Franziscean Cadastre in Landscape Structure Research: A Systematic Review
Martin Dolejš
Faculty of Science, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad LabemCzechia
Orcid profileSearch for this author on
and Michal Forejt
Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences PraguePraha, Czechia
Orcid profileSearch for this author on
Mar 29, 2019
About this article
Published Online: Mar 29, 2019
Page range: 131 - 144
Received: Oct 16, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0013
Keywords
© 2019 Martin Dolejš et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Frequency table of LULC classes_
| LULC class | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Built-up areas (yards) | 36 |
| Forest | 39 |
| Coniferous forests | 1 |
| Deciduous forests | 1 |
| Coppice woods | 1 |
| Slash and Burn areas | 1 |
| Agricultural land | 3 |
| Arable land | 30 |
| Arable land with trees | 2 |
| Arable land with vineyards | 1 |
| Arable land with olive trees | 1 |
| Orchards | 14 |
| Vineyards | 12 |
| Vineyards with trees | 1 |
| Vineyards with olive trees | 1 |
| Hop fields | 2 |
| Meadows and Pastures | 10 |
| Meadows | 18 |
| Meadows with trees (fruit trees) | 5 |
| Pastures | 13 |
| Pastures with trees (fruit trees) | 5 |
| Water bodies (lakes, fish ponds) | 28 |
| Water streams, rivers | 18 |
| Gardens | 15 |
| Non forest woody vegetation | 13 |
| Roads, paths | 9 |
| Swamps, wetlands | 7 |
| Barren land | 6 |
| Mining sites, Rocks | 4 |
| Others | 11 |
| Administrative boundaries | 2 |
| LULC classes not extracted | 6 |
j_quageo-2019-0013_tab_002_w2aab3b7c13b1b6b1ab1b8ab1Aa
| Group | Feature | Description | Categories, Values (min.–max., SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bibliographic info | Keyword | Database keyword used for search for record | Franziszeischer Kataster, Franciscian Cadastre, Stable Cadastre, Stabile Cadastre, Franciscan Cadastre, Františkánský katastr, Stabilní katastr and Austrian cadastre |
| Type | Type of the record | Article, Conference proceedings, Book Chapter, Review | |
| Year | Year of publishing | 2000–2018, 3.54 | |
| Article keywords | Keywords used in record | Comma delimited text | |
| State | Place of case study | Czechia, Croatia, Austria, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia | |
| Purpose and general source | Cadastral maps | Indication of cadastral maps use | YES/NO |
| Written registry | Indication of written registry use | YES/NO | |
| Purpose of the study – general | General categories of the purpose | Landscape – general category; Streams and water bodies; Agricultural land; Forests, Forestry; Reconstruction models; Ownership and property rights; Demography | |
| Purpose of the study – detailed | Detailed description of the purpose | Text description (e.g. stream and water bodies localization, land use / land cover change | |
| Methodology and data manipulation | Multitemporality | Application of multiple time segments | YES/NO |
| Number of time points | Number of time segments applied | 1–16, 2.73 | |
| Years of time points | Years of time segments used | 1529–2016, 97.61 | |
| Other map sources | Categorization of other map sources | abbreviation of map source (e.g. 2MIL – Second military mapping, ORTO_1991–2018 – orthphoto originating from 1991–2018) | |
| Other data sources | Categorization of other data sources | abbreviation of data source (e.g. URB – Urbaria, FS – Field Survey, SCH – Soil Chemistry) | |
| Type of LULC | LULC categories extracted, applied | full name of category provided by author (i. e. Vineyards, Arable land with fruit trees) | |
| Number of LULC classes | Count of distinguished LULC classes | 0–12, 3.24 | |
| LULC – map | LULC classes derived solely from map | YES/NO | |
| Georefference of map Sheet | Indicated GIS manipulation mentioned | YES/NO | |
| Vectorization/digitization of map | Indicated GIS manipulation mentioned | YES/NO | |
| Spatial scale | Scale of the study | Spatial scale of the study | administrative scales – Cadastre, Municipality, County, Region, State; individual scales – mountain range, protected area, river, river basin |
| Explicit scale of the study | Acreage under study as reported by authors | 0.23–12,200, 2111.29 (n=32) |