This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Adibfar, A., Costin, A., & Issa, R. R. A. (2020). Design copyright in architecture, engineering, and construction industry: Review of history, pitfalls, and lessons learned. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(3). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000421.AdibfarA.CostinA.IssaR. R. A. (2020). Design copyright in architecture, engineering, and construction industry: Review of history, pitfalls, and lessons learned. , 12(3). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000421.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Alkaabi, N., Salah, K., Jayaraman, R., Arshad, J., & Omar, M. (2020). Blockchain-based traceability and management for additive manufacturing. IEEE Access, 8, pp. 188363–188377.AlkaabiN.SalahK.JayaramanR.ArshadJ.OmarM. (2020). Blockchain-based traceability and management for additive manufacturing. , 8, pp. 188363–188377.Search in Google Scholar
Alreshidi, E., Mourshed, M., & Rezgui, Y. (2017). Factors for effective BIM governance. Journal of Building Engineering, 10, pp. 8–01.AlreshidiE.MourshedM.RezguiY. (2017). Factors for effective BIM governance. , 10, pp. 8–01.Search in Google Scholar
Beach, T., Petri, I., Rezgui, Y., & Rana, O. (2017). Management of collaborative BIM data by federating distributed BIM models. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31, p. 04017009.BeachT.PetriI.RezguiY.RanaO. (2017). Management of collaborative BIM data by federating distributed BIM models. , 31, p. 04017009.Search in Google Scholar
Brownie. (2020). Brownie — Brownie 1.18.1 Documentation. Available at https://eth-brownie.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ [accessed 13 April, 2022].Brownie. (2020). . Available at https://eth-brownie.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Brownie Mixes. (2022). Brownie mixes. GitHub. Available at https://github.com/brownie-mix [accessed 13 April, 2022].Brownie Mixes. (2022). . GitHub. Available at https://github.com/brownie-mix [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
BuildingSMART. (2020a). IFC4 Documentation. Available at https://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/RELEASE/IFC4/ADD2_TC1/HTML/ [accessed 13 April, 2022].BuildingSMART. (2020a). . Available at https://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/RELEASE/IFC4/ADD2_TC1/HTML/ [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
BuildingSMART. (2020b). IfcGloballyUniqueId. Globally Unique Id. Available at https://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/DEV/IFC4_3/RC2/HTML/schema/ifcutilityresource/lexical/ifcglobal-lyuniqueid.htm [accessed 13 April, 2022].BuildingSMART. (2020b). . Available at https://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/DEV/IFC4_3/RC2/HTML/schema/ifcutilityresource/lexical/ifcglobal-lyuniqueid.htm [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Celik, Y., Petri, I., & Rezgui, Y. (2021). Leveraging BIM and blockchain for digital twins. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2021 - Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: 10.1109/ICE/ITMC52061.2021.9570246.CelikY.PetriI.RezguiY. (2021). Leveraging BIM and blockchain for digital twins. In: . Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: 10.1109/ICE/ITMC52061.2021.9570246.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chan, D. W. M., Olawumi, T. O., & Ho, A. M. L. (2019). Perceived benefits of and barriers to building information modelling (BIM) implementation in construction: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Building Engineering, 25, p. 100764. doi: 10.1016/j. jobe.2019.100764.ChanD. W. M.OlawumiT. O.HoA. M. L. (2019). Perceived benefits of and barriers to building information modelling (BIM) implementation in construction: The case of Hong Kong. , 25, p. 100764. doi: 10.1016/j. jobe.2019.100764.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Li, H., Li, K., & Zhang, J. (2017). An improved P2P file system scheme based on IPFS and Blockchain. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, pp. 2652–2657.ChenY.LiH.LiK.ZhangJ. (2017). An improved P2P file system scheme based on IPFS and Blockchain. In: . IEEE, pp. 2652–2657.Search in Google Scholar
Chi, J., Lee, J., Kim, N., Choi, J., & Park, S. (2020). Secure and reliable blockchain-based eBook transaction system for self-published eBook trading. PloS one, 15, p. e0228418.ChiJ.LeeJ.KimN.ChoiJ.ParkS. (2020). Secure and reliable blockchain-based eBook transaction system for self-published eBook trading. , 15, p. e0228418.Search in Google Scholar
ConsenSys. (2022). Truffle | Overview – Truffle Suite. Available at https://trufflesuite.com/docs/truffle/[accessed 13 April, 2022].ConsenSys. (2022). . Available at https://trufflesuite.com/docs/truffle/ [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Crosby, M., Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Applied Innovation, 2, p. 71.CrosbyM.PattanayakP.VermaS.KalyanaramanV. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. , 2, p. 71.Search in Google Scholar
Darabseh, M., & Martins, J. P. (2021). Protecting BIM design intellectual property with blockchain: Review and framework. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference of CIB W78, Presented at the CIB W78 2021, Luxembourg.DarabsehM.MartinsJ. P. (2021). Protecting BIM design intellectual property with blockchain: Review and framework. In: , Luxembourg.Search in Google Scholar
Darabseh, M., & Martins, J. P. (2020). Risks and opportunities for reforming construction with blockchain: Bibliometric study. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 6, pp. 1204–1217. doi: 10.28991/cej-2020-03091541.DarabsehM.MartinsJ. P. (2020). Risks and opportunities for reforming construction with blockchain: Bibliometric study. , 6, pp. 1204–1217. doi: 10.28991/cej-2020-03091541.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Discuss IPFS. (2019). Does IPFS provide block-level file copying feature? - Lobby. discuss.ipfs.io. Available at https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/does-ipfs-provide-block-level-file-copying-feature/6388 [accessed 13 April, 2022].Discuss IPFS. (2019). . Available at https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/does-ipfs-provide-block-level-file-copying-feature/6388 [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Entriken, W., Shirley, D., Evans, J., & Sachs, N. (2018). EIP-721: Non-fungible token standard. Ethereum Improvement Proposals. Available at https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721 [accessed 13 April, 2022].EntrikenW.ShirleyD.EvansJ.SachsN. (2018). EIP-721: Non-fungible token standard. . Available at https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721 [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Etherscan. (2022). About us. Available at https://etherscan.io/aboutus [accessed 13 April, 2022].Etherscan. (2022). . Available at https://etherscan.io/aboutus [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Gilbert, H., & Handschuh, H. (2004). Security analysis of SHA-256 and sisters. In: Matsui, M., & Zuccherato, R. J. (eds.), Selected Areas in Cryptography, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 175–193. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24654-1_13.GilbertH.HandschuhH. (2004). Security analysis of SHA-256 and sisters. In: MatsuiM.ZuccheratoR. J. (eds.), . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 175–193. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24654-1_13.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Holland, M., Nigischer, & C., Stjepandić, J. (2017). Copyright protection in additive manufacturing with blockchain approach. In: Transdisciplinary Engineering: A Paradigm Shift. IOS Press, pp. 914–921.HollandM.Nigischer& C.StjepandićJ. (2017). Copyright protection in additive manufacturing with blockchain approach. In: . IOS Press, pp. 914–921.Search in Google Scholar
Infura. (2022). Welcome to Infura Docs. Available at https://docs. infura.io/infura [accessed 13 April, 2022].Infura. (2022). . Available at https://docs. infura.io/infura [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
IPFS Shipyard. (2021). Available at py-ipfs-http-client/files.py at master ipfs-shipyard/py-ipfs-http-client.. (2021). Available at py-ipfs-http-client/files.py at master ipfs-shipyard/py-ipfs-http-client.Search in Google Scholar
ISO. (1996). ISO/IEC 11578:1996. ISO. Available at https://www. iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/00/22/2229.html [accessed 13 April, 2022].ISO. (1996). . ISO. Available at https://www. iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/00/22/2229.html [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Jing, N., Liu, Q., & Sugumaran, V. (2021). A blockchain-based code copyright management system. Information Processing & Management, 58, p. 102518.JingN.LiuQ.SugumaranV. (2021). A blockchain-based code copyright management system. , 58, p. 102518.Search in Google Scholar
Kugler, L. (2021). Non-fungible tokens and the future of art. Communications of the ACM, 64, pp. 19–20.KuglerL. (2021). Non-fungible tokens and the future of art. , 64, pp. 19–20.Search in Google Scholar
Kuo, T. T., Kim, H. E., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2017). Blockchain distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and health care applications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24, pp. 1211–1220.KuoT. T.KimH. E.Ohno-MachadoL. (2017). Blockchain distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and health care applications. , 24, pp. 1211–1220.Search in Google Scholar
Li, X., Lu, W., Xue, F., Wu, L., Zhao, R., Lou, J., et al. (2022). Blockchain-enabled IoT-BIM platform for supply chain management in modular construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE) CO.1943-7862.0002229.LiX.LuW.XueF.WuL.ZhaoR.LouJ., (2022). Blockchain-enabled IoT-BIM platform for supply chain management in modular construction. , 148. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE) CO.1943-7862.0002229.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Luo, H., Das, M., Wang, J., & Cheng, J. C. P. (2019). Construction payment automation through smart contract-based blockchain framework. In: M, A.-H. (ed.), Proceedings of the 36th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, ISARC 2019. International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (I.A.A.R.C), pp. 1254–1260. doi: 10.22260/isarc2019/0168LuoH.DasM.WangJ.ChengJ. C. P. (2019). Construction payment automation through smart contract-based blockchain framework. In: MA.-H. (ed.), . International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (I.A.A.R.C), pp. 1254–1260. doi: 10.22260/isarc2019/0168Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
MDN. (2022). Identifying resources on the Web - HTTP / MDN. Available at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Basics_of_HTTP/Identifying_resources_on_the_Web [accessed 13 April, 2022].MDN. (2022). . Available at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Basics_of_HTTP/Identifying_resources_on_the_Web [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
MetaMask. (2022). Introduction | MetaMask Docs. Available at https://docs.metamask.io/guide/ [accessed 13 April, 2022].MetaMask. (2022). . Available at https://docs.metamask.io/guide/ [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Mouris, D., & Tsoutsos, N. G. (2022). NFTs for 3D models: Sustaining ownership in industry 4.0. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine.MourisD.TsoutsosN. G. (2022). NFTs for 3D models: Sustaining ownership in industry 4.0. .Search in Google Scholar
Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), pp. 355–364. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007.ØlnesS.UbachtJ.JanssenM. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. , 34(3), pp. 355–364. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
OpenSea. (2022). Getting Started – OpenSea. Available at https://support.opensea.io/hc/en-us/sections/360011539774-Getting-Started [accessed 13 April, 2022].OpenSea. (2022). . Available at https://support.opensea.io/hc/en-us/sections/360011539774-Get-ting-Started [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
OpenZeppelin. (2022). OpenZeppelin Contracts. Available at https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts [accessed 13 April, 2022].OpenZeppelin. (2022). . Available at https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Protocol Labs. (2022). Content Addressing | IPFS Docs. Available at.https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/content-addressing/#identifier-formats [accessed 13 April, 2022].Protocol Labs. (2022). . Available at.https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/content-addressing/#identifier-formats [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Protocol Labs. (2020). Merkle DAGs | IPFS Docs. Available at https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/merkle-dag/ [accessed 13 April, 2022].Protocol Labs. (2020). . Available at https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/merkle-dag/ [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Python Foundation. (2022). hashlib — Secure Hashes and Message Digests — Python 3.10.4 Documentation. Available at https://docs.python.org/3/library/hashlib.html [accessed 13 April, 2022].Python Foundation. (2022). . Available at https://docs.python.org/3/library/hashlib.html [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Sardroud, J. M., Mehdizadehtavasani, M., Khorramabadi, A., & Ranjbardar, A. (2018). Barriers analysis to effective implementation of BIM in the construction industry. In: ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. IAARC Publications. pp. 1–8.SardroudJ. M.MehdizadehtavasaniM.KhorramabadiA.RanjbardarA. (2018). Barriers analysis to effective implementation of BIM in the construction industry. In: . IAARC Publications. pp. 1–8.Search in Google Scholar
Tapscott, A., & Tapscott, D. (2017). How blockchain is changing finance. Harvard Business Review, 1, pp. 2–5.TapscottA.TapscottD. (2017). How blockchain is changing finance. , 1, pp. 2–5.Search in Google Scholar
Turk, Ž., & Klinc, R. (2017). Potentials of blockchain technology for construction management. Procedia Engineering, 196, pp. 638–645. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052.TurkŽ.KlincR. (2017). Potentials of blockchain technology for construction management. , 196, pp. 638–645. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wright, A., Andrews, H., Hutton, B., & Dennis, G. (2020). JSON Schema: A Media Type for Describing JSON Documents. Available at https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/json-schema-core.html [accessed 13 April, 2022].WrightA.AndrewsH.HuttonB.DennisG. (2020). . Available at https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/json-schema-core.html [Accessed 13 April, 2022].Search in Google Scholar