The comparison of IOTA Simple Rules, ADNEX Model, and RMI prediction models used in the diagnosis of ovarian tumours

1 J. Huang et al., “Worldwide Burden, Risk Factors, and Temporal Trends of Ovarian Cancer: A Global Study,” Cancers (Basel), 2022, 14: 2230 Search in Google Scholar

2 G. C. Jayson, E. C. Kohn, H. C. Kitchener, and J. A. Ledermann, “Ovarian cancer,” The Lancet, 2014, 384: 1376–1388 Search in Google Scholar

3 R. Forstner, “Early detection of ovarian cancer,” European Radiology, 2020, 30: 5370–5373. Search in Google Scholar

4 C. Stewart, C. Ralyea, and S. Lockwood, “Ovarian Cancer: An Integrated Review,” Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 2019, 35: 151–156. Search in Google Scholar

5 D. Timmerman et al., “ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours.,” Facts Views Vis Obgyn, 2021,13: 107–130. Search in Google Scholar

6 W. Froyman and D. Timmerman, “Methods of Assessing Ovarian Masses: International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Approach,” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 2019, 46: 625–641. Search in Google Scholar

7 D. Timmerman et al., “Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008, 31: 681–690. Search in Google Scholar

8 H. Chen, L. Qian, M. Jiang, Q. Du, F. Yuan, and W. Feng, “Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019, 54: 815–822. Search in Google Scholar

9 D. Jacobs, J. Oram, J. Fairbanks, C. Turner, and J. Fros’i’, “A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer,” 1990; 97:922–929. Search in Google Scholar