This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abu-Laban, Y. (2014). Gendering surveillance studies: The empirical and normative promise of feminist methodology. Surveillance & Society, 13(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i1.5163Abu-LabanY.2014Gendering surveillance studies: The empirical and normative promise of feminist methodologySurveillance & Society1314456https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i1.516310.24908/ss.v13i1.5163Search in Google Scholar
Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). MIT Press.AkrichM.1992The description of technical objectsInBijkerW. E.LawJ.(Eds.),Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change205224MIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142AlbrechtslundA.2008Online social networking as participatory surveillanceFirst Monday133https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i3.214210.5210/fm.v13i3.2142Search in Google Scholar
Baltar, F., & Brunet, I. (2012). Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research, 22(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211199960BaltarF.BrunetI.2012Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using FacebookInternet Research2215774https://doi.org/10.1108/1066224121119996010.1108/10662241211199960Search in Google Scholar
Barron, C. (2017). “Where are you, who are you with, what are you doing?” Children's strategies of negotiation and resistance to parental monitoring and surveillance via mobile phones. In E. Taylor, & T. Rooney (Eds.), Surveillance futures: Social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young people (pp. 110–121). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315611402BarronC.2017“Where are you, who are you with, what are you doing?” Children's strategies of negotiation and resistance to parental monitoring and surveillance via mobile phonesInTaylorE.RooneyT.(Eds.),Surveillance futures: Social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young people110121Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/978131561140210.4324/9781315611402Search in Google Scholar
Boesen, J., Rode, J. A., & Mancini, C. (2010). The domestic panopticon: Location tracking in families. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing – Ubicomp ’10, Copenhagen, Denmark. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864382BoesenJ.RodeJ. A.ManciniC.2010The domestic panopticon: Location tracking in familiesProceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing – Ubicomp ’10Copenhagen, DenmarkACM Presshttps://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.186438210.1145/1864349.1864382Search in Google Scholar
Brown, B., Taylor, A. S., Izadi, S., Sellen, A., Kaye, J. J., & Eardley, R. (2007). Locating family values: A field trial of the whereabouts clock. In J. Krumm, G. D. Abowd, A. Seneviratne, & T. Strang (Eds.), UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 354–371). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_21BrownB.TaylorA. S.IzadiS.SellenA.KayeJ. J.EardleyR.2007Locating family values: A field trial of the whereabouts clockInKrummJ.AbowdG. D.SeneviratneA.StrangT.(Eds.),UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing354371Springerhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_2110.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_21Search in Google Scholar
Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.xClarkL. S.2011Parental mediation theory for the digital ageCommunication Theory214323343https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.xSearch in Google Scholar
Clark, L. S. (2013). The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford University Press.ClarkL. S.2013The parent app: Understanding families in the digital ageOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Coutard, O., & Guy, S. (2007). STS and the city: Politics and practices of hope. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32(6), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907303600CoutardO.GuyS.2007STS and the city: Politics and practices of hopeScience, Technology, & Human Values326713734https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390730360010.1177/0162243907303600Search in Google Scholar
Doepke, M., & Zilibotti, F. (2019). Love, money, and parenting: How economics explains the way we raise our kids. Princeton University Press.DoepkeM.ZilibottiF.2019Love, money, and parenting: How economics explains the way we raise our kidsPrinceton University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Fotel, T., & Thomsen, T. U. (2002). The surveillance of children's mobility. Surveillance & Society, 1(4), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i4.3335FotelT.ThomsenT. U.2002The surveillance of children's mobilitySurveillance & Society14535554https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i4.333510.24908/ss.v1i4.3335Search in Google Scholar
Hasinoff, A. A. (2017). Where are you? Location tracking and the promise of child safety. Television & New Media, 18(6), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416680450HasinoffA. A.2017Where are you? Location tracking and the promise of child safetyTelevision & New Media186496512https://doi.org/10.1177/152747641668045010.1177/1527476416680450Search in Google Scholar
Koskela, H. (2002). Webcams, TV shows and mobile phones: Empowering exhibitionism. Surveillance & Society, 2(2/3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i2/3.3374KoskelaH.2002Webcams, TV shows and mobile phones: Empowering exhibitionismSurveillance & Society22/3199215https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i2/3.337410.24908/ss.v2i2/3.3374Search in Google Scholar
Ling, R. S. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone's impact on society. Morgan Kaufmann.LingR. S.2004The mobile connection: The cell phone's impact on societyMorgan KaufmannSearch in Google Scholar
Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life. Open University Press.LyonD.2001Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday lifeOpen University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Lyon, D. (2003). Surveillance technology and surveillance society. In T. J. Misa, P. Brey, & A. Feenberg (Eds.), Modernity and technology (pp. 161–184). MIT Press.LyonD.2003Surveillance technology and surveillance societyInMisaT. J.BreyP.FeenbergA.(Eds.),Modernity and technology161184MIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
Lyon, D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. Polity.LyonD.2018The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of lifePolitySearch in Google Scholar
Marx, G., & Steeves, V. (2010). From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 192–230. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4152MarxG.SteevesV.2010From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillanceSurveillance & Society73/4192230https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.415210.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4152Search in Google Scholar
Mascheroni, G., & Cuman, A. (2014). Net children go mobile: Final report. Deliverables D6.4 & D5.2. Educatt.MascheroniG.CumanA.2014Net children go mobile: Final report. Deliverables D6.4 & D5.2EducattSearch in Google Scholar
McIntosh, I., Punch, S., Dorrer, N., & Emond, R. (2010). “You don’t have to be watched to make your toast”: Surveillance and food practices within residential care. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4157McIntoshI.PunchS.DorrerN.EmondR.2010“You don’t have to be watched to make your toast”: Surveillance and food practices within residential careSurveillance & Society73/4290303https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.415710.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4157Search in Google Scholar
Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (Eds.). (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript-Verlag.MolA.MoserI.PolsJ.(Eds.).2010Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farmsTranscript-VerlagSearch in Google Scholar
Murphy, M. (2015). Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631271558913MurphyM.2015Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practicesSocial Studies of Science455717737https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127155891310.1177/0306312715589136Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, M. K., & Garey, A. I. (Eds.). (2009). Who's watching? Daily practices of surveillance among contemporary families. Vanderbilt University Press.NelsonM. K.GareyA. I.(Eds.).2009Who's watching? Daily practices of surveillance among contemporary familiesVanderbilt University Press10.2307/j.ctv17vf76wSearch in Google Scholar
Nihlén Fahlquist, J. (2015). Responsibility and privacy – Ethical aspects of using GPS to track children. Children & Society, 29(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12016Nihlén FahlquistJ.2015Responsibility and privacy – Ethical aspects of using GPS to track childrenChildren & Society2913847https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.1201610.1111/chso.12016Search in Google Scholar
Oostveen, A.-M., Vasalou, A., Van den Besselaar, P., & Brown, I. (2014). Child location tracking in the US and the UK: Same technology, different social implications. Surveillance & Society, 12(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i4.4937OostveenA.-M.VasalouA.Van den BesselaarP.BrownI.2014Child location tracking in the US and the UK: Same technology, different social implicationsSurveillance & Society124581593https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i4.493710.24908/ss.v12i4.4937Search in Google Scholar
Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003). Introduction: How users and non-users matter. In N. Oudshoorn, & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies (pp. 1–25). MIT Press.OudshoornN.PinchT.2003Introduction: How users and non-users matterInOudshoornN.PinchT.(Eds.),How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies125MIT Press10.7551/mitpress/3592.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Simpson, B. (2014). Tracking children, constructing fear: GPS and the manufacture of family safety. Information & Communications Technology Law, 23(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2014.970377SimpsonB.2014Tracking children, constructing fear: GPS and the manufacture of family safetyInformation & Communications Technology Law233273285https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2014.97037710.1080/13600834.2014.970377Search in Google Scholar
Smith, G. J. D. (2014). Opening the black box: The work of watching. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203519387SmithG. J. D.2014Opening the black box: The work of watchingRoutledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/978020351938710.4324/9780203519387Search in Google Scholar
Steeves, V., & Jones, O. (2010). Editorial: Surveillance, children and childhood. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4151SteevesV.JonesO.2010Editorial: Surveillance, children and childhoodSurveillance & Society73/4187191https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.415110.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4151Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, E., & Rooney, T. (2017). Surveillance futures: Social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young people. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315611402TaylorE.RooneyT.2017Surveillance futures: Social and ethical implications of new technologies for children and young peopleRoutledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/978131561140210.4324/9781315611402Search in Google Scholar
Vasalou, A., Oostveen, A.-M., & Joinson, A. N. (2012, February 11). A case study of non-adoption: The values of location tracking in the family. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2012 Conference, Seattle, USA. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2003131VasalouA.OostveenA.-M.JoinsonA. N.2012February11A case study of non-adoption: The values of location tracking in the familyComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2012 ConferenceSeattle, USAhttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.200313110.2139/ssrn.2003131Search in Google Scholar
Wrennall, L. (2010). Surveillance and child protection: De-mystifying the Trojan horse. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4158WrennallL.2010Surveillance and child protection: De-mystifying the Trojan horseSurveillance & Society73/4304324https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.415810.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4158Search in Google Scholar