1. bookVolume 12 (2019): Issue 1 (June 2019)
Journal Details
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
access type Open Access

Factors Determining the Efficiency of Slovak Public Procurement

Published Online: 18 Jun 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 12 (2019) - Issue 1 (June 2019)
Page range: 43 - 68
Journal Details
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

Many studies analyse factors (such as corruption, competitiveness, transaction costs), which are influencing public procurement efficiency. The purpose of this paper is to find out, what the main factors are in Slovakia that are influencing public procurement efficiency, and based on our analysis, we will also estimate what is the impact of each factor on the efficiency of public procurement in Slovakia.

The research for this paper was executed in three stages. We began with a small number of face-to-face in-depth interviews with specialist procurement advisors to contracting authorities. In the second stage, we created draft questionnaires for contracting authorities and for suppliers, and once we tested questionnaires, it was sent to 13,571 suppliers and to 4,300 contracting authorities. In the last stage, we used various types of analyses to examine identified factors.

There is significant agreement between suppliers and contractors that the two main factors causing inefficiencies are excessive bureaucracy and corruption or other ethical shortcomings. It is shown that insufficient competition, and the excessive use of the lowest price criterion for selecting winning bids, add further inefficiencies. Savings are greatest when there are between 6 and 8 bidders. E-auctions generally produce larger savings than more traditional methods, but Slovak procurement procedures are costly, compared to most other EU states.

This paper contributes to the understanding of what are the core factors which may influence public procurement efficiency. It also provides valuable information for government officials on how to change public procurement rules in order to achieve higher efficiency.


Afonso, A., L. Schuknecht and V. Tanzi. 2006. “Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence for New EU Member States and Emerging Markets.” Working Paper 581, Európska Centrálna Banka.10.2139/ssrn.876945Search in Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. A. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3), 488 – 500.10.2307/1879431Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bandiera, O., A. Prat and T. Valletti. 2008. Active and Passive Waste in Government Spending: Evidence from a Policy Experiment. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Available at https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=6799 (last accessed 10 May 2014).10.2139/ssrn.1115339Search in Google Scholar

Barney, J. and M. Hansen. 1994. “Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage.” Strategic Management Journal 15(1), 175 – 190.10.1002/smj.4250150912Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Barzel, Y. 1985. “Transaction Costs: Are they just Costs ?” Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 1985. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/40750776 (last accessed 12 December 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Brannman, L., J. D. Klein and L. W. Weiss. 1987. “The Price Effects of Increased Competition in Auction Markets.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 69(1), 24 – 32.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, T. L. and M. Potoski. 2003. “Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(4), 441 – 468.10.1093/jopart/mug030Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chamberland, D. 2005. “Boosting your Best Practices.” Purchasing B2B 47(6), 16 – 17.Search in Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm: USA.” Economica 4(16), 386 – 405. Available at http://laprimaradice.myblog.it/media/00/02/284940009.pdf (last accessed 1 March 2018).10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.xSearch in Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3 (October), 1 – 44.Search in Google Scholar

Demsetz, H. 1968. “The Cost of Transacting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 82(1), 33 – 53.Search in Google Scholar

Dimitri, N., G. Piga and G. Spagnolo (eds). 2006. Handbook of Procurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511492556Search in Google Scholar

Dyer, J. H. and W. Chu. 2000. “The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea.” Organization Science 14(1), 57 – 68.10.1287/orsc. DOISearch in Google Scholar

Elberfeld, W. and E. Wolfstetter. 1999. “A Dynamic Model of Bertrand Competition with Entry.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 17(4), 513 – 525.10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00054-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Electronic Marketplace. 2017. Data from Electronic Marketplace between 2014 – 2017. Available at www.eks.sk (last accessed 7 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Eurobarometer. 2014. Businesses’ Attitudes towards Corruption in the EU. Survey Flash Eurobarometer 374. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/flash/fl_374_en.pdf (last accessed 10 December 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Fernandes, T. and V. Viera. 2015. “Public e-Procurement Impacts in Small and Medium Enterprises.” International Journal of Procurement Management 8(5), 587 – 607.Search in Google Scholar

Gilley, O. and V. Karels. 1981. “The Competitive Effect in Bonus Bidding: New Evidence.” The Bell Journal of Economics 12(2), 637 – 648.10.2307/3003578Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gineitiene, Z. and K. Šerpytis. 2011. “The Impact of Competition and Purchase Volume on the Price in Public Procurement Tenders.” Socialinin mokslu studijos 3(2), 473 – 485.Search in Google Scholar

Grega, M. and J. Nemec. 2015a. “Factors Influencing Final Price of Public Procurement: Evidence from Slovakia.” Procedia Economics and Finance 25, 543 – 551.Search in Google Scholar

Grega, M. and J. Nemec. 2015b. “Competitiveness in Slovak and Czech Public Procurement and its Effect on the Final Price.” In V. Kajurova and J. Krajicek (eds). European Financial Systems 2015: Proceedings of the 12thInternational Scientific Conference. Brno: Masaryk University, 143 – 150.Search in Google Scholar

Gupta, S. 2002. “Competition and Collusion in a Government Procurement Auction Market.” Atlantic Economic Journal 30(1), 13 – 25.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Ch. W. 1990. “Cooperation, Opportunism, and the Invisible Hand: Implications for Transaction Cost Theory.” Academy of Management Review 15(3), 500 – 512.10.5465/amr.1990.4309111Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hunady, J. and M. Orviska. 2015. “Effect of Corruption on Tax Revenue in the OECD and Latin America Countries.” In Proceedings of the 20thInternational Conference Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance. Prague: University of Economics, 80 – 85.Search in Google Scholar

Iimi, A. 2006. “Auction Reforms for Effective Official Development Assistance.” Review of Industrial Organization 28(2), 109 – 128.10.1007/s11151-006-0012-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ilke, O., O. Rasim and K. Bedri. 2012. “Public Procurement Auctions and Competition in Turkey.” Review of Industrial Organization 40(3), 207 – 223.10.1007/s11151-011-9299-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Karjalainen, K. 2011. “Estimating the Cost Effects of Purchasing Centralization: Empirical Evidence from Framework Agreements in the Public Sector.” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 17(2), 87 – 97.Search in Google Scholar

Kastanioti, C., N. Kontodimopoulos, D. Stasinopoulo, N. Kapetaneas and N. Polyzos. 2012. “Public Procurement of Health Technologies in Greece in an Era of Economic Crisis.” Health Policy 109(1), 7 – 13.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhlman, J. and S. Johnson. 1983. “The Number of Competitors and Bid Prices.” Southern Economic Journal 50(1), 213 – 224.10.2307/1058052Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Langr, I. 2018. “Public Procurement in the Systemic Corruption Environment: Evidence from the Czech Republic.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 11(2), 53 – 79.Search in Google Scholar

Langr, I. and F. Ochrana. 2015. “Systemic Corruption in Public Procurement: Case of the Czech Republic.” In L. Sedmihradska (ed.). Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance 2015. Prague: University of Economics, Faculty of Finance and Accounting, 131 – 136.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J. 2009. “Sustainability of Civil Service Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years After EU Accession.” Sigma Paper. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan-Hinrik_Meyer-Sahling/publication/46456761_Sustainability_of_Civil_Service_Reforms_in_Central_and_Eastern_Europe_Five_Years_After_EU_Accession/links/02e7e-52aceaa8a0cf5000000.pdf (last accessed 1 March 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Mikušová-Meričková, B. and J. Nemec. 2013. “Factors Determining the Success of Contracting Local Public Services: Waste Collection and Waste Disposal, Management of Cemeteries in Slovakia.” Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government 11(3), 375 – 385.10.4335/11.3.375-385(2013)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Miller, W. L., A. B. Grodeland and T. Y. Koshechkina. 1998. Are the People Victims or Accomplices ? Budapest: LGI.Search in Google Scholar

Millet, I., D. H. Parente, J. L. Fizel and R. R. Venkataraman. 2004. “Metrics for Managing Online Procurement Auctions.” Interfaces 34(3), 171 – 179.10.1287/inte.1040.0073Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nemec, J. 2011. “Verejné projekty, verejné objednávky, verejné obstarávania.” In J. Medveď and J. Nemec (eds). Verejné financie. Bratislava: Sprint dva, 433 – 459.Search in Google Scholar

Nemec, J. 2018. “Public Administration Reforms in Slovakia: Limited Outcomes (Why ?).” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 11(1), 115 – 134.Search in Google Scholar

Nemec, J., F. Busina, M. Grega, M. Orviska and M. Sumpikova. 2016. “Transaction Costs in Czech and Slovak Public Procurement”. In L. Sedmihradska (ed.). Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance 2016: Proceedings of the 21stInternational Conference. Prague: University of Economics, 282 – 286.Search in Google Scholar

Nemec, J., B. Mikušová-Meričková and M. Grega. 2014. “Why Public Procurement does not Work Properly in Central Europe Conditions.” In F. Maron (ed.). IASA Conference Proceedings. Brussels: IIAS, 75 – 81.Search in Google Scholar

Nemec, J., M. Sumpikova, S. Klazar and M. Grega. 2014. “Efficiency versus Economy in Public Procurement.” In P. Loster and T. Pavelka (eds.). Conference Proceedings from the 8thInternational Days of Statistics and Economics. Prague: University of Economics, 1054 – 1063.Search in Google Scholar

Orviska, M. and J. Hudson. 2003. “Tax Evasion, Civic Duty and the Law Abiding Citizen.” European Journal of Political Economy 19(1), 83 – 102.10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00131-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Parker, D., Hartley, K. 2002. “Transaction Costs, Relational Contracting and Public Private Partnerships: A Case Study of UK Defence.” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 9(3), 97 – 108.Search in Google Scholar

Pavel, J. 2007. Ekonomické aspekty veřejných zakázek. Habilitačná práca. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.Search in Google Scholar

Pavel, J. 2010. “Analýza vlivu míry konkurence na cenu rozsáhlých staveb v dopravní infrastruktury.” Politická ekonomie 14(3), 343 – 356.Search in Google Scholar

Pavel, J. 2013. Veřejné zákazky a efektivnost. Ekopress: Praha.Search in Google Scholar

Plaček, M., M. Pucek and F. Ochrana. 2018. “Identifying Corruption Risk: A Comparison of Bulgaria and the Czech Republic.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13876988.2018.1472473?journalCode=fcpa20 (last accessed 6 December 2018).10.1080/13876988.2018.1472473?journalCode=fcpa20(lastaccessed6December2018)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Plaček, M., M. Schmidt, F. Ochrana and M. Pucek. 2017. “Do the Selected Characteristics of Public Tenders Affect the Likelihood of Filing Petitions with the Regulators of Public Tenders ?” Prague Economic Papers 26(3), 317 – 329.10.18267/j.pep.616Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Prier, E. and C. Mccue. 2007. “E-Procurement Adoption in Local Governments of the United States.” Government Procurement Magazine 2007. Available at http://americancityandcounty.com/issue20070201/e-procurement-adoption-local-governments-united-states1 (last accessed 6 December 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Public Procurement Indicators 2015. 2017. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/docs-room/documents/20679 (last accessed 22 December 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, J. 2008. “Benchmarking in Public Procurement.” Benchmarking: An International Journal 15(6), 782 – 793.Search in Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, S. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and10.1017/CBO9781139175098Search in Google Scholar

Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sambavisan, M., G. Wemyss and R. Ch. Rose. 2010. “User Acceptance of a G2B System: A Case of Electronic Procurement System in Malaysia.” Internet Research 20(2), 169 – 187.10.1108/10662241011032236Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sičáková-Beblavá, E., P. Klatik and M. Beblavy. 2013. “Ekonomické efekty elektronických aukcií na Slovensku.” Ekonomický časopis 61(10), 1067 – 1078.Search in Google Scholar

Sičáková-Beblavá, E., S. Satnikova and P. Klatik. 2011. Elektronické aukcie vo verejnom obstarávaní: teória a prax na Slovensku. Bratislava: Transparency International.Search in Google Scholar

Šipoš, G. and P. Klátik. 2013. Kvalita verejného obstarávania na Slovensku v roku 2012. Bratislava: Transparency International.Search in Google Scholar

Soudek, J. and J. Skuhrovec. 2013. “Public Procurement of Homogeneous Goods: the Czech Republic Case Study.” Econpapers. Prague: Charles University, 1 – 23. Available at http://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/sci/publication/show/id/4833/lang/cs (last accessed 10 May 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Soukopová, J. and I. Malý. 2012. “Vliv konkurence na výši výdajú na nakládaní s odpady obcí Jihomoravského kraje.” Waste Forum. Praha: CEMC, 173 – 183. Available at http://www.wasteforum.cz/cisla/WF_4_2012.pdf#page=15 (last accessed 12 May 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Soukopová, J., B. Mikušová-Meričková and J. Nemec. 2018. “The Efficiency of Local Service Delivery: The Czech Republic and Slovakia.” In I. Koprič, H. Woll-mann and G. Marcou (ed.). Evaluating Reforms of Local Public and Social Services in Europe. London: Palgrave McMillan, 151 – 170.Search in Google Scholar

Stanova, L. 2014. Explaining Developments of Central Structures for Civil Service Management. Bratislava: UK.Search in Google Scholar

Strand, I., P. Ramada and E. Canton. 2011. Public Procurement in Europe: Cost and Effectiveness. Brussels: European Commission. Available at https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/0cfa3445-7724-4af5-8c2b-d657cd690c03 (last accessed 10 May 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Suki, N. M. and T. Ramayah. 2010. “User Acceptance of the E-Government Services in Malaysia: Structural Equation Modelling Approach.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management 5(1), 395 – 412.Search in Google Scholar

Sulovcová, M. 2015. Benchmarking vo verejnom obstarávaní v podmienkach SR. Bachelor’s thesis at the Economic Faculty, University of Matej Bel, Department of Finance and Accounting.Search in Google Scholar

Sumpikova, M., F. Busina, M. Grega, J. Nemec and M. Orviska. 2016. “Transaction Costs in the Public Procurement: Selected Findings from Czech and Slovak Conditions.” In P. Loster and T. Pavelka (eds). Proceedings from International Scientific Conference International Days of Statistics and Economics. Prague: University of Economics in Prague, 1749 – 1758.Search in Google Scholar

Sumpikova, M., J. Nemec, M. Orviska and M. Grega. 2015. “Selected Factors Determining the Performance of the Czech Public Procurement System.” In P. Loster and T. Pavelka (eds). The 9thInternational Days of Statistics and Economics: Conference Proceedings. Prague: University of Economics, 1508 – 1517.Search in Google Scholar

Švejda, J. 2010. Transaction Costs in Slovak Public Procurement. Diploma thesis. University of Economics, Prague.Search in Google Scholar

Szymanski, S. 1996. “The Impact of Compulsory Competitive Tendering on Refuse Collection Services.” Fiscal Studies 17(3), 1 – 19.10.1111/j.1475-5890.1996.tb00491.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tadelis, S. 2012. “Public Procurement Design: Lessons from the Private Sector.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 30(3), 297 – 302.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2012.02.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tenders Electronic Daily. 2014. “EU above the Threshold Public Procurement Data.” Available at http://ted.europa.eu (last accessed 10 December 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Transparency International. 2016. Corruption Perception Index 2016. Available at www.transparency.org/cpi2016 (last accessed 1 March 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Triantafillou, P. 2007. “Benchmarking in the Public Sector: A Critical Conceptual Framework.” Public Administration Journal 85(3), 829 – 846.Search in Google Scholar

Vlach, J., E. Sičáková-Beblavá and J. Nemec. 2004. Monitoring verejného obstarávania vo vybraných nemocniciach SR. Bratislava: Transparency International.Search in Google Scholar

Williamson, O. 1985. “Reflections on the New Institutional Economics.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 141(1), 187 – 195.Search in Google Scholar

Žilinčík, S. 2015. Interview with Ing. Slavko Žilinčík on 19 October 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Contract for e-marketplace in Slovakia (EKS). Available online: http://www.crz.gov.sk/index.php?ID=1378721&l=sk (last accessed 31 January 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Data from Slovak public procurement available in open csv format. Available at tender.sme.sk (last accessed 10 December 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Data from Slovak public procurement available at Slovak Office for Public Procurement. 2018. Available at www.uvo.gov.sk (last accessed 31 January 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo