1. bookVolume 17 (2021): Issue s1 (October 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1801-3422
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Centralisation in one step. Centralisation and decentralisation in Hungary from a public services perspective

Published Online: 22 Oct 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 17 (2021) - Issue s1 (October 2021)
Page range: 703 - 728
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1801-3422
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

It is very difficult to group countries and state structures according to the extent of their decentralisation or the model they follow in the spatial distribution of power.

The strengthening of local municipalities and the almost continuous evolution of their role reflects the steady downsizing of public services provided by the state and the extension of market circumstances. Until the economic crisis in 2008, the importance of state redistribution increased in almost each of the developed countries, more and more nation state functions were centralised under the authority of international organisations, and the “curtailment” of national governments’ authority occurred in tandem with the strengthening of the local state, i.e. municipalities.

The study exploring the issue of centralisation and decentralisation does not seek to unearth the relationship between the two concepts, but to examine from the point of view of consumer satisfaction how such a hastily implemented reform is able to respond to consumer demands.

It also examines how those concerned by the financial and political changes, i.e. the population perceived this most important structural transformation of the period since the transition in 1989. Can it be verified from the consumers’ point of view that the transformation of the local municipal system improves the quality of service provision? The study reviews the process and social reception of the largest-scale administrative reform in Hungary post-1989 (with a primary focus on public services) using data from an extensive survey (representative of settlement type and sociode-mographic variables).

Keywords

Balázs, I – Hoffman, I. (2020): Közigazgatás és koronavírus – a közigazgatási jog rezilienciája vagy annak bukása? MTA Law Working Papers (21): 1–18. Search in Google Scholar

Begg, D. et al. (1993): Making Sense of Subsidiarity: How Much Centralization for Europe? Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. Search in Google Scholar

Bordás, P., Bartha I., and Horváth, M. T. (2020): Jobban teljesít. Centralizáció és minőség. Poli‑ tikatudományi Szemle (1): 73–96. Search in Google Scholar

Charbit, C. (2011): Governance of Public Policies in Decentralised Context. The Multi -level Approach. OECD Regional Development Working Papers. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg883pkxkhc-en.10.1787/5kg883pkxkhc-en Search in Google Scholar

Csontos, L., Kornai, J., and Tóth, I. Gy. (1996): Adótudatosság és fiskális illúziók. in Andorka, R., Kolosi, T., & Vukovich, Gy. ed. Társadalmi Riport, Budapest: TÁRKI, 238–271. Search in Google Scholar

Dreschler, W. 2009. Towards a Neo -Weberian European Union? Lisbon Agenda and Public Administration. Halduskultuur (10): 6–22. Search in Google Scholar

Dreschler, W. and Kattel, R. (2009): Towards the Neo -Weberian State? Perhaps, but Certainly Adieu, NPM! – The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy (2): 95–101. Search in Google Scholar

Finta, I. – Kovács, K. – Palné K. I. (2020): Önkormányzatok a koronavírus járvány kezelésében. Tér és Társadalom (4): 194–198. Search in Google Scholar

Gálosi -Kovács, B. and Haffner, T. (2017): A területfejlesztés intézmény -rendszerének változása Magyarországon. Területfejlesztés és Innováció 11 (1): 29–33. Search in Google Scholar

Halmosi, P. (2013): A gazdasági válság hatása az OECD -országok önkormányzataira. Pénzügyi Szemle (3): 296–309 Search in Google Scholar

Hesse, J. J. (ed.) (1991): Local Government and Urban Affairs in International Perspective. Baden--Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Search in Google Scholar

Heinelt, H. and Hlepas, N. (2006): Typologies of Local Government Systems. in H. Bäck, H. Heinelt and A. Magnier ed. The European Mayor: Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag Für Sozialwissenschaften, 21–42.10.1007/978-3-531-90005-6_2 Search in Google Scholar

Horváth, M. T., Péteri, G., & Vécsei P. (2014): Iskolapélda a pénzügyi decentralizációról. A magyarországi helyi forrásszabályozási rendszer (1990–2012) esete.” in Horváth, M. T. ed. Külön utak. Közfeladatok megoldásai. Budapest -Pécs: Dialóg Campus Kiadó, 331–353. Search in Google Scholar

Hutchcroft, P. D. (2001): Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power. Governance. An International Journal of Policy and Administration 14 (1): 23–53.10.1111/0952-1895.00150 Search in Google Scholar

Kákai, L., and Vető, B. (2019): Állam vagy/és önkormányzat? Adalékok az önkormányzati rendszer átalakításához. Politikatudományi Szemle (1): 17–41.10.30718/POLTUD.HU.2019.1.17 Search in Google Scholar

Kákai, L. (2019): Útkereső Önkormányzatok Magyarországon. Budapest: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Search in Google Scholar

Kákai, L. (2020): From Financial centralization to political centralization. The focal points of the municipal reforms from the transition until present day. in Silva, C. N. ed. Contemporary trends in Local Governance. Reform, Cooperation and Citizen participation Switzerland, Springer, 67–86. Search in Google Scholar

Kornai, J. (2017): Látlelet. Tanulmányok a magyar állapotokról. Budapest: HVG Könyvek. Search in Google Scholar

Lapidoth, R. (1997): Autonomy: flexible solutions to ethnic conflict. United States Institute of Peace, Washington Search in Google Scholar

Linder, W. (2002): Political Challenges of Decentralisation. Worldbank Institute, Washington D.C Search in Google Scholar

Litvack, J., Ahmad, J., and Bird, R. (1998): Rethinking Decentralization in Developing Countries. Washington DC: Word Bank. Sector Studies Series.10.1596/0-8213-4350-5 Search in Google Scholar

Loughlin, J. (2001): Subnational Democracy in the European Union. Challenges and Opportunities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxford-hb/9780199562978.001.0001. Search in Google Scholar

Loughlin, J. (2007): Reconfiguring the State: Trends in Territorial Governance in European States. Regional and Federal Studies 17 (4): 385–405.10.1080/13597560701691912 Search in Google Scholar

Mezei, C. (ed.) (2014): Zárótanulmány a hazai önkormányzatok finanszírozási helyzetéről. Pécs, MTA Közgazdaság- és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont Regionális Intézete. Available at:http://docplayer.hu/5950391-Zarotanulmany-a-hazai-onkormanyzatok-finanszirozasi--helyzeterol.html, 24th February, 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Musgrave, R. A. (1959): The Theory of Public Finance. New York, McGraw Hill. Search in Google Scholar

Oates, W. E. (2005): Toward a second -generations theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance (12): 349–373.10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9 Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2012): Reformating fiscalfederalism and local government. Beyond the zero‑sum game. OECD fiscalfederalismstudies. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/ctp/reforming-fiscal--federalism-and-local-government-9789264119970-en.htm,15th February 2020. Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2016): Subnational Government Structure and Finance. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=72696 (Accessed February 20, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

OECD Multi -level Governance Studies (2019): Making Decentralisation Work. A Handbook for Policy ‑Makers(doi.org/10.1787/g2g9faa7-en), Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/f9117991-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/f9117991-en. Search in Google Scholar

Pálné, K. I. (2014): Jó Kormányzás és decentralizáció. Székfoglaló előadások a Magyar Tudományos Akadémián. Budapest: MTA Search in Google Scholar

Peters, G. B., & Pierre, J. (ed.) (2006): Handbook of Public Policy. London: Sage.10.4135/9781848608054 Search in Google Scholar

Roóz, J. and Heidrich, B. (2013): Vállalati gazdaságtan és menedzsment alapjai. 4.2.1. fejezet. Available at: https://www.tankonyvtar.hu/hu/tartalom/tamop412A/0007_c1_1054_1055_1057_vallalatigazdtan_scorm/4_2_1_abraham_maslow_szukseglethierarchia_elmelete_XVlxSjTG3FzXfuFY.html, 15th October 2018). Search in Google Scholar

Sivák, J. (2014): Az önkormányzati rendszer rendszerszemléletben. Pénzügyi Szemle (3): 301–315. Search in Google Scholar

Somlyódyné, P. E. (2019): Városok szerepe a területi kormányzásban. Budapest, Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem, Közigazgatási Továbbfejlesztési Intézet. Search in Google Scholar

Soós, G., & Kákai, L. (2010): Remarkable Success and Costly Failures. An Evaluation of Subnational Democracy in Hungary. in Loughlin, J., Hendricks, F., & Lindstrom, A. ed. The handbook of Subnational Democracy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 528–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199562978.003.0023.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199562978.003.0023 Search in Google Scholar

Swianiewicz, P. (2014): An Empirical Typology of Local Government Systems in Eastern Europe. Lo‑ cal Government Studies, 40 (2): 292–311.10.1080/03003930.2013.807807 Search in Google Scholar

Szalai, Á. (2002): Fiskális Föderalizmus. Áttekintés. Közgazdasági Szemle (5): 424. Search in Google Scholar

Tállai, A, (2014): Egy év tükrében – Önkormányzati feladatfinanszírozás 2014 – Országos Önkormányzati és Közigazgatási Konferencia. Előadás. (Budapest, 16th January). Search in Google Scholar

Tiebout, Ch. M. (1956): A pure theory of fiscal decentralization. The Journal of Political Economy (64): 416–424.10.1086/257839 Search in Google Scholar

Torma, A. (2012): Önkormányzati reformok Nyugat -Európában és tanulságaik. Magyar Közigaz‑ gatás (9): 513–521. Search in Google Scholar

Tóth, I. Gy. (2010). A társadalmi kohézió elemei: bizalom, normakövetés, igazságosság és felelősségérzet – lennének… in Kolosi, T., & Tóth, I. Gy. ed. Társadalmi Riport 2010. Budapest: TÁRKI, 254–287. Search in Google Scholar

Weingast, B. R. (2009): Second generation fiscal federalism: Implications for decentralised demo‑ cratic governance and economic development. Discussion Draft, Hoover Institution, Stanford. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1153440.10.2139/ssrn.1153440 Search in Google Scholar

Vasvári, T. (2020): Beneficiaries and cost bearers: evidence on political clientelism from Hungary. Local Government Studies [online first] DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2020.1768852.10.1080/03003930.2020.1768852 Search in Google Scholar

Vígvári, A. (2009): Atipikus önkormányzati eladósodás Magyarországon. Közgazdasági Szemle (7–8): 709–730. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo