1. bookVolume 28 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Assessment of the Technical Level of Magnetic Fishing Tools

Published Online: 26 May 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 28 (2020) - Issue 2 (June 2020)
Page range: 78 - 83
Received: 01 Jan 2020
Accepted: 01 Mar 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2450-5781
First Published
30 Mar 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

A variety of magnetic fishing tools poses the task of the optimal choice of tool for eliminating accidents during the construction, operation and repair of wells. Existing criteria for assessing the quality of fishing magnets are characterized by the complexity of the determination and the ambiguity of the results. Therefore, the aim of research is development of a new approach to determining the technical level of fishing tools of various types and designs. A complex criterion has been developed that allows to evaluate the technical level of magnetic systems by correlating the actual and theoretical values of the total and specific lifting forces. Also it has been carried out a qualimetric analysis of magnetic tools, which are currently offered by world manufacturers. As a result, mathematical models are found that describe the average and modern world level of devices with specific lifting force. Technical decisions are proposed, the implementation of which in the design of magnetic systems of fishing tools will allow to achieve high values of lifting force. Application of the proposed complex criterion along with the results of qualimetric analysis will make it possible to objectively assess the technical level of magnetic fishing tools both at the design stage and during serial production.

Keywords

[1] B. Coll, G. Laws, J. Jenpert, M. Sportelli, C. Svoboda, and M. Trimble, “Specialized Tools for Wellbore Debris Recovery,” Oilfield Review, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 4-13, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[2] E. Johnson, J. Land, M. Lee, and R. Robertson, “Landing the big one – the art of fishing,” Oilfield Review, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 26-35, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[3] P. Connell and D. Haughton, “Removal of Debris from Deepwater Wellbores Using Vectored Annulus Cleaning Systems Reduces Problems and Saves Rig Time,” presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2118/96440-MS.10.2118/96440-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[4] D. Haughton and P. Connell, “Reliable and Effective Down-hole Cleaning System for Debris and Junk Removal,” presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2118/101727-MS.10.2118/101727-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[5] E. A. Akhmadullin, V. I. Balaba, V. S. Zaretsky, and V. Ya. Kershenbaum, “Quantitative assessment of repair work quality in wells,” Construction of Oil and Gas Wells on Land and Sea, vol. 8, pp. 14-18, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. A. Short, Prevention, Fishing, and Casing Repair. Tulsa: PennWell Publishing, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. V. Panevnik, I. F. Kontsur, and D. A. Panevnik, “Determination of operating parameters of near-bit ejector assembly,” Oil Industry, vol. 10, pp. 10-20, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[8] I. R. Minnakhmetov and R. N. Talipov, “Classification of the tool for well bottom cleaning from metal,” Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin, vol. 2, pp. 389-391, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Douglas, “Fishing techniques for drilling operations,” in Proc. AAPG Southwest Section Meeting, 1999, pp. 15-24.Search in Google Scholar

[10] J. DeGeare, The Guide to Oilwell Fishing Operations: Tools, Techniques, and Rules of Thumb, 2nd ed. Oxford: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[11] R. R. Zeynalov, “Investigation of magnetic drilling systems of magnetic catcher,” Construction of Oil and Gas Wells on Land and Sea, vol. 7, pp. 8-10, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. T. Kobyljanskij, “Choice and justification of the main functional criteria for assessing the technical level of magnetic fishing tools,” Bulletin KuzSTU, vol. 2, pp. 15-18, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Y. A. Kurnikov, I. F. Koncur, M. T. Kobyljanskij, and L. I. Romanyshyn, Magnetic fishing tools for well cleaning. Lviv, Ukraine: High school Publishing, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

[14] E. I. Kryzhanovsky, P. N. Raiter, L. I. Romanishin, and T. L. Romanishin, “Experimental research of characteristics of magnetic systems of the fishing tools,” Oil Industry, vol. 7, pp. 104-106, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. Romanyshyn, A. Dzhus, and L. Romanyshyn, “Design and research of fishing tools with rational parameters of magnetic systems,” Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 17-22, 2017. doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2017.10882.Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. Goldman, Handbook of Modern Ferromagnetic Materials. Boston, MA: Springer, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4917-8.10.1007/978-1-4615-4917-8Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. A. Gasanov, R. G. Amirov, and Z. E. Eivazova, “Development of new parametric series of magnetic extractors on the basis of highly energetic magnetic catching devices,” Oilfield Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 39-41, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[18] I. Ya. Shirali and T. M. Tagieva, “Design concept and parametric line of well magnetic devices,” Construction of Oil and Gas Wells on Land and Sea, vol. 12, pp. 5-8, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[19] D. M. Kobyljanskij, T. V. Bogdanova, and M. T. Kobyljanskij, “Analysis and development of the catcher drilling tool with multiply coonnected magnetic drilling systems,” in Proc. VI International Conf. New Word in Scince and Practice, vol. 3, 2017, pp. 6-16.Search in Google Scholar

[20] T. Romanyshyn, V. Sheketa, L. Romanyshyn, and M. Buchynskyi, “Study of the efficiency of the large-diameter fishing tools with the moving magnetic systems,” New Tends in Production Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 206-213, 2019. doi:10.2478/ntpe-2019-0021.10.2478/ntpe-2019-0021Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo