[Alexander, J A., L. L. Morlock and B. D. Gifford. 1988. “The Effects of Corporate Restructuring on Hospital Policymaking.” Health Services Research 23, 311 – 337.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alexander, Jeffrey A. and Bryan J. Weiner. 1998. “The Adoption of the Corporate Governance Model by Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 8, 223 – 242.]Search in Google Scholar
[Almond, Paul and Mike Esbester. 2018. “Regulatory Inspection and the Changing Legitimacy of Health and Safety: Regulatory Inspection and Legitimacy.” Regulation & Governance 12, 46 – 63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bach, Tobias and Sylvia Veit. 2017. “The Determinants of Promotion to High Public Office in Germany: Partisan Loyalty, Political Craft, or Managerial Competencies ?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28, 254 – 269.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blondel, Jean. 2002. “Party Government, Patronage, and Party Decline in Western Europe.” In Richard Gunther, José Ramón Montero and Juan J. Linz (eds). Political Parties. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 233 – 256.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang, Kelly H. 2003. Appointing Central Bankers: The Politics of Monetary Policy in the United States and the European Monetary Union. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511510526]Search in Google Scholar
[Christiansen, Peter Munk, Birgitta Niklasson and Patrik Öhberg. 2016. “Does Politics Crowd out Professional Competence ? The Organisation of Ministerial Advice in Denmark and Sweden.” West European Politics 39, 1230 – 1250.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corder, Kevin. 2003. “Structural Choice and Political Control of Bureaucracy: Updating Federal Credit Programs.” In George Krause and Kenneth Meier (eds). Politics, Policy, and Organizations: Frontiers in the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 233 – 258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Creutzfeldt, Naomi. 2016. “What Do we Expect from an Ombudsman ? Narratives of Everyday Engagement with the Informal Justice System in Germany and the UK.” International Journal of Law in Context 12, 437 – 452.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlström, Carl and Birgitta Niklasson. 2013. “The Politics of Politization in Sweden.” Public Administration 91, 891 – 907.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlvik, Julia. 2018. Inside Asylum Bureaucracy: Organizing Refugee Status Determination in Austria. Vienna: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-63306-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlvik, Julia and Axel Pohn-Weidinger. 2018. “Administering Access to the Public Ombuds Institution: A Case Study on the Austrian Ombudsman Board.” In Marc Hertog and Richard Kirkham (eds). Research Handbook on the Ombudsman. UK: Edward Elgar, 394 – 414.]Search in Google Scholar
[Derlien, Hans-Ulrich. 2008. “Die politische und die administrative Elite der Bundesrepublik.” In Werner Jann and Klaus König (eds). Regieren zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 291 – 328.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ebinger, Falk, Nicolas Lux, Christoph Kintzinger and Benjamin Garske. 2018. “Die Deutsche Verwaltungselite der Regierungen Brandt bis Merkel II: Herkunft, Zusammensetzung und Politisierung der Führungskräfte in den Bundesministerien.” Der Moderne Staat: Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management 11, 1 – 23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz. 2015. “Credibility Versus Control: Agency Independence and Partisan Influence in the Regulatory State.” Comparative Political Studies 48, 823 – 853.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz. 2016. “The Politicization of Regulatory Agencies: Between Partisan Influence and Formal Independence.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26, 507 – 518.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eymeri-Douzans, Jean-Michel. 2003. “Frontière ou marches ? De la contribution de la haute administration à la production du politique.” In Jacques Lagroye (ed.). La politisation. Paris: Belin, 47 – 77.]Search in Google Scholar
[Falaschetti, Dino. 2002. “Does Partisan Heritage Matter ? The Case of the Federal Reserve.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 249864 (Microeconomics 18), 488 – 510.]Search in Google Scholar
[Farrell, Nora. 2013. The Canadian Ombuds / Man / Person: Impartial and Independent Aspirational, Achievable or Impossible ? Ph.D. dissertation, York University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Figueiredo, Jr., Rui J. P. de and Richard G. Vanden Bergh. 2004. “The Political Economy of State-Level Administrative Procedure Acts.” The Journal of Law and Economics 47, 569 – 588.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerber, Brian J., Cherie Maestas and Nelson C. Dometrius. 2005. “State Legislative Influence over Agency Rulemaking: The Utility of Ex Ante Review.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5, 24 – 46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2008. Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilardi, Fabrizio and M. Maggeti. 2011. “The Independence of Regulatory Authorities.” In David Levi-Faur (ed.). Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 201 – 214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 2010. Grounded Theory: Strategien Qualitativer Forschung. 3rd edn. Bern: Hans Huber.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goetz, Klaus H. 1999. “Senior Officials in the German Federal Administration: Institutional Change and Positional Differentiation.” In Edward Page and Vincent Wright (eds). Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 147 – 177.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gottherer, Dean M. 2009. “Fundamental Elements of an Effective Ombudsman Institution.” Paper presented at the 9th IOI World Conference, 2009, in Stockholm, Sweden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanretty, Chris and Christel Koop. 2012. “Measuring the Formal Independence of Regulatory Agencies.” Journal of European Public Policy 19, 198 – 216.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hertogh, Marc. 2013. “Why the Ombudsman does not Promote Public Trust in Government: Lessons from the Low Countries.” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 35, 245 – 258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoppmann, Joern, Florian Naegele and Bastien Girod. 2019. “Boards as a Source of Inertia: Examining the Internal Challenges and Dynamics of Boards of Directors in Times of Environmental Discontinuities.” Academy of Management Journal 62, 437 – 468.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huber, John D. and Charles R. Shipan. 2002. Deliberate Discretion ?: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804915]Search in Google Scholar
[Hustedt, Thurid and Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen. 2014. “Ensuring Political Responsiveness: Politicization Mechanisms in Ministerial Bureaucracies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 80(4), 746 – 765.]Search in Google Scholar
[Innes, Robert and Arnab Mitra. 2015. “Parties, Politics, and Regulation: Evidence from Clean Air Act Enforcement.” Economic Inquiry 53, 522 – 539.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jann, Werner and Sylvia Veit. 2010. “Politicisation of Administration or Bureaucratisation of Politics ? The Case of Germany.” Potsdamer Diskussionspapiere zur Verwaltungswissenschaft 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kagan, Robert A. 1994. “Regulatory Enforcement.” In David H. Rosenbloom and Richard D. Schwartz (eds). Handbook of Regulation and Administrative Law. New York: Marcel Dekker, 383 – 422.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koo, Jeong-Woo and Francisco O. Ramirez. 2009. “National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966 – 2004.” Social Forces 87, 1321 – 1353.10.1353/sof.0.0167]Search in Google Scholar
[Kopecký, Petr, Peter Mair and Maria Spirova (eds). 2012. Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599370.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kucsko-Stadlmayer, Gabriele. 2008. European Ombudsman-Institutions: A Comparative Legal Analysis regarding the Multifaceted Realisation of an Idea. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-211-72882-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, David E. 2007. “Testing Pendleton’s Premise: Do Political Appointees Make Worse Bureaucrats ?” Journal of Politics 69, 1073 – 1088.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liegl, Barbara and Wolfgang C. Müller. 1999. “Senior Officials in Austria.” In Edward Page and Vincent Wright (eds). Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States. New York: Oxford University Press, 90 – 120.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th-anniversary expanded edn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maggetti, Martino. 2007. “De Facto Independence after Delegation: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis.” Regulation & Governance 1, 271 – 294.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maggetti, Martino, Karin Ingold and Frédéric Varone. 2013. “Having your Cake and Eating it, too: Can Regulatory Agencies Be Both Independent and Accountable ?” Swiss Political Science Review 19, 1 – 25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mcallister, Lesley K. 2009. “Dimensions of Enforcement Style: Factoring in Regulatory Autonomy and Capacity.” Law & Policy, November.10.1111/j.1467-9930.2009.00308.x]Search in Google Scholar
[McCubbins, Matthew D., Roger G. Noll and Barry R. Weingast. 1989. “Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies.” Virginia Law Review 75, 431.]Search in Google Scholar
[May, Peter J. and Robert S. Wood. 2003. “At the Regulatory Front Lines: Inspectors Enforcement Styles and Regulatory Compliance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13, 139.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moe, Terry. 1985. “Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the US NLRB.” American Political Science Review 79, 1116.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moe, Terry. 1990. “The Politics of Structural Choice.” In Oliver E. Williamson (ed.). Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 116 – 153.]Search in Google Scholar
[Molano León, Ricardo. 2011. “The Roles of the Board of Directors: The Unresolved Riddle.” Vniversitas 60, 602.]Search in Google Scholar
[Müller, Wolfgang C. 2007. “The Changing Role of the Austrian Civil Service: The Impact of Politicisation, Public Sector Reform, and Europeanisation.” In Edward Page and Vincent Wright (ed.). From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations. Transforming Government. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 38 – 62.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nölle, Genia. 2010. “Frauen in Führungspositionen des öffentlichen Sektors: Anspruch und Wirklichkeit.” In Andreas Gourmelon and Michael Mroß (eds). Führung im Öffentlichen Sektor. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 147 – 155.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak, Manfred and Hannes Tretter. 2007. “Vorschläge zur Errichtung einer nationalen Menschenrechtsinstitution in Österreich.” Journal Für Rechtspolitik 15, 1 – 10.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Flynn, Patrick Eamon and Tim A. Mau. 2014. “A Demographic and Career Profile of Municipal CAOs in Canada: Implications for Local Governance: Municipal CAOs in Canada.” Canadian Public Administration 57, 154 – 170.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oosting, Martin. 2001. “Protecting the Integrity and Independence of the Ombudsman Institution: The Global Perspective.” In International Ombudsman Institute (ed.). The International Ombudsman Yearbook. Alphen aan den Riijn: Kluwer Law International, 7 – 24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parker, Lee David. 2007. “Internal Governance in the Nonprofit Boardroom: A Participant Observer Study.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 15, 923 – 934.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. Guy. 2013. “Politicisation: What is tt and Why should we Care ?” In Christine Neuhold, Sophie Vanhoonacker and Luc Verhey (eds). Civil Servants and Politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 12 – 24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. Guy and Jon Pierre. 2004. “Politicization of the Civil Service: Concepts, Causes, Consequences.” In B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre (eds). Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control. New York: Routledge, 1 – 13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pohn-Weidinger, Axel and Julia Dahlvik. forthcoming. “Ombudsinstitutionen als Ressource für strategische Rechtsmobilisierung für kollektive Zwecke.” Zeitschrift für Kultur- und Kollektivwissenschaft.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poggione, Sarah J. and Christopher Reenock. 2009. “Political Insulation and Legislative Interventions: The Impact of Rule Review.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9, 456 – 485.]Search in Google Scholar
[Potoski, Matthew. 2002. “Designing Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Administrative Procedures and Agency Choice in State Environmental Policy.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2, 1 – 23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reenock, C. M. and B. J. Gerber. 2007. “Political Insulation, Information Exchange, and Interest Group Access to the Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18, 415 – 440.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reif, Linda C. 2004. The Ombudsman, Good Governance, and the International Human Rights System. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-5932-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Roy, Gregory and Philip James Giddings. 2000. “The Ombudsman Institution: Growth and Development.” In Philip James Giddings and Gregory Roy (eds). Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1 – 18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schönherr, Fritz. 1977. Volksanwaltschaft: Das Bundesgesetz vom 24. 2. 1977 über die Volksanwaltschaft, erläutert aus den Materialien, samt früheren Entwürfen und Erläuterungen sowie einer kritischen Würdigung der Verwirklichung des Ombudsmann-Gedankens in Österreich. Wien: Manz.]Search in Google Scholar
[Short, Jodi L. 2019. “The Politics of Regulatory Enforcement and Compliance: Theorizing and Operationalizing Political Influences.” Regulation & Governance.https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12291.10.1111/rego.12291]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomic, Slobodan. 2018. “Legal Independence vs. Leaders’ Reputation: Exploring Drivers of Ethics Commissions’ Conduct in New Democracies.” Public Administration 96, 544 – 560.]Search in Google Scholar
[Treib, Oliver. 2012. “Party Patronage in Austria: From Reward to Control.” In Petr Kopecký, Peter Mair and Maria Spirova (eds). Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford University Press, 31 – 51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ugyel, Lhawang. 2016. “Ideal Types in Public Administration.” In Lhawang Ugyel (ed.). Paradigms and Public Sector Reform. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 53 – 72.]Search in Google Scholar
[Veit, Sylvia and Simon Scholz. 2016. “Linking Administrative Career Patterns and Politicization: Signalling Effects in the Careers of Top Civil Servants in Germany.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82, 516 – 535.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verhoest, Koen, B. Guy Peters, Geert Bouckaert and Bram Verschuere. 2004. “The Study of Organisational Autonomy: A Conceptual Review.” Public Administration and Development 24, 101 – 118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Volksanwaltschaft. 2019. Bericht der Volksanwaltschaft an den Nationalrat und an den Bundesrat 2018. Wien: Volksanwaltschaft.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walsh, James P. and James K. Seward. 1990. “On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms.” Academy of Management Review 15, 421 – 458.]Search in Google Scholar
