1. bookVolume 38 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2083-134X
First Published
16 Apr 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Synthesis and mechanism of aluminum silicate mesoporous materials by F108 template

Published Online: 13 Apr 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 38 (2020) - Issue 4 (December 2020)
Page range: 566 - 576
Received: 02 Jul 2018
Accepted: 23 Apr 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2083-134X
First Published
16 Apr 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Aluminosilicate mesoporous materials were synthesized using F108 template (polyethylene glycol-polypropylene glycolpolyethylene glycol) at a concentration of 0.034 g/ml and the molar ratio of Al2O3 to SiO2 was 0.09. The products were then characterized using nitrogen adsorption/desorption tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The effects of various crystallization temperatures as well as sodium hydroxide concentrations on the average diameter, pore volume, surface area, and morphology of the synthetic material were analyzed. Results showed that a sodium hydroxide concentration of 11 mol/L and a crystallization temperature of 130 °C produced a synthetic material with regular pore size and homogeneous arrangement including a specific surface area of 137.62 m2/g, an average pore volume of 0.27 cm3/g, along with an average pore size of 15.33 nm.

Keywords

[1] Iupa C., Pure Appl. Chem., 603 (1985), 619. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Pei D.Y., Dong Y.Z., Davd I.M., Nature, 152 (1998), 155. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Luan Z., Cheng C., Klinowsk J., J. Phys. Chem., 1018 (1995), 1024.10.1021/j100003a026 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Biz S., White M.G., J. Phys. Chem., 8432 (1999), 8442.10.1021/jp984790z Search in Google Scholar

[5] Lin Y., Lin H., Mou C., Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 203 (2004), 208.10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.08.015 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hu H.J., Zhao H.Q., Wang L.Z., Mineral Prot. Util., 10 (1998), 13. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Song C., Yong R.Y., Kui X.Z., Jin D.W., Catal. Today, 116 (2006), 2. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lu B., Gui Z.N., Yi H.W., Deng H., Gao F.Z., Yan F.Z., Meng L.W., Yu H.S., Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 54 (2016), 58. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Pranjal K., Choitayna D.P., Prantu D., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 145 (2014), 150. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Joanna G., Anna O., Izabela N., Micha M., Robert P., Chem. Eng. J., 209 (2016), 219. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Xiao B.W, Min Y.S, Bo M., Nai T.Y., Xiao Y.A., Mater. Lett., 59 (2016), 62. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lee N.K., Hammad R.K., Electrochim. Acta., 22 (2016), 30. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Chandler D., Nature, 640 (2005), 647.10.1038/nature0416216193038 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Alexandridisl P., Holzwarth J.F., Hatton T.A., J. Macromol., 2414 (1994), 2425.10.1021/ma00087a009 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo