Does the Nature of Interactions with Higher Education Institutions Influence the Innovative Capabilities of Creative Firms? The Case of a South-Western Norwegian County
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Asheim B.T., Gertler M.S., 2005. The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R. (eds), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 291–317.AsheimB.T.GertlerM.S.2005The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systemsFagerbergJ.MoweryD.C.NelsonR.R.(eds),Oxford University PressOxford29131710.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011Search in Google Scholar
Bakhshi H., Freeman A., Higgs P., 2013. A dynamic mapping of the UK’s creative industries. Nesta, London.BakhshiH.FreemanA.HiggsP.2013NestaLondonSearch in Google Scholar
Baker S.E., Edwards R., 2012. How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf, (accessed: 21 November 2018)BakerS.E.EdwardsR.2012How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative researchhttp://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf, (accessed: 21 November 2018)Search in Google Scholar
Bengtsson B., Hertting N., 2014. Generalization by mechanism: Thin rationality and ideal-type analysis in case study research. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44(6): 707–732. DOI: 10.1177/0048393113506495BengtssonB.HerttingN.2014Generalization by mechanism: Thin rationality and ideal-type analysis in case study research44670773210.1177/0048393113506495Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bush V., 1945. Science – The endless frontier. A report to the president on a program for postwar scientific research. National Science Foundation, Washington.BushV.1945National Science FoundationWashington10.21236/ADA361303Search in Google Scholar
Cappetta R., Cillo P., Ponti A., 2006. Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation. Research Policy 35(9): 1273–1290. DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.009.CappettaR.CilloP.PontiA.2006Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation3591273129010.1016/j.respol.2006.02.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J., 2009. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management 46: 201–234. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374CarayannisE.G.CampbellD.F.J.2009“Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem4620123410.1504/IJTM.2009.023374Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carayannis E.G., Grigoroudis E., Campbell D.F.J., Meissner D., Stamati D., 2018. The ecosystem as helix: An exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Management 48(1): 148–162. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12300CarayannisE.G.GrigoroudisE.CampbellD.F.J.MeissnerD.StamatiD.2018The ecosystem as helix: An exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models48114816210.1111/radm.12300Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Castañer X., Campos L., 2002. The determinants of artistic innovation: Bringing in the role of organizations. Journal of Cultural Economics 26(1): 29–52. DOI 10.1023/A:1013386413465.CastañerX.CamposL.2002The determinants of artistic innovation: Bringing in the role of organizations261295210.1023/A:1013386413465Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chapain C., Cooke P., de Propris L., Macneil S., Mateo Garcia J., 2010. Creative clusters and innovation. Putting creativity on the map. NESTA, London, UK.ChapainC.CookeP.de ProprisL.MacneilS.Mateo GarciaJ.2010NESTALondon, UKSearch in Google Scholar
Chesbrough H., 2006. Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: Chesbrough H., Vanhaverbeke W., West J. (eds), Open innovation, researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1–12.ChesbroughH.2006Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovationChesbroughH.VanhaverbekeW.WestJ.(eds),Oxford University PressOxford112Search in Google Scholar
Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128–152. DOI 10.2307/2393553.CohenW.M.LevinthalD.A.1990Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation35112815210.2307/2393553Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DCMS, 1998. Creative industries mapping document. Department of Culture Media and Sport UK Government, London.DCMS1998Department of Culture Media and Sport UK GovernmentLondonSearch in Google Scholar
Ekeland A., 2017. Sysselsetting i petroleumnæringene og relaterte næringer (Employment in the oil industry and related industries) 2016. Statistics Norway 2017/27.EkelandA.2017Sysselsetting i petroleumnæringene og relaterte næringer(Employment in the oil industry and related industries) 2016.201727Search in Google Scholar
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., 1997. Universities in the global economy: A triple helix of academic-industry-government relations. Croom Helm, London.EtzkowitzH.LeydesdorffL.1997Croom HelmLondonSearch in Google Scholar
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29: 109–123. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4EtzkowitzH.LeydesdorffL.2000The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations2910912310.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
European Commission, 2006. The new SME definition. User guide and model declaration. European Commission, Brussels.European Commission2006European CommissionBrusselsSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission, 2010. European competitive report 2010. European Commission, Brussels.European Commission2010European CommissionBrusselsSearch in Google Scholar
Ferguson M., 2014. Knowledge exchange between universities and the creative industries in the UK: A case study of current practice. Industry and Higher Education 28(3): 177–183.FergusonM.2014Knowledge exchange between universities and the creative industries in the UK: A case study of current practice28317718310.5367/ihe.2014.0207Search in Google Scholar
Fitjar R.D., Rodríguez-Pose A., 2015. Networking, context and firm-level innovation: Cooperation through the regional filter in Norway. Geoforum 63: 25–35. DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.05.010.FitjarR.D.Rodríguez-PoseA.2015Networking, context and firm-level innovation: Cooperation through the regional filter in Norway63253510.1016/j.geoforum.2015.05.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Florida R., 2004. The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books, New York.FloridaR.2004Basic BooksNew YorkSearch in Google Scholar
Florida R., Gates G., Knudsen B., Stolarick K., 2006. The university and the creative economy. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.FloridaR.GatesG.KnudsenB.StolarickK.2006George Mason UniversityFairfax, VASearch in Google Scholar
George G., Zahra S.A., Wood D.R., 2002. The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing 17(6): 577–609. DOI 10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6.GeorgeG.ZahraS.A.WoodD.R.2002The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies17657760910.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Guest G., Bunce A., Johnson L., 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18(1): 59–82. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05279903GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL.2006How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability181598210.1177/1525822X05279903Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hawkins R.W., Langford C., Sidhu K., 2007. University research in an ‘innovation society’. In: OECD, Science, technology and innovation indicators in a changing world: Responding to policy needs. Paris: 171–192.HawkinsR.W.LangfordC.SidhuK.2007University research in an ‘innovation society’OECDParis171192Search in Google Scholar
Jensen M.B., Johnson B., Lorenz E., Lundvall B.Å., 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36(5): 680–693. DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006.JensenM.B.JohnsonB.LorenzE.LundvallB.Å.2007Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation36568069310.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jøsendal K., Berg C., Solheim A., Stevenson B., 2008. Kreative næringer i Rogaland 2008 (Creative Industries in Rogaland 2008). Stavanger. IRIS Report 2009/004.JøsendalK.BergC.SolheimA.StevensonB.2008(Creative Industries in Rogaland 2008).StavangerIRIS Report 2009/004.Search in Google Scholar
Jøsendal K., Berg C., Westnes P., Claussen T., 2004. Kreative næringer i Rogaland (Creative Industries in Rogaland). Stavanger. Rogalandsforskning Report 2004/169.JøsendalK.BergC.WestnesP.ClaussenT.2004(Creative Industries in Rogaland).StavangerRogalandsforskning Report 2004/169.Search in Google Scholar
Kaufmann A., Tödtling F., 2001. Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: The importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research Policy 30(5): 791–804. DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00118-9.KaufmannA.TödtlingF.2001Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: The importance of boundary-crossing between systems30579180410.1016/S0048-7333(00)00118-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Laursen K., Reichstein T., Salter A., 2011. Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies 45(4): 507–523. DOI 10.1080/00343400903401618.LaursenK.ReichsteinT.SalterA.2011Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom45450752310.1080/00343400903401618Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Laursen K., Salter A., 2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27(2): 131–150.LaursenK.SalterA.2006Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms27213115010.1002/smj.507Search in Google Scholar
Lawson B., Samson D., 2001. Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management 5(3): 377–400.LawsonB.SamsonD.2001Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach5337740010.1142/S1363919601000427Search in Google Scholar
Lazeretti L., Boix R., Capone F., 2013. Why do creative industries cluster? In: Lazzeretti L. (ed.), Creative industries and innovation in Europe. Concepts, measures and comparative case studies. Routledge: Regional Studies Association.LazerettiL.BoixR.CaponeF.2013Why do creative industries cluster?LazzerettiL.(ed.),RoutledgeRegional Studies Association10.4324/9780203112571-10Search in Google Scholar
Maclaurin W.R., 1953. The sequence from invention to innovation and its relation to economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 67(1): 97–111.MaclaurinW.R.1953The sequence from invention to innovation and its relation to economic growth6719711110.2307/1884150Search in Google Scholar
Martin R., Moodysson J., 2011. Innovation in symbolic industries: The geography and organization of knowledge sourcing. European Planning Studies 19(7): 1183–1203. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2011.573131.MartinR.MoodyssonJ.2011Innovation in symbolic industries: The geography and organization of knowledge sourcing1971183120310.1080/09654313.2011.573131Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moodysson J., Coenen L., Asheim B., 2008. Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: Analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the medicon valley life-science cluster. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40(5): 1040–1056. DOI 10.1068/a39110.MoodyssonJ.CoenenL.AsheimB.2008Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: Analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the medicon valley life-science cluster4051040105610.1068/a39110Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mould O., Vorley T., Roodhouse S., 2009. Realizing capabilities—academic creativity and the creative industries. Creative Industries Journal 1(2): 137–150. DOI 10.1386/cij.1.2.137_1.MouldO.VorleyT.RoodhouseS.2009Realizing capabilities—academic creativity and the creative industries1213715010.1386/cij.1.2.137_1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mowery D.C., Sampat B.N., 2005. Universities in national innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R. (eds), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 209–239.MoweryD.C.SampatB.N.2005Universities in national innovation systemsFagerbergJ.MoweryD.C.NelsonR.R.(eds),Oxford University PressOxford20923910.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
OECD, 2005. Oslo manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. OECD Publishing, Paris.OECD2005OECD PublishingParisSearch in Google Scholar
Plum O., Hassink R., 2014. Knowledge bases, innovativeness and competitiveness in creative industries: The case of Hamburg’s video game developers. Regional Studies, Regional Science 1(1): 248–268. DOI 10.1080/21681376.2014.967803.PlumO.HassinkR.2014Knowledge bases, innovativeness and competitiveness in creative industries: The case of Hamburg’s video game developers1124826810.1080/21681376.2014.967803Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Potts J., 2011. Creative industries and economic evolution. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.PottsJ.2011Edward ElgarCheltenham, UK10.4337/9780857930705Search in Google Scholar
Rajapathirana R.P.J., Hui Y., 2018. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 3(1): 44–55. DOI 10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002.RajapathiranaR.P.J.HuiY.2018Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance31445510.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Taylor C., Comunian R., Smith D.N., 2014. The role of universities in the regional creative economies of the UK: Hidden protagonists and the challenge of knowledge transfer. European Planning Studies 22(12): 2456–2476. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.790589.TaylorC.ComunianR.SmithD.N.2014The role of universities in the regional creative economies of the UK: Hidden protagonists and the challenge of knowledge transfer22122456247610.1080/09654313.2013.790589Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Teece D.J., 2000. Managing intellectual capital: Organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions. Oxford University Press, Oxford.TeeceD.J.2000Oxford University PressOxfordSearch in Google Scholar
UNCTAD, 2008. Creative economy report 2008. The challenge of assessing the creative economy: towards informed policy-making. United Nations, New York, NY.UNCTAD2008United NationsNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar
UNCTAD, 2010. Creative economy report 2010. Creative economy: A feasible development option. United Nations, New York, NY.UNCTAD2010United NationsNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar
Yin R.K., 2011. Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press, New York, NY.YinR.K.2011The Guilford PressNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar