study.Chest.2005;127(1):53-59. doi:10.1378/chest.127.1.53Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Torella M, Torella D, Chiodini P, et al. LOWERing the INtensity of oral anticoaGulant Therapy in patients with bileaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement: Results from the “LOWERING-IT” Trial. Am Heart J. 2010;160(1):171-178. doi:10.1016/J.AHJ.2010.05.005TorellaMTorellaDChiodiniPLOWERing the INtensity of oral anticoaGulant Therapy in patients with bileaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement: Results from the “LOWERING-IT” Trial.Am Heart J.2010;160(1):171-178. doi:10.1016/J.AHJ.2010.05.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ricottini E, Nusca A, Ussia GP, Grigioni F. Antithrombotic treatment for valve prostheses: Which drug, which dose, and when? Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;72:4-14. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2022.05.008RicottiniENuscaAUssiaGPGrigioniF.Antithrombotic treatment for valve prostheses: Which drug, which dose, and when?Prog Cardiovasc Dis.2022;72:4-14. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2022.05.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Reyes G, Badia S, Alvarez P, et al. Results of aortic valve replacement with the supra-annular Sorin Bicarbon Overline prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012;21(3):358-363. Accessed May 17, 2023. https://europepmc.org/article/ MED/22808838ReyesGBadiaSAlvarezPResults of aortic valve replacement with the supra-annular Sorin Bicarbon Overline prosthesis.J Heart Valve Dis.2012;21(3):358-363.Accessed May 17, 2023.https://europepmc.org/article/MED/22808838Search in Google Scholar
Freitas-Ferraz AB, Tirado-Conte G, Dagenais F, et al. Aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus. Circulation. 2019;139(23):2685-2702. doi:10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038408Freitas-FerrazABTirado-ConteGDagenaisFAortic stenosis and small aortic annulus.Circulation.2019;139(23):2685-2702. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038408Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ghoneim A, Bouhout I, Demers P, et al. Management of small aortic annulus in the era of sutureless valves: A comparative study among different biological options. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016;152(4):1019-1028. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.058GhoneimABouhoutIDemersPManagement of small aortic annulus in the era of sutureless valves: A comparative study among different biological options.Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2016;152(4):1019-1028. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.058Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hoffmann G, Ogbamicael SA, Jochens A, et al. Impact of patientprosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement on short-term survival: a retrospective single center analysis of 632 consecutive patients with isolated stented biological aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(6):469-474. doi:10.1055/S-0033-1363498HoffmannGOgbamicaelSAJochensAImpact of patientprosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement on short-term survival: a retrospective single center analysis of 632 consecutive patients with isolated stented biological aortic valve replacement.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2014;62(6):469-474. doi:10.1055/S-0033-1363498Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kulik A, Al-Saigh M, Chan V, et al. Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: Is there a benefit? Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2008;85(1):94-100. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.058KulikAAl-SaighMChanVEnlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: Is there a benefit?Annals of Thoracic Surgery.2008;85(1):94-100. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.058Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sá MPBO, Carvalho MMB, Filho DCS, et al. Impact of surgical aortic root enlargement on the outcomes of aortic valve replacement: A metaanalysis of 13 174 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;29(1):74-82. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivy364SáMPBOCarvalhoMMBFilhoDCSImpact of surgical aortic root enlargement on the outcomes of aortic valve replacement: A metaanalysis of 13 174 patients.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg.2019;29(1):74-82. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivy364Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yousef S, Brown JA, Serna-Gallegos D, et al. Impact of aortic root enlargement on patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2023;115(2):396-402. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.052YousefSBrownJASerna-GallegosDImpact of aortic root enlargement on patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.Annals of Thoracic Surgery.2023;115(2):396-402. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.052Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rocha R V., Manlhiot C, Feindel CM, et al. Surgical enlargement of the aortic root does not increase the operative risk of aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2018;137(15):1585-1594. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030525RochaR V.ManlhiotCFeindelCMSurgical enlargement of the aortic root does not increase the operative risk of aortic valve replacement.Circulation.2018;137(15):1585-1594. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030525Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Konno S, Imai Y, Iida Y, Nakajima M, Tatsuno K. A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;70(5):909-917. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)39673-4KonnoSImaiYIidaYNakajimaMTatsunoK.A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1975;70(5):909-917. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)39673-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rastan H, Koncz J. Aortoventriculoplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1976;71(6):920-927. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)40132-3RastanHKonczJ.Aortoventriculoplasty.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1976;71(6):920-927. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)40132-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tabatabaie MB, Ghavidel AA, Yousefnia MA, Hoseini S, Javadpour SH, Raesi K. Classic Konno-Rastan procedure: indications and results in the current era. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2006;14(5):377-381. doi:10.1177/021849230601400506TabatabaieMBGhavidelAAYousefniaMAHoseiniSJavadpourSHRaesiK.Classic Konno-Rastan procedure: indications and results in the current era.Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann.2006;14(5):377-381. doi:10.1177/021849230601400506Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dhareshwar J, Sundt TM, Dearani JA, Schaff H V., Cook DJ, Orszulak TA. Aortic root enlargement: What are the operative risks? Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2007;134(4):916-924. doi:10.1016/j. jtcvs.2007.01.097DhareshwarJSundtTMDearaniJASchaffHV.CookDJOrszulakTA.Aortic root enlargement: What are the operative risks?Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2007;134(4):916-924. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.097Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nicks R, Cartmill T, Bernstein L. Hypoplasia of the aortic root : The problem of aortic valve replacement. Thorax. 1970;25(3):339-346. doi:10.1136/thx.25.3.339NicksRCartmillTBernsteinL.Hypoplasia of the aortic root : The problem of aortic valve replacement.Thorax.1970;25(3):339-346. doi:10.1136/thx.25.3.339Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Manouguian S, Seybold-Epting W. Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision into the anterior mitral leaflet. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;78(3):402-412. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)38105-XManouguianSSeybold-EptingW.Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision into the anterior mitral leaflet.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1979;78(3):402-412. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)38105-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rittenhouse EA, Sauvage LR, Stamm SJ, Mansfield PB, Hall DG, Herndon PS. Radical enlargement of the aortic root and outflow tract to allow valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1979;27(4):367-373. doi:10.1016/ S0003-4975(10)63319-XRittenhouseEASauvageLRStammSJMansfieldPBHallDGHerndonPS.Radical enlargement of the aortic root and outflow tract to allow valve replacement.Ann Thorac Surg.1979;27(4):367-373. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(10)63319-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Massias SA, Pittams A, Mohamed M, Ahmed S, Younas H, Harky A. Aortic root enlargement: When and how. J Card Surg. 2021;36(1):229-235. doi:10.1111/jocs.15175MassiasSAPittamsAMohamedMAhmedSYounasHHarkyA.Aortic root enlargement: When and how.J Card Surg.2021;36(1):229-235. doi:10.1111/jocs.15175Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nuñez L, Aguado MG, Pinto AG, Larrea JL. Enlargement of the aortic annulus by resecting the commissure between the left and noncoronary cusps. Tex Heart Inst J. 1983;10(3):301-303. Accessed May 21, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/15227115/?tool=EBINuñezLAguadoMGPintoAGLarreaJL.Enlargement of the aortic annulus by resecting the commissure between the left and noncoronary cusps.Tex Heart Inst J.1983;10(3):301-303.Accessed May 21, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/15227115/?tool=EBISearch in Google Scholar
Yang B. A novel simple technique to enlarge the aortic annulus by two valve sizes. JTCVS Tech. 2021;5:13-16. doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.10.038YangB.A novel simple technique to enlarge the aortic annulus by two valve sizes.JTCVS Tech.2021;5:13-16. doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.10.038Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ozaki S, Kawase I, Yamashita H, et al. Aortic valve reconstruction using self-developed aortic valve plasty system in aortic valve disease. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12(4):550-553. doi:10.1510/ ICVTS.2010.253682/2/550FIG4.GIFOzakiSKawaseIYamashitaHAortic valve reconstruction using self-developed aortic valve plasty system in aortic valve disease.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg.2011;12(4):550-553. doi:10.1510/ICVTS.2010.253682/2/550FIG4.GIFOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mylonas KS, Tasoudis PT, Pavlopoulos D, Kanakis M, Stavridis GT, Avgerinos D V. Aortic valve neocuspidization using the Ozaki technique: A meta-analysis of reconstructed patient-level data. Am Heart J. 2023;255:1-11. doi:10.1016/J.AHJ.2022.09.003MylonasKSTasoudisPTPavlopoulosDKanakisMStavridisGTAvgerinosDV.Aortic valve neocuspidization using the Ozaki technique: A meta-analysis of reconstructed patient-level data.Am Heart J.2023;255:1-11. doi:10.1016/J.AHJ.2022.09.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bentall H, De Bono A. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta.Thorax. 1968;23(4):338. doi:10.1136/THX.23.4.338BentallHDe BonoA.A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta.Thorax.1968;23(4):338. doi:10.1136/THX.23.4.338Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kouchoukos NT, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, Perrillo JB. Sixteen-year experience with aortic root replacement. Results of 172 operations. Ann Surg. 1991;214(3):308. doi:10.1097/00000658-199109000-00013KouchoukosNTWareingTHMurphySFPerrilloJB.Sixteen-year experience with aortic root replacement. Results of 172 operations.Ann Surg.1991;214(3):308. doi:10.1097/00000658-199109000-00013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cabrol C, Pavie A, Gandjbakhch I, et al. Complete replacement of the ascending aorta with reimplantation of the coronary arteries: New surgical approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981;81(2):309-315. doi:10.1016/ S0022-5223(19)37641-XCabrolCPavieAGandjbakhchIComplete replacement of the ascending aorta with reimplantation of the coronary arteries: New surgical approach.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1981;81(2):309-315. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)37641-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Urbanski PP, Dinstak W, Rents W, Heinz N, Diegeler A. Long-term results after aortic root replacement using self-assembled valve composite grafts in patients with small aortic annulus. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;18(2):159-163. doi:10.1093/ICVTS/IVT447UrbanskiPPDinstakWRentsWHeinzNDiegelerA.Long-term results after aortic root replacement using self-assembled valve composite grafts in patients with small aortic annulus.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg.2014;18(2):159-163. doi:10.1093/ICVTS/IVT447Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fudulu D, Zakkar M, Stoica S. Aorto-mitral patch enlargement for elective substantial double valve upsizing. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2020;11(1):101-104. doi:10.1177/2150135119881396/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_2150135119881396-FIG3.JPEGFuduluDZakkarMStoicaS.Aorto-mitral patch enlargement for elective substantial double valve upsizing.World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg.2020;11(1):101-104. doi:10.1177/2150135119881396/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_2150135119881396-FIG3.JPEGOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ross DN. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet. 1967;2(7523):956-958. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90794-5RossDN.Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft.Lancet.1967;2(7523):956-958. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90794-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sievers HH, Ensminger S. Update on the German ross registry. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;10(4):515-517. doi:10.21037/acs-2020-rp-154SieversHHEnsmingerS.Update on the German ross registry.Ann Cardiothorac Surg.2021;10(4):515-517. doi:10.21037/acs-2020-rp-154Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Aboud A, Charitos EI, Fujita B, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing the Ross procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(11):1412-1422. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.034AboudACharitosEIFujitaBLong-term outcomes of patients undergoing the Ross procedure.J Am Coll Cardiol.2021;77(11):1412-1422. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.034Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thom H, Visan AC, Keeney E, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Ross procedure versus conventional aortic valve replacement in young adults. Open Heart. 2019;6(1). doi:10.1136/openhrt-2019-001047ThomHVisanACKeeneyEClinical and cost-effectiveness of the Ross procedure versus conventional aortic valve replacement in young adults.Open Heart.2019;6(1). doi:10.1136/openhrt-2019-001047Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sharabiani MTA, Dorobantu DM, Mahani AS, et al. Aortic valve replacement and the Ross operation in children and young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(24):2858-2870. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.021SharabianiMTADorobantuDMMahaniASAortic valve replacement and the Ross operation in children and young adults.J Am Coll Cardiol.2016;67(24):2858-2870. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zakkar M, Bruno VD, Visan AC. Surgery for young adults with aortic valve disease not amenable to repair. Front Surg. 5:18.ZakkarMBrunoVDVisanAC.Surgery for young adults with aortic valve disease not amenable to repair.Front Surg.5:18.Search in Google Scholar
Mazine A, El-Hamamsy I, Verma S, et al. Ross procedure in adults for cardiologists and cardiac Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(22):2761-2777. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2200MazineAEl-HamamsyIVermaSRoss procedure in adults for cardiologists and cardiac Surgeons.J Am Coll Cardiol.2018;72(22):2761-2777. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2200Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Skillington PD, Mokhles MM, Takkenberg JJM, et al. The Ross procedure using autologous support of the pulmonary autograft: Techniques and late results. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2015;149(2):S46-S52. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.068SkillingtonPDMokhlesMMTakkenbergJJMThe Ross procedure using autologous support of the pulmonary autograft: Techniques and late results.Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2015;149(2):S46-S52. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.068Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Konno S, Imai Y, Iida Y, Nakajima M, Tatsuno K. A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;70(5):909-917. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)39673-4KonnoSImaiYIidaYNakajimaMTatsunoK.A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1975;70(5):909-917. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)39673-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kenny LA, Austin C, Golesworthy T, Venugopal P, Alphonso N. Personalized external aortic root support (PEARS) for aortic root aneurysm. Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021;26(2):290-305. doi:10.1053/J.OPTECHSTCVS.2021.03.001KennyLAAustinCGolesworthyTVenugopalPAlphonsoN.Personalized external aortic root support (PEARS) for aortic root aneurysm.Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2021;26(2):290-305. doi:10.1053/J.OPTECHSTCVS.2021.03.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Grubb KJ. Aortic root enlargement during aortic valve replacement:Nicks and Manouguian techniques. Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2015;20(3):206-218. doi:10.1053/J.OPTECHSTCVS.2016.02.004GrubbKJ.Aortic root enlargement during aortic valve replacement:Nicks and Manouguian techniques.Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2015;20(3):206-218. doi:10.1053/J.OPTECHSTCVS.2016.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar