Identification of
According to AlgaeBase (Guiry & Guiry 2020), 18 species of the genus
Most common species of the
There are many factors that threaten habitats of
This paper aims to present a review of research on the
Field surveys were conducted at 150 localities in 97 rivers of Western, Southwestern, Eastern and Southern Serbia from April to November in 2017, 2018 and 2019. Twenty mature thalli were collected at each locality where
Morphological features were analyzed under a Motic BA310 microscope with up to 800× magnification and photographed with BRESSER (9MP) and MicroCamLab. For the identification of
The type of substrate, current velocity (m s−1), maximum depth and shade were determined at each locality. Environmental conditions were measured according to the American Public Health Association (1995): temperature (°C), pH, conductivity (μS cm−1), water hardness (mg l−1), dissolved oxygen (mg l−1) and nutrient concentration. Nitrogen concentration was determined as ammonia nitrogen NH4-N (mg l−1) and nitrate nitrogen NO3-N (mg l−1), while the concentration of soluble phosphorus was determined as orthophosphate PO4-P (mg l−1) concentration.
Possible threat factors were determined at each locality by visual analysis, as well as according to the Survey of Small Hydropower Plants in the Republic of Serbia (Ministry of Mining and Energy of the Republic of Serbia): 1 – no negative impact, 2 – impact by local population (wastewater, solid waste, traffic), 3 – planned construction of HPP, 4 – small HPP constructed, 5 – planned construction of small HPP.
The available literature on the distribution and ecology of the
During field surveys carried out in 2017, 2018, and 2019, a total of 150 riverine locations were studied and thalli of the
Figure 1
Geographical location of
(■)

Geographical coordinates and environmental parameters of
Species | River (population code)/Date | Geographical coordinates | Altitude (m) | Depth (cm) | Substrate type | Velocity (m s−1) | Temperature (°C) | pH | Cond. (μS cm−1) | Hardness (mg l−1) | O2 (mg l−1) | NH4 (mg l−1) | NO3 (mg l−1) | PO4 (mg l−1) | Degree of shade | Coverage (%) | Associated macroalgae | Threat factors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Veljušnica (VE) 15.08.2018 | 43°22′05.7″N 19°54′35.0″E | 992 | 0 | stone | 1.3 | 13.9 | 8.11 | 320 | 160 | 9.87 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 20 | 2 | ||
Jelašnica (JR) 20.08.2019 | 42°37′56.9″N 22°07′06.6″E | 433 | 5–10 | stone | 1.5 | 17.4 | 7.53 | 590 | 280 | 9.72 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 10 | 2 | ||
Gradska River (GR) 26.05.2018 | 42°54′07.6″N 22°20′46.3″E | 544 | 0 | stone | 1.8 | 14.7 | 7.51 | 100 | 50 | 9.96 | <0.03 | <4 | 0.19 | +++ | 10 | 2, 4 | ||
Božica channel (BC) 23.07.2019 | 42°40′44.8″N 22°21′02.1″E | 1212 | 0–5 | stone | 2 | 15.6 | 7.7 | 510 | 260 | 9.66 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | +++ | 10 | 2 | ||
Masurica (MR) 28.05.2018 | 42°36′48.5″N 22°13′13.0″E | 887 | 5–10 | stone | 1.5 | 11.5 | 7.48 | 60 | 30 | 10.35 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 30 | / | 1 | |
Vuneva (VU) 28.05.2018 | 42°36′46.7″N 22°13′16.2″E | 889 | 10 | stone | 1.3 | 11.2 | 7.46 | 70 | 30 | 10.41 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | + | 7 | / | 1 |
+++ full sunlight; ++ partial shade; + full shade.
1 – no negative impact; 2 – impact by local population (wastewater, solid waste, traffic); 3 – planned construction of HPP; 4 – small HPP constructed; 5 – planned construction of small HPP
Geographical coordinates and environmental parameters of
Species | River (population code)/Date | Geographical coordinates | Altitude (m) | Depth (cm) | Substrate type | Velocity (m s−1) | Temperature (°C) | pH | Cond. (μS cm−1) | Hardness (mg l−1) | O2 (mg l−1) | NH4 (mg l−1) | NO3 (mg l−1) | PO4 (mg l−1) | Degree of shade | Coverage (%) | Associated macroalgae | Threat factors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Veliki Rzav (VR)* 19.05.2018 | 43°45′12.5″N 22°00′12.1″E | 389 | 50 | stone | 2.0 | 10.4 | 7.98 | 270 | 130 | 9.98 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | +++ | 5 | 3 | ||
Mileševka (MI)* 06.07.2019 | 43°21′58.4″N 19°43′16.9″E | 571 | 5 | stone | 1.6 | 15.1 | 8.05 | 295 | 150 | 9.91 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 10 | 2 | ||
Vlasina (VL) 26.05.2018 | 42°51′09.4″N 22°17′02.1″E | 730 | 0–5 | stone | 1.5 | 14.1 | 7.59 | 90 | 40 | 10.1 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | +++ | 20 | 2, 4, 5 | ||
Božica River (BR) 27.05.2018 | 42°37′07.0″N 22°24′02.4″E | 1038 | 0 | stone | 1.3 | 13.3 | 7.08 | 80 | 40 | 9.35 | <0.03 | <4 | 0.21 | +++ | 20 | 2 | ||
Golema River (GO) 30.08.2018 | 43°23′44.2″N 22°36′18.8″E | 905 | 0 | stone | 1.5 | 13.6 | 7.83 | 180 | 100 | 9.86 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | + | 30 | / | 2 | |
Dojkinačka River (DR1) 19.08.2019 | 43°15′40.9″N 22°46′50.6″E | 960 | 10 | stone | 2.0 | 12.1 | 7.32 | 160 | 100 | 10.31 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | + | 10 | / | 5 | |
Dojkinačka River (DR2) 19.08.2019 | 43°15′02.0″N 22°46′32.6″E | 972 | 10 | stone | 1.5 | 12.3 | 7.26 | 140 | 110 | 10.2 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 20 | / | 5 | |
Dojkinačka River (DR3) 19.08.2019 | 43°15′32.0″N 22°46′37.8″E | 924 | 10 | stone | 1.8 | 12.3 | 7.29 | 140 | 110 | 10.28 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 20 | / | 5 |
new finding
+++ full sunlight; ++ partial shade; + full shade.
1 – no negative impact; 2 – impact by local population (wastewater, solid waste, traffic); 3 – planned construction of HPP; 4 – small HPP constructed; 5 – planned construction of small HPP
Geographical coordinates and environmental parameters of the
Morphological and reproductive features of
Species | River | Plant length (cm) | Sterile basal part | Branching | Nodal diameter (μm) | Internodal diameter (μm) | ND:ID | Spermatangial papillae arrangement | Carpospores length (μm) | Carpospores diameter (μm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Veljušnica (VE). | 3.2–8.7 | gradually expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 460–690 | 370–560 | 1.3 | Protruding; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 15.2–19.1 (29.5–48.8)* | 9.6–13.8 (20.5–42.6)* | + | |
Jelašnica (JR) | 5.3–8.5 | gradually expanding into the fertile part | true | 480–720 | 300–450 | 1.4 | protruding or flat; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 26.8–42.1* | 19.3–33.2* | – | |
Gradska River (GR) | 5.1–9.25 | gradually expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 410–590 | 300–430 | 1.4 | protruding or flat; 3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 13.6–20.5 | 10–15.2 | – | |
Božica channel (BC) | 4.6–9.7 | gradually expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 490–750 | 400–580 | 1.3 | protruding or flat; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 30.7–42.1* | 20.5–30.7* | – | |
Masurica (MR) | 2.3–5 | imperceptibly expanding into the fertile part | true | 360–530 | 290–440 | 1.3 | plane, rarely protruding; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 12.1–22.5 | 6.2–13.5 | – | |
Vuneva (VU) | 2.6–5.6 | imperceptibly expanding into the fertile part | true | 380–520 | 300–440 | 1.3 | plane, rarely protruding; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 12–22 | 6–13.7 | – |
+ present; – not present
mature carpospores
Morphological and reproductive features of
Species | River (population code) | Plant length (cm) | Sterile basal part | Branching | Nodal diameter (μm) | Internodal diameter (μm) | ND:ID | Spermatangial papillae arrangement | Carpospores length (μm) | Carpospores diameter (μm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Veliki Rzav (VR) | 2.5–5.2 | abruptly expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 400–570 | 290–440 | 1.5 | patches; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 21.7–31.2 | 12.1–17.5 | – | |
Mileševka (MI) | 4.5–11.5 | abruptly or gradually expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 450–590 | 300–430 | 1.4 | protruding; 2–4 in whorls; regular or irregular | 35.8–50.5* | 20.5–38.5* | + | |
Vlasina (VL) | 4.9–12.2 | abruptly expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 550–680 | 400–550 | 1.3 | patches; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 20.5–33.7 | 13.6–18.8 | – | |
Božica River (BR) | 4.7–7.1 | abruptly expanding into the fertile part | true | 460–650 | 350–520 | 1.3 | patches; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 23.5–33.5* | 15.2–20.5* | + | |
Golema River (GO) | 4.7–6.2 | abruptly expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 500–620 | 360–450 | 1.3 | patches; 2–4 in whorls; regular or irregular | 20.5–26.2 | 10.8–18.5 | – | |
Dojkinačka River (DR1, DR2, DR3) | 5.4–9.3 | abruptly expanding into the fertile part | no | 510–780 | 360–580 | 1.4 | patches; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 29.5–41* | 18.5–25.3* | + |
+ present; – not present
mature carpospores
Our research covered all previously known localities of
Geographical coordinates and environmental parameters of the previously described
River (population code)/Date | Geographical coordinates | Altitude (m) | Depth (cm) | Substrate type | Velocity (m s−1) | Temperature (°C) | pH | Conductivity (μS cm−1) | O2 (mg l−1) | N (mg l−1) | P (mg l−1) | Degree of shade | Associated macroalgae | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Golema River (as the Crnovrška River) 06.1991 | / | 1250 | / | stone | 1.42 | 9.0 | 7.6 | / | 13.6 | 0.45 | 0.2 | ++ | Simić 1995 | |
Svrljiški Timok River 06.1991 | / | 400 | / | stone | 1 | 14.7 | 8.35 | / | 10.68 | 0.45 | 0.1 | +++ | Simić 2002 | |
Resava River 01.05.2003 | / | 450 | / | / | 1.5 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | Simić 2007 |
Resava River 12.04.2004 | / | 800 | / | / | 1.1 | 10.0 | 7.8 | 160 | 8.59 | 4.7 | 0.058 | / | / | Simić 2007 |
Božica River 15.08.2004 | / | 1100 | / | / | 1.1 | 13.8 | 7.1 | 70 | 8.51 | 4.6 | 0.443 | / | / | Simić 2007 |
Vlasina River 15.08.2004 | / | 1000 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | Simić 2007 |
Dojkinačka River 26.07.2010 | 43°15′43.3″N 22°46′23.2″E | 1015 | 30 | / | / | 12.5 | 7.0 | / | / | / | / | / | Blagojević et al. 2017 | |
Dojkinačka River 25.07.2010 | 43°15′24.5″N 22°46′31.3″E | 1000 | 30 | / | / | 15.0 | 7.5 | / | / | / | / | / | Blagojević et al. 2017 | |
Dojkinačka River 25.07.2010 | 43°15′02.0″N 22°46′32.6″E | 972 | 30 | / | / | 16.0 | 8.0 | / | / | / | / | / | Blagojević et al. 2017 | |
Dojkinačka River 25.07.2010 | 43°15′32.0″N 22°46′37.8″E | 924 | 30 | / | / | 17.0 | 7.0 | / | / | / | / | / | Blagojević et al. 2017 |
+++ full sunlight; ++ partial shade
Hypertrophies of tissue at the base of spermatangia, in the form of papules with regular or irregular edges, were observed along thalli collected from the Božica River, the Dojkinačka River, the Veljušnica River, the Jelašnica River and the Gradska River.
Homotypic synonym:
Heterotypic synonym:
Thalli grew in tufts. Almost every collected thallus was tattered and small in size, very dark green or black in color, and covered with the epiphyte
Figure 2
Morphological and reproductive features of

Basionym:
Heterotypic synonym:
Thalli grew in tufts. Their length ranged from 4.6 to 9.7 cm (Fig. 3: 1, Table 3). They were dark green in color. The thalli gradually narrowed into the base and continued into the sterile basal part (Fig. 3: 2, Table 3). The sterile basal part was 0.4–1.6 cm long, thin, slightly stalked. True branching was present, but not abundant (Table 3). False branching was observed in the regenerated parts of the thallus in places where it was torn (the Gradska River and the Božica channel; Table 3). The nodal diameter (ND) ranged from 410 to 750 μm and the internodal diameter (ID) ranged from 300 to 580 μm (Fig. 3: 3, Table 3). The nodal to internodal diameter ratio (ND/ID) ranged from 1.3 to 1.4 (Table 3). Spermatangial papillae were protruding or flat, 3 in whorls, regularly or irregularly distributed in the nodal region (Fig. 3: 3, Table 3). The carposporophyte zone was usually cylindrical. Young carpospores were in strings, oval to oblong (length 13.6–20.5 μm, width 10–15.2 μm; the Gradska River; Table 3). Oval to oblong mature carpospores (length 26.8–42.1 μm, width 19.3–33.2 μm) were observed in specimens from the Jelašnica River and the Božica channel (Table 3). The
Figure 3
Morphological and reproductive features of

Thalli grew in tufts. Their length ranged from 2.3 to 5.6 cm (Fig. 4: 1, Table 3). They were olive green to dark green, curved, slender. They indistinctly tapered toward the base and continued into the sterile basal part (Table 3). The sterile basal part was 0.5–0.9 cm long, thin, unstalked. True branching was present (Table 3). The nodal diameter (ND) ranged from 360 to 530 μm and the internodal diameter (ID) ranged from 290 to 440 μm (Fig. 4: 2, Table 3). The nodal to internodal diameter ratio (ND/ID) was 1.3 (Table 3). Spermatangial papillae were flat, slightly or rarely prominently protruding, 2–3 in whorls, regularly or rarely irregularly distributed in the nodal region (Fig. 4: 3, Table 3). The carposporophyte zone was usually cylindrical. Young carpospores were in strings, ellipsoidal to oblong (length 12–22.5 μm, width 6–13.7 μm; Table 3). Mature carpospores and the
Figure 4
Morphological and reproductive features of

Basionym:
Homotypic synonyms:
Heterotypic synonyms:
Thalli grew in tufts. Their length ranged from 2.5 to 12.2 cm (Fig. 5: 1, Table 4). The thalli were yellowish olive or olive green in color. They abruptly narrowed toward the base and continued into the sterile basal part (Fig. 5: 2, Table 4). The sterile basal part was 0.5–1.5 cm long, thin, stalked. True branching was sparse; false branching was also observed (Table 4). The nodal diameter (ND) ranged from 400 to 780 μm and the internodal diameter (ID) ranged from 290 to 580 μm (Fig. 5: 3, Table 4). The nodal to internodal diameter ratio (ND/ID) ranged from 1.3 to 1.5 (Table 4). Spermatangial papillae occurred in patches, 2–4 in whorls, regularly or irregularly distributed in the nodal region (Fig. 5: 3, Table 4). The carposporophyte zone was usually cylindrical. Young carpospores were in strings, cylindrical (length 20.5–33.7 μm, width 10.8–18.8 μm; Table 4). Mature carpospores were oval to oblong (length 23.5–50.5 μm, width 15.2–38.5 μm; Table 4). The
Figure 5
Morphological and reproductive features of

The most common species in the collected samples was
Thalli of
Epiphytes were found on thalli of
It was observed during the field surveys that only the Masurica and Vuneva river localities were not affected by negative anthropogenic impact. Whereas all other localities were found to be affected by threat factors (Tables 1, 2).
Our research confirms the difficulties in the identification of
The above-mentioned difficulties in identifying
False branching was observed on thalli of
Since identification of
Data on the geographical distribution and ecology of the
In general,
Thalli of the
Our research confirmed that
Because
Previous findings on the occurrence of
Habitats of the new
The construction of all planned small HPPs in Serbia will provide an insignificant energy balance, but environmental damage to these ecosystems will be immeasurable (Ristić et al. 2018). Since all parts of riverine ecosystems are interconnected, any disturbance to one part of the system will trigger a response in most parts of the system (Wu et al. 2010). The significant impact of small HPPs on riverine ecosystems is particularly pronounced in periods of moderate flows, when minimum water flow prescribed by the law does not discharge into the river (Wu et al. 2010; Fijko et al. 2017). Wu et al. (2010) researched and proved the significant effects of small HPPs on the benthic algal community in terms of different physical and chemical conditions between control and dammed sites, a significant increase in chlorophyll-a concentration, total algal density and major impact on the overall benthic algal community in dry periods.
Perhaps the most striking negative ecological impact of small HPPs is observed at the multiple installation level. The presence of multiple installations reduces conductivity in rivers and impedes the dispersal ability of freshwater organisms (Kibler & Tullos 2013). The cumulative effects of small HPPs are observed on the Vlasina River, where nine small HPPs are already constructed and several are planned for construction (Ministry of Mining and Energy of Republic of Serbia). During our field surveys, the watercourse downstream from the constructed small HPPs was devasted and no benthic algae were observed.
Since
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Geographical coordinates and environmental parameters of Lemanea fluviatilis localities in Serbia
Species | River (population code)/Date | Geographical coordinates | Altitude (m) | Depth (cm) | Substrate type | Velocity (m s−1) | Temperature (°C) | pH | Cond. (μS cm−1) | Hardness (mg l−1) | O2 (mg l−1) | NH4 (mg l−1) | NO3 (mg l−1) | PO4 (mg l−1) | Degree of shade | Coverage (%) | Associated macroalgae | Threat factors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Veliki Rzav (VR) |
43°45′12.5″N 22°00′12.1″E | 389 | 50 | stone | 2.0 | 10.4 | 7.98 | 270 | 130 | 9.98 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | +++ | 5 | 3 | ||
Mileševka (MI) |
43°21′58.4″N 19°43′16.9″E | 571 | 5 | stone | 1.6 | 15.1 | 8.05 | 295 | 150 | 9.91 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 10 | 2 | ||
Vlasina (VL) 26.05.2018 | 42°51′09.4″N 22°17′02.1″E | 730 | 0–5 | stone | 1.5 | 14.1 | 7.59 | 90 | 40 | 10.1 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | +++ | 20 | 2, 4, 5 | ||
Božica River (BR) 27.05.2018 | 42°37′07.0″N 22°24′02.4″E | 1038 | 0 | stone | 1.3 | 13.3 | 7.08 | 80 | 40 | 9.35 | <0.03 | <4 | 0.21 | +++ | 20 | 2 | ||
Golema River (GO) 30.08.2018 | 43°23′44.2″N 22°36′18.8″E | 905 | 0 | stone | 1.5 | 13.6 | 7.83 | 180 | 100 | 9.86 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | + | 30 | / | 2 | |
Dojkinačka River (DR1) 19.08.2019 | 43°15′40.9″N 22°46′50.6″E | 960 | 10 | stone | 2.0 | 12.1 | 7.32 | 160 | 100 | 10.31 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | + | 10 | / | 5 | |
Dojkinačka River (DR2) 19.08.2019 | 43°15′02.0″N 22°46′32.6″E | 972 | 10 | stone | 1.5 | 12.3 | 7.26 | 140 | 110 | 10.2 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 20 | / | 5 | |
Dojkinačka River (DR3) 19.08.2019 | 43°15′32.0″N 22°46′37.8″E | 924 | 10 | stone | 1.8 | 12.3 | 7.29 | 140 | 110 | 10.28 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 20 | / | 5 |
Geographical coordinates and environmental parameters of the previously described Lemanea fluviatilis localities from Serbia
River (population code)/Date | Geographical coordinates | Altitude (m) | Depth (cm) | Substrate type | Velocity (m s−1) | Temperature (°C) | pH | Conductivity (μS cm−1) | O2 (mg l−1) | N (mg l−1) | P (mg l−1) | Degree of shade | Associated macroalgae | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Golema River (as the Crnovrška River) 06.1991 | / | 1250 | / | stone | 1.42 | 9.0 | 7.6 | / | 13.6 | 0.45 | 0.2 | ++ | ||
Svrljiški Timok River 06.1991 | / | 400 | / | stone | 1 | 14.7 | 8.35 | / | 10.68 | 0.45 | 0.1 | +++ | ||
Resava River 01.05.2003 | / | 450 | / | / | 1.5 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
Resava River 12.04.2004 | / | 800 | / | / | 1.1 | 10.0 | 7.8 | 160 | 8.59 | 4.7 | 0.058 | / | / | |
Božica River 15.08.2004 | / | 1100 | / | / | 1.1 | 13.8 | 7.1 | 70 | 8.51 | 4.6 | 0.443 | / | / | |
Vlasina River 15.08.2004 | / | 1000 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
Dojkinačka River 26.07.2010 | 43°15′43.3″N 22°46′23.2″E | 1015 | 30 | / | / | 12.5 | 7.0 | / | / | / | / | / | ||
Dojkinačka River 25.07.2010 | 43°15′24.5″N 22°46′31.3″E | 1000 | 30 | / | / | 15.0 | 7.5 | / | / | / | / | / | ||
Dojkinačka River 25.07.2010 | 43°15′02.0″N 22°46′32.6″E | 972 | 30 | / | / | 16.0 | 8.0 | / | / | / | / | / | ||
Dojkinačka River 25.07.2010 | 43°15′32.0″N 22°46′37.8″E | 924 | 30 | / | / | 17.0 | 7.0 | / | / | / | / | / |
Geographical coordinates and environmental parameters of Lemanea fucina, Lemanea rigida and Lemanea sp. localities in Serbia
Species | River (population code)/Date | Geographical coordinates | Altitude (m) | Depth (cm) | Substrate type | Velocity (m s−1) | Temperature (°C) | pH | Cond. (μS cm−1) | Hardness (mg l−1) | O2 (mg l−1) | NH4 (mg l−1) | NO3 (mg l−1) | PO4 (mg l−1) | Degree of shade | Coverage (%) | Associated macroalgae | Threat factors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Veljušnica (VE) 15.08.2018 | 43°22′05.7″N 19°54′35.0″E | 992 | 0 | stone | 1.3 | 13.9 | 8.11 | 320 | 160 | 9.87 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 20 | 2 | ||
Jelašnica (JR) 20.08.2019 | 42°37′56.9″N 22°07′06.6″E | 433 | 5–10 | stone | 1.5 | 17.4 | 7.53 | 590 | 280 | 9.72 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 10 | 2 | ||
Gradska River (GR) 26.05.2018 | 42°54′07.6″N 22°20′46.3″E | 544 | 0 | stone | 1.8 | 14.7 | 7.51 | 100 | 50 | 9.96 | <0.03 | <4 | 0.19 | +++ | 10 | 2, 4 | ||
Božica channel (BC) 23.07.2019 | 42°40′44.8″N 22°21′02.1″E | 1212 | 0–5 | stone | 2 | 15.6 | 7.7 | 510 | 260 | 9.66 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | +++ | 10 | 2 | ||
Masurica (MR) 28.05.2018 | 42°36′48.5″N 22°13′13.0″E | 887 | 5–10 | stone | 1.5 | 11.5 | 7.48 | 60 | 30 | 10.35 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | ++ | 30 | / | 1 | |
Vuneva (VU) 28.05.2018 | 42°36′46.7″N 22°13′16.2″E | 889 | 10 | stone | 1.3 | 11.2 | 7.46 | 70 | 30 | 10.41 | <0.03 | <4 | <0.06 | + | 7 | / | 1 |
Morphological and reproductive features of Lemanea fucina, Lemanea rigida and Lemanea sp. from Serbia
Species | River | Plant length (cm) | Sterile basal part | Branching | Nodal diameter (μm) | Internodal diameter (μm) | ND:ID | Spermatangial papillae arrangement | Carpospores length (μm) | Carpospores diameter (μm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Veljušnica (VE). | 3.2–8.7 | gradually expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 460–690 | 370–560 | 1.3 | Protruding; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 15.2–19.1 (29.5–48.8) |
9.6–13.8 (20.5–42.6) |
+ | |
Jelašnica (JR) | 5.3–8.5 | gradually expanding into the fertile part | true | 480–720 | 300–450 | 1.4 | protruding or flat; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 26.8–42.1 |
19.3–33.2 |
– | |
Gradska River (GR) | 5.1–9.25 | gradually expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 410–590 | 300–430 | 1.4 | protruding or flat; 3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 13.6–20.5 | 10–15.2 | – | |
Božica channel (BC) | 4.6–9.7 | gradually expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 490–750 | 400–580 | 1.3 | protruding or flat; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 30.7–42.1 |
20.5–30.7 |
– | |
Masurica (MR) | 2.3–5 | imperceptibly expanding into the fertile part | true | 360–530 | 290–440 | 1.3 | plane, rarely protruding; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 12.1–22.5 | 6.2–13.5 | – | |
Vuneva (VU) | 2.6–5.6 | imperceptibly expanding into the fertile part | true | 380–520 | 300–440 | 1.3 | plane, rarely protruding; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 12–22 | 6–13.7 | – |
Morphological and reproductive features of Lemanea fluviatilis from Serbia
Species | River (population code) | Plant length (cm) | Sterile basal part | Branching | Nodal diameter (μm) | Internodal diameter (μm) | ND:ID | Spermatangial papillae arrangement | Carpospores length (μm) | Carpospores diameter (μm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Veliki Rzav (VR) | 2.5–5.2 | abruptly expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 400–570 | 290–440 | 1.5 | patches; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 21.7–31.2 | 12.1–17.5 | – | |
Mileševka (MI) | 4.5–11.5 | abruptly or gradually expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 450–590 | 300–430 | 1.4 | protruding; 2–4 in whorls; regular or irregular | 35.8–50.5 |
20.5–38.5 |
+ | |
Vlasina (VL) | 4.9–12.2 | abruptly expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 550–680 | 400–550 | 1.3 | patches; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 20.5–33.7 | 13.6–18.8 | – | |
Božica River (BR) | 4.7–7.1 | abruptly expanding into the fertile part | true | 460–650 | 350–520 | 1.3 | patches; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 23.5–33.5 |
15.2–20.5 |
+ | |
Golema River (GO) | 4.7–6.2 | abruptly expanding into the fertile part | true/false | 500–620 | 360–450 | 1.3 | patches; 2–4 in whorls; regular or irregular | 20.5–26.2 | 10.8–18.5 | – | |
Dojkinačka River (DR1, DR2, DR3) | 5.4–9.3 | abruptly expanding into the fertile part | no | 510–780 | 360–580 | 1.4 | patches; 2–3 in whorls; regular or irregular | 29.5–41 |
18.5–25.3 |
+ |
Distribution of Phenol Derivatives by River Waters to the Marine Environment (Gulf of Gdansk, Baltic Sea) Use of Coontail as a Natural Phytoremediation Feed Additive for Common Carp The Assessment of Health Risk from Heavy Metals with Water Indices for Irrigation and the Portability of Munzur Stream: A Case Study of the Ovacık Area (Ramsar Site), Türkiye Morphometric variation of Spicara flexuosum Rafinesque, 1810 (Teleostei: Sparidae) inhabiting the Sea of Marmara, the Aegean and the Mediterranean Coast of TürkiyeDetermination of genetic diversity between natural and cultured populations of Common Dentex ( Dentex dentex ) fish in the East Aegean SeaInvestigation of otolith asymmetry in Mulloidichthys flavolineatus andParupeneus forsskali (Perciformes: Mullidae) from Egypt’s Hurghada fishing harbour on the Red SeaUse of Biomonitoring Tools to Detect Water Quality-Dependent Ecosystem (Macroinvertebrate) Responses in Lentic Systems: The Examples of Lakes İznik and Manyas, Türkiye Post-Dredging Nitrogen Dynamics at the Sediment–Water Interface: The Shallow, Eutrophic Mogan Lake, Turkey Element-based ecological and human health risk assessment in a lagoon system in a densely populated basin Effects of the tide on the temporal and spatial physicochemical structure of the Kienké river estuary (South Atlantic Coast of Cameroon, Kribi) and its phytoplankton