This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
*Aharoni, T., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2021). “Be less of a slave to the news”: A texto-material perspective on news avoidance among young adults. Journalism Studies, 22(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1852885*AharoniT.Kligler-VilenchikN.Tenenboim-WeinblattK.2021“Be less of a slave to the news”: A texto-material perspective on news avoidance among young adultsJournalism Studies2214259https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1852885Search in Google Scholar
*Aharoni, T., Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K., Baden, C., & Overbeck, M. (2022). Dynamics of (dis) trust between the news media and their audience: The case of the April 2019 Israeli exit polls. Journalism, 23(2), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920978105*AharoniT.Tenenboim-WeinblattK.BadenC.OverbeckM.2022Dynamics of (dis) trust between the news media and their audience: The case of the April 2019 Israeli exit pollsJournalism232337353https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920978105Search in Google Scholar
*Ahmed, S. (2023). Navigating the maze: Deepfakes, cognitive ability, and social media news skepticism. New Media & Society, 25(5), 1108–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211019198*AhmedS.2023Navigating the maze: Deepfakes, cognitive ability, and social media news skepticismNew Media & Society25511081129https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211019198Search in Google Scholar
*Alyukov, M. (2023). Harnessing distrust: News, credibility heuristics, and war in an authoritarian regime. Political Communication, 40(5), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2196951*AlyukovM.2023Harnessing distrust: News, credibility heuristics, and war in an authoritarian regimePolitical Communication405527554https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2196951Search in Google Scholar
*Andersen, K., Shehata, A., & Andersson, D. (2023). Alternative news orientation and trust in mainstream media: A longitudinal audience perspective. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1986412*AndersenK.ShehataA.AnderssonD.2023Alternative news orientation and trust in mainstream media: A longitudinal audience perspectiveDigital Journalism115833852https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1986412Search in Google Scholar
*Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Hooker, C. M., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). Online news creation, trust in the media, and political participation: Direct and moderating effects over time. Journalism, 19(5), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917700447*Ardèvol-AbreuA.HookerC. M.Gil de ZúñigaH.2018Online news creation, trust in the media, and political participation: Direct and moderating effects over timeJournalism195611631https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917700447Search in Google Scholar
*Aupers, S. (2012). ‘Trust no one’: Modernization, paranoia and conspiracy culture. European Journal of Communication, 27(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111433566*AupersS.2012‘Trust no one’: Modernization, paranoia and conspiracy cultureEuropean Journal of Communication2712234https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111433566Search in Google Scholar
*Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317*BennettW. L.LivingstonS.2018The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutionsEuropean Journal of Communication332122139https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317Search in Google Scholar
*Bodó, B. (2021). Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2668–2690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820939922*BodóB.2021Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediatorsNew Media & Society23926682690https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820939922Search in Google Scholar
*Cammaerts, B. (2015). Neoliberalism and the post-hegemonic war of position: The dialectic between invisibility and visibilities. European Journal of Communication, 30(5), 522–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115597847*CammaertsB.2015Neoliberalism and the post-hegemonic war of position: The dialectic between invisibility and visibilitiesEuropean Journal of Communication305522538https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115597847Search in Google Scholar
Carlson, M. (2018). The information politics of journalism in a post-truth age. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1879–1888. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1494513CarlsonM.2018The information politics of journalism in a post-truth ageJournalism Studies191318791888https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1494513Search in Google Scholar
Carlson, M., Robinson, S., & Lewis, S. C. (2021). Digital press criticism: The symbolic dimensions of Donald Trump’s assault on U.S. journalists as the “enemy of the people”. Digital Journalism, 9(6), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1836981CarlsonM.RobinsonS.LewisS. C.2021Digital press criticism: The symbolic dimensions of Donald Trump’s assault on U.S. journalists as the “enemy of the people”Digital Journalism96737754https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1836981Search in Google Scholar
*Clementson, D. E. (2019). Why won’t you answer the question? Mass-mediated deception detection after journalists’ accusations of politicians’ evasion. Journal of Communication, 69(6), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz036*ClementsonD. E.2019Why won’t you answer the question? Mass-mediated deception detection after journalists’ accusations of politicians’ evasionJournal of Communication696674695https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz036Search in Google Scholar
*Cloudy, J., Banks, J., & Bowman, N. D. (2023). The str(AI)ght scoop: Artificial intelligence cues reduce perceptions of hostile media bias. Digital Journalism, 11(9), 1577–1596. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1969974*CloudyJ.BanksJ.BowmanN. D.2023The str(AI)ght scoop: Artificial intelligence cues reduce perceptions of hostile media biasDigital Journalism11915771596https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1969974Search in Google Scholar
*Coleman, S. (2012). Believing the news: From sinking trust to atrophied efficacy. European Journal of Communication, 27(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112438806*ColemanS.2012Believing the news: From sinking trust to atrophied efficacyEuropean Journal of Communication2713545https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112438806Search in Google Scholar
Dahlgren, P. (2018). Media, knowledge and trust: The deepening epistemic crisis of democracy. Javnost - The Public, 25(1-2), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819DahlgrenP.2018Media, knowledge and trust: The deepening epistemic crisis of democracyJavnost - The Public251-22027https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819Search in Google Scholar
*Das, A., & Schroeder, R. (2021). Online disinformation in the run-up to the Indian 2019 election. Information, Communication & Society, 24(12), 1762–1778. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1736123*DasA.SchroederR.2021Online disinformation in the run-up to the Indian 2019 electionInformation, Communication & Society241217621778https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1736123Search in Google Scholar
*DeAndrea, D. C., Tong, S. T., & Lim, Y. (2018). What causes more mistrust: Profile owners deleting user-generated content or website contributors masking their identities? Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1068–1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301523*DeAndreaD. C.TongS. T.LimY.2018What causes more mistrust: Profile owners deleting user-generated content or website contributors masking their identities?Information, Communication & Society21810681080https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301523Search in Google Scholar
*de León, E., Makhortykh, M., & Adam, S. (2024). Hyperpartisan, alternative, and conspiracy media users: An anti-establishment portrait. Political Communication, 41(6), 877–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2325426*de LeónE.MakhortykhM.AdamS.2024Hyperpartisan, alternative, and conspiracy media users: An anti-establishment portraitPolitical Communication416877902https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2325426Search in Google Scholar
*De Leyn, T., De Wolf, R., Vanden Abeele, M., & De Marez, L. (2022). Networked gift-giving: Ethno-religious minority youths’ negotiation of status and social ties in a society of distrust. New Media & Society, 26(7), 4163–4182. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221114628*De LeynT.De WolfR.Vanden AbeeleM.De MarezL.2022Networked gift-giving: Ethno-religious minority youths’ negotiation of status and social ties in a society of distrustNew Media & Society26741634182https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221114628Search in Google Scholar
*Doll, M. E., Moy, P., & Beckers, K. (2023). In peace journalism we trust? Effects of peace journalism on news-item credibility and media trust. Journalism Studies, 24(16), 1999–2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2274589*DollM. E.MoyP.BeckersK.2023In peace journalism we trust? Effects of peace journalism on news-item credibility and media trustJournalism Studies241619992019https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2274589Search in Google Scholar
*Egelhofer, J. L., Boyer, M., Lecheler, S., & Aaldering, L. (2022). Populist attitudes and politicians’ disinformation accusations: Effects on perceptions of media and politicians. Journal of Communication, 72(6), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac031*EgelhoferJ. L.BoyerM.LechelerS.AalderingL.2022Populist attitudes and politicians’ disinformation accusations: Effects on perceptions of media and politiciansJournal of Communication726619632https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac031Search in Google Scholar
Ekström, M., & Patrona, M. (2024). Authoritarian populism and the challenges for news journalism: A discourse approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003390152EkströmM.PatronaM.2024Authoritarian populism and the challenges for news journalism: A discourse approachRoutledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003390152Search in Google Scholar
*Elvestad, E., Phillips, A., & Feuerstein, M. (2018). Can trust in traditional news media explain cross-national differences in news exposure of young people online? A comparative study of Israel, Norway and the United Kingdom. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1332484*ElvestadE.PhillipsA.FeuersteinM.2018Can trust in traditional news media explain cross-national differences in news exposure of young people online? A comparative study of Israel, Norway and the United KingdomDigital Journalism62216235https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1332484Search in Google Scholar
Ettema, J. S. (2007). Journalism as reason-giving: Deliberative democracy, institutional accountability, and the news media’s mission. Political Communication, 24(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701312860EttemaJ. S.2007Journalism as reason-giving: Deliberative democracy, institutional accountability, and the news media’s missionPolitical Communication242143160https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701312860Search in Google Scholar
Fawzi, N., Steindl, N., Obermaier, M., Prochazka, F., Arlt, D., Blöbaum, B., Dohle, M., Engelke, K. M., Hanitzsch, T., Jackob, N., Jakobs, I., Klawier, T., Post, S., Reinemann, C., Schweiger, W., & Ziegele, M. (2021). Concepts, causes and consequences of trust in news media – A literature review and framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1960181FawziN.SteindlN.ObermaierM.ProchazkaF.ArltD.BlöbaumB.DohleM.EngelkeK. M.HanitzschT.JackobN.JakobsI.KlawierT.PostS.ReinemannC.SchweigerW.ZiegeleM.2021Concepts, causes and consequences of trust in news media – A literature review and frameworkAnnals of the International Communication Association452154174https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1960181Search in Google Scholar
*Fenton, N. (2019). (Dis)trust. Journalism, 20(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807068*FentonN.2019(Dis)trustJournalism2013639https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807068Search in Google Scholar
*Figenschou, T. U., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2019). Challenging journalistic authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies, 20(9), 1221–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868*FigenschouT. U.IhlebækK. A.2019Challenging journalistic authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative mediaJournalism Studies20912211237https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868Search in Google Scholar
*Flew, T. (2021). The global trust deficit disorder: A communications perspective on trust in the time of global pandemics. Journal of Communication, 71(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab006*FlewT.2021The global trust deficit disorder: A communications perspective on trust in the time of global pandemicsJournal of Communication712163186https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab006Search in Google Scholar
*Frischlich, L., Kuhfeldt, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Clever, L. (2023). Alternative counter-news use and fake news recall during the COVID-19 Crisis. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259*FrischlichL.KuhfeldtL.Schatto-EckrodtT.CleverL.2023Alternative counter-news use and fake news recall during the COVID-19 CrisisDigital Journalism11180102https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259Search in Google Scholar
*Goyanes, M., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2023). Antecedents of news avoidance: Competing effects of political interest, news overload, trust in news media, and “news finds me” perception. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1990097*GoyanesM.Ardèvol-AbreuA.Gil de ZúñigaH.2023Antecedents of news avoidance: Competing effects of political interest, news overload, trust in news media, and “news finds me” perceptionDigital Journalism111118https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1990097Search in Google Scholar
*Gray, J., & Murray, S. (2016). Hidden: Studying media dislike and its meaning. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(4), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877915572223*GrayJ.MurrayS.2016Hidden: Studying media dislike and its meaningInternational Journal of Cultural Studies194357372https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877915572223Search in Google Scholar
*Guðmundsson, B., & Kristinsson, S. (2019). Journalistic professionalism in Iceland: A framework for analysis and an assessment. Journalism, 20(12), 1684–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917695416*GuðmundssonB.KristinssonS.2019Journalistic professionalism in Iceland: A framework for analysis and an assessmentJournalism201216841703https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917695416Search in Google Scholar
*Gunn, J. (2018). On social networking and psychosis. Communication Theory, 28(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx002*GunnJ.2018On social networking and psychosisCommunication Theory2816988https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx002Search in Google Scholar
*Ha, L., Xu, Y., Yang, C., Wang, F., Yang, L., Abuljadail, M., Hu, X., Jiang, W., & Gabay, I. (2018). Decline in news content engagement or news medium engagement? A longitudinal analysis of news engagement since the rise of social and mobile media 2009–2012. Journalism, 19(5), 718–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916667654*HaL.XuY.YangC.WangF.YangL.AbuljadailM.HuX.JiangW.GabayI.2018Decline in news content engagement or news medium engagement? A longitudinal analysis of news engagement since the rise of social and mobile media 2009–2012Journalism195718739https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916667654Search in Google Scholar
*Haller, A., & Holt, K. (2019). Paradoxical populism: How PEGIDA relates to mainstream and alternative media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1665–1680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449882*HallerA.HoltK.2019Paradoxical populism: How PEGIDA relates to mainstream and alternative mediaInformation, Communication & Society221216651680https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449882Search in Google Scholar
*Hameleers, M. (2022). Separating truth from lies: Comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands. Information, Communication & Society, 25(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1764603*HameleersM.2022Separating truth from lies: Comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and NetherlandsInformation, Communication & Society251110126https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1764603Search in Google Scholar
*Hameleers, M., Brosius, A., & de Vreese, C. H. (2022). Whom to trust? Media exposure patterns of citizens with perceptions of misinformation and disinformation related to the news media. European Journal of Communication, 37(3), 237–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072667*HameleersM.BrosiusA.de VreeseC. H.2022Whom to trust? Media exposure patterns of citizens with perceptions of misinformation and disinformation related to the news mediaEuropean Journal of Communication373237268https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072667Search in Google Scholar
*Hameleers, M., Harff, D., & Schmuck, D. (2023). The alternative truth kept hidden from us: The effects of multimodal disinformation disseminated by ordinary citizens and alternative hyperpartisan media: Evidence from the US and India. Digital Journalism, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2210616*HameleersM.HarffD.SchmuckD.2023The alternative truth kept hidden from us: The effects of multimodal disinformation disseminated by ordinary citizens and alternative hyperpartisan media: Evidence from the US and IndiaDigital Journalism122https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2210616Search in Google Scholar
*Hameleers, M., & Minihold, S. (2022). Constructing discourses on (un)truthfulness: Attributions of reality, misinformation, and disinformation by politicians in a comparative social media setting. Communication Research, 49(8), 1176–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220982762*HameleersM.MiniholdS.2022Constructing discourses on (un)truthfulness: Attributions of reality, misinformation, and disinformation by politicians in a comparative social media settingCommunication Research49811761199https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220982762Search in Google Scholar
*Hameleers, M., & Yekta, N. (2023). Entering an information era of parallel truths? A qualitative analysis of legitimizing and de-legitimizing truth claims in established versus alternative media outlets. Communication Research, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231189685*HameleersM.YektaN.2023Entering an information era of parallel truths? A qualitative analysis of legitimizing and de-legitimizing truth claims in established versus alternative media outletsCommunication Research123https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231189685Search in Google Scholar
Hanitzsch, T., van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695HanitzschT.van DalenA.SteindlN.2018Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the pressThe International Journal of Press/Politics231323https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695Search in Google Scholar
Harsin, J. (2015). Regimes of posttruth, postpolitics, and attention economies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8(2), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12097HarsinJ.2015Regimes of posttruth, postpolitics, and attention economiesCommunication, Culture & Critique82327333https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12097Search in Google Scholar
*Hewa, N. (2021). For the record: Journalism recording technologies from “fish hooks” to frame rates. Journalism Studies, 22(3), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1871400*HewaN.2021For the record: Journalism recording technologies from “fish hooks” to frame ratesJournalism Studies223342357https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1871400Search in Google Scholar
*Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., Madrigal, G., Ploger, G., Carr, S., Carbone, M., Battocchio, A. F., & Soroka, S. (2024). Identity driven information ecosystems. Communication Theory, 34(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae006*Hiaeshutter-RiceD.MadrigalG.PlogerG.CarrS.CarboneM.BattocchioA. F.SorokaS.2024Identity driven information ecosystemsCommunication Theory3428291https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae006Search in Google Scholar
*Hjorth, F., & Adler-Nissen, R. (2019). Ideological asymmetry in the reach of pro-Russian digital disinformation to United States audiences. Journal of Communication, 69(2), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz006*HjorthF.Adler-NissenR.2019Ideological asymmetry in the reach of pro-Russian digital disinformation to United States audiencesJournal of Communication692168192https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz006Search in Google Scholar
*Humprecht, E. (2019). Where ‘fake news’ flourishes: A comparison across four western democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 22(13), 1973–1988. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1474241*HumprechtE.2019Where ‘fake news’ flourishes: A comparison across four western democraciesInformation, Communication & Society221319731988https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1474241Search in Google Scholar
*Humprecht, E. (2023). The role of trust and attitudes toward democracy in the dissemination of disinformation—A comparative analysis of six democracies. Digital Journalism, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2200196*HumprechtE.2023The role of trust and attitudes toward democracy in the dissemination of disinformation—A comparative analysis of six democraciesDigital Journalism118https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2200196Search in Google Scholar
*Humprecht, E., Esser, F., Aelst, P. V., Staender, A., & Morosoli, S. (2023). The sharing of disinformation in cross-national comparison: Analyzing patterns of resilience. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1342–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2006744*HumprechtE.EsserF.AelstP. V.StaenderA.MorosoliS.2023The sharing of disinformation in cross-national comparison: Analyzing patterns of resilienceInformation, Communication & Society26713421362https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2006744Search in Google Scholar
*Ihlebæk, K. A., & Holter, C. R. (2021). Hostile emotions: An exploratory study of far-right online commenters and their emotional connection to traditional and alternative news media. Journalism, 22(5), 1207–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985726*IhlebækK. A.HolterC. R.2021Hostile emotions: An exploratory study of far-right online commenters and their emotional connection to traditional and alternative news mediaJournalism22512071222https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985726Search in Google Scholar
Jakobsson, P., & Stiernstedt, F. (2023). Trust and the media: Arguments for the (irr)elevance of a concept. Journalism Studies, 24(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2169191JakobssonP.StiernstedtF.2023Trust and the media: Arguments for the (irr)elevance of a conceptJournalism Studies244479495https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2169191Search in Google Scholar
*Jakobsson, P., & Stiernstedt, F. (2024). Media resentment. European Journal of Communication, 39(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241228961*JakobssonP.StiernstedtF.2024Media resentmentEuropean Journal of Communication393245258https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241228961Search in Google Scholar
*Juarez Miro, C., & Anderson, J. (2024). Correcting false information: Journalistic coverage during the 2016 and 2020 US elections. Journalism Studies, 25(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2293830*Juarez MiroC.AndersonJ.2024Correcting false information: Journalistic coverage during the 2016 and 2020 US electionsJournalism Studies252218236https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2293830Search in Google Scholar
*Kaiser, J., Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2022). Partisan blocking: Biased responses to shared misinformation contribute to network polarization on social media. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac002*KaiserJ.VaccariC.ChadwickA.2022Partisan blocking: Biased responses to shared misinformation contribute to network polarization on social mediaJournal of Communication722214240https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac002Search in Google Scholar
Kangas, O., & Kvist, J. (2018). Nordic welfare states. In B. Greve (Ed.), Routledge handbook of the welfare state (2nd ed.) (pp. 148–160). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207049KangasO.KvistJ.2018Nordic welfare statesInGreveB.(Ed.),Routledge handbook of the welfare state2nd ed.148160Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207049Search in Google Scholar
*Karlsson, M. (2020). Dispersing the opacity of transparency in journalism on the appeal of different forms of transparency to the general public. Journalism Studies, 21(13), 1795–1814. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1790028*KarlssonM.2020Dispersing the opacity of transparency in journalism on the appeal of different forms of transparency to the general publicJournalism Studies211317951814https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1790028Search in Google Scholar
*Kim, B., & Jin, B. (2023). Ideological and economic influences on journalistic autonomy and cynicism: A moderating role of digital adaptation of news organizations. Journalism, 24(9), 2076–2094. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221095334*KimB.JinB.2023Ideological and economic influences on journalistic autonomy and cynicism: A moderating role of digital adaptation of news organizationsJournalism24920762094https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221095334Search in Google Scholar
*Knudsen, E., Dahlberg, S., Iversen, M. H., Johannesson, M. P., & Nygaard, S. (2022). How the public understands news media trust: An open-ended approach. Journalism, 23(11), 2347–2363. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211005892*KnudsenE.DahlbergS.IversenM. H.JohannessonM. P.NygaardS.2022How the public understands news media trust: An open-ended approachJournalism231123472363https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211005892Search in Google Scholar
*Koivunen, A., & Vuorelma, J. (2022). Trust and authority in the age of mediatised politics. European Journal of Communication, 37(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072653*KoivunenA.VuorelmaJ.2022Trust and authority in the age of mediatised politicsEuropean Journal of Communication374393408https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072653Search in Google Scholar
*Kyriakidou, M., Morani, M., Cushion, S., & Hughes, C. (2023). Audience understandings of disinformation: Navigating news media through a prism of pragmatic scepticism. Journalism, 24(11), 2379–2396. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221114244*KyriakidouM.MoraniM.CushionS.HughesC.2023Audience understandings of disinformation: Navigating news media through a prism of pragmatic scepticismJournalism241123792396https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221114244Search in Google Scholar
Ladd, J. M. (2012). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton University Press.LaddJ. M.2012Why Americans hate the media and how it mattersPrinceton University PressSearch in Google Scholar
*Lee, E. H., Lee, T. (D.), & Lee, B.-K. (2022). Understanding the role of new media literacy in the diffusion of unverified information during the COVID-19 pandemic. New Media & Society, 26(9), 5195–5218. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221130955*LeeE. H.LeeT. (D.)LeeB.-K.2022Understanding the role of new media literacy in the diffusion of unverified information during the COVID-19 pandemicNew Media & Society26951955218https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221130955Search in Google Scholar
*Lee, E.-J., & Jang, J. (2023). How political identity and misinformation priming affect truth judgments and sharing intention of partisan news. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2163413*LeeE.-J.JangJ.2023How political identity and misinformation priming affect truth judgments and sharing intention of partisan newsDigital Journalism111226245https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2163413Search in Google Scholar
*Li, J. (2023). Not all skepticism is “healthy” skepticism: Theorizing accuracy- and identity-motivated skepticism toward social media misinformation. New Media & Society, 27(1), 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231179941*LiJ.2023Not all skepticism is “healthy” skepticism: Theorizing accuracy- and identity-motivated skepticism toward social media misinformationNew Media & Society271522544https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231179941Search in Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2017). Trust and power (C. Morgner, & M. King, Eds.). Polity Press.LuhmannN.2017Trust and powerMorgnerC.KingM.Eds.Polity PressSearch in Google Scholar
*Lyons, B. A. (2022). Why we should rethink the third-person effect: Disentangling bias and earned confidence using behavioral data. Journal of Communication, 72(5), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac021*LyonsB. A.2022Why we should rethink the third-person effect: Disentangling bias and earned confidence using behavioral dataJournal of Communication725565577https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac021Search in Google Scholar
*Maddox, J. (2023). Micro-celebrities of information: Mapping calibrated expertise and knowledge influencers among social media veterinarians. Information, Communication & Society, 26(14), 2726–2752. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2109980*MaddoxJ.2023Micro-celebrities of information: Mapping calibrated expertise and knowledge influencers among social media veterinariansInformation, Communication & Society261427262752https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2109980Search in Google Scholar
*Markov, Č., & Min, Y. (2023). Unpacking public animosity toward professional journalism: A qualitative analysis of the differences between media distrust and cynicism. Journalism, 24(10), 2136–2154. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221122064*MarkovČ.MinY.2023Unpacking public animosity toward professional journalism: A qualitative analysis of the differences between media distrust and cynicismJournalism241021362154https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221122064Search in Google Scholar
*Martí-Danés, A., Besalú, R., Pont-Sorribes, C., & Gómez-Puertas, L. (2023). Analysis of news credibility in the digital press: Source types have a limited effect, while age, gender, and education are differential factors. Journalism, 25(12), 2582–2603. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231215190*Martí-DanésA.BesalúR.Pont-SorribesC.Gómez-PuertasL.2023Analysis of news credibility in the digital press: Source types have a limited effect, while age, gender, and education are differential factorsJournalism251225822603https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231215190Search in Google Scholar
*Martin, J. D., & Hassan, F. (2020). News media credibility ratings and perceptions of online fake news exposure in five countries. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2215–2233. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1827970*MartinJ. D.HassanF.2020News media credibility ratings and perceptions of online fake news exposure in five countriesJournalism Studies211622152233https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1827970Search in Google Scholar
*Martin, J. D., Martins, R. J., & Naqvi, S. (2018). Media use predictors of online political efficacy among Internet users in five Arab countries. Information, Communication & Society, 21(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1266375*MartinJ. D.MartinsR. J.NaqviS.2018Media use predictors of online political efficacy among Internet users in five Arab countriesInformation, Communication & Society211129146https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1266375Search in Google Scholar
*Masullo, G. M., Tenenboim, O., & Lu, S. (2023). “Toxic atmosphere effect”: Uncivil online comments cue negative audience perceptions of news outlet credibility. Journalism, 24(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211064001*MasulloG. M.TenenboimO.LuS.2023“Toxic atmosphere effect”: Uncivil online comments cue negative audience perceptions of news outlet credibilityJournalism241101119https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211064001Search in Google Scholar
*Matthes, J. (2013). The affective underpinnings of hostile media perceptions: Exploring the distinct effects of affective and cognitive involvement. Communication Research, 40(3), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211420255*MatthesJ.2013The affective underpinnings of hostile media perceptions: Exploring the distinct effects of affective and cognitive involvementCommunication Research403360387https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211420255Search in Google Scholar
*Mesmer, K. R. (2023). Socializing students to accept hostility? How instructors talk about hostility in the journalism classroom. Journalism, 25(12), 2564–2581. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231219099*MesmerK. R.2023Socializing students to accept hostility? How instructors talk about hostility in the journalism classroomJournalism251225642581https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231219099Search in Google Scholar
*Michailidou, A., & Trenz, H.-J. (2021). Rethinking journalism standards in the era of post-truth politics: From truth keepers to truth mediators. Media, Culture & Society, 43(7), 1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211040669*MichailidouA.TrenzH.-J.2021Rethinking journalism standards in the era of post-truth politics: From truth keepers to truth mediatorsMedia, Culture & Society43713401349https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211040669Search in Google Scholar
*Molina, M. D., & Sundar, S. S. (2024). Does distrust in humans predict greater trust in AI? Role of individual differences in user responses to content moderation. New Media & Society, 26(6), 3638–3656. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221103534*MolinaM. D.SundarS. S.2024Does distrust in humans predict greater trust in AI? Role of individual differences in user responses to content moderationNew Media & Society26636383656https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221103534Search in Google Scholar
*Moran, R. E., & Nechushtai, E. (2023). Before reception: Trust in the news as infrastructure. Journalism, 24(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211048961*MoranR. E.NechushtaiE.2023Before reception: Trust in the news as infrastructureJournalism243457474https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211048961Search in Google Scholar
*Moreno-Almeida, C., & Banaji, S. (2019). Digital use and mistrust in the aftermath of the Arab Spring: Beyond narratives of liberation and disillusionment. Media, Culture & Society, 41(8), 1125–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718823143*Moreno-AlmeidaC.BanajiS.2019Digital use and mistrust in the aftermath of the Arab Spring: Beyond narratives of liberation and disillusionmentMedia, Culture & Society41811251141https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718823143Search in Google Scholar
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001MuddeC.Rovira KaltwasserC.2017Populism: A very short introductionOxford University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
*Nelson, J. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2023). Only “sheep” trust journalists? How citizens’ self-perceptions shape their approach to news. New Media & Society, 25(7), 1522–1541. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211018160*NelsonJ. L.LewisS. C.2023Only “sheep” trust journalists? How citizens’ self-perceptions shape their approach to newsNew Media & Society25715221541https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211018160Search in Google Scholar
*Neo, R. L. (2020). The limits of online consensus effects: A social affirmation theory of how aggregate online rating scores influence trust in factual corrections. Communication Research, 47(5), 771–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218782823*NeoR. L.2020The limits of online consensus effects: A social affirmation theory of how aggregate online rating scores influence trust in factual correctionsCommunication Research475771792https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218782823Search in Google Scholar
*Park, C. S. (2024). Why people rely on fact-checkers? Testing theses of “perceived severity of fake news” and “disappointment in news media”. Journalism Studies, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2289878*ParkC. S.2024Why people rely on fact-checkers? Testing theses of “perceived severity of fake news” and “disappointment in news media”Journalism Studies251118https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2289878Search in Google Scholar
*Park, S., Fisher, C., Fletcher, R., Tandoc, E., Dulleck, U., Fulton, J., Stepnik, A., & Yao, S. P. (2024). Exploring responses to mainstream news among heavy and non-news users: From high-effort pragmatic scepticism to low effort cynical disengagement. New Media & Society, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241234916*ParkS.FisherC.FletcherR.TandocE.DulleckU.FultonJ.StepnikA.YaoS. P.2024Exploring responses to mainstream news among heavy and non-news users: From high-effort pragmatic scepticism to low effort cynical disengagementNew Media & Society121https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241234916Search in Google Scholar
*Park, Y. J., Chung, J. E., & Kim, J. N. (2022). Social media, misinformation, and cultivation of informational mistrust: Cultivating Covid-19 mistrust. Journalism, 23(12), 2571–2590. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221085050*ParkY. J.ChungJ. E.KimJ. N.2022Social media, misinformation, and cultivation of informational mistrust: Cultivating Covid-19 mistrustJournalism231225712590https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221085050Search in Google Scholar
*Parks, P. (2020). Toward a humanistic turn for a more ethical journalism. Journalism, 21(9), 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919894778*ParksP.2020Toward a humanistic turn for a more ethical journalismJournalism21912291245https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919894778Search in Google Scholar
*Pasitselska, O. (2022). Logics of exclusion: How Ukrainian audiences renegotiate propagandistic narratives in times of conflict. Political Communication, 39(4), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2047846*PasitselskaO.2022Logics of exclusion: How Ukrainian audiences renegotiate propagandistic narratives in times of conflictPolitical Communication394475499https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2047846Search in Google Scholar
*Pedersen, S., & Burnett, S. (2022). Women’s use and abuse of the news media during the COVID-19 pandemic on Mumsnet. Digital Journalism, 10(6), 1098–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1967768*PedersenS.BurnettS.2022Women’s use and abuse of the news media during the COVID-19 pandemic on MumsnetDigital Journalism10610981114https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1967768Search in Google Scholar
*Peeters, M., & Maeseele, P. (2024). From sporadic sympathy to devoted skepticism: Alternative media use as an affective sense-making practice. Digital Journalism, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2312426*PeetersM.MaeseeleP.2024From sporadic sympathy to devoted skepticism: Alternative media use as an affective sense-making practiceDigital Journalism120https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2312426Search in Google Scholar
*Pingree, R. J. (2011). Effects of unresolved factual disputes in the news on epistemic political efficacy. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01525.x*PingreeR. J.2011Effects of unresolved factual disputes in the news on epistemic political efficacyJournal of Communication6112247https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01525.xSearch in Google Scholar
*Post, S., & Bienzeisler, N. (2024). The honest broker versus the epistocrat: Attenuating distrust in science by disentangling science from politics. Political Communication, 41(5), 763–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2317274*PostS.BienzeislerN.2024The honest broker versus the epistocrat: Attenuating distrust in science by disentangling science from politicsPolitical Communication415763785https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2317274Search in Google Scholar
*Pyo, J. Y. (2024). Haters as anti-fans? Accruing capital through audiences who hate journalists. Digital Journalism, 12(6), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2191331*PyoJ. Y.2024Haters as anti-fans? Accruing capital through audiences who hate journalistsDigital Journalism126773789https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2191331Search in Google Scholar
*Quick, B. L., Morgan, S. E., LaVoie, N. R., & Bosch, D. (2014). Grey’s anatomy viewing and organ donation attitude formation: Examining mediators bridging this relationship among African Americans, Caucasians, and Latinos. Communication Research, 41(5), 690–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213475476*QuickB. L.MorganS. E.LaVoieN. R.BoschD.2014Grey’s anatomy viewing and organ donation attitude formation: Examining mediators bridging this relationship among African Americans, Caucasians, and LatinosCommunication Research415690716https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213475476Search in Google Scholar
Rekker, R. (2021). The nature and origins of political polarization over science. Public Understanding of Science, 30(4), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521989193RekkerR.2021The nature and origins of political polarization over sciencePublic Understanding of Science304352368https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521989193Search in Google Scholar
*Riedl, A., & Eberl, J.-M. (2022). Audience expectations of journalism: What’s politics got to do with it? Journalism, 23(8), 1682–1699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920976422*RiedlA.EberlJ.-M.2022Audience expectations of journalism: What’s politics got to do with it?Journalism23816821699https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920976422Search in Google Scholar
*Robinson, S., Jensen, K., & Dávalos, C. (2021). “Listening literacies” as keys to rebuilding trust in journalism: A typology for a changing news audience. Journalism Studies, 22(9), 1219–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1937677*RobinsonS.JensenK.DávalosC.2021“Listening literacies” as keys to rebuilding trust in journalism: A typology for a changing news audienceJournalism Studies22912191237https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1937677Search in Google Scholar
*Ross Arguedas, A. A., Badrinathan, S., Mont’Alverne, C., Toff, B., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2022). “It’s a battle you are never going to win”: Perspectives from journalists in four countries on how digital media platforms undermine trust in news. Journalism Studies, 23(14), 1821–1840. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2112908*Ross ArguedasA. A.BadrinathanS.Mont’AlverneC.ToffB.FletcherR.NielsenR. K.2022“It’s a battle you are never going to win”: Perspectives from journalists in four countries on how digital media platforms undermine trust in newsJournalism Studies231418211840https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2112908Search in Google Scholar
*Sang, Y., Lee, J. Y., Park, S., Fisher, C., & Fuller, G. (2020). Signalling and expressive interaction: Online news users’ different modes of interaction on digital platforms. Digital Journalism, 8(4), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1743194*SangY.LeeJ. Y.ParkS.FisherC.FullerG.2020Signalling and expressive interaction: Online news users’ different modes of interaction on digital platformsDigital Journalism84467485https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1743194Search in Google Scholar
*Schwarzenegger, C. (2020). Personal epistemologies of the media: Selective criticality, pragmatic trust, and competence–confidence in navigating media repertoires in the digital age. New Media & Society, 22(2), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819856919*SchwarzeneggerC.2020Personal epistemologies of the media: Selective criticality, pragmatic trust, and competence–confidence in navigating media repertoires in the digital ageNew Media & Society222361377https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819856919Search in Google Scholar
*Seçkin, G., Hughes, S., Campbell, P., & Lawson, M. (2021). In internet we trust: Intersectionality of distrust and patient non-adherence. Information, Communication & Society, 24(5), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874479*SeçkinG.HughesS.CampbellP.LawsonM.2021In internet we trust: Intersectionality of distrust and patient non-adherenceInformation, Communication & Society245751771https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874479Search in Google Scholar
*Shin, J., & Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12284*ShinJ.ThorsonK.2017Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social mediaJournal of Communication672233255https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12284Search in Google Scholar
*Shin, W., Kim, C., & Joo, J. (2021). Hating journalism: Anti-press discourse and negative emotions toward journalism in Korea. Journalism, 22(5), 1239–1255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985729*ShinW.KimC.JooJ.2021Hating journalism: Anti-press discourse and negative emotions toward journalism in KoreaJournalism22512391255https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985729Search in Google Scholar
*Splendore, S., & Curini, L. (2020). Proximity between citizens and journalists as a determinant of trust in the media: An application to Italy. Journalism Studies, 21(9), 1167–1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1725601*SplendoreS.CuriniL.2020Proximity between citizens and journalists as a determinant of trust in the media: An application to ItalyJournalism Studies21911671185https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1725601Search in Google Scholar
*Stecula, D. A., Motta, M., Kuru, O., & Jamieson, K. H. (2022). The great and powerful Dr. Oz? Alternative health media consumption and vaccine views in the United States. Journal of Communication, 72(3), 374–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac011*SteculaD. A.MottaM.KuruO.JamiesonK. H.2022The great and powerful Dr. Oz? Alternative health media consumption and vaccine views in the United StatesJournal of Communication723374400https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac011Search in Google Scholar
*Suiter, J., & Fletcher, R. (2020). Polarization and partisanship: Key drivers of distrust in media old and new? European Journal of Communication, 35(5), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120903685*SuiterJ.FletcherR.2020Polarization and partisanship: Key drivers of distrust in media old and new?European Journal of Communication355484501https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120903685Search in Google Scholar
*Szostek, J. (2018). News media repertoires and strategic narrative reception: A paradox of dis/belief in authoritarian Russia. New Media & Society, 20(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816656638*SzostekJ.2018News media repertoires and strategic narrative reception: A paradox of dis/belief in authoritarian RussiaNew Media & Society2016887https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816656638Search in Google Scholar
*Thurman, N., Moeller, J., Helberger, N., & Trilling, D. (2019). My friends, editors, algorithms, and I. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1493936*ThurmanN.MoellerJ.HelbergerN.TrillingD.2019My friends, editors, algorithms, and IDigital Journalism74447469https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1493936Search in Google Scholar
*Tsai, J.-Y., Bosse, R., Sridharan, N., & Chadha, M. (2022). Reclaiming the narratives: Situated multidimensional representation of underserved Indigenous communities through citizen-driven reporting. Journalism, 23(10), 2132–2152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920983261*TsaiJ.-Y.BosseR.SridharanN.ChadhaM.2022Reclaiming the narratives: Situated multidimensional representation of underserved Indigenous communities through citizen-driven reportingJournalism231021322152https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920983261Search in Google Scholar
*Tsang, S. J. (2018). Empathy and the hostile media phenomenon. Journal of Communication, 68(4), 809–829. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy031*TsangS. J.2018Empathy and the hostile media phenomenonJournal of Communication684809829https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy031Search in Google Scholar
*Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371*TsfatiY.CappellaJ. N.2003Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposureCommunication Research305504529https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371Search in Google Scholar
*Tuomola, S., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2023). Emotion mobilisation through the imagery of people in Finnish-language right-wing alternative media. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2061551*TuomolaS.Wahl-JorgensenK.2023Emotion mobilisation through the imagery of people in Finnish-language right-wing alternative mediaDigital Journalism1116179https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2061551Search in Google Scholar
*van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Hameleers, M., & Ohme, J. (2023). Can fighting misinformation have a negative spillover effect? How warnings for the threat of misinformation can decrease general news credibility. Journalism Studies, 24(6), 803–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2187652*van der MeerT. G. L. A.HameleersM.OhmeJ.2023Can fighting misinformation have a negative spillover effect? How warnings for the threat of misinformation can decrease general news credibilityJournalism Studies246803823https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2187652Search in Google Scholar
*Vanhaeght, A.-S. (2018). The need for not more, but more socially relevant audience participation in public service media. Media, Culture & Society, 41(1), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718798898*VanhaeghtA.-S.2018The need for not more, but more socially relevant audience participation in public service mediaMedia, Culture & Society411120137https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718798898Search in Google Scholar
*van Krieken, K. (2020). Do reconstructive and attributive quotes in news narratives influence engagement, credibility and realism? Journalism Studies, 21(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1632735*van KriekenK.2020Do reconstructive and attributive quotes in news narratives influence engagement, credibility and realism?Journalism Studies212145161https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1632735Search in Google Scholar
*van Zoonen, L. (2012). I-pistemology: Changing truth claims in popular and political culture. European Journal of Communication, 27(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112438808*van ZoonenL.2012I-pistemology: Changing truth claims in popular and political cultureEuropean Journal of Communication2715667https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112438808Search in Google Scholar
*Vermeer, S., Kruikemeier, S., Trilling, D., & de Vreese, C. (2022). Using panel data to study political interest, news media trust, and news media use in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journalism Studies, 23(5-6), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.2017790*VermeerS.KruikemeierS.TrillingD.de VreeseC.2022Using panel data to study political interest, news media trust, and news media use in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemicJournalism Studies235-6740760https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.2017790Search in Google Scholar
*Vraga, E. K., & Tully, M. (2021). News literacy, social media behaviors, and skepticism toward information on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637445*VragaE. K.TullyM.2021News literacy, social media behaviors, and skepticism toward information on social mediaInformation, Communication & Society242150166https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637445Search in Google Scholar
*Wagner, M. C., & Boczkowski, P. J. (2019). The reception of fake news: The interpretations and practices that shape the consumption of perceived misinformation. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 870–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1653208*WagnerM. C.BoczkowskiP. J.2019The reception of fake news: The interpretations and practices that shape the consumption of perceived misinformationDigital Journalism77870885https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1653208Search in Google Scholar
*Wagnsson, C. (2023). The paperboys of Russian messaging: RT/Sputnik audiences as vehicles for malign information influence. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1849–1867. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2041700*WagnssonC.2023The paperboys of Russian messaging: RT/Sputnik audiences as vehicles for malign information influenceInformation, Communication & Society26918491867https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2041700Search in Google Scholar
*Wenzel, A. (2020). Red state, purple town: Polarized communities and local journalism in rural and small-town Kentucky. Journalism, 21(4), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918783949*WenzelA.2020Red state, purple town: Polarized communities and local journalism in rural and small-town KentuckyJournalism214557573https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918783949Search in Google Scholar
*Wu, A. X. (2018). Brainwashing paranoia and lay media theories in China: The phenomenological dimension of media use (and the self) in digital environments. Media, Culture & Society, 40(6), 909–926. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717734409*WuA. X.2018Brainwashing paranoia and lay media theories in China: The phenomenological dimension of media use (and the self) in digital environmentsMedia, Culture & Society406909926https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717734409Search in Google Scholar
*Yamamoto, M., Jo, H., & Ran, W. (2022). Anti-media expression by citizens: Conservative summary sites, hostile media perceptions, and media trust in Japan. Information, Communication & Society, 25(13), 1952–1968. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1907436*YamamotoM.JoH.RanW.2022Anti-media expression by citizens: Conservative summary sites, hostile media perceptions, and media trust in JapanInformation, Communication & Society251319521968https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1907436Search in Google Scholar
*Yamamoto, M., Lee, T.-T., & Ran, W. (2016). Media trust in a community context: A multilevel analysis of individual- and prefecture-level sources of media trust in Japan. Communication Research, 43(1), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565894*YamamotoM.LeeT.-T.RanW.2016Media trust in a community context: A multilevel analysis of individual- and prefecture-level sources of media trust in JapanCommunication Research431131154https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565894Search in Google Scholar
*Zimdars, M., Cullinan, M. E., & Na, K. (2023). Alternative health groups on social media, misinformation, and the (de)stabilization of ontological security. New Media & Society, 26(10), 6059–6076. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221146171*ZimdarsM.CullinanM. E.NaK.2023Alternative health groups on social media, misinformation, and the (de)stabilization of ontological securityNew Media & Society261060596076https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221146171Search in Google Scholar
*Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020). Mistrust, disinforming news, and vote choice: A panel survey on the origins and consequences of believing disinformation in the 2017 German parliamentary election. Political Communication, 37(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095*ZimmermannF.KohringM.2020Mistrust, disinforming news, and vote choice: A panel survey on the origins and consequences of believing disinformation in the 2017 German parliamentary electionPolitical Communication372215237https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095Search in Google Scholar