1. bookVolume 40 (2019): Issue 2 (October 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
08 Sep 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Treatment of Acetabular Defects with Porous Metal Augments in Revision Hip Surgery

Published Online: 11 Oct 2019
Page range: 33 - 39
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
08 Sep 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English

Porous metal augments have been used successfully for management of large acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. This study analyzes and compares the clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous metal augments in cemented and uncemented acetabular revisions, all performed at the same institution. In the period 2015-2017, 36 patients with 37 large acetabular defects were treated with porous metal augments in cemented and uncemented acetabular revisions. Postoperatively, patients were monitored for two years on average period of 24-36 months.

Keywords

1. A. Paprosky WG,Perona PG, Lawrence JM.Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthropalsty.A 6-yaer follow-up evaluation.J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 3.10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Pollock FH,Whiteside LA.The fate of massive allografts in total hip acetabular revision surgery.J Arthroplasty 1992; 7: 271–6.140294210.1016/0883-5403(92)90048-USearch in Google Scholar

3. Temleton JE,CalaghanJJ, Goetz DD, et al.Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen year follow-up study. J.Bone Joint surg Am 2001; 83: 1706.Search in Google Scholar

4. Macheras G, Kateros K, Kostakos A, et al. Eight to ten year clinical and radiographioc outcome of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component. J arthroplasty 2009; 24(5): 705.10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.02018703310Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Sporer SM, ORourke M, Chong P, et al. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm follow-up.Clin.Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 395Search in Google Scholar

6. Sporer SM,Paprosky WG,The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augments for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty 2006; 6(Suppl 2): 8310.1016/j.arth.2006.02.096Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Pilliar RM. Porous surfaced metallic implants for orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21 (A1 Suppl): 1–333553195Search in Google Scholar

8. Crosnier EA, Keogh PS, Miles AW. A novel method to assess primary stability of press fit acetabular cups.Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2014; 228: 1126–34.Search in Google Scholar

9. Moore MS, McAuley JP, Young AM, Engh Sr CA. Radiographic signs of osseointegration in porous coated acetabular components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 444: 176–83.Search in Google Scholar

10. Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Safir o, Gross AE. Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss:a mid-term review. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B: 166–72.Search in Google Scholar

11. Schreurs BW, Bolder SB, Gardeniers JW, et al. Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting, and a cemented cup. A 15 to 20 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 204; 86: 492.Search in Google Scholar

12. Weden SH, Paprosky WG, Porous ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws. A minimum twelve year follow-up.J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1266.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hungerford DS, Jones LC. The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures. Clin orthop 1988; 235; 12.Search in Google Scholar

14. Padgett DE, Kull L, Rosenberg A, et al.Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. J bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 1692.Search in Google Scholar

15. Gross AE.Restoration of acetabular bone loss 2005. J arthroplasty 2006; 21(Suppl 1): 117.Search in Google Scholar

16. Gallo J, Rozkydal Z, Sklensky M. Reconstruction of severeacetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cechoslov 2006; 73: 157.Search in Google Scholar

17. Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: Clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J arthroplasty 2005; 20: 1002.Search in Google Scholar

18. Levine B, Dela Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Aplications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; 393: 181.Search in Google Scholar

19. Meneghini RM, Ford KS, McCollough CH, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. Bone remodeling around porous metal cementless acetabular components. J.Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 741–7.10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Nehme A, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004: 201.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo