[1. Holywell, G. & Breault, R. (2013). An overview of useful methods to treat, recover, or recycle spent potlining, JOM. 65, 1441–1451. DOI: 10.1007/s11837-013-0769-y.10.1007/s11837-013-0769-y]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Pawlek, R.P. (2012). Spent Potlining: An Update, in: Light Met., 2012. DOI: 10.1002/9781118359259.ch227.10.1002/9781118359259.ch227]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Chauke, L. & Garbers-Craig, A.M. (2013). Reactivity between carbon cathode materials and electrolyte based on industrial and laboratory data, Carbon N. Y. 58, 40–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.023.10.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.023]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Hop, J.G., Støre, A., Foosnæs, T. & Øye, H.A. (2004). Chemical and physical changes of cathode carbon by aluminium electrolysis, VII Int. Conf. Molten Slags Fuxes Salts. 775–782. DOI: 10.1179/037195505X63376.10.1179/037195505X63376]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Østrem, Ø. (2013). Cathode wear in Hall-Héroult cells, Thesis for the degree of PhD, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Silveira, B.I., Dantas, A.E., Blasquez, J.E. & Santos, R.K.P. (2002). Characterization of inorganic fraction of spent potliners: Evaluation of the cyanides and fluorides content, J. Hazard. Mater. 89, 177–183. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00303-X.10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00303-X]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Mikša, D., Homšak, M. & Samec, N. (2003). Spent pot-lining utilisation possibilities, Waste Manag. Res. 21, 467–473. DOI: 10.1177/0734242X0302100509.10.1177/0734242X0302100509]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Tropenauer, B., Klinar, D., Samec, N. & Golob, J. 2018. Circular economy model of cathode waste processing. DOI: 10.18690/978-961-286-211-4.8.10.18690/978-961-286-211-4.8]Search in Google Scholar
[9. O’Neil, M.J. (ed.), (2001). The Merck Index – An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. 13th Edition, Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., p. 456.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Cenčič, M., Kobal, I. & Golob, J. (1998). Thermal Hydro-lysis of Cyanides in Spent Pot Lining of Aluminium Electrolysis, Chem. Eng. Technol. 21, 523–532. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4125(199806)21:6<523::AID-CEAT523>3.0.CO;2-P.10.1002/(SICI)1521-4125(199806)21:6<523::AID-CEAT523>3.0.CO;2-P]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Ntuk, U., Tait, S. White, E.T. & Steel, K.M. (2015). The precipitation and solubility of aluminium hydroxyfluoride hydrate between 30 and 70oC. Hydrometallurgy, 155, 79—87. DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.04.010.10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.04.010]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Schönfelder, I., Gock, E. Tochtrop, E. & Schmidt Rieder, E. 2015. Recycling von Elektrolyseausbruch (SPL) aus der Primäraluminiumgewinnung, (n.d.). http://www.vivis.de/phocadownload/Download/2015_rur/2015_RuR_385-404_Gock.pdf (accessed June 15, 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Zhao, L.C. 2001. Comprehensive recovery of waste linings of aluminium electrolysers, CN patent 1,320,491 (Appl. date 28 February 2001). https://patents.google.com/patent/CN1320491A/en.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Shi, Z., Li, W. Hu, X., Ren, B., Gao, B. & Wang, Z. (2012). Recovery of carbon and cryolite from spent pot lining of aluminium reduction cells by chemical leaching, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 22, 222–227. DOI:10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61164-3.10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61164-3]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Kasireddy, V., Bernuer, J.L. & Kimmerle, F.M. (2003). Recycling of spent pot linings, US patent No.: US 6,596,252 B2, Date of Patent: Jul. 22, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Lisbona, D.F. & Steel, K.M. (2008). Recovery of fluoride values from spent pot-lining: Precipitation of an aluminium hydroxyfluoride hydrate product, Sep. Purif. Technol. 61(2), 182–192. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.10.012.10.1016/j.seppur.2007.10.012]Search in Google Scholar
[17. NIOSH – The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2016, Solubility of Cryolite, (2016). access on 10. Jun 2018 https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0559.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Staffan Sjoeberg, Chemical Specification in Aqueous Al3+-F–-OH– Systems of relevance to Natural Waters and Body Fluids: The dissolution of AlF3 and Na3AlF6 (cryolite). Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Umeå University, Sweden. Unpublished report for Toxicon AB, (2002). (Committee for Risk Assessment RAC Annex 1 Background Document to the Opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling at Community level of Trisodium hexafluoroaluminate (cryolite), natural and synthetic; 2010).]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Averill, B. & Eldredge, P. (2016). General Chemistry: Principles, Patterns, and Applications 1.0 |Flat World Education, Flat World Educ.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Reynolds, J.G. & Belsher, J.D. (2017). A Review of Sodium Fluoride Solubility in Water. J. Chem. Eng. 62(6), 1743–1748. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.7b00089.10.1021/acs.jced.7b00089]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Selvaraj, D., Toghiani, R.K. & Lindner, J.S. (2017). Solubility in the Na + F + NO3 and Na + PO4+ NO3 Systems in Water and in Sodium Hydroxide Solutions. J. Chem. Eng. 53(6), 1250–1255.DOI:10.1021/je700597m.10.1021/je700597m]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Weber, C.F., Beahm, E.C., Lee, D.D. & Watson, J.S. (2000). A Solubility Model for Aqueous Solutions Containing Sodium, Fluoride, and Phosphate Ions, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39(2), 518–526. DOI: 10.1021/ie990457l.10.1021/ie990457l]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Xiping, C. & Wangxing, L. (2007). Research on crushing character of spent cathode, in: TMS Light Materials.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Tropenauer, B., Klinar, D., Samec, N., Golob, J. & Kortnik, J. (2019). Sustainable waste-treatment procedure for the spent potlining (SPL) from aluminium production. Mater. Tehnol. 53(2), 277–284. DOI: 10.17222/mit.2018.147.10.17222/mit.2018.147]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Patent application No.: P-201900265, Slovenian Intellectual Property Office (SIPO), (January 6. 2020).]Search in Google Scholar