[
1. Ginat DT, Gupta R. Advances in computed tomography imaging technology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;16:431-53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-121813-11360110.1146/annurev-bioeng-121813-11360125014788
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Tabari A, Lo Gullo R, Murugan V, Otrakji A, Digumarthy S, Kalra M. Recent advances in computed tomographic technology. J Thorac Imaging. 2017;32(2):89-100. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.000000000000025810.1097/RTI.000000000000025828221262
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Romans LE. Computed tomography for technologists: A comprehensive text, second edition. Computed Tomography for Technologists: A Comprehensive Text. 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I, Dougherty G, McLean D. Volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) for tube current modulation (TCM) in CT scanning. Int J Radiat Res. 2018;16(3):289-97.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Khan A, Khosa F, Nasir K, Yassin A, Clouse ME. Comparison of radiation dose and image quality: 320-MDCT versus 64-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(1):163-8. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.525010.2214/AJR.10.5250329428521701026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. NHS England. Diagnostic imaging dataset annual statistical. NHS Engl Internet.. 2020;1–29. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/10/Annual-Statistical-Release-2019-20-PDF-1.4MB.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Juliusson G, Thorvaldsdottir B, Kristjansson JM, Hannesson P. Diagnostic imaging trends in the emergency department: an extensive single-center experience. Acta Radiol Open. 2019;8(7):205846011986040. https://doi.org/10.1177/205846011986040410.1177/2058460119860404666984631392034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Pola A, Corbella D, Righini A, et al. Computed tomography use in a large italian region: Trend analysis 2004-2014 of emergency and outpatient ct examinations in children and adults. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(6):2308-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5225-x10.1007/s00330-017-5225-x29318431
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Smith-Bindman R, Wang Y, Chu P, et al. International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: Prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2019;364:k4931. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k493110.1136/bmj.k4931631408330602590
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, Bruesewitz MR, McCollough CH. CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics. 2008;28(1):245-53. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.28107502410.1148/rg.28107502418203941
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Huda W, Mettler FA. Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: What good are they? Radiology. 2011;258(1):236-42. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.1010029710.1148/radiol.1010029720971777
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Anam C, Budi WS, Adi K, et al. Assessment of patient dose and noise level of clinical CT images: automated measurements. J Radiol Prot. 2019;39(3):783-93. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ab23cc10.1088/1361-6498/ab23cc31117064
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gray MF. CT dose index and patient dose : They are not the same thing. Radiology. 2011;259(2):311-6. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.1110180010.1148/radiol.11101800307912021502387
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. The Report of AAPM Task Group 204. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in paediatric and adult body CT examinations. 2011. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. The Report of AAPM Task Group 220. Use of water equivalent diameter for calculating patient size and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in CT. 2014. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_220.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I, Dougherty G. Automated calculation of water-equivalent diameter (DW) based on AAPM task group 220. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(4):320-33. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.617110.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6171569005927455491
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I, Dougherty G. The evaluation of the effective diameter (Deff) calculation and its impact on the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Atom Indonesia. 2017;43(1):55-60. https://doi.org/10.17146/aij.2017.61710.17146/aij.2017.617
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Gabusi M, Riccardi L, Aliberti C, Vio S, Paiusco M. Radiation dose in chest CT: Assessment of size-specific dose estimates based on water-equivalent correction. Phys Med. 2016;32(2):393-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.12.00810.1016/j.ejmp.2015.12.00826781588
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Burton CS, Szczykutowicz TP. Evaluation of AAPM reports 204 and 220: Estimation of effective diameter, water-equivalent diameter, and ellipticity ratios for chest, abdomen, pelvis, and head CT scans. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(1):228-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.1222310.1002/acm2.12223576801429178549
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Anam C, Haryanto F, Widita R, Arif I. Automated estimation of patient’s size from 3D image of patient for size specific dose estimates (SSDE). Adv Sci Eng Med. 2015;7(10):892-6. https://doi.org/10.1166/asem.2015.178010.1166/asem.2015.1780
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Brady SL, Kaufman RA. Investigation of American Association of Physicists in medicine report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. Radiology. 2012;265(3):832-40. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.1212013110.1148/radiol.1212013123093679
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Pourjabbar S, Singh S, Padole A, Saini A, Blake MA, Kalra M. Size-specific dose estimates: localizer or transverse abdominal computed tomography images? World J Radiol. 2014;6(5):210-7. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.21010.4329/wjr.v6.i5.210403754724876925
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Tsalafoutas IA, Kharita MH, Al-Naemi H, Kalra MK. Radiation dose monitoring in computed tomography: Status, options and limitations. Phys Med. 2020;79:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.02010.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.02032980754
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Juszczyk J, Badura P, Czajkowska J, et al. Automated size-specific dose estimates using deep learning image processing. Med Image Anal. 2021;68:101898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.10189810.1016/j.media.2020.10189833248330
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Toyoda T, et al. A simple method for calibrating pixel values of the CT localizer radiograph for calculating water-equivalent diameter and size-specific dose estimate. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2018;179:158-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx24110.1093/rpd/ncx24129136233
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Mihailidis D, Tsapaki V, Tomara P. A simple manual method to estimate water-equivalent diameter for calculating size-specific dose estimate in chest computed tomography. Br J Radiol. 2020;93:20200473. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.2020047310.1259/bjr.20200473777470533058736
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D, Buckley KS, Taylor GA. Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6):1611-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.377110.2214/AJR.09.377120489103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Boone JM, Cooper VN, Nemzek WR, McGahan JP, Seibert JA. Monte Carlo assessment of computed tomography dose to tissue adjacent to the scanned volume. Med Phys. 2000;27(10):2393-407. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.131280910.1118/1.131280911099210
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. ICRU. Patient dosimetry for X rays used in medical imaging. J ICRU. 2005;5(2):iv-vi. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru_ndi01810.1093/jicru_ndi018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Kim S, Lee GH, Lee S, Park SH, Pyo HB, Cho JS. Body fat measurement in computed tomography image. Biomed Sci Instrum. 1999;35:303-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Anam C, Arif I, Haryanto F, et al. A simplified method for the water-equivalent diameter calculation to estimate patient dose in CT examinations. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2019;185(1):42-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncy21410.1093/rpd/ncy21430508150
]Search in Google Scholar