MRI-assisted cervix cancer brachytherapy pre-planning, based on application in paracervical anaesthesia: final report

1. Haie-Meder C, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E, Briot E, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GECESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 2005; 74: 235-45.10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.015Search in Google Scholar

2. Dimopoulous JCA, Schard G, Berger D, Lang S, Goldner G, Helbich T, et al. Systematic evaluation of MRI findings in different stages of treatment of cervical cancer: potential of MRI on delineation of target patho-anatomical structures and organs at risk. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64: 1380-8.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.10.017Search in Google Scholar

3. Boss EA, Barentsz JO, Massuger LF, Boonstra H. The role of MI imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 256-70.10.1007/s003300050042Search in Google Scholar

4. Subak LL, Hricak H. Powell CB, Azizi L, Stern JL. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:3-50.10.1016/0029-7844(95)00109-5Search in Google Scholar

5. Mitchell DG, Snyder B, Coakley F, Reinhold C, Thomas G, Amendola M, et al. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 5687-94.10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4799Search in Google Scholar

6. Oszarlak O, Tjalma W, Scheppens E, Corthouts B, Op de Beeck B, Van Marck E, et al. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 338-45.Search in Google Scholar

7. Hricak H, Gatsonsis C, Coakley FV, Snyder B, Reinhold C, Schwartz LH, et al. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. Radiology 2007; 245: 491-8.10.1148/radiol.2452061983Search in Google Scholar

8. Jung DC, Ju W, Choi HJ, Kang S, Park S, Yoo CW, et al. The validity of tumour diameter assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and gross specimen with regard to tumour volume in cervical cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44: 1524-8.10.1016/j.ejca.2008.04.023Search in Google Scholar

9. Bipat S, Glas AS, van der Velden J, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systemic review. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 59-66.10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00409-8Search in Google Scholar

10. Dimopoulos JCA, Schirl G, Baldinger A, Helbich TH, Pötter R. MRI assessment of cervical cancer for adaptive radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2009; 185: 282-7.10.1007/s00066-009-1918-719440666Search in Google Scholar

11. Kiristis C, Lang S, Dimopoulos J, Berger D, Georg D, Pötter R. The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: design, application, treatment planning, and dosimetric results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 65: 624-30.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.03616690444Search in Google Scholar

12. Dimopoulos JCA, Kiristis C, Petric P, Georg P, Lang S, Berger D, et al. The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: clinical feasibility and preliminary results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 66: 83-90.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.041Search in Google Scholar

13. Pötter R, Dimopoulos J, Georg P, Lang S, Waldhäusl C, Wachter-Gerstner N, et al. Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer. Radiother Oncol 2007; 83: 148-55.10.1016/j.radonc.2007.04.012Search in Google Scholar

14. Haie-Meder C. MRI-based brachytherapy (BT) in the treatment of cervical cancer: experience of the Institute Gustave-Roussy. Radiother Oncol 2007; 83(Suppl 1): S11-12.Search in Google Scholar

15. Lindegaard JC, Tandercup K, Nielsen SK, Haack S, Gelineck J. MRI-guided 3D optimization significantly improves DVH parameters of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71: 756-64.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.032Search in Google Scholar

16. De Brabandere M, Mousa AG, Nulens A, Swinnen A, Van Limbergen E. Potential of dose optimization in MRI-based PDR brachytherapy of cervix carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2008; 88: 217-26.10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.026Search in Google Scholar

17. Petrič, P, Hudej R, Šegedin B, Zobec Logar HB. MRI assisted treatment planning improves the DVH parameters in cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2011; 99: 264-265.10.1016/S0167-8140(11)70776-9Search in Google Scholar

18. Hudej R, Petric P, Burger J. Standard versus 3D optimized MRI-based planning for uterine cervix cancer brachyradiotherapy-the Ljubljana experience. In: Jarm T, Kramar P, Županič A, editors. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering proceedings. 11th Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2007, 26-30 June, 2007, Ljubljana, Slovenia. New York: Springer; 2007(16). p. 875-8.10.1007/978-3-540-73044-6_227Search in Google Scholar

19. Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Tersteeg RJ, Roesink JM, Bijmolt S, Nomden CN, Moerland MA, et al. MRI-guided treatment-planning optimisation in intracavitary or combined intracavitary/interstitial PDR brachytherapy using tandem ovoid applicators in locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93: 322-30.10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.014Search in Google Scholar

20. Petrič P, Hudej R, Rogelj P, Lindegaard J, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, et al. Frequency-distribution mapping of HR CTV in cervix cancer: possibilities and limitations of existent and prototype applicators. Radiother Oncol 2010; 96: 70.Search in Google Scholar

21. Kuipers T, Hoekstra CJ, van Riet A, Mak AC, Vonk EJ, Elders LH. HDR brachytherapy applied to cervical carcinoma with moderate lateral expansion: modified principles of treatment. Radiother Oncol 2001; 58: 25-30.10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00320-0Search in Google Scholar

22. Pötter R, Haie-Mader C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GECESTRO Working Group: (II): concepts and terms of 3D imaging, radiation physics, radiobiology, and 3D dose volume parameters. Radiother Oncol 2006; 78: 67-77.10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.01416403584Search in Google Scholar

23. Hellebust TP, Kirisits C, Berger D, Pérez-Calatayud J, De Brabandere M, De Leeuw A, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group: Considerations and pitfalls in comissioning and applicator reconstruction in 3D image-based treatment planning of cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2010; 96: 153-60.10.1016/j.radonc.2010.06.00420663578Search in Google Scholar

24. Dimopoulos JC, Petrow P, Tanderup K, Petric P, Berger D, Kirisits C, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): Basic principles and parameters for MRI imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2012; 103: 113-22.10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.024Search in Google Scholar

25. Petric, P, Hudej R, Music M. MRI assisted cervix cancer brachytherapy preplanning, based on insertion of the applicator in para-cervical anaesthesia: preliminary results of a prospective study. J Contemp Brachyther 2009; 1: 163-9.Search in Google Scholar

26. Gerbaulet A, Pötter R, Haie-Meder C. Cervix cancer. In: Gerbaulet A, Pötter R, Mazeron JJ, Meertens H, Van Limbergen E, eds. The GEC ESTRO Handbook of Brachytherapy. Brussels: European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology; 2002. p. 301-63.Search in Google Scholar

27. Fokdal L, Tanderup K, Hokland SB, Røhl L, Pedersen EM, Nielsen SK, et al. Clinical feasibilty of combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer employing MRI with a tandem/ring applicator in situ and virtual preplanning of the interstitial component. Radiother Oncol 2013; 107: 63-8.10.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.010Search in Google Scholar

28. Granai CO, Allee P, Doherty F, Madoc-Jones H, Curry SL. Ultrasound used for assessing the in situ position of intrauterine tandems. Gynecol Oncol 1984; 18: 334-8.10.1016/0090-8258(84)90045-3Search in Google Scholar

29. Sahinler I, Cepni I, Colpan D, Cepni K, Koksal S, Koca A, et al. Tandem application with transvaginal ultrasound guidance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59: 190-6.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.028Search in Google Scholar

30. Mayr NA, Montebello JF, Sorosky JI, Daugherty JS, Nguyen DL, Mardirossian G, et al. Brachytherapy management of the retroverted uterus using ultrasound- guided implant applicator placement. Brachytherapy 2005; 4: 24-9.10.1016/j.brachy.2004.10.007Search in Google Scholar

31. Davidson MT, Yuen J, D’Souza D, Radwan JS, Hammond JA, Batchelar DL. Optimization of high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy applicator placement: the benefits of intraoperative ultrasound guidance. Brachytherapy 2008; 7: 248-53.10.1016/j.brachy.2008.03.004Search in Google Scholar

32. Stock RG, Chan K, Terk M, Dewyngaert JK, Stone NN, Dottino P. A new technique for performing Syed -Neblett template interstitial implants for gynecologic malignancies using transrectal-ultrasound guidance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 37: 819-25.10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00558-5Search in Google Scholar

33. Weitmann HD, Knocke TH, Waldhäusl C, Pötter R. Ultrasound-guided interstitial Brachytherapy in the treatment of advanced vaginal recurences from cervical and endometrial carcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol 2006; 182: 86-95.10.1007/s00066-006-1420-416447015Search in Google Scholar

34. Petric P, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E, Haie Meder C. Adaptive contouring of the target volume and organs at risk. In: Viswanathan AN, editor. Gynecologic radiation therapy: novel approaches to image-guidance and management. Heidelberg: Springer cop.; 2011. p. 99-118.10.1007/978-3-540-68958-4_9Search in Google Scholar

35. Viswanathan AN, Cormack R, Holloway CL, Tanaka C, O’Farrell D, Devlin PM, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided interstitial therapy for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 66: 91-9.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.03716839709Search in Google Scholar

36. D’Amico AV, Cormack R, Tempany CM, Kumar S, Topulos G, Kooy HM, et al. Real-time magnetic resonance image-guided interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42: 507-15.10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00271-5Search in Google Scholar

37. Menard C, Susil RC, Choyke P, Gustafson GS, Kammerer W, Ning H, et al. MRI-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy in standard 1.5T scanner. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59: 1414-23.Search in Google Scholar

38. Albert M, Tempany CM, Schultz D, Chen MH, Cormack RA, Kumar S, et al. Late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity after magnetic resonance image-guided prostate brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy. Cancer 2003; 98: 949-54.10.1002/cncr.1159512942561Search in Google Scholar

39. Kettenbach J, Pokrajac B, Schamp S, Fellner C, Schmid R, Gustorff B, et al. MRI-assisted brachytherapy of nonresectable liver metastases. Preliminary technical and clinical experiences. Radiologe 2001; 41: 56-63.10.1007/s00117005092711220098Search in Google Scholar

40. Tangsiriwatthana T, Sangkomkamhang US, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M. Paracervical local anaesthesia for cervical dilatation and uterine intervention. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD005056. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005056.10.1002/14651858.CD005056Search in Google Scholar

41. Cooper NA, Khan KS, Clark TJ. Local anaesthesia for pain control during outpatient hysteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J 2010; 340: c1130.10.1136/bmj.c1130284450220332307Search in Google Scholar

42. Finikiotis G. Side-effects and complications of outpatient hysteroscopy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 33: 61-2.10.1111/j.1479-828X.1993.tb02056.xSearch in Google Scholar

43. Petric P, Hudej R, Rogelj P, Blas M, Segedin B, Logar HB, et al. Comparison of 3D MRI with high sampling efficiency and 2D multiplanar MRI for contouring in cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiol Oncol 2012; 46: 242-51.10.2478/v10019-012-0023-1347295323077463Search in Google Scholar

44. Zobec Logar HL, Segedin B, Hudej R, Petric P. Definitive radiotherapy for uterine cervix cancer: long term results for patients treated in the period from 1998 till 2002 at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. Radiol Oncol 2013; 47: 280-8. 10.2478/raon-2013-0025379488424133393Search in Google Scholar