1. bookVolume 13 (2020): Issue 2 (December 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Innovative HR Practices of Regional Administrations: Is it a New Round of Civil Service Reform in Russia ?

Published Online: 10 Dec 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 13 (2020) - Issue 2 (December 2020)
Page range: 229 - 248
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The paper examines the innovative HR practices of regional administrations in Russia and the inter-regional cooperation between HR departments of regional governmental bodies; in practice the dissemination is complicated by their relations with the federal bodies (national level) responsible for civil-service regulation.

The authors use the case of Russia to describe the positive experience of blended inter-regional (horizontal) and federal-local (vertical) cooperation between HR departments of the civil service (federal, regional, municipal) that started as a “best practices” initiative, guided by the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of Russia (MLSP of Russia) in 2015. Several cases of such cooperation are described as examples of positive influence on the civil service with pushing changes, and as a tool to foster civil-service reform.

Our findings lead us to the conclusion that the knowledge and motivation accumulated by the innovative HR practices in regional governmental bodies enables them to overcome political, administrative, financial and legal barriers in public-service reform. From a theoretical perspective, the research shows that the theories of public-administration service reform (institutional and instrumental) should take into account the regional HR practices and inter-regional cooperation that promote those practices. Specific features and benefits of regional innovations help to compensate for the lack of formal political support of reforms, or to conquer bureaucratic resistance to change. As it happened in Russia, the regional initiatives facilitated multiple leadership behaviors that have the capacity to increase the willingness to experiment, expand commitment to innovations, and boost motivation for professional development.

Future research on the influence of new regional HR practices on civil-service reform can be concentrated on the exploration of regional communities of practice (CoP) that are involved in the process of elaborating and disseminating new HR practices. It will provide a better understanding of the limits and possibilities of the regions to support civil-service reform on a national level.

Keywords

Atnashev, T. [Атнашев, Т. М.]. 2017. “Самоотверженные чиновники ? Факторы высокой мотива ции госслужащих.” Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления 3, 149 – 166.Search in Google Scholar

Barabashev, A. and A. Klimenko. 2017. “Russian Governance Changes and Performance.” Chinese Political Science Review 2(1), 22 – 40.Search in Google Scholar

Barabashev, A. and V. Prokofiev. 2019. “Why Reforms of Public Service of Russia are Cyclic: An Institutional Explanation from a Liberal Perspective.” In R. Cucciolla (ed.). Dimensions and Challenges of Russian Liberalism. Cham: Springer, 165 – 188.Search in Google Scholar

Barabashev, A. and J. Straussman. 2007. “Public Service Reform in Russia: 1991 – 2006.” Public Administration Review 67(3), 373 – 382.Search in Google Scholar

Borschevsky, G. [Борщевский Г. А.] 2017. “Оценка тенденций развития государственной службы: Вопросы методологии.” Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления 1, 103 – 128.Search in Google Scholar

Borschevsky, G. [Борщевский, Г. А.]. 2018. “Реформирование государственной службы в России: промежуточные итоги и перспективы.” Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления 2, 65 – 88.Search in Google Scholar

Bouckaert, G., J. Nemec, V. Nakrosis, G. Hajnal and K. Tonnisson (eds). 2008. Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.Search in Google Scholar

Copric, I. 2018. “One Candle, Two Candles … Is There the Third One ? Croatian Public Administration Service Reform before and after the EU Accession.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 11(1), 41 – 61.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrolyubova, E. I., E. N. Klochkova and V. N. Yuzhakov. 2018. The Number and Remuneration of Federal Civil Servants in the Conditions of Implementation of Program-target and Project Methods [in Russian]. Moscow: Delo.Search in Google Scholar

Gans-Morse J., A. Kalgin, A. Klimenko, D. Vorobyev and A. A. Yakovlev. 2019. “Public Service Motivation as a Predictor of Altruism, Dishonesty, and Corruption.” Northwestern Institute for Policy Research. Series WP-19 – 16.10.2139/ssrn.3651520Search in Google Scholar

Gans-Morse, J., A. Kalgin, A. Klimenko and A. Yakovlev. 2017. “Motivations for Public Service in Corrupt States: Evidence from Post-Soviet Russia.” Basic research program working papers series: public and social policy. WP BRP 13 / PSP / 2017.10.2139/ssrn.3072181Search in Google Scholar

Gel’man, V. Ya. and A. V. Starodubtsev. 2014. “Possibilities and Limitations of Authoritarian Modernization: Russian Reforms of 2000s” [in Russian]. Politiya 4, 6 – 30.Search in Google Scholar

Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba [Государственная служба]. 2009. Комплексный подход. Под ред. А. В. Оболонского. Moscow: Дело Publ. House.Search in Google Scholar

Hammerschmid, G., S. Van de Walle, Rh. Andrews and Ph. Bezes (eds). 2016. Public Administration Service Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing LTD.10.4337/9781783475407Search in Google Scholar

Ivanova, N. and D. Podolskiy. 2017. “Гарантии государственных гражданских служащих как элемент современной кадровой политики.” Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления 1, 173 – 190.Search in Google Scholar

Kalgin, A. [Калгин, А. С.] and O. Kalgina [О. В. Калгина]. 2018. “Карьерный выбор между государственным и частным сектором среди студентов: Роль черт личности.” Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления 4, 145 – 171.Search in Google Scholar

Kalgin, A., D. Parfenova, D. Podolskiy and J. Campbell. 2018. “Performance Management and Job-Goal Alignment: A Conditional Process Model of Turnover Intention in the Public Sector.” International Journal of Public Sector Management. 31(1): 65-80.10.1108/IJPSM-04-2016-0069Search in Google Scholar

Kopric, I and P. Kovac (eds). 2017. European Administrative Space: Spreading Standards, Building Capacities. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, S. and H. Wollmann. 2019. Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing LTD.Search in Google Scholar

Kupryashin, G. L. 2015. “Institutional Pitfalls and Public Administration Crises.” E-Journal on Public Administration 51. Available at http://e-journal.spa.msu.ru/uploads/vestnik/2015/vipusk__51._avgust_2015_g._/problemi_upravlenija_teorija_i_praktika/kupryashin.pdf (last accessed 18 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Labor. 2019. Report on PA Programs. Available at https://mintrud.gov.ru/ministry/programms/gossluzhba (last accessed 18 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Nakrosis, V. 2018. “The Agendas of Public Administration Service Reforms in Lithuania: Windows of Opportunity in the Period 2004 – 2017.” NISPAceeJournal of Public Administration and Policy 11(1), 91 – 114.Search in Google Scholar

Nemec, J. 2018. “Public Administration Service Reforms in Slovakia: Limited Outcomes (Why ?).” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 11(1), 115 – 134.Search in Google Scholar

Nemec, J., A. Kuzekova, K. Sadykova and A. Kuzekov. 2017. “Human Capital of Civil Service of the Republic of Kazakhstan.” Public Administration Issues 3, 29 – 50.Search in Google Scholar

Nezhina, T. G. and A. G. Barabashev. 2019. “Serving the Country or Serving Th y-self: The Quest for Prosocial Motives of Russian MPA Students.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 39(1), 106 – 134.Search in Google Scholar

Nezhina, T. G. and T. V. Zaytseva. 2018. “A Public Servant: To Be or Not to Be. The Determinants of Employment Decisions Among the Russian MPA Students.” International Journal of Public Administration 41(1), 72 – 82.Search in Google Scholar

Obolonsky, A. V. [Оболонский, А. В.]. 2011. Кризис административно-бюрократического государства. Реформы государственной службы: международный опыт и российские реалии. Москва: Фонд “Либеральная миссия”.Search in Google Scholar

Obolonsky, A. V. 2017. “The Crisis of the Bureaucratic State and the Failed Attempts to Overcome it in the Russian Public Service.” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration Journal 4, 569 – 591.Search in Google Scholar

Obolonsky A. V. and A. G. Barabashev. 2014. “How to Clean Out the Augean Stable of Our Bureaucracy: Two Views.” Russian Politics and Law 52(2), 77 – 94.Search in Google Scholar

The Order of the Government of the Russian Federation. 2020. Правительство Российской Федерации. Постановление от 26 июня 2020 года № 935 “О Всероссийском конкурсе Лучшие кадровые практики и инициативы в системе государственного и муниципального управления.” Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/74218108/ (last accessed 18 October 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Panova, E. and N. Oparina. 2015. “Modern Instruments of Human Resources Management in Russian Civil Service” [in Russian]. Public Administration: Electronic Journal 48, 103 – 122.Search in Google Scholar

Pesti, C. and T. Randma-Liiv. 2018. “Towards a Managerial Public Service Bargain: The Estonian Civil Service Reform.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 11(1), 135 – 154.Search in Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pryadilnikov, M. 2016. “Public Policy Training and Development of MPA / MPP Programs in the Russian Federation.” Policy and Society 35, 371 – 383.Search in Google Scholar

Reforma gosudarstvennoj sluzhby Rossii [Реформа государственной службы России]. 2003. История попыток реформирования с 1992 по 2000 год. Под ред. Т. В. Зайцевой. Москва: Издательство “Весь Мир”.Search in Google Scholar

Reforma gosudarstvennoj sluzhby Rossijskoj Federatsii [Реформа государственной службы Российской Федерации]. 2006. (2000 – 2003 годы). Под ред. А. Г. Барабашева. Москва: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ.Search in Google Scholar

Rowney, D. K. and E. Husky (eds). 2009. Russian Bureaucracy and State: Officialdom from Alexander III to Vladimir Putin. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Špaček, D. 2018. “Public Administration Service Reform in Czechia after 2000: Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 11(1), 155 – 182.Search in Google Scholar

Sungurov, A. Yu. 2018. “Russian Reforms, Its Research and Discussion”. In A. Sungurov (ed.). Russian Reforms: View from 2017. Moscow: Norma, 6 – 19.Search in Google Scholar

Vintar, M, A. Rosenbaum, G. Jenei and W. Drechsler (eds). 2013. The Past, Present and Future of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAceePress.Search in Google Scholar

Zajceva, T. [Зайцева, Т. В.] and T. Nezhina [Т. Г. Нежина]. 2019. “Привлечение молодежи на государственную и муниципальную службу: опыт регионов России.” Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления 1, 160 – 189.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo