1. bookVolume 64 (2021): Issue 1 (June 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Sep 2018
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Determination of the Stress Increase of the Unbonded Tendon in a Continuous Concrete Beam at Ultimate Capacity Using Nonlinear Analysis

Published Online: 17 Jul 2021
Page range: 109 - 128
Received: 26 Mar 2021
Accepted: 26 Jun 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Sep 2018
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Predicting the stress increase of an unbonded tendon in a post-tensioned continuous concrete beam at ultimate capacity is more difficult than when bonded tendons are used. The failure mechanisms of the continuous beam are also different to that of the simple-span beam. The loading type, ductility of the support area and moment redistribution influence the behaviour of the continuous structures. In this research, the simplified nonlinear analysis was used for predicting the unbonded tendon stress increase at ultimate capacity in continuous two-span beams. The model is based on the moment-curvature relationships of the reinforced concrete cross-sections under different compressive forces and deformations of the continuous beam under loading. The results have been compared with the experimental results of recent studies found in the literature. In addition, 92 unbonded post-tensioned two-span beams with different reinforcements have been examined by using the model and compared to the results obtained from empirical equations from the literature. The results from the nonlinear analysis correspond well to the results from the other models up to the reinforcement ratio of 0.35. The calculated values of the maximum moment capacity at the centre support were close to the results from the test beams.

Keywords

1. Maguire M, Chang M, Collins W & Sun Y: “Stress Increase of Unbonded Tendons in Continuous Post-Tensioned Members”. Journal of Bridge Engineering ASCE, 22(2), 2017, 12 pp.Search in Google Scholar

2. Mattock A H, Yamazaki J & Kattula B T: “Comparative Study of Prestressed Concrete Beams, With and Without Bond”. ACI Journal, V.68, No. 2, February 1971, pp. 116-125Search in Google Scholar

3. Cooke N, Park R & Yong P: “Flexural Strength of Prestressed Concrete Members with Unbonded Tendons”. PCI Journal, 26(6), 1981, pp. 52-80Search in Google Scholar

4. Du G & Tao X: “Ultimate Stress of Unbonded Tendons in Partially Prestressed Concrete Beams”. PCI Journal, V. 31, No 6, 1985, pp. 72-91Search in Google Scholar

5. Burns N H, Charney F A & Vines W R: “Tests of One-Way Post-Tensioned Slabs with Unbonded Tendons”. PCI Journal, V. 33, No. 5, September-October 1978, 66-83Search in Google Scholar

6. Harajli M H, Hijazi S: “Evaluation of the Ultimate Steel Stress in Partially Prestressed Concrete Members”. PCI Journal, V.36, No. 1, 1991, pp 62-82.Search in Google Scholar

7. Harajli M H: “On the Stress in Unbonded Tendons at Ultimate: Critical Assessment and Proposed Changes”. ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 6, 2006, pp. 803-812Search in Google Scholar

8. Harajli M H: “Proposed Modification of AASHTO-LRFD for Computing Stress in Unbonded Tendons at Ultimate”. Journal of Bridge Engineering ASCE, V.16, No. 6, 2011, pp.828-838Search in Google Scholar

9. Harajli M H: “Tendon Stress at Ultimate in Continuous Unbonded Post-Tensioned Members: Proposed Modification of ACI 318, Eq. (18-4) and (18-5)”. ACI Structural Journal, V. 109, No. 2, 2012, pp.183-192Search in Google Scholar

10. Naaman A E & Alkhairi F M: “Stress at Ultimate in Unbonded Post-Tensioned Tendons: Part 2 – Proposed Methodology”. ACI Structural Journal, V.88, No. 6, November-December 1991, pp. 683-692Search in Google Scholar

11. Weller B: “Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Biegetragverhalten von Durchlaufträgen mit Vorspannung ohne Verbund“. Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton, Heft 391, Berlin 1988, Seite 73-125Search in Google Scholar

12. Kordina K & Hegger J: “Zur Ermittlung der Biegebruch-Tragfähigkeit bei Vorspannung ohne Verbund”. Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, Heft 4, April 1987, Seite 85-90Search in Google Scholar

13. Zhou W & Zheng W Z: “Experimental Research on Plastic Design Method and Moment Redistribution in Continuous Beams Prestressed with Unbonded Tendons”. Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 62, No. 1, 2010, pp. 51-64Search in Google Scholar

14. Zhou W & Zheng W Z: “Unbonded Tendon Stresses in Continuous Post-Tensioned Beams”. ACI Structural Journal, V.111, No. 3, May-June 2014, pp. 525-536Search in Google Scholar

15. Maguire M, Collins W N, Halbe K R & Roberts-Wollmann C L: “Multi-Span Members with Unbonded Tendons: Ultimate Strength Behavior”. ACI Structural Journal, No. 113-S18, March-April, 2016, pp. 195-204Search in Google Scholar

16. Allouche E N, Campbell T I, Green M F & Soudki K A: “Tendon Stress in Continuous Unbonded Prestressed Concrete Members – Part 2: Parametric Study”. PCI Journal, 44(1), 1999, pp. 60-72Search in Google Scholar

17. Kim S K & Lee D H: “Nonlinear Analysis Method for Continuous Post-Tensioned Concrete Members with Unbonded Tendons”. Engineering Structures, 40, 2012, pp.487-500Search in Google Scholar

18. Vu N A, Castel A & François R: “Response of Post-tensioned Concrete Beams with Unbonded Tendons including Serviceability and Ultimate State”. Engineering Structures, 32(2), 2010, pp. 556-559Search in Google Scholar

19. Zimmermann J: “Biegetragverhalten und Bemessung von Trägern mit Vorspannung ohne Verbund”. Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton, Heft 391, Berlin 1988, Seite 5-71Search in Google Scholar

20. European standard EN 1992-1-1, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, 2005, 226 pp.Search in Google Scholar

21. fib Model Code 2010 (2013), fib Model Code for Concrete Structures. International Federation for Structural Concrete. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn, 2013, 402 p.Search in Google Scholar

22. Rombach G: “Spannbetonbau”. 2. Auflage, 2009, Seite 608Search in Google Scholar

23. Krüger W & Mertzsch O: “Spannbetonbau-Praxis nach Eurocode 2 Mit Berechnungsbeispielen”. 3. Auflage, Bauwerk BBB, Beuth, 2012, Seite 318Search in Google Scholar

24. ACI Committee 318: “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-11) and Commentary”. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2011, 503 pp.Search in Google Scholar

25. LUSAS Academic Bridge Plus softwareSearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo