Open Access

Evaluation of various common prostate IMRT techniques based on estimated tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities in correlation with patients anatomical parameters derived from the CT scans


Cite

[1] Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol. 2012;61(6):1079-1092.10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.05422424666Search in Google Scholar

[2] Khan FM, Gerbi BJ. Treatment planning in radiation oncology. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Pan HY, Jiang J, Hoffman KE, et al. Comparative toxicities and cost of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, proton radiation, and stereotactic body radiotherapy among younger men with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(18):1823-1830.10.1200/JCO.2017.75.5371600810529561693Search in Google Scholar

[4] Mavroidis P, Komisopoulos G, Buckey C, et al. Radiobiological evaluation of prostate cancer IMRT and conformal-RT plans using different treatment protocols. Phys Med. 2017;40:33-41.10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.07.00328712717Search in Google Scholar

[5] Luxton G, Hancock SL, Boyer AL. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(1):267-284.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.02415093924Search in Google Scholar

[6] Deb P, Fielding AL. Radiobiological model comparison of 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT plans for the treatment of prostate cancer. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2009;32(2):51-61.10.1007/BF0317862919623855Search in Google Scholar

[7] Mesbahi A, Rasouli N, Mohammadzadeh M, et al. Comparison of Radiobiological Models for Radiation Therapy Plans of Prostate Cancer: Three-dimensional Conformal versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2018;8(3):1-12.10.31661/jbpe.v9i3Jun.655Search in Google Scholar

[8] Khan MI, Jiang R, Kiciak A, et al. Dosimetric and radiobiological characterizations of prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A single-institution review of ninety cases. J Med Phys. 2016;41(3):162-168.10.4103/0971-6203.189479501903427651562Search in Google Scholar

[9] Chow J, Jiang R, Kiciak A. Dose-volume consistency and radiobiological characterization between prostate IMRT and VMAT plans. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2016;4(4).Search in Google Scholar

[10] Chow JC, Jiang R, Kiciak A, Markel D. Dosimetric comparison between the prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using the planning target volume (PTV) dose–volume factor. J Radiother Pract. 2016;15(3):263-268.10.1017/S1460396916000194Search in Google Scholar

[11] Schreibmann E, Xing L. Feasibility study of beam orientation class-solutions for prostate IMRT. Med Phys. 2004;31(10):2863-2870.10.1118/1.179757115543796Search in Google Scholar

[12] Schreibmann E, Lahanas M, Xing L, et al. Multiobjective evolutionary optimization of the number of beams, their orientations and weights for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(5):747-770.10.1088/0031-9155/49/5/00715070200Search in Google Scholar

[13] Yang R, Dai J, Yang Y, et al. Beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using mixed integer programming. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(15):3653-3666.10.1088/0031-9155/51/15/00416861772Search in Google Scholar

[14] Yuan L, Ge Y, Lee WR, et al. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. Med Phys. 2012;39(11):6868-6878.10.1118/1.4757927Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wu B, Ricchetti F, Sanguineti G, et al. Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control. Med Phys. 2009;36(12):5497-5505.10.1118/1.3253464Search in Google Scholar

[16] Källman P, Agren A, Brahme A. Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992;62(2):249-262.10.1080/09553009214552071Search in Google Scholar

[17] Pollack A, Walker G, Horwitz EM, et al. Randomized trial of hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3860-3868.10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1972Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sanchez-Nieto B, Nahum AE. BIOPLAN: software for the biological evaluation of radiotherapy treatment plans. Med Dosim. 2000;25(2):71-76.10.1016/S0958-3947(00)00031-5Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hodapp N. The ICRU Report 83: prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Strahlenther Onkol. 2012;188(1):97-99.10.1007/s00066-011-0015-x22234506Search in Google Scholar

[20] Lee WR, Amin MB, Bruner DW, et al. A phase III randomized study of hypofractionated 3D-CRT/IMRT versus conventionally fractionated 3D-CRT/IMRT in patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer. Clinical Trial NCT00331773.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Pollack A, Hanlon AL, Horwitz EM, et al. Dosimetry and preliminary acute toxicity in the first 100 men treated for prostate cancer on a randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(2):518-526.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.970189275416242256Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1898-0309
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Physics, Technical and Applied Physics, Medical Physics