[Aberbach, J. D., R. D. Putnam and B. A. Rockman. 1981. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674020047]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauer, M. W., B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, K. Yesilkagit and S. Becker. 2021. Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009023504]Search in Google Scholar
[Blom-Hansen, J., R. Morton and S. Serritzlew. 2015. “Experiments in Public Management Research.” International Public Management Journal 18, 151 – 170.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brehm, J. and S. Gates. 2002. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. 4th edn. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, S. R. 1996. “Q Methodology and Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research 6, 561 – 567.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cairney, P. 2016. The Politics of Evidence-Based Policymaking. London: Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-51781-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen, J. G. and N. Opstrup. 2018. “Bureaucratic Dilemmas: Civil Servants between Political Responsiveness and Normative Constraints.” Governance 31, 481 – 498.10.1111/gove.12312]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahl, R. A. 1961. Who Governs ? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eymeri-Douzans, J.-M., X. Bioy and S. Mouton. 2015. Le règne des entourages: Cabinets et conseillers de l’executif. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.10.3917/scpo.eymer.2015.01]Search in Google Scholar
[Guedes-Neto, J. and B. G. Peters. 2021. “Working, Shirking or Sabotage in Times of Democratic Backsliding: An Experimental Study in Brazil.” In M. W. Bauer, B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, K. Yesilkagit and S. Becker (eds). Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009023504.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Hood, C. and M. Lodge. 2006. The Politics of Public Service Bargains: Reward, Competency, Loyalty and Blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019926967X.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Jeffares, S. and C. Skelcher. 2011. “Democratic Subjectivities in Network Governance: A Q Methodology Study of English and Dutch Public Managers.” Public Administration, 89(4), pp. 1253 – 1273.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, H. 1981. The Administrative Behavior of Federal Bureau Chiefs. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, K, H. and J. C. N. Raadschelders. 2008. “Political-Administrative Relations: Impact of and Puzzles in Aberbach, Putnam and Rockman 1981.” Governance 21, 419 – 438.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00406.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Pelgrims, C. 2005. “Personal Advisors of Ministers: More than Personal Loyal Agents.” In G. Peters, G. Sootla and B. Connaughton (eds). Politico-Administrative Dilemma: Traditional Problems and New Solutions. Bratislava: NISPAceePress, pp.69–90.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. G. 1987. “Bureaucrats and Politicians in the Politics of Policymaking.” In J. E. Lane (ed.). Bureaucracy and Public Choice. London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. G. 2020. “Politicians and Bureaucrats in Central and Eastern Europe: Governance with Increased Politicisation.” In S. Mazur and P. Kopycinski (eds). Public Administration in Central Europe. London: Macmillan, pp 93 – 105.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poguntke, T. and P. Webb (eds). 2007. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Savoie, D. J. 2008. Court Government and the Collapse of Accountability in Canada and the United Kingdom. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442687769]Search in Google Scholar