Phase angle as a prognostic indicator of surgical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer
, , , , and
Nov 30, 2023
About this article
Article Category: Research Article
Published Online: Nov 30, 2023
Page range: 524 - 529
Received: Aug 03, 2023
Accepted: Sep 30, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0060
Keywords
© 2023 Jana Gulin et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
FIGURE 1.

Characteristics of patients
|
50 (71 %) | |||
|
20 (29 %) | |||
65.0 (10.7) [62.4–67.6] | 61.7 (9.8) [56.9–66.6] | 66.1 (10.9) [63.1–69.2] | 0.137 | |
5.23 (2.77) [5.0–5.5] | 5.64 (0.72) [5.3–6.0] | 5.09 (0.98) [4.8–5.4] | 0.036 |
|
|
17 (24,3) | 4 (22.2) | 13 (25.0) | |
|
2 (2,9) | 1 (5.5) | 1 (1.9) | |
|
45 (64,3) | 11 (61.1) | 34 (65.4) | |
|
1 (1,4) | 1 (5.5) | 0 (0) | |
|
1 (1,4) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.9) | |
|
4 (5,7) | 1 (5.5) | 3 (5.8) |
Odds for developing a complication and probabilities of developing a complication at different values of phase angle
4.5 | 5.532 | 84.7 |
5.0 | 3.831 | 79.3 |
5.5 | 2.651 | 72.6 |
6.0 | 1.837 | 64.8 |
Mean age and mean phase angle in each Clavien Dindo grade
18 (26) | 61.7 [56.9–66.6] | 5.64 [5.28–6.00] | |
5 (7) | 56.0 [50.2–61.8] | 6.22 [5.64–6.80] | |
38 (54) | 67.1 [63.4–70.7] | 4.99 [4.67–5.31] | |
4 (6) | 62.2 [45.0–79.5] | 5.15 [3.41–6.88] | |
5 (7) | 72.2 [60.5–83.9] | 4.64 [3.77–5.51] | |
0 (0) |
Contingency Table with the sensitivity and a specificity of the phase angle
33 (true positive) | 19 (false negative) | 52 | |
7 (false positive) | 11 (true negative) | 18 | |
40 | 30 |