The ambiguities of surveillance as care and control: Struggles in the domestication of location-tracking applications by Danish parents

Abu-Laban, Y. (2014). Gendering surveillance studies: The empirical and normative promise of feminist methodology. Surveillance & Society, 13(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i1.5163 Abu-LabanY. 2014 Gendering surveillance studies: The empirical and normative promise of feminist methodology Surveillance & Society 13 1 44 56 https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i1.5163 10.24908/ss.v13i1.5163 Search in Google Scholar

Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). MIT Press. AkrichM. 1992 The description of technical objects In BijkerW. E. LawJ. (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change 205 224 MIT Press Search in Google Scholar

Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142 AlbrechtslundA. 2008 Online social networking as participatory surveillance First Monday 13 3 https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142 10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142 Search in Google Scholar

Baltar, F., & Brunet, I. (2012). Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research, 22(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211199960 BaltarF. BrunetI. 2012 Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook Internet Research 22 1 57 74 https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211199960 10.1108/10662241211199960 Search in Google Scholar

Barron, C. (2017). “Where are you, who are you with, what are you doing?” Children's strategies of negotiation and resistance to parental monitoring and surveillance via mobile phones. In E. Taylor, & T. Rooney (Eds.), Surveillance futures: Social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young people (pp. 110–121). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315611402 BarronC. 2017 “Where are you, who are you with, what are you doing?” Children's strategies of negotiation and resistance to parental monitoring and surveillance via mobile phones In TaylorE. RooneyT. (Eds.), Surveillance futures: Social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young people 110 121 Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315611402 10.4324/9781315611402 Search in Google Scholar

Boesen, J., Rode, J. A., & Mancini, C. (2010). The domestic panopticon: Location tracking in families. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing – Ubicomp ’10, Copenhagen, Denmark. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864382 BoesenJ. RodeJ. A. ManciniC. 2010 The domestic panopticon: Location tracking in families Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing – Ubicomp ’10 Copenhagen, Denmark ACM Press https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864382 10.1145/1864349.1864382 Search in Google Scholar

Brown, B., Taylor, A. S., Izadi, S., Sellen, A., Kaye, J. J., & Eardley, R. (2007). Locating family values: A field trial of the whereabouts clock. In J. Krumm, G. D. Abowd, A. Seneviratne, & T. Strang (Eds.), UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 354–371). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_21 BrownB. TaylorA. S. IzadiS. SellenA. KayeJ. J. EardleyR. 2007 Locating family values: A field trial of the whereabouts clock In KrummJ. AbowdG. D. SeneviratneA. StrangT. (Eds.), UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing 354 371 Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_21 10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_21 Search in Google Scholar

Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x ClarkL. S. 2011 Parental mediation theory for the digital age Communication Theory 21 4 323 343 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x Search in Google Scholar

Clark, L. S. (2013). The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford University Press. ClarkL. S. 2013 The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age Oxford University Press Search in Google Scholar

Coutard, O., & Guy, S. (2007). STS and the city: Politics and practices of hope. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32(6), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907303600 CoutardO. GuyS. 2007 STS and the city: Politics and practices of hope Science, Technology, & Human Values 32 6 713 734 https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907303600 10.1177/0162243907303600 Search in Google Scholar

Doepke, M., & Zilibotti, F. (2019). Love, money, and parenting: How economics explains the way we raise our kids. Princeton University Press. DoepkeM. ZilibottiF. 2019 Love, money, and parenting: How economics explains the way we raise our kids Princeton University Press Search in Google Scholar

Fotel, T., & Thomsen, T. U. (2002). The surveillance of children's mobility. Surveillance & Society, 1(4), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i4.3335 FotelT. ThomsenT. U. 2002 The surveillance of children's mobility Surveillance & Society 1 4 535 554 https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i4.3335 10.24908/ss.v1i4.3335 Search in Google Scholar

Hasinoff, A. A. (2017). Where are you? Location tracking and the promise of child safety. Television & New Media, 18(6), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416680450 HasinoffA. A. 2017 Where are you? Location tracking and the promise of child safety Television & New Media 18 6 496 512 https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416680450 10.1177/1527476416680450 Search in Google Scholar

Koskela, H. (2002). Webcams, TV shows and mobile phones: Empowering exhibitionism. Surveillance & Society, 2(2/3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i2/3.3374 KoskelaH. 2002 Webcams, TV shows and mobile phones: Empowering exhibitionism Surveillance & Society 2 2/3 199 215 https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i2/3.3374 10.24908/ss.v2i2/3.3374 Search in Google Scholar

Ling, R. S. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone's impact on society. Morgan Kaufmann. LingR. S. 2004 The mobile connection: The cell phone's impact on society Morgan Kaufmann Search in Google Scholar

Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life. Open University Press. LyonD. 2001 Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life Open University Press Search in Google Scholar

Lyon, D. (2003). Surveillance technology and surveillance society. In T. J. Misa, P. Brey, & A. Feenberg (Eds.), Modernity and technology (pp. 161–184). MIT Press. LyonD. 2003 Surveillance technology and surveillance society In MisaT. J. BreyP. FeenbergA. (Eds.), Modernity and technology 161 184 MIT Press Search in Google Scholar

Lyon, D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. Polity. LyonD. 2018 The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life Polity Search in Google Scholar

Marx, G., & Steeves, V. (2010). From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 192–230. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4152 MarxG. SteevesV. 2010 From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillance Surveillance & Society 7 3/4 192 230 https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4152 10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4152 Search in Google Scholar

Mascheroni, G., & Cuman, A. (2014). Net children go mobile: Final report. Deliverables D6.4 & D5.2. Educatt. MascheroniG. CumanA. 2014 Net children go mobile: Final report. Deliverables D6.4 & D5.2 Educatt Search in Google Scholar

McIntosh, I., Punch, S., Dorrer, N., & Emond, R. (2010). “You don’t have to be watched to make your toast”: Surveillance and food practices within residential care. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4157 McIntoshI. PunchS. DorrerN. EmondR. 2010 “You don’t have to be watched to make your toast”: Surveillance and food practices within residential care Surveillance & Society 7 3/4 290 303 https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4157 10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4157 Search in Google Scholar

Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (Eds.). (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript-Verlag. MolA. MoserI. PolsJ. (Eds.). 2010 Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms Transcript-Verlag Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, M. (2015). Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631271558913 MurphyM. 2015 Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices Social Studies of Science 45 5 717 737 https://doi.org/10.1177/030631271558913 10.1177/0306312715589136 Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, M. K., & Garey, A. I. (Eds.). (2009). Who's watching? Daily practices of surveillance among contemporary families. Vanderbilt University Press. NelsonM. K. GareyA. I. (Eds.). 2009 Who's watching? Daily practices of surveillance among contemporary families Vanderbilt University Press 10.2307/j.ctv17vf76w Search in Google Scholar

Nihlén Fahlquist, J. (2015). Responsibility and privacy – Ethical aspects of using GPS to track children. Children & Society, 29(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12016 Nihlén FahlquistJ. 2015 Responsibility and privacy – Ethical aspects of using GPS to track children Children & Society 29 1 38 47 https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12016 10.1111/chso.12016 Search in Google Scholar

Oostveen, A.-M., Vasalou, A., Van den Besselaar, P., & Brown, I. (2014). Child location tracking in the US and the UK: Same technology, different social implications. Surveillance & Society, 12(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i4.4937 OostveenA.-M. VasalouA. Van den BesselaarP. BrownI. 2014 Child location tracking in the US and the UK: Same technology, different social implications Surveillance & Society 12 4 581 593 https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i4.4937 10.24908/ss.v12i4.4937 Search in Google Scholar

Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). Introduction: How users and non-users matter. In N. Oudshoorn, & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies (pp. 1–25). MIT Press. OudshoornN. PinchT. 2003 Introduction: How users and non-users matter In OudshoornN. PinchT. (Eds.), How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies 1 25 MIT Press 10.7551/mitpress/3592.003.0006 Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, B. (2014). Tracking children, constructing fear: GPS and the manufacture of family safety. Information & Communications Technology Law, 23(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2014.970377 SimpsonB. 2014 Tracking children, constructing fear: GPS and the manufacture of family safety Information & Communications Technology Law 23 3 273 285 https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2014.970377 10.1080/13600834.2014.970377 Search in Google Scholar

Smith, G. J. D. (2014). Opening the black box: The work of watching. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203519387 SmithG. J. D. 2014 Opening the black box: The work of watching Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203519387 10.4324/9780203519387 Search in Google Scholar

Steeves, V., & Jones, O. (2010). Editorial: Surveillance, children and childhood. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4151 SteevesV. JonesO. 2010 Editorial: Surveillance, children and childhood Surveillance & Society 7 3/4 187 191 https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4151 10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4151 Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, E., & Rooney, T. (2017). Surveillance futures: Social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young people. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315611402 TaylorE. RooneyT. 2017 Surveillance futures: Social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young people Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315611402 10.4324/9781315611402 Search in Google Scholar

Vasalou, A., Oostveen, A.-M., & Joinson, A. N. (2012, February 11). A case study of non-adoption: The values of location tracking in the family. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2012 Conference, Seattle, USA. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2003131 VasalouA. OostveenA.-M. JoinsonA. N. 2012 February 11 A case study of non-adoption: The values of location tracking in the family Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2012 Conference Seattle, USA https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2003131 10.2139/ssrn.2003131 Search in Google Scholar

Wrennall, L. (2010). Surveillance and child protection: De-mystifying the Trojan horse. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4158 WrennallL. 2010 Surveillance and child protection: De-mystifying the Trojan horse Surveillance & Society 7 3/4 304 324 https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4158 10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4158 Search in Google Scholar