The initial results of MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy in high volume tertiary center
, , , and
Nov 28, 2024
About this article
Article Category: Research Article
Published Online: Nov 28, 2024
Page range: 501 - 508
Received: Jun 09, 2024
Accepted: Oct 09, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0060
Keywords
© 2024 Tomaz Smrkolj et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 2.

Comparison of time-based patient groups for learning curve estimation on institution level
Pearson χ2 | df | sig | Pearson χ2 | df | sig | Pearson χ2 | df | sig | |
2 patient groups | 0.458 | 1 | 0.498 | 0.658 | 1 | 0.417 | 0.291 | 1 | 0.590 |
3 patient groups | 2.145 | 2 | 0.342 | 2.265 | 2 | 0.322 | 1.373 | 2 | 0.503 |
6 patient groups | 4.807 | 5 | 0.440 | 2.872 | 5 | 0.720 | 2.322 | 5 | 0.803 |
Patient and lesion characteristics
Age (years) | 35 | 91 | 69.0 ± 7.9 | 70.0 |
0.45 | 115.4 | 9.7 ± 11.7 | 7.0 | |
Prostate volume (ml) | 15 | 313 | 52.8 ± 32.3 | 45 |
No. lesions biopsied in a patient | 1 | 3 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.0 |
Largest diameter of lesion (mm) | 3.0 | 41.0 | 12.8 ± 6.6 | 11.5 |
No. of cores per lesion targeted BX | 1 | 8 | 4.26 ± 1.2 | 4.0 |
No. of cores systematic BX | 0 | 14 | 6.9 ± 1.8 | 6.0 |
No. of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted BX performed by urologist before | 1 | 65 | 22.5 ± 19.7 | 20.0 |
Proportion of positive targeted biopsy (BX) lesions categorised by Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score
PIRADS 3 (%) | 104 (81.9%) | 127 | |
PIRADS 4 (%) | 108 (52.9%) | 204 | |
PIRADS 5 (%) | 13 (16.0%) | 81 |
Results of multiple logistic regression of positive histopathologic result
Max lesion diameter | 0.945 | 0.998 | 0.955 | 1.044 |
Number of previous patients with targeted BX performed by urologist | 0.113 | 1.013 | 0.997 | 1.028 |