1. bookVolume 30 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Factors, Increasing the Efficiency of Work of Maintenance, Repair and Operation Units of Industrial Enterprises

Published Online: 12 Feb 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 30 (2022) - Issue 1 (March 2022)
Page range: 91 - 97
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The article contains the analysis of factors influencing the efficiency of work of equipment maintenance, repair and operation (MRO) units of industrial enterprises. We have systematized various classifications of these factors, which were proposed in economic literature by different authors. We have divided the factors into following groups: general and local; primary and secondary; external and internal; major and non-essential; direct and oblique; reducing and boosting the expenses on equipment MRO and repair cost; production and non-production; depending on management and independent; economic, operation, organization ones; structural and production-technical ones; which are interconnected. It has been proposed to classify factors influencing the efficiency of equipment MRO units into five groups: economic, exploitation, organization, production-technical and structural ones. Using expert evaluation method, the factors have been divided into three groups according to degree of their influence on efficiency of work of equipment MRO units of industrial enterprises. The priority was given to the factors of the first group, having decisive influence on formation of efficiency. The most significant factors have been identified. In opinion of experts, these factors include: method of organization of work of equipment MRO service; level of economic autonomy of MRO enterprise in terms of organization of equipment MRO; financial and market situation of enterprise; the degree of repair complexity of production equipment.

Keywords

[1] Z.B. Khmelnitskaya. Organizational and economic problems of increasing the efficiency of production and technical services. Ural University. 205 p. 1987. Search in Google Scholar

[2] A.N. Vodolazov. Economic assessment of the activities of auxiliary production facilities of the enterprise: methodology and tools. DonSTU. 22 p. 2002. Search in Google Scholar

[3] V.N. Goncharov, O.A. Burbelo, A.I. Vavin. The efficiency of the production infrastructure of enterprises. LOT. 164 p. 1994. Search in Google Scholar

[4] L.N. Dragun. Improving the economic management of repair production (theory and practice). Irkutsk University Publ., 140 p. 1985. Search in Google Scholar

[5] R.N. Kolegaev, K.I. Melnikova, B.I. Krivoberets. Efficiency of the repair service of the enterprise and association. Technique, 160 p. 1976. Search in Google Scholar

[6] G.A. Morgun. Efficiency management of enterprises in the conditions of reforming the electric power industry. UPI, 192 p. 2004. Search in Google Scholar

[7] V.K. Myltsev. Questions of increasing the organizational and technical level and efficiency of repair production. UPI. 25 p. 1981. Search in Google Scholar

[8] U.F. Nasibullin. Interplant management of the repair service. SPb GIEA. 17 p. 1997. Search in Google Scholar

[9] S.F. Pokropivny. Efficiency of car repair. Tekhnika, 256 p. 1975. Search in Google Scholar

[10] R.R. Stepanova. Methods and tools for increasing the economic efficiency of repair services of chemical enterprises. D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia. 145 p. 2004. Search in Google Scholar

[11] N.G. Chumachenko. Problems of organizing the effective functioning of auxiliary production in mechanical engineering. IEM USSR Academy of Sciences, 30 p. 1979. Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Tabor. Ranking of management factors for safe maintenance system based on Grey Systems Theory. Production Engineering Archives. 2021, 27(3), pp. 196-202, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.2610.30657/pea.2021.27.26 Search in Google Scholar

[13] K. Kowalik, D. Klimecka-Tatar. The process approach to service quality management. Production Engineering Archives. issue 18, pp. 31-34 doi:10.30657/pea.2018.18.05. 2018.10.30657/pea.2018.18.05 Search in Google Scholar

[14] R. Ulewicz, M. Mazur. Economic aspects of robotization of production processes by example of a car semi-trailers manufacturer, Manufacturing Technology. 19(6), pp. 1054-1059, doi: 10.21062/ujep/408.2019/a/1213-2489/MT/19/6/1054. 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. Furman. Work Safety Improvement Within Autonomous Maintenance. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering MAPE 2020, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 161-171 https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2020-0014.2020. Search in Google Scholar

[16] P. Gackowiec. General overview of maintenance strategies – concepts and approaches Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering MAPE 2019, vol. 2, issue 1, https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2019-0013.2019. Search in Google Scholar

[17] B. Al-Najjar, & I. Alsyouf, I. Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. International Journal of Production Economics, 84(1), pp. 85-100. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-8.10. 2003. Search in Google Scholar

[18] H. Cherkaoui, K.T. Huynh, & A. Grall. On the Assessment of Performance and Robustness of Condition-Based Maintenance Strategies. IFAC-PapersOnLine, Elsevier B.V. 49(12), pp. 809-814. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.874.10.1016. Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. Mikler. Life Cycle Costing Used for Justifying Transition to Predictive Maintenance Strategies. Journal of Machine Engineering, 11(4), 2011. pp. 49-58. Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. Tabor. Maintenance management and occupational safety in manufacturing organizations. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 10 (2), pp. 225-235. 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[21] E.C. Özcan, S. Ünlüsoy, & T. Eren. A combined goal programming – AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier Ltd, 78 (May 2016), pp. 1410-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.039. 2016.10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.039 Search in Google Scholar

[22] L. Oubahman, S. Duleba. Review of PROMETHEE method in transportation, Production Engineering Archives. 27(1), pp. 69-74. doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.9. 2021.10.30657/pea.2021.27.9 Search in Google Scholar

[23] D.L. Krutikhin. V.E. Lyalin. Application of queuing systems to improve the efficiency of maintenance and equipment repair services at an industrial enterprise//Mathematical models and information technologies in the organization of production. no. 2 (23). pp. 48-52. 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[24] V.M. Semyonov. Problems of the efficiency of maintenance of mechanical engineering production. UPI. 40 p. 1978. Search in Google Scholar

[25] K. Knop. Analysing the machines working time utilization for improvement purposes. Production Engineering Archives. 2021, 27(2), pp. 137-147, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.1810.30657/pea.2021.27.18 Search in Google Scholar

[26] N.F. Revenko. The economic mechanism in repair production (on the example of industrial associations and enterprises of the mechanical engineering industry). IEP AN UkrSSR. 351 p. 1991. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Z.B. Khmelnitskaya. Organization and management of production and technical maintenance of mechanical engineering enterprises. 1992. Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. Krynke. Management optimizing the costs and duration time of the process in the production system. Production Engineering Archives. 2021, 27(3), pp. 163-170, doi: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.2110.30657/pea.2021.27.21 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo