<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Community participation has entered the 21<sup>st</sup> century and the era of e-participation, e-government and e-planning. With the opportunity to use Public Participation Support Systems, Computer-Aided Web Interviews and crowdsourcing mapping platforms, citizens are equipped with the tools to have their voices heard. This paper presents a case study of the deployment of such an online mapping platform in Jeseník, Czech Republic. In total, 533 respondents took part in the online mapping survey, which included six spatial questions. Respondents marked 4,714 points and added 1,538 comments to these points. The main aim of the research was to find whether there were any significant differences in the answers from selected groups (age, gender, home location) of respondents. The results show largest differences in answers of various (below 20 and above 20 year) age groups. Nevertheless further statistical examination would be needed to confirm the visual comparison.</p></abstract>

Community participation has entered the 21st century and the era of e-participation, e-government and e-planning. With the opportunity to use Public Participation Support Systems, Computer-Aided Web Interviews and crowdsourcing mapping platforms, citizens are equipped with the tools to have their voices heard. This paper presents a case study of the deployment of such an online mapping platform in Jeseník, Czech Republic. In total, 533 respondents took part in the online mapping survey, which included six spatial questions. Respondents marked 4,714 points and added 1,538 comments to these points. The main aim of the research was to find whether there were any significant differences in the answers from selected groups (age, gender, home location) of respondents. The results show largest differences in answers of various (below 20 and above 20 year) age groups. Nevertheless further statistical examination would be needed to confirm the visual comparison.

Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic

Department of Development and Environmental Studies

Quaestiones Geographicae

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Community participation has entered the 21st century and the era of e-participation, e-government and e-planning. With the opportunity to use Public...

Parameter	Where is it enjoyable?	Where is it dangerous?	Where is it deprived?	Where is a place with dangerous traffic?	Where do you miss something?	Where do you spend your free time?	Total
Total number of points	1,063	784	733	688	576	870	4,714
Points from web map	978	742	689	648	545	850	4,452
Points from paper map	85	42	44	40	31	20	262
Number of comments	308	275	244	233	310	168	1,538

Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic

Published Online: Sep 06, 2018

Page range: 151 - 162

Received: Dec 03, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0031

Keywords
emotional maps, crowdsourcing, geoparticipation, online maps, community participation

© 2018 Jiří Pánek, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Basic statistics from the participatory mapping results.

Participatory Mapping in Community Participation – Case Study of Jeseník, Czech Republic

Published Online: Sep 06, 2018

Page range: 151 - 162

Received: Dec 03, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0031

Keywordsemotional maps, crowdsourcing, geoparticipation, online maps, community participation

© 2018 Jiří Pánek, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Basic statistics from the participatory mapping results.

Keywords
emotional maps, crowdsourcing, geoparticipation, online maps, community participation