Open Access

CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations after transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation: a propensity score-matched study


Cite

Figure 1

Patient flow diagram.
TACE = transarterial chemoembolization; MWA = microwave ablation
Patient flow diagram. TACE = transarterial chemoembolization; MWA = microwave ablation

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curves comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival overall survival (OS) from different groups. (A) Cumulative PFS between the unmatched A and B groups. (B) Cumulative PFS between the matched A and B groups. (C) Cumulative OS between the unmatched A and B groups. (D) Cumulative OS between the matched A and B groups.
Kaplan-Meier curves comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival overall survival (OS) from different groups. (A) Cumulative PFS between the unmatched A and B groups. (B) Cumulative PFS between the matched A and B groups. (C) Cumulative OS between the unmatched A and B groups. (D) Cumulative OS between the matched A and B groups.

Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curves comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to the statistically significant prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis after propensity score-match. (A) Cumulative PFS between portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and None-PVTT patients. (B). Cumulative OS between male and female. (C) Cumulative OS between Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) B and C stages patients.
Kaplan-Meier curves comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to the statistically significant prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis after propensity score-match. (A) Cumulative PFS between portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and None-PVTT patients. (B). Cumulative OS between male and female. (C) Cumulative OS between Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) B and C stages patients.

Figure 4

Subgroup analyses revealed by Kaplan-Meier curves comparing progression-free survival (PFS). (A) Comparison of the PFS between portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and None-PVTT patients in group B. (B) Comparison of the PFS between PVTT and None-PVTT patients in group A. (C) Comparison of the PFS between group A and B in patients with PVTT. (D) Comparison of the PFS between group A and B in none-PVTT patients. (E) Comparison of the PFS between group A and B in high-risk location 1. (F) Comparison of the PFS between group A and B in high-risk location 2.
Subgroup analyses revealed by Kaplan-Meier curves comparing progression-free survival (PFS). (A) Comparison of the PFS between portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and None-PVTT patients in group B. (B) Comparison of the PFS between PVTT and None-PVTT patients in group A. (C) Comparison of the PFS between group A and B in patients with PVTT. (D) Comparison of the PFS between group A and B in none-PVTT patients. (E) Comparison of the PFS between group A and B in high-risk location 1. (F) Comparison of the PFS between group A and B in high-risk location 2.

Complications related to the procedure

Adverse events Group A (N = 49) AE Grade
Group B (N = 98) AE Grade
P value
1 2 3-4 1 2 3-4
Fever 3 3 0 0 3 9 10 0 0.608‡
Nausea 5 3 2 0 5 9 11 0 0.852†
Diarrhea 3 2 1 0 3 5 5 0 1‡
Pain required treatment 13 10 3 0 13 39 42 0 0.007†*
Liver abscess 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1‡
Puncture hemorrhage 1 1 0 0 1 5 8 0 0.274‡
Displacement of seeds 0 0 0 0 0 - - - -
RILD 0 0 0 0 0 - - - -

Intrahepatic and high-risk locations tumor responses in the two groups after propensity score matching (PSM)

Tumor response Intrahepatic Tumor Tumor in high-risk locations

Group A (n = 49) Group B (n = 98) P value Group A (n = 49) Group B (n = 98) P value
Complete response (CR) 4 6 5 9
Partial response (PR) 21 23 28 29
Stable disease (SD) 17 41 13 40
Progressive disease (PD) 7 28 3 20
Objective response rate (ORR) (%) 51.0% 29.6% 0.011†* 67.3% 38.8% < 0.001†*
Disease control rate (DCR) (%) 85.7% 71.4% 0.055† 93.9% 79.6% 0.025†*

Baseline patient characteristics before and after propensity score-matched

Parameter Total (N = 181) Total cohort PSM cohort

Group A Group B P Group A Group B P


N = 49 N = 132 value N = 49 N = 98 value
Sex 0.37 0.751
Male 162 (89.5%) 46 (93.9%) 116 (87.9%) 46 (93.9%) 89 (90.8%)
Female 19 (10.5%) 3 (6.12%) 16 (12.1%) 3 (6.12%) 9 (9.18%)
Age (y) 56.0 [47.0;64.0] 56.0 [47.0;68.0] 55.5 [48.0;62.0] 0.425 56.0 [47.0;68.0] 55.0 [48.0;62.0] 0.468
BCLC 0.041* 1
B 72 (39.8%) 13 (26.5%) 59 (44.7%) 13 (26.5%) 26 (26.5%)
C 109 (60.2%) 36 (73.5%) 73 (55.3%) 36 (73.5%) 72 (73.5%)
Maximum median (IQR), tumor mm diameter, 29.0 [18.0;49.0] 36.0 [22.0;53.0] 26.5 [18.0;46.0] 0.039* 36.0 [22.0;53.0] 31.0 [18.0;57.8] 0.579
Tumor number 0.927 0.66
1-2 60 (33.1%) 17 (34.7%) 43 (32.6%) 17 (34.7%) 29 (29.6%)
≥ 3 121 (66.9%) 32 (65.3%) 89 (67.4%) 32 (65.3%) 69 (70.4%)
PVTT 0.202 1
None 108 (59.7%) 25 (51.0%) 83 (62.9%) 25 (51.0%) 49 (50.0%)
Yes 73 (40.3%) 24 (49.0%) 49 (37.1%) 24 (49.0%) 49 (50.0%)
Distant metastasis 0.171 0.953
None 109 (60.2%) 25 (51.0%) 84 (63.6%) 25 (51.0%) 52 (53.1%)
Yes 72 (39.8%) 24 (49.0%) 48 (36.4%) 24 (49.0%) 46 (46.9%)
High risk location 0.045* 0.76
1 98 (54.2%) 33 (67.3%) 65 (49.2%) 33 (67.3%) 62 (63.3%)
2 83 (45.8%) 16 (32.7%) 67 (50.8%) 16 (32.7%) 36 (36.7%)
TACE sessions 2.00 [1.00;3.00] 2.00 [1.00;2.00] 2.00 [1.00;3.00] 0.442 2.00 [1.00;2.00] 1.00 [1.00;3.00] 0.464
MWA sessions 1.00 [0.00;2.00] 1.00 [0.00;2.00] 1.00 [0.00;2.00] 0.162 1.00 [0.00;2.00] 1.00 [0.00;2.00] 0.31
Cause of liver disease: 0.09 0.181
Continued
HCV/HBV 169 (93.4%) 43 (87.8%) 126 (95.5%) 43 (87.8%) 93 (94.9%)
Other 12 (6.6%) 6 (12.2%) 6 (4.55%) 6 (12.2%) 5 (5.10%)
ECOG score 0.189 0.669
0 126 (69.6%) 30 (61.2%) 96 (72.7%) 30 (61.2%) 65 (66.3%)
1 55 (30.4%) 19 (38.8%) 36 (27.3%) 19 (38.8%) 33 (33.7%)
Child-pugh score 0.563 0.386
A 82 (45.3%) 46 (93.9%) 36 (27.3%) 46 (93.9%) 86 (87.8%)
B 99 (54.7%) 3 (6.12%) 96 (72.7%) 3 (6.12%) 12 (12.2%)
AFP, ng/mL 0.811 0.576
< 400 125 (69.1%) 35 (71.4%) 90 (68.2%) 35 (71.4%) 64 (65.3%)
≥ 400 56 (30.9%) 14 (28.6%) 42 (31.8%) 14 (28.6%) 34 (34.7%)
PT (s) 12.2 [11.5;13.1] 12.0 [11.5;12.8] 12.3 [11.6;13.1] 0.167 12.0 [11.5;12.8] 12.2 [11.5;13.1] 0.331
ALB (g/L) 40.35 [36.2;43.9] 40.8 [36.7;44.1] 40.2 [36.0;43.9] 0.329 40.8 [36.7;44.1] 40.3 [36.1;44.1] 0.518
TBIL (mg/dL) 13.55 [10.1;19.32] 12.3 [8.73;18.2] 14.6 [10.4;20.4] 0.167 12.3 [8.73;18.2] 14.6 [10.1;20.2] 0.227

Multivariate analyses of predictors of progression-free survival after treatment

Risk Factor Univariate Multivariate

HR 95%CI P value HR 95%CI P value
Sex
Female 1
Male 0.755 0.393–1.451 0.399
Age (y)
< 60 1
≥ 60 1.093 0.761–1.569 0.63
Maximum diameter (tumor mm) 1.006 1.000–1.013 0.071* 1.003 0.996-1.010 0.458
Tumor number
1-2 1
≥ 3 1.104 0.915–1.332 0.302
BCLC stage
B 1
C 1.395 0.929–2.095 0.109
High-risk location
1 1
2 0.665 0.456–0.970 0.034** 0.846 0.550-1.302 0.447
PVTT
None
Yes 1.615 1.124–2.319 0.010** 1.625 1.015-2.546 0.040**
Distant metastasis
None
Yes 1.099 0.772–1.565 0.602
TACE sessions 1.062 0.964–1.170 0.223
MWA sessions 1.006 0.914–1.106 0.905
Treatment
TACE+MWA 1
TACE+MWA+ 125I 0.527 0.357–0.778 0.002** 0.479 0.328-0.733 <0.001**
Cause of liver disease
Other 1
HBV/HCV 1.36 0.662–2.791 0.402
ECOG score
0 1
1 1.269 0.876–1.837 0.208
AFP
≤ 400 ng/mL 1
Continued
> 400 ng/mL 1.72 1.164–2.542 0.006** 1.403 0.948-2.129 0.090
Prothrombin time (s) 0.942 0.827–1.073 0.367
Albumin (g/L) 0.987 0.951–1.024 0.477
Continued
Total Bilirubin (μmol/L) 1.001 0.995–1.008 0.649
Child-pugh class
A 1
B 1.216 0.654–2.263 0.536
eISSN:
1581-3207
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Internal Medicine, Haematology, Oncology, Radiology