1. bookVolume 9 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2353-3773
First Published
15 Dec 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Discourse Construction by Non-Government Actors in Urban Regeneration Governance

Published Online: 30 Dec 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2021) - Issue 2 (December 2021)
Page range: 40 - 51
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2353-3773
First Published
15 Dec 2015
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This paper employs critical discourse analysis to examine how Warsaw citizens (residents) perceived and organized the narratives of their participation in the governance of urban regeneration between 2004 and 2016 and how this evolved over that period. The study reveals citizens’ discursive practices, such as the construction of positive and negative identities of the relevant social actors, the binary opposition between ‘us and them’, the development of new interpretations of urban regeneration, and finally, the gradual elaboration of a model of empowered citizenship. Drawing on the concept of democratic urban regeneration policymaking, the research suggests that in the case of Warsaw, one can speak of a shift from a citizen discourse of rebellious participation in non-deliberative governance towards one of more consensual and empowering participation in more deliberative governance.

Keywords

Atkinson, R., Tallon A., and Williams D. (2019). ‘Governing urban regeneration in the UK: a case of “variegated neoliberalism” in action?’. European Planning Studies. Vol. 27, No. 6, 1083–1106. Search in Google Scholar

Berry, M. (2014). ‘Neoliberalism and the city: Or the failure of market fundamentalism’. Housing Theory and Society. Vol. 31, No. 1, 1–18. Search in Google Scholar

Cohen J. (1997). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In J. Bohman, W. Rehg (eds.). Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press, 67–91. Search in Google Scholar

Daniel K. (2020). ‘Partycypacja obywatelska na poziomie lokalnym — przykład miasta Opola’. Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne. Vol. 28, 133–145. Search in Google Scholar

Edelman M. (1988). Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Edelman M. (2001). The Politics of Misinformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612640 Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough N. (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London Routledge.10.4324/9780203697078 Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough N. (2013). ‘Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies’. Critical Policy Studies. Vol. 7, No. 2, 177–197. Search in Google Scholar

Farrelly M., Sullivan H. (2010). ‘Discourses of democracy in neighborhood governance’. Critical Policy Studies. Vol. 4. No. 3, 234–249. Search in Google Scholar

Fischer F. (2012). Participatory governance: From Theory to Practice. In. D. Levi-Faur (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 457–71.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0032 Search in Google Scholar

Galvin M., Mooney Simmie G. (2017). ‘Theorising participation in urban regeneration partnerships: an adult education perspective’. Journal of Education Policy. Vol. 32, No. 6, 809–831. Search in Google Scholar

Hilmer J. (2010). ‘The State of Participatory Democratic Theory’. New Political Science. Vol. 32, No. 1, 43–63.10.1080/07393140903492118 Search in Google Scholar

Jaśkowiec D. (2017). ‘Partycypacja obywatelska jako utopijna wizja samorządzenia społeczności lokalnych… — na przykładzie miasta Krakowa’. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica. Vol. 18, No. 247, 40–49. Search in Google Scholar

Kennelly K., Watt P. (2012). ‘Seeing Olympic effects through the eyes of marginally housed youth: changing places and the gentrification of East London’. Visual Studies. Vol. 27, No. 2, 151–160.10.1080/1472586X.2012.677496 Search in Google Scholar

Office of the Capital City Of Warsaw (2008) Local Urban Regeneration Program for the years 2005–2013. (2008). Available at: https://rewitalizacja.um.warszawa.pl/lokalny-program-rewitalizacji-mst-warszawy Search in Google Scholar

Office of the Capital City Of Warsaw (2015) Integrated Urban Regeneration Program until 2022. Available at: http://rewitalizacja.um.warszawa.pl/zintegrowany-program-rewitalizacji Search in Google Scholar

Lowndes V., and Sullivan H. (2008). ‘How low can you go? Rationales and challenges for neighbourhood governance’. Public administration. Vol. 86, No. 1, 53–74.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00696.x Search in Google Scholar

Merkel W., and Gagnon J.-P. (2016). ‘Democracies and their Crises Reconsidered [Interview]’. Democratic Theory. Vol. 3, No. 1, 91–109. Search in Google Scholar

Ogrodowski J. (2017). Partycypacja społeczna i partnerstwo w rewitalizacji. Report for the Instytut Rozwoju Miast Kraków. Search in Google Scholar

Pawłowska A., Kmieciak R., Radzik-Maruszak K., Antkowiak P., Kołomycew A. (2020). Od dialogu do deliberacji. Podmioty niepubliczne jako (nie)obecny uczestnik lokalnego procesu decyzyjnego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. Search in Google Scholar

Pawłowska A., Radzik-Maruszak K. (2016). ‘Instytucjonalno-prawne warunki partycypacji i dialogu obywatelskiego na poziomie lokalnym (na przykładzie wybranych miast)’. Acta Politica. Vol. 3, No. 37, 19–38. Search in Google Scholar

Pawłowska A., Radzik-Maruszak K. (2021). ‘Social councils — responsible actors in collaborative local governance or silent information-providers? Empirical evidence from selected Polish cities’. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne. Vol. 1, No. 83. Search in Google Scholar

Pierre J., Peters B., G. (2012). Urban governance. In. K. Mossberger, S. E. Clarke, P. John (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71–86. Search in Google Scholar

Radzik-Maruszak K., Haveri A., Pawłowska A. (2020). ‘Pro-Civic Representation? Citizens’ Participation in the Opinion of Finnish and Polish Local Councilors’. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science. No. 60E/June, 85–103.10.24193/tras.60E.6 Search in Google Scholar

Radziszewski M. (2016). ‘Budżet obywatelski instrumentem rozwoju kapitału społecznego’. Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne. Vol. 51, 131–154.10.15804/athena.2016.51.08 Search in Google Scholar

Richardson J. E. (2007). Analysing Newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8 Search in Google Scholar

Rowe G., Frewer L., J. (2004). ‘Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda’. Science, Technology, & Human Values. Vol. 29, No. 4, 512–556. Search in Google Scholar

Van Til J., Van Til S. B. (1970). ‘Citizen Participation in Social Policy: The End of the Cycle?’. Social Problems. Vol. 17, No. 3, 313–323.10.2307/799552 Search in Google Scholar

Vandenbussche L. (2018). ‘Mapping Stakeholders’ Relating Pathways in Collaborative Planning Processes; A Longitudinal Case Study of an Urban Regeneration Partnership’. Planning Theory & Practice. Vol. 19, No. 4, 534–557. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo