Automated Quantitative Relaxometry for Deep Neuromuscular Blockade in Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy

[1]Madsen MV, Scheppan S, Mork E, Kissmeyer P, Rosenberg J, Gatke MR. Influence of deep neuromuscular block on the surgeons assessment of surgical conditions during laparotomy: a randomized controlled double blinded trial with rocuronium and sugammadex. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119: 435–42.MadsenMVScheppanSMorkEKissmeyerPRosenbergJGatkeMRInfluence of deep neuromuscular block on the surgeons assessment of surgical conditions during laparotomy: a randomized controlled double blinded trial with rocuronium and sugammadexBr J Anaesth20171194354210.1093/bja/aex24128969327Search in Google Scholar

[2]Ozdemir-van Brunschot DMD, Braat AE, van der Jagt MFP, Scheffer GJ, Martini CH, Langenhuijsen JF, e al. Deep neuro-muscular blockade improves surgical conditions during low-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2017; 32: 245–51.Ozdemir-van BrunschotDMDBraatAEvan der JagtMFPSchefferGJMartiniCHLangenhuijsenJFDeep neuro-muscular blockade improves surgical conditions during low-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic donor nephrectomySurg Endosc2017322455110.1007/s00464-017-5670-2577050128643056Search in Google Scholar

[3]Biro P, Paul G, Dahan A, Brull SJ. Proposal for a Revised Classification of the Depth of Neuromuscular Block and Suggestions for Further Development in Neuromuscular Monitoring. Anesth Analg 2019; 128: 1361–3.BiroPPaulGDahanABrullSJProposal for a Revised Classification of the Depth of Neuromuscular Block and Suggestions for Further Development in Neuromuscular MonitoringAnesth Analg20191281361310.1213/ANE.000000000000406531094813Search in Google Scholar

[4]Ali HH, Utting JE, Nightingale DA, Gray C. Quantitative assessment of residual curarization in humans. Br J Anaesth 1970; 42: 802–3.AliHHUttingJENightingaleDAGrayCQuantitative assessment of residual curarization in humansBr J Anaesth1970428023Search in Google Scholar

[5]Viby-Mogensen J, Howardy-Hansen P, Chraemmer-Jorgensen B, Ording H, Engbaek J, Nielsen A. Posttetanic count (PTC): a new method of evaluating an intense nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology 1981; 55: 458–61.Viby-MogensenJHowardy-HansenPChraemmer-JorgensenBOrdingHEngbaekJNielsenAPosttetanic count (PTC): a new method of evaluating an intense nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockadeAnesthesiology1981554586110.1097/00000542-198110000-00024Search in Google Scholar

[6]Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen J. Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 310–7.ClaudiusCSkovgaardLTViby-MogensenJArm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyographyBr J Anaesth2010105310710.1093/bja/aeq16220595196Search in Google Scholar

[7]Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J, th International Neuromuscular M. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuro-muscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 789–808.Fuchs-BuderTClaudiusCSkovgaardLTErikssonLIMirakhurRKViby-MogensenJth International Neuromuscular MGood clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuro-muscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revisionActa Anaesthesiol Scand20075178980810.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01352.x17635389Search in Google Scholar

[8]Fuchs-Buder T, Schreiber JU, Meistelman C. Monitoring neuro-muscular block: an update. Anaesthesia 2009; 64 Suppl 1: 82–9.Fuchs-BuderTSchreiberJUMeistelmanCMonitoring neuro-muscular block: an updateAnaesthesia200964Suppl 182910.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05874.x19222435Search in Google Scholar

[9]Grosse-Sundrup M, Henneman JP, Sandberg WS, Bateman BT, Uribe JV, Nguyen NT, et al. Intermediate acting non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: prospective propensity score matched cohort study. BMJ 2012; 345: e6329.Grosse-SundrupMHennemanJPSandbergWSBatemanBTUribeJVNguyenNTIntermediate acting non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: prospective propensity score matched cohort studyBMJ2012345e632910.1136/bmj.e6329347308823077290Search in Google Scholar

[10]Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Shear TD, Vender JS, et al. Residual Neuromuscular Block in the Elderly: Incidence and Clinical Implications. Anesthesiology 2015; 123: 1322–36.MurphyGSSzokolJWAvramMJGreenbergSBShearTDVenderJSResidual Neuromuscular Block in the Elderly: Incidence and Clinical ImplicationsAnesthesiology201512313223610.1097/SA.0000000000000223Search in Google Scholar

[11]Nemes R, Fulesdi B, Pongracz A, Asztalos L, Szabo-Maak Z, Lengyel S, Tassonyi E. Impact of reversal strategies on the incidence of postoperative residual paralysis after rocuronium relaxation without neuromuscular monitoring: A partially randomised placebo controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34: 609–16.NemesRFulesdiBPongraczAAsztalosLSzabo-MaakZLengyelSTassonyiEImpact of reversal strategies on the incidence of postoperative residual paralysis after rocuronium relaxation without neuromuscular monitoring: A partially randomised placebo controlled trialEur J Anaesthesiol2017346091610.1097/EJA.000000000000058528030444Search in Google Scholar

[12]Rodiera J, Serradell A, Alvarez-Gomez JA, Aliaga L. The cuff method: a pilot study of a new method of monitoring neuromuscular function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 1552–8.RodieraJSerradellAAlvarez-GomezJAAliagaLThe cuff method: a pilot study of a new method of monitoring neuromuscular functionActa Anaesthesiol Scand2005491552810.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00777.x16223405Search in Google Scholar

[13]Veiga Ruiz G, Garcia Cayuela J, Orozco Montes J, Parreno Caparros M, Garcia Rojo B, Aguayo Albasini JL. Monitoring intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure with one device (TOF-Cuff): A comparative study with mechanomyography and invasive blood pressure. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2017; 64: 560–7.Veiga RuizGGarcia CayuelaJOrozco MontesJParreno CaparrosMGarcia RojoBAguayo AlbasiniJLMonitoring intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure with one device (TOF-Cuff): A comparative study with mechanomyography and invasive blood pressureRev Esp Anestesiol Reanim201764560710.1016/j.redare.2017.09.002Search in Google Scholar

[14]Naguib M, Brull SJ, Kopman AF, Hunter JM, Fulesdi B, Arkes HR, et al. Consensus Statement on Perioperative Use of Neuromuscular Monitoring. Anesth Analg 2017; 127: 71–80.NaguibMBrullSJKopmanAFHunterJMFulesdiBArkesHRConsensus Statement on Perioperative Use of Neuromuscular MonitoringAnesth Analg2017127718010.1213/ANE.000000000000267029200077Search in Google Scholar

[15]Blobner M, Frick CG, Stauble RB, Feussner H, Schaller SJ, Unterbuchner C, et al. Neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions (NISCO). Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 627–36.BlobnerMFrickCGStaubleRBFeussnerHSchallerSJUnterbuchnerCNeuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions (NISCO)Surg Endosc2015296273610.1007/s00464-014-3711-725125097Search in Google Scholar

[16]Eikermann M, Blobner M, Groeben H, Rex C, Grote T, Neuhauser M, et al. Postoperative upper airway obstruction after recovery of the train of four ratio of the adductor pollicis muscle from neuro-muscular blockade. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 937–42.EikermannMBlobnerMGroebenHRexCGroteTNeuhauserMPostoperative upper airway obstruction after recovery of the train of four ratio of the adductor pollicis muscle from neuro-muscular blockadeAnesth Analg20061029374210.1213/01.ane.0000195233.80166.1416492855Search in Google Scholar

[17]Koo BW, Oh AY, Seo KS, Han JW, Han HS, Yoon YS. Randomized Clinical Trial of Moderate Versus Deep Neuromuscular Block for Low-Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. World J Surg 2016; 40: 2898–903.KooBWOhAYSeoKSHanJWHanHSYoonYSRandomized Clinical Trial of Moderate Versus Deep Neuromuscular Block for Low-Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic CholecystectomyWorld J Surg201640289890310.1007/s00268-016-3633-827405749Search in Google Scholar

[18]Madsen MV, Istre O, Springborg HH, Staehr-Rye AK, Rosenberg J, et al. Deep neuromuscular blockade and low insufflation pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Dan Med J 2017; 64: pii: A5364.MadsenMVIstreOSpringborgHHStaehr-RyeAKRosenbergJDeep neuromuscular blockade and low insufflation pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomyDan Med J201764pii: A5364.Search in Google Scholar

[19]Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 498–505.MartiniCHBoonMBeversRFAartsLPDahanAEvaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular blockBr J Anaesth201411249850510.1093/bja/aet37724240315Search in Google Scholar

[20]Sundman E, Witt H, Olsson R, Ekberg O, Kuylenstierna R, Eriksson LI. The incidence and mechanisms of pharyngeal and upper esophageal dysfunction in partially paralyzed humans: pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry after atracurium. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 977–84.SundmanEWittHOlssonREkbergOKuylenstiernaRErikssonLIThe incidence and mechanisms of pharyngeal and upper esophageal dysfunction in partially paralyzed humans: pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry after atracuriumAnesthesiology2000929778410.1097/00000542-200004000-0001410754616Search in Google Scholar

[21]Torensma B, Martini CH, Boon M, Olofsen E, In ‘t Veld B, Liem RS, et al. Deep Neuromuscular Block Improves Surgical Conditions during Bariatric Surgery and Reduces Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0167907.TorensmaBMartiniCHBoonMOlofsenEIn ‘t VeldBLiemRSDeep Neuromuscular Block Improves Surgical Conditions during Bariatric Surgery and Reduces Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled TrialPLoS One201611e016790710.1371/journal.pone.0167907514801127936214Search in Google Scholar

[22]Yoo YC, Kim NY, Shin S, Choi YD, Hong JH, Kim CY, et al. The Intraocular Pressure under Deep versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade during Low-Pressure Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomized Trial. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0135412.YooYCKimNYShinSChoiYDHongJHKimCYThe Intraocular Pressure under Deep versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade during Low-Pressure Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomized TrialPLoS One201510e013541210.1371/journal.pone.0135412455273626317357Search in Google Scholar

[23]Bogani G, Uccella S, Cromi A, Serati M, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F. Low vs standard pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy: prospective randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 466–71.BoganiGUccellaSCromiASeratiMCasarinJPinelliCGhezziFLow vs standard pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy: prospective randomized trialJ Minim Invasive Gynecol2014214667110.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.09124374246Search in Google Scholar

[24]Vijayaraghavan N, Sistla SC, Kundra P, Ananthanarayan PH, Karthikeyan VS, Ali SM, et al. Comparison of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double blinded randomized controlled study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014; 24: 127–33.VijayaraghavanNSistlaSCKundraPAnanthanarayanPHKarthikeyanVSAliSMComparison of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double blinded randomized controlled studySurg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech2014241273310.1097/SLE.0b013e318293798024686347Search in Google Scholar

[25]Warle MC, Berkers AW, Langenhuijsen JF, van der Jagt MF, Dooper PM, Kloke HJ, et al. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy to optimize live donors’ comfort. Clin Transplant 2013; 27: E478–83.WarleMCBerkersAWLangenhuijsenJFvan der JagtMFDooperPMKlokeHJLow-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy to optimize live donors’ comfortClin Transplant201327E4788310.1111/ctr.1214323795745Search in Google Scholar

[26]Baete S, Vercruysse G, Vander Laenen M, De Vooght P, Van Melkebeek J, Dylst D, et al. The Effect of Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Block on Surgical Conditions and Postoperative Respiratory Function in Bariatric Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1469–75.BaeteSVercruysseGVander LaenenMDe VooghtPVan MelkebeekJDylstDThe Effect of Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Block on Surgical Conditions and Postoperative Respiratory Function in Bariatric Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical TrialAnesth Analg201712414697510.1213/ANE.000000000000180128107276Search in Google Scholar

[27]Bruintjes MH, van Helden EV, Braat AE, Dahan A, Scheffer GJ, van Laarhoven CJ, Warle MC. Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118: 834–42.BruintjesMHvan HeldenEVBraatAEDahanASchefferGJvan LaarhovenCJWarleMCDeep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysisBr J Anaesth20171188344210.1097/01.sa.0000527502.74147.9cSearch in Google Scholar

[28]Kopman AF, Naguib M. Is deep neuromuscular block beneficial in laparoscopic surgery? No, probably not. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60: 717–22.KopmanAFNaguibMIs deep neuromuscular block beneficial in laparoscopic surgery? No, probably notActa Anaesthesiol Scand2016607172210.1111/aas.1269926846546Search in Google Scholar

[29]Jacobs VR, Hillerer KM, Fischer T, Bogner G, Morrison JE, Jr. Minimally invasive insufflation technique is and should not be a “black box” principle. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 1121–2.JacobsVRHillererKMFischerTBognerGMorrisonJEJrMinimally invasive insufflation technique is and should not be a “black box” principleJ Minim Invasive Gynecol2014211121210.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.00125020085Search in Google Scholar