[Adnett, N. and P. Davies. 2000. “Competition and Curriculum Diversity in Local Schooling Markets: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Education Policy 15(2), 157 – 167.10.1080/026809300285872]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Altrichter, H., M. Heinrich and K. Soukup-Altrichter. 2014. “School Decentralization as a Process of Differentiation, Hierarchization and Selection.” Journal of Education Policy 29(5), 675 – 699.10.1080/02680939.2013.873954]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Altrichter, H. and M. Rürup. 2010. “Schulautonomie und die Folgen.” In H. Altrichter and K. Maag Merki (eds). Handbuch Neue Steuerung im Schulsystem. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 111 – 144.10.1007/978-3-531-92245-4_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Caldwell, B. J. and J. M. Spinks. 2013. The Self-Transforming School. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203387986]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chapman, C. 2013. “Academy Federations, Chains and Teaching Schools in England: Reflections on Leadership, Policy and Practice.” Journal of School Choice: International Research and Reform 7(3), 334 – 352.10.1080/15582159.2013.808936]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, C. 2015. “From one School to many: reflections on the Impact and Nature of School Federations and Chains in England.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 43(1), 46 – 60.10.1177/1741143213494883]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, C., D. Muijs and P. Sammons. 2009. A Quantitative Study of the Impact on Student Outcomes. Nottingham: NCSL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, Y. C. and T. Tai Hoi Lee. 2016. “School Autonomy, Leadership and Learning: A Reconceptualization.” International Journal of Educational Management 30(2), 177 – 196.10.1108/IJEM-08-2015-0108]Search in Google Scholar
[Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks (Calif.), London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks (Calif.), London: SAGE Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Daun, H. 2010. “The New Mode of Governance in European Education – in the Context of Globalisation and EU-ification.”. Orbis scholae 4(2), 115 – 131.10.14712/23363177.2018.129]Search in Google Scholar
[Eurydice. 2007. School Autonomy in Europe: Policies and Measures. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit, European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[Flick, U. 2006. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London, Thousand Oaks (Calif.), New Delhi: SAGE Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glatter, R. 2012. “Persistent Preoccupations: The Rise and Rise of School Autonomy and Accountability in England.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 40(5), 559 – 575.10.1177/1741143212451171]Search in Google Scholar
[Gobby, B. 2013. “Enacting the Independent Public Schools Program in Western Australia.” Issues in Educational Research 23(1), 19 – 34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hallinger, P. and K. Snidvongs. 2005. Adding Value to School Leadership and Management: A Review of Trends in the Development of Managers in the Education and Business Sectors. Nottingham, England: NCSL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanushek, E. A., S. Link and L. Wößmann. 2013. “Does School Autonomy Make Sense everywhere ? Panel Estimates from PISA.” Journal of Development Economics 104, 212 – 232.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Higham, R. and P. Earley. 2013. “School Autonomy and Government Control: School Leaders’ Views on a Changing Policy Landscape in England.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 41(6), 701 – 717.10.1177/1741143213494191]Search in Google Scholar
[Holmes, K., J. Clement and J. Albright. 2013. “The Complex Task of Leading Educational Change in Schools.” School Leadership & Management 33(3), 270 – 283.10.1080/13632434.2013.800477]Search in Google Scholar
[Honig, M. I. and L. R. Rainey. 2012. “Autonomy and School Improvement: What do we Know and where do we Go from here ?” Educational Policy 26(3), 465 – 495.10.1177/0895904811417590]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jones, J. 2009. “The Development of Leadership Capacity through Collaboration in Small Schools.” School Leadership & Management 29(2), 129 – 156.10.1080/13632430902775509]Search in Google Scholar
[Karlsen, G. E. 2000. “Decentralized Centralism; Framework for a Better Understanding of Governance in the Field of Education.” Journal of Educational Policy 15(50), 525 – 538.10.1080/026809300750001676]Search in Google Scholar
[Keddie, A. 2014. “‘It’s like Spiderman … with Great Power Comes Great Responsibility’: School Autonomy and the Audit Culture.” School Leadership & Management 34(5), 502 – 517.10.1080/13632434.2014.938040]Search in Google Scholar
[Keddie, A. 2016. “School Autonomy as ‘the Way of the Future’: Issues of Equity, Public Purpose and Moral Leadership.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 44(5), 713 – 727.10.1177/1741143214559231]Search in Google Scholar
[Klenke, K., J. R. Wallace and S. M. Martin. 2015. Qualitative Research in the Study of Leadership. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levin, B. and M. Fullan. 2008. “Learning about System Renewal.” Educational Management Administration and Leadership 36(1), 289 – 303.10.1177/1741143207087778]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindsay, G., D. Muijs and A. Harris. 2007. School Federations Pilot Study 2003 – 2007. London: TSO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maag Merki, M. and B. Steinert. 2006. “Die Prozessstruktur von teilautonomen Schulen und ihre Effektivität für die Herstellung optimaler Lernkontexte für schulische Bildungsprozesse.” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Bildungswissenschaften 28, 103 – 122.10.24452/sjer.28.S.4759]Search in Google Scholar
[Malen, B., R. T. Ogawa and J. Kranz. 1990. “What do we Know about School Based Management: Case Study of the Literature – a Call for Research.” In W. Clune and J. Witte (eds). Choice and Control in American Education 2, 289 – 342.]Search in Google Scholar
[Monkevičius, A. and J. Urbanovič. 2016. “Decentralization of Education Management and School Leadership: The Effects of Public Management Reform Ideologies.” In E. Samier (eds). Ideologies in Educational Administration and Leadership. London: Routledge, 193 – 216.10.4324/9781315661155-14]Search in Google Scholar
[Ofsted. 2011. Leadership of More than One School: An Evaluation of the Impact of Federated Schools. Manchester: Ofsted.]Search in Google Scholar
[Phegley, M. N. and J. Oxford. 2010. “Cross-Level Collaboration: Students and Teachers Learning from each other.” The English Journal 99(5), 27 – 34.10.58680/ej201010813]Search in Google Scholar
[Provisions of the State Education Strategy for 2003 – 2012, approved by the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania on 4 July 2003, by Resolution No. IX-1700.]Search in Google Scholar
[Todman, P., J. Harris, J. Carter and J. McCamphill. 2009. Better together: Exploratory Case Studies of Formal Collaborations between Small Rural Primary Schools. London: DCSF.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tooley, J. 1993. A Market-Led Alternative for the Curriculum: Breaking the Code. London: Institute of Education/Tufnell Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Urbanovič, J. 2011. Mokyklos autonomijos valdymo modelis / Model of School Autonomy Management. Doctoral thesis, MRU, Vilnius.]Search in Google Scholar
[Urbanovič, J. and J. Navickaitė. 2016. Lyderystė autonomiškoje mokykloje / Leadership in Autonomous Schools. Vilnius: MRU.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walsh, P. 2010. “Does Competition among Schools Encourage Grade Inflation ?” Journal of School Choice 4(2), 149 – 173.10.1080/15582159.2010.483918]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, J. 2008. United we Stand: A Soft Federation Model for Small Primary Schools. Nottingham: National College.]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank. 2007. What do we Know about School Based Management ? Washington, D.C.: World Bank.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods, P. A. and T. Simkins. 2014. “Understanding the Local: Themes and Issues in the Experience of Structural Reform in England.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 42(3), 324 – 340.10.1177/1741143214521587]Search in Google Scholar
[Wößmann, L. 2005. “Educational Production in Europe.” Economic Policy 20(43), 445 – 504.10.1111/j.1468-0327.2005.00144.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Wößmann, L., E. Lüdemann, G. Schütz and M. R. West. 2007. “School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice, and the Level of Student Achievement: International Evidence from PISA 2003.” Education Working Paper 13. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).]Search in Google Scholar