This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Blaszka, M., Burch, L. M., Frederick, E. L., Clavio, G. & Walsh, P. (2012). #WorldSeries: An empirical examination of a Twitter hashtag during a major sporting event. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5(4): 435–453.BlaszkaM.BurchL. M.FrederickE. L.ClavioG.WalshP.2012#WorldSeries: An empirical examination of a Twitter hashtag during a major sporting event5443545310.1123/ijsc.5.4.435Search in Google Scholar
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10: P10008. doi: http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008BlondelV. D.GuillaumeJ.-L.LambiotteR.LefebvreE.2008Fast unfolding of communities in large networks10P10008. doi: http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P1000810.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008Search in Google Scholar
Bruns, A. (2008). Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation. Information Polity, 13(1–2): 71–85.BrunsA.2008Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation131–2718510.3233/IP-2008-0141Search in Google Scholar
Bruns, A. & Burgess, J. (2015). Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In N. Rambukkana (ed.), Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks (pp. 13–28). New York: Peter Lang.BrunsA.BurgessJ.2015Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publicsInRambukkanaN.(ed.)1328New YorkPeter LangSearch in Google Scholar
Bruns, A. & Moe, H. (2014). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 15–28). New York: Peter Lang.BrunsA.MoeH.2014Structural layers of communication on TwitterInWellerK.BrunsA.BurgessJ.MahrtM.PuschmannC.(eds.)1528New YorkPeter Lang10.3726/978-1-4539-1170-9Search in Google Scholar
Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Banks, J., Tjondronegoro, D., Dreiling, A., Hartley, J., Leaver, T., Aly, A., Highfield, T., Wilken, R., Rennie, E., Lusher, D., Allen, M., Marshall, D., Demetrious, K. & Sadkowsky, T. (2016). TrISMA: Tracking infrastructure for social media analysis. Retrieved from http://trisma.org/ [Accessed 2018, December 7].BrunsA.BurgessJ.BanksJ.TjondronegoroD.DreilingA.HartleyJ.LeaverT.AlyA.HighfieldT.WilkenR.RennieE.LusherD.AllenM.MarshallD.DemetriousK.SadkowskyT.2016Retrieved from http://trisma.org/ [Accessed 2018, December 7]Search in Google Scholar
Bruns, A., Moon, B., Münch, F. & Sadkowsky, T. (2017). The Australian Twittersphere in 2016: Mapping the follower/followee network. Social Media + Society, 3(4): 1–15. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117748162.BrunsA.MoonB.MünchF.SadkowskyT.2017The Australian Twittersphere in 2016: Mapping the follower/followee network34115doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/205630511774816210.1177/2056305117748162Search in Google Scholar
Burgess, J. & Bruns, A. (2015). Easy data, hard data: The politics and pragmatics of Twitter research after the computational turn. In G. Langlois, J. Redden & G. Elmer (eds.), Compromised data: From social media to big data (pp. 94–111). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.BurgessJ.BrunsA.2015Easy data, hard data: The politics and pragmatics of Twitter research after the computational turnInLangloisG.ReddenJ.ElmerG.(eds.)94111New YorkBloomsbury AcademicSearch in Google Scholar
Coleman, S. (2003). A tale of two houses: The House of Commons, the Big brother house and the people at home. Parliamentary Affairs, 56: 733–758. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsg113.ColemanS.2003A tale of two houses: The House of Commons, the Big brother house and the people at home56733758doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsg11310.1093/pa/gsg113Search in Google Scholar
Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum, 23(4): 525–535. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/10304310903003270CrawfordK.2009Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media234525535doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/1030431090300327010.1080/10304310903003270Search in Google Scholar
Cunningham, S. (2001). Popular media as public “sphericules” for diasporic communities. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(2): 131–147. doi: http://doi.org10.1177/136787790100400201CunninghamS.2001Popular media as public “sphericules” for diasporic communities42131147doi: http://doi.org10.1177/13678779010040020110.1177/136787790100400201Search in Google Scholar
Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DahlgrenP.2009CambridgeCambridge University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Dixon, D. (2012). Analysis tool or research methodology? Is there an epistemology for patterns? In D. M. Berry (ed.), Understanding digital humanities (pp. 191–209). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.DixonD.2012Analysis tool or research methodology? Is there an epistemology for patterns?InBerryD. M.(ed.)191209Houndmills, UKPalgrave Macmillan10.1057/9780230371934_11Search in Google Scholar
Gitlin, T. (1998). Public sphere or public sphericules? In J. Curran & T. Liebes (eds.), Media, ritual and identity (pp. 175–202). London: Routledge.GitlinT.1998Public sphere or public sphericules?InCurranJ.LiebesT.(eds.)175202LondonRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Griffin, A. (2016, September 23). Shitposting: What is the bizarre online behaviour that could win Donald Trump the election? The Independent [online]. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/what-is-shitposting-donald-trump-us-election-2016-palmer-luckey-a7326111.html [Accessed 2018, December 7].GriffinA.2016September23Shitposting: What is the bizarre online behaviour that could win Donald Trump the election?[online]. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/what-is-shitposting-donald-trump-us-election-2016-palmer-luckey-a7326111.html [Accessed 2018, December 7]Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16: 411–426. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x.HabermasJ.2006Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research16411426doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.xSearch in Google Scholar
Haddon, L. (2016). The domestication of complex media repertoires. In K. Sandvik, A. M. Thorhauge & B. Valtysson (eds.), The media and the mundane: Communication across media in everyday life (pp. 17–29). Gothenburg: Nordicom.HaddonL.2016The domestication of complex media repertoiresInSandvikK.ThorhaugeA. M.ValtyssonB.(eds.)1729GothenburgNordicomSearch in Google Scholar
Highfield, T. (2013). National and state-level politics on social media: Twitter, Australian political discussions, and the online commentariat. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 6(4): 342–360. doi: http://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2013.060648.HighfieldT.2013National and state-level politics on social media: Twitter, Australian political discussions, and the online commentariat64342360doi: http://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2013.06064810.1504/IJEG.2013.060648Search in Google Scholar
Highfield, T. (2014). Following the yellow jersey: Tweeting the Tour de France. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 249–262). New York: Peter Lang.HighfieldT.2014Following the yellow jersey: Tweeting the Tour de FranceInWellerK.BrunsA.BurgessJ.MahrtM.PuschmannC.(eds.)249262New YorkPeter LangSearch in Google Scholar
Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S. & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLOS ONE, 9(6) doi: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679JacomyM.VenturiniT.HeymannS.BastianM.2014ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software96doi: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.009867910.1371/journal.pone.0098679Search in Google Scholar
Larsson, A. O. & Moe, H. (2014). Twitter in politics and elections: Insights from Scandinavia. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 319–330). New York: Peter Lang.LarssonA. O.MoeH.2014Twitter in politics and elections: Insights from ScandinaviaInWellerK.BrunsA.BurgessJ.MahrtM.PuschmannC.(eds.)319330New YorkPeter LangSearch in Google Scholar
Marwick, A. E. & boyd, danah (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1): 114–133. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.MarwickA. E.boyddanah2011I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience131114133doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/146144481036531310.1177/1461444810365313Search in Google Scholar
McEwan, S. (2017). Nation of shitposters: Ironic engagement with the Facebook posts of Shannon Noll as reconfiguration of an Australian national identity. Journal of Media and Communication, 8(2): 19–39.McEwanS.2017Nation of shitposters: Ironic engagement with the Facebook posts of Shannon Noll as reconfiguration of an Australian national identity821939Search in Google Scholar
McKinnon, M., Semmens, D., Moon, B., Amarasekara, I. & Bolliet, L. (2016). Science, Twitter and election campaigns: Tracking #auspol in the Australian federal elections. Journal of Science Communication, 15(6). doi: http://doi.org/10.22323/2.15060204.McKinnonM.SemmensD.MoonB.AmarasekaraI.BollietL.2016Science, Twitter and election campaigns: Tracking #auspol in the Australian federal elections156doi: http://doi.org/10.22323/2.1506020410.22323/2.15060204Search in Google Scholar
McNamara, L. (2016, September 1). Explainer: What is Section 18C and why do some politicians want it changed? The Conversation [online]. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-section-18c-and-why-do-some-politicians-want-it-changed-64660 [Accessed 2018, December 7].McNamaraL.2016September1Explainer: What is Section 18C and why do some politicians want it changed?[online]. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-section-18c-and-why-do-some-politicians-want-it-changed-64660 [Accessed 2018, December 7]Search in Google Scholar
Münch, F. (2019). Measuring networked media – Exploring network science methods for large scale online media studies. PhD Dissertation. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.MünchF.2019PhD DissertationBrisbaneQueensland University of Technology10.5204/thesis.eprints.125543Search in Google Scholar
Murthy, D. (2018). Twitter (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.MurthyD.20182nd ed.CambridgePolitySearch in Google Scholar
Palen, L., Starbird, K., Vieweg, S. & Hughes, A. (2010). Twitter-based information distribution during the 2009 Red River Valley flood threat. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(5): 13–17.PalenL.StarbirdK.ViewegS.HughesA.2010Twitter-based information distribution during the 2009 Red River Valley flood threat365131710.1002/bult.2010.1720360505Search in Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. & Blasiola, S. (2016). Structures of feeling, storytelling, and social media: The case of #Egypt. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A. O. Larsson & C. Christensen (eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 211–222). London: Routledge.PapacharissiZ.BlasiolaS.2016Structures of feeling, storytelling, and social media: The case of #EgyptInBrunsA.EnliG.SkogerbøE.LarssonA. O.ChristensenC.(eds.)211222LondonRoutledge10.4324/9781315716299-15Search in Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin.PariserE.2011LondonPenguin10.3139/9783446431164Search in Google Scholar
Pear Analytics. (2009). Twitter study–August 2009. Retrieved from http://www.pearanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Twitter-Study-August-2009.pdf [Accessed 2018, December 7].Pear Analytics2009Retrieved from http://www.pearanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Twitter-Study-August-2009.pdf [Accessed 2018, December 7]Search in Google Scholar
Rambukkana, N. (ed.). (2015). Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks. New York: Peter Lang.RambukkanaN.(ed.)2015New YorkPeter Lang10.3726/978-1-4539-1672-8Search in Google Scholar
Rogers, R. (2014). Foreword: Debanalising Twitter: The transformation of an object of study. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt & C. Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and society (pp. ix–xxvi). New York: Peter Lang.RogersR.2014Foreword: Debanalising Twitter: The transformation of an object of studyInWellerK.BrunsA.BurgessJ.MahrtM.PuschmannC.(eds.)ixxxviNew YorkPeter LangSearch in Google Scholar
Sandvik, K., Thorhauge, A. M. & Valtysson, B. (2016). Introduction. In K. Sandvik, A. M. Thorhauge & B. Valtysson (eds.), The media and the mundane: Communication across media in everyday life (pp. 9–15). Gothenburg: Nordicom.SandvikK.ThorhaugeA. M.ValtyssonB.2016IntroductionInSandvikK.ThorhaugeA. M.ValtyssonB.(eds.)915GothenburgNordicomSearch in Google Scholar
Senft, T. M. (2013). Microcelebrity and the branded self. In J. Hartley, J. Burgess & A. Bruns (eds.), A companion to new media dynamics (pp. 346–354). London: Blackwell.SenftT. M.2013Microcelebrity and the branded selfInHartleyJ.BurgessJ.BrunsA.(eds.)346354LondonBlackwell10.1002/9781118321607.ch22Search in Google Scholar
Sensis. (2016). Sensis social media report 2016: How Australian people and businesses are using social media. Melbourne: Sensis. Retrieved from https://www.sensis.com.au/asset/PDFdirectory/Sensis_Social_Media_Report_2016.PDF [Accessed 2018, December 7].Sensis2016MelbourneSensisRetrieved from https://www.sensis.com.au/asset/PDFdirectory/Sensis_Social_Media_Report_2016.PDF [Accessed 2018, December 7]Search in Google Scholar
Shaw, F., Burgess, J., Crawford, K. & Bruns, A. (2013). Sharing news, making sense, saying thanks: Patterns of talk on Twitter during the Queensland floods. Australian Journal of Communication, 40(1): 23–39.ShawF.BurgessJ.CrawfordK.BrunsA.2013Sharing news, making sense, saying thanks: Patterns of talk on Twitter during the Queensland floods4012339Search in Google Scholar
Simon, J. & Ess, C. (2015). Philosophy & Technology, 28(1): 157–162. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0189-8.SimonJ.EssC.2015281157162doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0189-810.1007/s13347-015-0189-8Search in Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.SunsteinC. R.2009Princeton, NJPrinceton University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Van Dijck, J. & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1): 2–14. doi: http://doi.org.10.12924/mac2013.01010002.Van DijckJ.PoellT.2013Understanding social media logic11214doi: http://doi.org.10.12924/mac2013.0101000210.17645/mac.v1i1.70Search in Google Scholar