A systematic review of deep learning techniques for generating synthetic CT images from MRI data

1 Yousef R, Khan S, Gupta G, et al. U-Net-Based Models towards Optimal MR Brain Image Segmentation. Diagnostics. 2023;13(9):1624. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091624 Search in Google Scholar

2 Sharma DK, Chatterjee M, Kaur G, Vavilala S. Deep learning applications for disease diagnosis. Deep Learning for Medical Applications with Unique Data. Published online 2022:31-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824145-5.00005-8 Search in Google Scholar

3 Rana M, Bhushan M. Machine learning and deep learning approach for medical image analysis: diagnosis to detection. Multimed Tools Appl. 2022;82(17):26731-26769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-14305-w Search in Google Scholar

4 Wyawahare MV, Patil PM, Abhyankar HK. Image registration techniques: an overview. International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. 2009;2(3):11-28. Search in Google Scholar

5 Brady SL, Trout AT, Somasundaram E, Anton CG, Li Y, Dillman JR. Improving Image Quality and Reducing Radiation Dose for Pediatric CT by Using Deep Learning Reconstruction. Radiology. 2021;298(1):180-188. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020202317 Search in Google Scholar

6 Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang G, et al. Deep Learning With Radiomics for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment: Challenges and Potential. Front Oncol. 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.773840 Search in Google Scholar

7 Kasula BY. Harnessing Machine Learning for Personalized Patient Care. Transactions on Latest Trends in Artificial Intelligence. 2023;4(4). Search in Google Scholar

8 Dias R, Torkamani A. Artificial intelligence in clinical and genomic diagnostics. Genome Med. 2019;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0689-8 Search in Google Scholar

9 Bullmore E. The future of functional MRI in clinical medicine. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):1267-1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.026 Search in Google Scholar

10 Razzak MI, Naz S, Zaib A. Deep Learning for Medical Image Processing: Overview, Challenges and the Future. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics. Published online November 14, 2017:323-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65981-7_12 Search in Google Scholar

11 Johnstone E, Wyatt JJ, Henry AM, et al. Systematic Review of Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation Methodologies for Use in Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Only Radiation Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2018;100(1):199-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.08.043 Search in Google Scholar

12 Acquah IK, Inkoom S, Hasford F. COMPARISON OF METHODS OF µ-MAP GENERATION: MR-BASED METHOD IN PET/MR IMAGING VERSUS PSEUDO-CT METHOD IN RADIOTHERAPY DOSE PLANNING. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2024. Search in Google Scholar

13 Edmund JM, Nyholm T. A review of substitute CT generation for MRI-only radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0747-y Search in Google Scholar

14 Vera-Olmos J, Torrado-Carvajal A, Prieto-de-la-Lastra C, et al. How to Pseudo-CT: A Comparative Review of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for CT Synthesis. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(22):11600. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211600 Search in Google Scholar

15 Largent A, Barateau A, Nunes JC, et al. Comparison of Deep Learning-Based and Patch-Based Methods for Pseudo-CT Generation in MRI-Based Prostate Dose Planning. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2019;105(5):1137-1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.049 Search in Google Scholar

16 Bahrami A, Karimian A, Arabi H. Comparison of different deep learning architectures for synthetic CT generation from MR images. Physica Medica. 2021;90:99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.09.006 Search in Google Scholar

17 Boulanger M, Nunes JC, Chourak H, et al. Deep learning methods to generate synthetic CT from MRI in radiotherapy: A literature review. Physica Medica. 2021;89:265-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.027 Search in Google Scholar

18 Mahmood T, Rehman A, Saba T, Nadeem L, Bahaj SAO. Recent Advancements and Future Prospects in Active Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation and Classification. IEEE Access. 2023;11:113623-113652. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3313977 Search in Google Scholar

19 Boldrini L, Bibault JE, Masciocchi C, Shen Y, Bittner MI. Deep Learning: A Review for the Radiation Oncologist. Front Oncol. 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00977 Search in Google Scholar

20 Cao Z, Gao X, Chang Y, Liu G, Pei Y. Improving synthetic CT accuracy by combining the benefits of multiple normalized preprocesses. J Applied Clin Med Phys. 2023;24(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14004 Search in Google Scholar

21 Harrison R, Jones B, Gardner P, Lawton R. Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06122-y Search in Google Scholar

22 Savin GD, Fleșeriu C, Batrancea L. Eye tracking and tourism research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Vacation Marketing. 2021;28(3):285-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667211053387 Search in Google Scholar

23 Nightingale A. A guide to systematic literature reviews. Surgery (Oxford). 2009;27(9):381-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2009.07.005 Search in Google Scholar

24 Moher D, Shamseer L, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 Search in Google Scholar

25 Anudjo MNK, Vitale C, Elshami W, et al. Considerations for environmental sustainability in clinical radiology and radiotherapy practice: A systematic literature review and recommendations for a greener practice. Radiography. 2023;29(6):1077-1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.09.006 Search in Google Scholar

26 Sirriyeh R, Lawton R, Gardner P, Armitage G. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. Evaluation Clinical Practice. 2011;18(4):746-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01662.x Search in Google Scholar

27 Han X. MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method. Med Phys. 2017;44(4):1408-1419. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12155 Search in Google Scholar

28 Gupta D, Kim M, Vineberg KA, Balter JM. Generation of Synthetic CT Images From MRI for Treatment Planning and Patient Positioning Using a 3-Channel U-Net Trained on Sagittal Images. Front Oncol. 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00964 Search in Google Scholar

29 Neppl S, Landry G, Kurz C, et al. Evaluation of proton and photon dose distributions recalculated on 2D and 3D Unet-generated pseudoCTs from T1-weighted MR head scans. Acta Oncologica. 2019;58(10):1429-1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1630754 Search in Google Scholar

30 Nie D, Trullo R, Lian J, et al. Medical Image Synthesis with Context-Aware Generative Adversarial Networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Published online 2017:417-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_48 Search in Google Scholar

31 Emami H, Dong M, Nejad-Davarani SP, Glide-Hurst CK. Generating synthetic CTs from magnetic resonance images using generative adversarial networks. Medical Physics. 2018;45(8):3627-3636. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13047 Search in Google Scholar

32 Kazemifar S, McGuire S, Timmerman R, et al. MRI-only brain radiotherapy: Assessing the dosimetric accuracy of synthetic CT images generated using a deep learning approach. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2019;136:56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.026 Search in Google Scholar

33 Wolterink JM, Dinkla AM, Savenije MHF, Seevinck PR, van den Berg CAT, Išgum I. Deep MR to CT Synthesis Using Unpaired Data. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Published online 2017:14-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68127-6_2 Search in Google Scholar

34 Yang H, Sun J, Carass A, et al. Unpaired Brain MR-to-CT Synthesis Using a Structure-Constrained CycleGAN. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Published online 2018:174-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_20 Search in Google Scholar

35 Koike Y, Akino Y, Sumida I, et al. Feasibility of synthetic computed tomography generated with an adversarial network for multi-sequence magnetic resonance-based brain radiotherapy. Journal of Radiation Research. 2019;61(1):92-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz063 Search in Google Scholar

36 Dinkla AM, Florkow MC, Maspero M, et al. Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT for head and neck radiotherapy generated by a patch-based three-dimensional convolutional neural network. Medical Physics. 2019;46(9):4095-4104. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13663 Search in Google Scholar

37 Xiang L, Wang Q, Nie D, et al. Deep embedding convolutional neural network for synthesizing CT image from T1-Weighted MR image. Medical Image Analysis. 2018;47:31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.03.011 Search in Google Scholar

38 Spadea MF, Pileggi G, Zaffino P, et al. Deep Convolution Neural Network (DCNN) Multiplane Approach to Synthetic CT Generation From MR images—Application in Brain Proton Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2019;105(3):495-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2535 Search in Google Scholar

39 Alvarez Andres E, Fidon L, Vakalopoulou M, et al. Dosimetry-Driven Quality Measure of Brain Pseudo Computed Tomography Generated From Deep Learning for MRI-Only Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2020;108(3):813-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.006 Search in Google Scholar

40 Li Y, Li W, Xiong J, Xia J, Xie Y. Comparison of Supervised and Unsupervised Deep Learning Methods for Medical Image Synthesis between Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Images. Zhou Z, ed. BioMed Research International. 2020;2020(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5193707 Search in Google Scholar

41 Massa HA, Johnson JM, McMillan AB. Comparison of deep learning synthesis of synthetic CTs using clinical MRI inputs. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(23):23NT03. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abc5cb Search in Google Scholar

42 Autret D, Guillerminet C, Roussel A, Cossec-Kerloc’h E, Dufreneix S. Comparison of four synthetic CT generators for brain and prostate MR-only workflow in radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2023;18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02336-y Search in Google Scholar

43 Xue X, Ding Y, Shi J, et al. Cone Beam CT (CBCT) Based Synthetic CT Generation Using Deep Learning Methods for Dose Calculation of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021;20. https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338211062415 Search in Google Scholar

44 Zimmermann L, Knäusl B, Stock M, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Georg D, Kuess P. An MRI sequence independent convolutional neural network for synthetic head CT generation in proton therapy. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik. 2022;32(2):218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.10.003 Search in Google Scholar

45 Wang Y, Liu C, Zhang X, Deng W. Synthetic CT Generation Based on T2 Weighted MRI of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN). Front Oncol. 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01333 Search in Google Scholar

46 Qi M, Li Y, Wu A, et al. Multi-sequence MR image-based synthetic CT generation using a generative adversarial network for head and neck MRI-only radiotherapy. Medical Physics. 2020;47(4):1880-1894. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14075 Search in Google Scholar

47 Aouadi S, Yoganathan S, Torfeh T, et al. Generation of synthetic CT from CBCT using deep learning approaches for head and neck cancer patients. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2023;9(5):055020. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/acea27 Search in Google Scholar

48 Chen L, Liang X, Shen C, Jiang S, Wang J. Synthetic CT generation from CBCT images via deep learning. Medical Physics. 2020;47(3):1115-1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13978 Search in Google Scholar

49 Chen L, Liang X, Shen C, Nguyen D, Jiang S, Wang J. Synthetic CT generation from CBCT images via unsupervised deep learning. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66(11):115019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac01b6 Search in Google Scholar

50 de Koster RJC, Thummerer A, Scandurra D, Langendijk JA, Both S. Technical note: Evaluation of deep learning based synthetic CTs clinical readiness for dose and NTCP driven head and neck adaptive proton therapy. Medical Physics. 2023;50(12):8023-8033. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16782 Search in Google Scholar

51 Jeon W, An HJ, Kim J in, et al. Preliminary Application of Synthetic Computed Tomography Image Generation from Magnetic Resonance Image Using Deep-Learning in Breast Cancer Patients. J Radiat Prot Res. 2019;44(4):149-155. https://doi.org/10.14407/jrpr.2019.44.4.149 Search in Google Scholar

52 Olberg S, Zhang H, Kennedy WR, et al. Synthetic CT reconstruction using a deep spatial pyramid convolutional framework for MR-only breast radiotherapy. Medical Physics. 2019;46(9):4135-4147. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13716 Search in Google Scholar

53 Florkow MC, Zijlstra F, Willemsen K, et al. Deep learning–based MR-to-CT synthesis: The influence of varying gradient echo–based MR images as input channels. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2019;83(4):1429-1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28008 Search in Google Scholar

54 Liu L, Johansson A, Cao Y, Dow J, Lawrence TS, Balter JM. Abdominal synthetic CT generation from MR Dixon images using a U-net trained with ‘semi-synthetic’ CT data. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(12):125001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab8cd2 Search in Google Scholar

55 Qian P, Xu K, Wang T, et al. Estimating CT from MR Abdominal Images Using Novel Generative Adversarial Networks. J Grid Computing. 2020;18(2):211-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-020-09513-3 Search in Google Scholar

56 Parrella G, Vai A, Nakas A, et al. Synthetic CT in Carbon Ion Radiotherapy of the Abdominal Site. Bioengineering. 2023;10(2):250. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020250 Search in Google Scholar

57 Szmul A, Taylor S, Lim P, et al. Deep learning based synthetic CT from cone beam CT generation for abdominal paediatric radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68(10):105006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acc921 Search in Google Scholar

58 Arabi H, Dowling JA, Burgos N, et al. Comparative study of algorithms for synthetic CT generation from MRI: Consequences for MRI-guided radiation planning in the pelvic region. Medical Physics. 2018;45(11):5218-5233. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13187 Search in Google Scholar

59 Chen S, Qin A, Zhou D, Yan D. Technical Note: U-net-generated synthetic CT images for magnetic resonance imaging-only prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning. Medical Physics. 2018;45(12):5659-5665. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13247 Search in Google Scholar

60 Florkow MC, Zijlstra F, Kerkmeijer LGW, et al. The impact of MRI-CT registration errors on deep learning-based synthetic CT generation. Angelini ED, Landman BA, eds. Medical Imaging 2019: Image Processing. Published online March 15, 2019:116 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2512747 Search in Google Scholar

61 Stadelmann JV, Schulz H, van der Heide UA, Renisch S. Pseudo-CT image generation from mDixon MRI images using fully convolutional neural networks. Gimi B, Krol A, eds. Medical Imaging 2019: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging. Published online March 15, 2019:33. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2512741 Search in Google Scholar

62 Bahrami A, Karimian A, Fatemizadeh E, Arabi H, Zaidi H. A new deep convolutional neural network design with efficient learning capability: Application to CT image synthesis from MRI. Medical Physics. 2020;47(10):5158-5171. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14418 Search in Google Scholar

63 Fetty L, Löfstedt T, Heilemann G, et al. Investigating conditional GAN performance with different generator architectures, an ensemble model, and different MR scanners for MR-sCT conversion. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(10):105004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab857b Search in Google Scholar

64 Lena B, Florkow MC, Ferrer CJ, et al. Synthetic CT for the planning of MR-HIFU treatment of bone metastases in pelvic and femoral bones: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(7):4537-4546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08568-y Search in Google Scholar

65 Wyatt JJ, Kaushik S, Cozzini C, et al. Comprehensive dose evaluation of a Deep Learning based synthetic Computed Tomography algorithm for pelvic Magnetic Resonance-only radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2023;184:109692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109692 Search in Google Scholar

66 Bambach S, Ho ML. Deep Learning for Synthetic CT from Bone MRI in the Head and Neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;43(8):1172-1179. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7588 Search in Google Scholar

67 Lei Y, Harms J, Wang T, et al. MRI-only based synthetic CT generation using dense cycle consistent generative adversarial networks. Medical Physics. 2019;46(8):3565-3581. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13617 Search in Google Scholar

68 Shafai-Erfani G, Lei Y, Liu Y, et al. MRI-Based Proton Treatment Planning for Base of Skull Tumors. International Journal of Particle Therapy. 2019;6(2):12-25. https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-19-00062.1 Search in Google Scholar

69 Kazemifar S, Barragán Montero AM, Souris K, et al. Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT generated with GANs for MRI-only proton therapy treatment planning of brain tumors. J Applied Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(5):76-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12856 Search in Google Scholar

70 Maspero M, Bentvelzen LG, Savenije MHF, et al. Deep learning-based synthetic CT generation for paediatric brain MR-only photon and proton radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2020;153:197-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.029 Search in Google Scholar

71 Tang B, Wu F, Fu Y, et al. Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT image generated using a neural network for MR-only brain radiotherapy. J Applied Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(3):55-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13176 Search in Google Scholar

72 Wang CC, Wu PH, Lin G, et al. Magnetic Resonance-Based Synthetic Computed Tomography Using Generative Adversarial Networks for Intracranial Tumor Radiotherapy Treatment Planning. JPM. 2022;12(3):361. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030361 Search in Google Scholar

73 Klages P, Benslimane I, Riyahi S, et al. Comparison of Patch-Based Conditional Generative Adversarial Neural Net Models with Emphasis on Model Robustness for Use in Head and Neck Cases for MR-Only planning. Published online 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.00536 Search in Google Scholar

74 Peng Y, Chen S, Qin A, et al. Magnetic resonance-based synthetic computed tomography images generated using generative adversarial networks for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2020;150:217-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.049 Search in Google Scholar

75 Tie X, Lam S, Zhang Y, Lee K, Au K, Cai J. Pseudo-CT generation from multi-parametric MRI using a novel multi-channel multi-path conditional generative adversarial network for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Medical Physics. 2020;47(4):1750-1762. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14062 Search in Google Scholar

76 Xu K, Cao J, Xia K, et al. Multichannel Residual Conditional GAN-Leveraged Abdominal Pseudo-CT Generation via Dixon MR Images. IEEE Access. 2019;7:163823-163830. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951924 Search in Google Scholar

77 Cusumano D, Lenkowicz J, Votta C, et al. A deep learning approach to generate synthetic CT in low field MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy for abdominal and pelvic cases. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2020;153:205-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.018 Search in Google Scholar

78 Fu J, Singhrao K, Cao M, et al. Generation of abdominal synthetic CTs from 0.35T MR images using generative adversarial networks for MR-only liver radiotherapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2020;6(1):015033. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ab6e1f Search in Google Scholar

79 Maspero M, Savenije MHF, Dinkla AM, et al. Dose evaluation of fast synthetic-CT generation using a generative adversarial network for general pelvis MR-only radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(18):185001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aada6d Search in Google Scholar

80 Bird D, Nix MG, McCallum H, et al. Multicentre, deep learning, synthetic-CT generation for ano-rectal MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2021;156:23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.027 Search in Google Scholar

81 Brou Boni KND, Klein J, Vanquin L, et al. MR to CT synthesis with multicenter data in the pelvic area using a conditional generative adversarial network. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(7):075002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab7633 Search in Google Scholar

82 Cao G, Li Y, Wu S, et al. Clinical feasibility of MRI-based synthetic CT imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study. Acta Radiol. 2023;65(1):41-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851231169173 Search in Google Scholar

83 Irmak S, Zimmermann L, Georg D, Kuess P, Lechner W. Cone beam CT based validation of neural network generated synthetic CTs for radiotherapy in the head region. Medical Physics. 2021;48(8):4560-4571. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14987 Search in Google Scholar

84 Li W, Kazemifar S, Bai T, et al. Synthesizing CT images from MR images with deep learning: model generalization for different datasets through transfer learning. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2021;7(2):025020. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/abe3a7 Search in Google Scholar

85 Wang T, Lei Y, Fu Y, et al. A review on medical imaging synthesis using deep learning and its clinical applications. J Applied Clin Med Phys. 2020;22(1):11-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13121 Search in Google Scholar

86 McKenzie EM, Santhanam A, Ruan D, O’Connor D, Cao M, Sheng K. Multimodality image registration in the head-and-neck using a deep learning-derived synthetic CT as a bridge. Medical Physics. 2020;47(3):1094-1104. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13976 Search in Google Scholar

87 Liu Y, Lei Y, Wang Y, et al. MRI-based treatment planning for proton radiotherapy: dosimetric validation of a deep learning-based liver synthetic CT generation method. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64(14):145015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab25bc Search in Google Scholar

88 Dal Bello R, Lapaeva M, La Greca Saint-Esteven A, et al. Patient-specific quality assurance strategies for synthetic computed tomography in magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy of the abdomen. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology. 2023;27:100464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100464 Search in Google Scholar

89 Liu Y, Lei Y, Wang T, et al. MRI-based treatment planning for liver stereotactic body radiotherapy: validation of a deep learning-based synthetic CT generation method. The British Journal of Radiology. 2019;92(1100). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190067 Search in Google Scholar

90 Prunaretty J, Güngör G, Gevaert T, et al. A multi-centric evaluation of self-learning GAN based pseudo-CT generation software for low field pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Front Oncol. 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1245054 Search in Google Scholar

91 Tian L, Lühr A. Proton range uncertainty caused by synthetic computed tomography generated with deep learning from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Oncologica. 2023;62(11):1461-1469. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2256967 Search in Google Scholar

92 Hemsley M, Chugh B, Ruschin M, et al. Deep Generative Model for Synthetic-CT Generation with Uncertainty Predictions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Published online 2020:834-844. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_81 Search in Google Scholar

93 Bourbonne V, Jaouen V, Hognon C, et al. Dosimetric Validation of a GAN-Based Pseudo-CT Generation for MRI-Only Stereotactic Brain Radiotherapy. Cancers. 2021;13(5):1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13051082 Search in Google Scholar

94 Liu F, Yadav P, Baschnagel AM, McMillan AB. MR-based treatment planning in radiation therapy using a deep learning approach. J Applied Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(3):105-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12554 Search in Google Scholar

95 Lerner M, Medin J, Jamtheim Gustafsson C, Alkner S, Siversson C, Olsson LE. Clinical validation of a commercially available deep learning software for synthetic CT generation for brain. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01794-6 Search in Google Scholar

96 Yang X, Feng B, Yang H, et al. CNN-based multi-modal radiomics analysis of pseudo-CT utilization in MRI-only brain stereotactic radiotherapy: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer. 2024;24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-11844-3 Search in Google Scholar

97 Thummerer A, de Jong BA, Zaffino P, et al. Comparison of the suitability of CBCT- and MR-based synthetic CTs for daily adaptive proton therapy in head and neck patients. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(23):235036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abb1d6 Search in Google Scholar

98 Palmér E, Karlsson A, Nordström F, et al. Synthetic computed tomography data allows for accurate absorbed dose calculations in a magnetic resonance imaging only workflow for head and neck radiotherapy. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology. 2021;17:36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.12.007 Search in Google Scholar

99 Fu J, Yang Y, Singhrao K, et al. Deep learning approaches using 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks for generating male pelvic synthetic computed tomography from magnetic resonance imaging. Medical Physics. 2019;46(9):3788-3798. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13672 Search in Google Scholar

100 Liu Y, Lei Y, Wang T, et al. CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using deep-attention cycleGAN for pancreatic adaptive radiotherapy. Medical Physics. 2020;47(6):2472-2483. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14121 Search in Google Scholar

101 Liu X, Emami H, Nejad-Davarani SP, et al. Performance of deep learning synthetic CTs for MR-only brain radiation therapy. J Applied Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(1):308-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13139 Search in Google Scholar

102 Largent A, Marage L, Gicquiau I, et al. Head-and-Neck MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning: From acquisition in treatment position to pseudo-CT generation. Cancer/Radiothérapie. 2020;24(4):288-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2020.01.008 Search in Google Scholar

103 Liu J, Yan H, Cheng H, et al. CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using generative adversarial networks with disentangled representation. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021;11(12):4820-4834. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-1056 Search in Google Scholar

104 Nie D, Cao X, Gao Y, Wang L, Shen D. Estimating CT Image from MRI Data Using 3D Fully Convolutional Networks. In: Carneiro, G., et al. Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications. DLMIA LABELS 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8_18 Search in Google Scholar

105 Xiang L, Wang Q, Nie D, et al. Deep embedding convolutional neural network for synthesizing CT image from T1-Weighted MR image. Medical Image Analysis. 2018;47:31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.03.011 Search in Google Scholar

106 Pan S, Abouei E, Wynne J, et al. Synthetic CT generation from MRI using 3D transformer-based denoising diffusion model. Medical Physics. 2023;51(4):2538-2548. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16847 Search in Google Scholar

107 Thummerer A, van der Bijl E, Galapon A Jr, et al. SynthRAD2023 Grand Challenge dataset: Generating synthetic CT for radiotherapy. Medical Physics. 2023;50(7):4664-4674. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16529 Search in Google Scholar

108 Wang J, Zhu H, Wang SH, Zhang YD. A Review of Deep Learning on Medical Image Analysis. Mobile Netw Appl. 2020;26(1):351-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01672-7 Search in Google Scholar

109 Dinkla AM, Wolterink JM, Maspero M, et al. MR-Only Brain Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Evaluation of Synthetic CTs Generated by a Dilated Convolutional Neural Network. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2018;102(4):801-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.058 Search in Google Scholar

110 Li W, Li Y, Qin W, et al. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) synthesis from brain computed tomography (CT) images based on deep learning methods for magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020;10(6):1223-1236. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-19-885 Search in Google Scholar

111 Wang C, Uh J, Merchant TE, Hua C ho, Acharya S. Facilitating MR-Guided Adaptive Proton Therapy in Children Using Deep Learning-Based Synthetic CT. International Journal of Particle Therapy. 2022;8(3):11-20. https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-20-00099.1 Search in Google Scholar

112 Liu Y, Lei Y, Wang Y, et al. Evaluation of a deep learning-based pelvic synthetic CT generation technique for MRI-based prostate proton treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64(20):205022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab41af Search in Google Scholar

113 Bäumer C, Frakulli R, Kohl J, et al. Adaptive Proton Therapy of Pediatric Head and Neck Cases Using MRI-Based Synthetic CTs: Initial Experience of the Prospective KiAPT Study. Cancers. 2022;14(11):2616. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112616 Search in Google Scholar

114 Florkow MC, Guerreiro F, Zijlstra F, et al. Deep learning-enabled MRI-only photon and proton therapy treatment planning for paediatric abdominal tumours. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2020;153:220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.056 Search in Google Scholar