Coherence and phase synchrony analyses of EEG signals in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): A study of functional brain connectivity

[1] Dauwels J, Vialatte F, Latchoumane C, et al. EEG synchrony analysis for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: A study with several synchrony measures and EEG datasets. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:2224-2227.10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5334862Search in Google Scholar

[2] Petrella JR, Coleman RE, Doraiswamy PM. Neuroimaging and early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: a look to the future. Radiology. 2003;226(2):315-36.10.1148/radiol.2262011600Search in Google Scholar

[3] Braak H, Braak E. Staging of Alzheimer's disease-related neurofibrillary changes. Neurobiol Aging. 1995;16(3):271-278.10.1016/0197-4580(95)00021-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Czigler B, Csikós D, Hidasi Z, et al. Quantitative EEG in early Alzheimer’s disease patients-power spectrum and complexity features. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008;68(1):75-80.10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.11.002Search in Google Scholar

[5] Adeli H, Ghosh-Dastidar S, Dadmehr N. A spatio-temporal wavelet-chaos methodology for EEG-based diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2008;444(2):190-194.10.1016/j.neulet.2008.08.008Search in Google Scholar

[6] Coben LA, Danziger WL, Storandt M. A longitudinal EEG study of mild senile dementia of Alzheimer type: changes at 1 year and at 2.5 years. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985;61(2):101-112.10.1016/0013-4694(85)91048-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Giaquinto S, Nolfe G. The EEG in the normal elderly: a contribution to the interpretation of aging and dementia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986;63(6):540-546.10.1016/0013-4694(86)90141-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Brenner RP, Ulrich RF, Spiker DG, et al. Computerized EEG spectral analysis in elderly normal demented and depressed subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986;64(6):483-492.10.1016/0013-4694(86)90184-7Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bennys K, Rondouin G, Vergnes C, Touchon J. Diagnostic value of quantitative EEG in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurophysiol Clin. 2001;31(3):153-160.10.1016/S0987-7053(01)00254-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Pijnenburg YAL, v d Made Y, van Cappellen van Walsum AM, et al. EEG synchronization likelihood in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease during a working memory task. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(6):1332-1339.10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.02915134700Search in Google Scholar

[11] Stam CJ, Montez T, Jones BF, et al. Disturbed fluctuations of resting state EEG synchronization in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(3):708-715.10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.022Search in Google Scholar

[12] Sakkalis V. Review of advanced techniques for the estimation of brain connectivity measured with EEG/MEG. Comput Biol Med. 2011;41(12):1110-1117.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.020Search in Google Scholar

[13] Uhlhaas PJ, Singer W. Neural synchrony in brain disorders: relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology. Neuron. 2006;52(1):155-168.10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.020Search in Google Scholar

[14] Blinowska KJ, Kamiński M, Brzezicka A, Kamiński J. Application of directed transfer function and network formalism for the assessment of functional connectivity in working memory task. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2013;371(1997):20110614.10.1098/rsta.2011.0614Search in Google Scholar

[15] Dauwels J, Vialatte F, Musha T, Cichocki A. A comparative study of synchrony measures for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on EEG. NeuroImage. 2010;49(1):668-693.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.056Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Locatelli T, Cursi M, Liberati D, et al. EEG coherence in Alzheimer’s disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;106(3):229-237.10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00129-6Search in Google Scholar

[17] Leuchter AF, Spar JE, Walter DO, Weiner H. Electroencephalograpic spectra and coherence in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s-type and multi-infarct dementia: a pilot study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44(11):993-998.10.1001/archpsyc.1987.018002300730123314770Search in Google Scholar

[18] Jelic V, Julin P, Shigeta M, et al. Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele decreases functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease as measured by EEG coherence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;63(1):59-65.10.1136/jnnp.63.1.5921696419221969Search in Google Scholar

[19] Adler G, Brassen S, Jajcevic A. EEG coherence in Alzheimer’s dementia. J Neural Transm. 2003;110(9):1051-1058.10.1007/s00702-003-0024-812928837Search in Google Scholar

[20] Brunovsky M, Matousek M, Edman A, et al. Objective assessment of the degree of dementia by means of EEG. Neuropsychobiology. 2003;48(1):19-26.10.1159/00007182412886036Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] Stam CJ, van der Made Y, Pijnenburg YAL, Scheltens PH. EEG synchronization in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003 Aug;108(2):90-96.10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.02067.xSearch in Google Scholar

[22] Babiloni C, Ferri R, Moretti DV, et al. Abnormal fronto-parietal coupling of brain rhythms in mild Alzheimer’s disease: a multricentric EEG study. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19(9):2583-2590.10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03333.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Babiloni C, Ferri R, Binetti G, et al. Fronto-parietal coupling of brain rhythms in mild cognitive impairment: a multicentric EEG study. Brain Res Bull. 2006;69(1):63-73.10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.10.013Search in Google Scholar

[24] Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-198.10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695-699.10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26] Nunez PL, Srinivasan R, Westdorp AF, et al. EEG coherency I: Statistics reference electrode volume conduction Laplacians cortical imaging and interpretation at multiple scales. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;103(5):499-515.10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00066-7Search in Google Scholar

[27] Nunez PL, Silberstein RB, Shi Z, et al. EEG coherency II: experimental comparisons of multiple measures. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;110(3):469-486.10.1016/S1388-2457(98)00043-1Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sankari Z, Adeli H, Adeli A. Intrahemispheric, interhemispheric, and distal EEG coherence in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122(5):897-906.10.1016/j.clinph.2010.09.008Search in Google Scholar

[29] Lachaux JP, Rodrigues E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8(4):194-208.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<194::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-COpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Glass A, Zappulla R, Nieves J, Diamond S. EEG coherence as a predictor of spike propagation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;82(1):10-16.10.1016/0013-4694(92)90176-ISearch in Google Scholar

[31] Kikuchi M, Wada Y, Koshino Y, et al. Effect of normal aging upon interhemispheric EEG coherence: analysis during rest and photic stimulation. Clin Electroencephalogr. 2000;31(4):170-174.10.1177/155005940003100404Search in Google Scholar

[32] Anghinah R, Kanda PA, Jorge MS, et al. Alpha band coherence analysis of EEG in healthy adult’s and Alzheimer’s type dementia patients. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2000;58(2A):272-275.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Jelic V, Shigeta M, Julin P, et al. Quantitative electroencephalography power and coherence in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Dementia. 1996;7(6):314-323.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Soininen H, Riekkinen PJ. EEG in diagnostics and follow-up of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1992;139:36-39.10.1111/j.1600-0404.1992.tb04452.xSearch in Google Scholar

[35] Elmstahl S, Rosen I, Gullberg B. Quantitative EEG in elderly patients with Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls. Dementia. 1994;5(2):119-124.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Hogan MJ, Swanwick GR, Kaiser J, et al. Memory-related EEG power and coherence reductions in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003;49(2):147-263.10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00118-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[37] Jeong J. EEG dynamics in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(7):1490-1505.10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.001Search in Google Scholar

[38] Besthorn C, Forstl H, Geiger-Kabish C, et al. EEG coherence in Alzheimer disease. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90(3):242-245.10.1016/0013-4694(94)90095-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[39] Güntekin B, Saatçi E, Yener G. Decrease of evoked delta, theta and alpha coherences in Alzheimer patients during a visual oddball paradigm. Brain Res. 2008;1235:109-116.10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.028Search in Google Scholar

[40] Jiang ZY. Study on EEG power and coherence in patients with mild cognitive impairment during working memory task. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2005;6(12):1213-1219.10.1631/jzus.2005.B1213Search in Google Scholar

[41] Basar E, Basar-Erogluc C, Karakas S, Schurmanna M. Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001;39(2-3):241-248.10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00145-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[42] Kaminski M, Blinowska KJ. Directed Transfer Function is not influenced by volume conduction-inexpedient pre-processing should be avoided. Front Comput Neurosci. 2014;8:61.10.3389/fncom.2014.00061405036124959136Search in Google Scholar

[43] Olejarczyk E, Marzetti L, Pizzella V, Zappasodi F. Comparison of connectivity analyses for resting state EEG data. J Neural Eng. 2017;14(3):036017.10.1088/1741-2552/aa640128378705Search in Google Scholar

[44] Kaminski M, Brzezicka A, Kaminski J, Blinowska K. Measures of coupling between neural populations based on Granger causality principle. Frontiers Comput Neurosci. 2016;10:114.10.3389/fncom.2016.00114508029227833546Search in Google Scholar

[45] Burgess AP. On the interpretation of synchronization in EEG hyperscanning studies: a cautionary note. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:881.10.3389/fnhum.2013.00881387094724399948Search in Google Scholar