1. bookVolume 29 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Process Ambidexterity in Startups Innovation

Published Online: 02 Dec 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 29 (2021) - Issue 1 (March 2021)
Page range: 27 - 32
Received: 01 Feb 2020
Accepted: 01 Oct 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The article is of theoretical and empirical character. The main objective is to identify certain conditions related to the innovative ambidexterity of Polish startups. The objective implementation protocol of the study determined its structure. Its first part presents the most important theoretical concepts related to the presented issues. In particular, on the basis of the literature on the subject, analyses of the innovative ambidexterity. Moreover a start-up was equated with a company operating no longer than a year, which offers an innovative solution. Theoretical considerations provided the basis for the empirical presentation of the results of the author’s own research conducted in 2019 in Poland on startups. On the basis of the outcome it has been established the most important factors determining innovative ambidexterity in startups are: having access to external source of financing and to external infrastructure as well as the acquisition of a license/patent. Moreover it has been diagnosed that create innovation and simultaneously reduce in startups the tension between exploitation and exploration activities to a large extent rely on external sources when implementing their innovation processes. For the theory on management, the theoretical-empirical deliberations presented in the article may be a valuable source of information within the scope of the influence the particular elements of innovative ambidexterity have on startups. However, for entrepreneurs they may be an impulse in the field of effective use of the innovative ambidexterity in the process of building competitiveness of young companies in Poland.

Keywords

[1] Almahendra R., Ambos, B.: Exploration and exploitation: a 20-year review of evolution and reconceptualisation. International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 19(01), 2015.10.1142/S1363919615500085Search in Google Scholar

[2] Andriopoulos C., Lewis M. W.: Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization science, vol. 20(4), pp. 696-717, 2009.10.1287/orsc.1080.0406Search in Google Scholar

[3] Birkinshaw J., Gupta K.: Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 27(4), pp. 287-298, 2013.10.5465/amp.2012.0167Search in Google Scholar

[4] Blank S., Dorf B.: The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. BookBaby, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Blank S., Euchner J.: The Genesis and Future of Lean Startup: An Interview with Steve Blank. Research-Technology Management, vol. 61(5), pp. 15-21, 2018.10.1080/08956308.2018.1495963Search in Google Scholar

[6] Brem A.: Creativity and routine: conceptual considerations on managing organisational ambidexterity in entrepreneurial ventures. International Journal of Entrepreneur-ship and Innovation Management, vol. 21(3), pp. 261-273, 2017.10.1504/IJEIM.2017.083472Search in Google Scholar

[7] Chen M., Yang Z., Dou W., Wang F.: Flying or dying? Organizational change, customer participation, and innovation ambidexterity in emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 35(1), pp. 97-119, 2018.10.1007/s10490-017-9520-5Search in Google Scholar

[8] Coccia M.: Radical Innovations as Drivers of Breakthroughs: Characteristics and Properties of the Management of Technology Leading to Superior Organizational Performance in the Discovery Process of R&D Labs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 28 (4), pp. 381-395, 2016,10.1080/09537325.2015.1095287Search in Google Scholar

[9] Performance. Creativity and innovation management, vol.24(3), pp. 359-372, 2015.10.1111/caim.12137Search in Google Scholar

[10] Felício J.A., Caldeirinha V., Dutra A.: Ambidextrous capacity in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Research, vol. 101, pp. 607-614, 2019.10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.061Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gilbert D.H, Smith A., Sutherland F.: Osmotic strategy: Innovating at the core to inspire at the edges. Organizational Dynamics, vol. 44.3, pp. 217-225, 2015.10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.05.007Search in Google Scholar

[12] Goel S., Jones R. J.: Entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation in family business: A systematic review and future directions. Family Business Review, vol. 29(1), pp. 94-120, 2016.10.1177/0894486515625541Search in Google Scholar

[13] Guisado-González M., González-Blanco J., Coca-Pérez J.L.: Analyzing the relationship between exploration, exploitation and organizational innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), pp. 1142-1162, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Jansen J. J., Kostopoulos K.C., Mihalache O.R., Papalexandris A.: A socio-psychological perspective on team ambi-dexterity: The contingency role of supportive leadership behaviours. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 53(6), pp. 939-965, 2016.10.1111/joms.12183Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jen Huang C., Ju Li C.: Exploration for the relationship between innovation, IT and performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 6(2), pp. 237-252, 2005,10.1108/14691930510592825Search in Google Scholar

[16] Li D., Lin J., Cui W., Qian Y.: The trade-off between knowledge exploration and exploitation in technological innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 22(4), pp. 781-801, 2018.10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0401Search in Google Scholar

[17] Li Y., Vanhaverbeke W., Schoenmakers W.: Exploration and exploitation in innovation: Reframing the interpretation. Creativity and innovation management, vol. 17(2), pp. 107-126, 2008.10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00477.xSearch in Google Scholar

[18] March James G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. “Organization science, vol. 2(1) pp. 71-87, 1991.10.1287/orsc.2.1.71Search in Google Scholar

[19] Mueller S., Volery T., von Siemens B.: What do entrepreneurs actually do? An observational study of entrepreneurs’ everyday behavior in the start-up and growth stages. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 36(5), pp. 995-1017, 2012.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00538.xSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Müller S. D., Påske N., Rodil L.: Managing Ambidexterity in Startups Pursuing Digital Innovation. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 44, pp. 273-298, 2019.10.17705/1CAIS.04418Search in Google Scholar

[21] Perlow L.A., Okhuysen G.A., Repenning, N.P.: The speed trap: Exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Academy of Management journal, vol. 45(5), pp. 931-955, 2002.10.5465/3069323Search in Google Scholar

[22] Piao M.: A long life after exploitation and exploration. European journal of innovation management, vol. 17(2), pp. 209-228, 2014.10.1108/EJIM-09-2013-0087Search in Google Scholar

[23] Reis E.: The lean startup. New York: Crown Business, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Rhee M., Kim T. 2016.: Exploration and exploitation. in M. Augier, D.J. Teece, The Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_388-1.10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_388-1Search in Google Scholar

[25] Sariol A.M., Abebe M.A.: The influence of CEO power on explorative and exploitative organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 73, pp. 38-45, vol. 2017.10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.016Search in Google Scholar

[26] Schreuders J., Legesse A.: Organizational ambidexterity: How small technology firms balance innovation and support. Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 2(2), pp. 17-21, 2012.10.22215/timreview/522Search in Google Scholar

[27] Sipe L.J.: How do senior managers influence experience innovation? Insights from a hospitality marketplace. International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 54, pp. 75-83, 2012.10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.01.009Search in Google Scholar

[28] Skala A.: The Startup as a Result of Innovative Entrepreneurship. In: Digital Startups in Transition Economies. Pal-grave Pivot, Cham, 2019, pp. 1-40.10.1007/978-3-030-01500-8_1Search in Google Scholar

[29] Smith W.K., Lewis M.W.: Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, vol. 36, pp. 381-403, 2011,10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958Search in Google Scholar

[30] Still K.: Accelerating research innovation by adopting the lean startup paradigm. Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 7(5), pp. 32-43, 2017,10.22215/timreview/1075Search in Google Scholar

[31] Wasserman N.: The founder’s dilemmas: Anticipating and avoiding the pitfalls that can sink a startup. Princeton University Press, 2012.10.2307/j.ctvcm4hqcSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Zakrzewska-Bielawska A.: Strategie rozwoju przedsiębiorstw: nowe spojrzenie. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Zakrzewska-Bielawska A.: “Struktury organizacyjne sprzyjające odnowie organizacyjnej przedsiębiorstw: ambidextrous approach”. Management Forum., vol. 3. No. 1, pp. 105-111, 2015.10.15611/mf.2015.1.16Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo