1. bookVolume 18 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2501-238X
First Published
16 Apr 2016
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Dialectics of Industrial Design viz-a-viz The Meta – Design Phenomenon: The on-Going Narrative / Implications for New Design Paradigms and Design Education

Published Online: 07 Apr 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 18 (2019) - Issue 1 (March 2019)
Page range: 219 - 232
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2501-238X
First Published
16 Apr 2016
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The paper examined the dialectics and the Philosophical Theorization of the Phenomenon of Industrial design viz-a-viz meta-design, both as new areas of the philosophical discourse and intellectualization of both fields. This is not only as new subject disciplines / profession but also as New/Novel, and “uncharted waters” in the study and philosophy of both. Which is aimed at their adoption as a veritable tool and vehicle, for achieving New and innovative franchises and enterprises that might thus help bring about creating potentially New Design paradigms. In the body of the text it was established that by employing interdisciplinarity and collaborative efforts / approaches, designers try to achieve these New design efforts which are inspired by the way living organisms, systems and mechanisms, function and work. This eventually will influence, change or completely overhaul the way we feed, cloth ourselves, shelter, communicate or even co-habit in the future. The paper also established that the implications of the above will help engender a new narrative in the discussions and reasoning (or the dialectics) of these two disciplines and also of how they will affect the subjects practice and the various attempts aimed at its Pedagogy /Education. It was also established that the nature of such an Education and the Impartation of the adequate Design skills to graduates must adopt New strategies and implementation of an Industrial/Technological-based subject-Bias that leans towards Design intuitiveness, ingenious Technical/Technologically result oriented reasoning and practices. Bearing in mind the infusion also of various multidisciphinary subject areas that will help broaden the learner’s horizon. The paper recommends that the issue of the Dialectics and phenomenology of Industrial Design/Meta design (which is the philosophical study of the structure and makeup (or consciousness) of the concepts, context and content of industrial design) must be embedded in the implementation of the three conceptual Approaches of Design which are:-Design Awareness, Design Activity and Design Manufacture/fabrication. This is the sum total of all Design and Creative endeavours.

Keywords

1. Adler, M.J. (2000) “Dialectics” Routledge Press, LondonSearch in Google Scholar

2. Ayer. A. J. (1984) “Philosophy in the Twentieth Century”. London: Unwin paperbacks Pub.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bertell, O & Tony, S. (2008) “Dialectics for the New Century” London. England, Palgrave Macmillan, Pub.Search in Google Scholar

4. Donald, L. (2003) (Eng. Trans.) “Phenomenology of Perception:- Maurice Ponty” London, Routledge Press.Search in Google Scholar

5. Evan, T. (2007) “Autopoiesis: The organization of the living”: Mind in life: Biology Phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard Univ. Press Boston USA.Search in Google Scholar

6. Fisher, G. & Giaccardi, E. (2006) “Metadesign”. A Framework for the Future of End use development”. In Lieberman, F.P & Wulf. V. (eds.) Kluwer Acad. Pub. Dordrecht. Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

7. Giaccardi, E (2003) “Principles of Metadesign: Processes and levels of Cocreation in the New design space. Kluwer Acad. Publishers. Dordrecht. Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

8. Goosseff, K. A. (2010). Autopoiesis and Meaning: A biological approach to Bakhtins super addressee. Journal of Organizational Change Management, University of Boston Press. Massachusetts. USA.10.1108/09534811011031319Search in Google Scholar

9. Hiesinger, K.B & Marcus, G. H (1993). “Landmarks of Twentieth century Designs” New York. Abbeville Press.Search in Google Scholar

10. Howard, L. I. W. (1989) “Hegel, Heraclitus, and Marxs Dialetic”. Harvester wheat sheaf, Pub.London.Search in Google Scholar

11. Ira, G. (1986) “Dialectical materialism”: Its Laws, Categories and Practice, Petras Press NY. New York.Search in Google Scholar

12. Kimbell, R. (2005) “Assessing Design innovation in Technology Education in New Perspectives, Research, Assessment and Curriculum development (eds) Lars Lindstrom Vol 17. Stockholm Inst. Of Ed Press/pubSearch in Google Scholar

13. Livingston, N. (1990) “Between Science and Literature”: An Introduction to Autopoietics. Univ of Illinois Press. Illinois. USA.Search in Google Scholar

14. Lucie-Smith, E. (2001) “History of Industrial Design”, Oxford. Phaidon Press. UK.Search in Google Scholar

15. Michel, H. (2008) “Material Phenomenology”. Fordham University Press. New York.Search in Google Scholar

16. Mitchel, C. T. (1993) “Redefining Designing” New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold Pub.Search in Google Scholar

17. Noblet, J. (ed) (1993) “Industrial Design: Reflection of a century”. Flammarion /APCI. Pub. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

18. O’Brien, J. Millis, B. Cohen, M. (2008) “The Design Education course Syllabus”. San Francisco: Wiley and Sons pub.Search in Google Scholar

19. Petroski, H. (1994) “Design paradigms; case Histories of Error and Judgement” in Eng. Design. Newtown Press. N. Jersey USA.10.1017/CBO9780511805073Search in Google Scholar

20. Pierre, T (1962) “What is phenomenology”, Chicago, Quadrangle Books.Search in Google Scholar

21. Smith, D. W. & Thomasson, A. L. (2005) (eds) “Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind”, New York, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272457.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

22. Spramzi, M. (2011) “The Art of Dialectics between Dialogue and Rhetoric” The Aristotelian Tradition, Philadelphia USA, John Benjamin’s Pub.10.1075/cvs.9Search in Google Scholar

23. Vassao, C. A. (2010) “Metadesign tools, Strategies and ethics towards complexity” Blutcher Pub. Sao Paulo. Briazil.Search in Google Scholar

24. Wake, W. (2000) “Design paradigms”. A source book for creative visualization. Adwark pub. London.Search in Google Scholar

25. Walker, A.J. (1989) “Design History and History of Design”, London. Pluto Press.Search in Google Scholar

26. Wood, J. (2007) “Win-win: synergy tools for metadesigners”. In Designing for the 21st Century, Interdisciplinary questions and insights. (Ed.) Thomas Inns. Gower Pub. London.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo