1. bookVolume 64 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1508-5791
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Radionuclide neutron source trajectories in the closed nuclear fuel cycle

Published Online: 02 Mar 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 64 (2019) - Issue 1 (March 2019)
Page range: 3 - 9
Received: 20 Nov 2017
Accepted: 10 Dec 2018
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1508-5791
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The highest efficiency in the usage of nuclear energy resources can be implemented in fast breeder reactors of generation IV. It is achieved thanks to the ability of consuming minor actinides (MAs) in energy production. One of the options to use this benefit is full recycling of MAs to close the nuclear fuel cycle. Monte Carlo burn up (MCB), an integrated burn-up calculation code, deals with the complexity of the burn-up process which is applied to the European Lead-cooled Fast Reactor (ELFR). MCB uses continuous energy representation of cross section and spatial effects of full core reactor model; however, it automatically calculates nuclide production in all possible reactions or decay channels. Multi-recycling of MAs can cause an intensified build-up of curium, berkelium and californium. Some of their isotopes are strong neutron emitters from spontaneous fission, which hinders fuel recycling. The implementation of a novel methodology for trajectory period folding allows us to trace the life cycle of crucial MAs from the beginning of the reactor life towards the state of adiabatic equilibrium. The result of the analysis performed is presented, showing the sources of strong contribution to the neutron production rate. The parametric sensitivity analysis method for selected nuclide reactions is applied, revealing sensitivity of transmutation chains for the production of neutron emitter isotopes.

Keywords

1. Artioli, C., Grasso, G., & Petrovich, C. (2010). A new paradigm for core design aimed at the sustainability of nuclear energy: the solution of the extended equilibrium state. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 37, 915–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2010.03.016.10.1016/j.anucene.2010.03.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Oettingen, M., Cetnar, J., & Mirowski, T. (2015). The MCB code for numerical modeling of fourth generation nuclear reactors. Comput. Sci., 16(4), 329–350.10.7494/csci.2015.16.4.329Search in Google Scholar

3. Stanisz, P., Oettingen, M., & Cetnar, J. (2016). Monte Carlo modeling of Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor in adiabatic equilibrium state. Nucl. Eng. Des., 301, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.02.025.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.02.025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Stanisz, P., Cetnar, J., & Domańska, G. (2015). Modeling minor actinide multiple recycling in a lead-cooled fast reactor to demonstrate a fuel cycle without long-lived nuclear waste. Nukleonika, 60(3), 581–590. DOI: 10.1515/nuka-2015-0111.10.1515/nuka-2015-0111Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Cetnar, J., Stanisz, P., & Domańska, G. (2013). Adiabatic fuel cycle assessment of LFR core with MOX using MCB system. Study for the LEADER project of European Union’s 7th FP EURATOM. Kraków: AGH University, WEiP. (KEJ/2013/4).Search in Google Scholar

6. Cetnar, J., Stanisz, P., & Domańska, G. (2013). Transition to the adiabatic-LFR: preliminary definition of the start-up core and MA-burning capabilities evaluation. Report for the LEADER project of European Union’s 7th FP EURATOM. Kraków: AGH University, WeiP. (KEJ/2013/5).Search in Google Scholar

7. Cetnar, J. (2006). General solution of Bateman equations for nuclear transmutations. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 33, 640–645. DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.004.10.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Cinotti, L., Smith, C. F., Siennicki, J. J., Abderrahim, H. A., Benamati, G., Locatelli, G., Monti, S., Wider, H., Struwe, D., Orden, A., & Hwang, S. (2007). The potential of the LFR and the ELSY project. In International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2007): The nuclear renaissance at work. Proceedings of a meeting held 13–18 May 2007, Nice, France (Vol. 5, pp. 3231–3240). Societe Francaise d’Energie Nucleaire (SFEN).Search in Google Scholar

9. Mills, R. W. (2007). Future requirements of nuclear data for the handling, reprocessing and disposal of spent nuclear fuel. In International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology. DOI: 10.1051/ndata:07730.10.1051/ndata:07730Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Döderlein, C., Tucek, K., Cetnar, J., Grasso, G., & Stanisz, P. (2012). Definition of the ELFR core and neutronic characterization, Lead-cooled European Advanced Demonstrator Reactor. European Commission Directorate-General JRC. (DEL 005-2011).Search in Google Scholar

11. OECD NEA Data Bank. (2006). Processing of the JEFF-3.1 Cross Section Library into Continuous Energy Monte Carlo Radiation Transport and Criticality Data Library. (NEA/NSC/DOC18).Search in Google Scholar

12. Firestone, R. B., Shirley, V., Baglin, C., Chu, S., & Zipkin, J. (1996). Table of isotopes 8E. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

13. Mills, R. W. (2008). Nuclear data for the handling, reprocessing and disposal of spent nuclear fuel. UK: Nexia Solutions Ltd., Sellafield Works.Search in Google Scholar

14. Bays, S., Piet, S., Pope, M., Youinou, G., Dumontier, A., & Hawn, D. (2009). Transmutation dynamics: Impacts of multi-recycling on fuel cycle performances. Idaho National Laboratory. (INL/EXT-09 16857).Search in Google Scholar

15. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. (2015). Review of integral experiments for minor actinide management. (NEA no. 7222).Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo