A Conceptual Model for Sustainable Reusable Packaging in Food Supply Chains

1 Accorsi, R., Baruffaldi, G., Manzini, R. (2020). A Closed-Loop Packaging Network Design Model to Foster Infinitely Reusable and Recyclable Containers in Food Industry // Sustainable Production and Consumption. Vol. 24, pp. 48–61. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.014 Search in Google Scholar

2 Accorsi, R., Battarra, I., Guidani, B., Manzini, R., Ronzoni, M., Volpe, L. (2022). Augmented Spatial LCA for Comparing Reusable and Recyclable Food Packaging Containers Networks // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 375, No. 134027. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134027 Search in Google Scholar

3 Albrecht, S., Bertling, J., Fischer, M., Gehring, F. (2022). Reusable Plastic Crates vs. Single-Use Cardboard Boxes: Two Packaging Systems in Competition. Fraunhofer UMSICHT and IBP Report. doi: 10.24406/publica-456 Search in Google Scholar

4 Anwar, F., Widodo, E., Vanany, I. (2023). Sustainable Reverse Logistics Implementation with Triple Bottom Line Approach. doi: 10.46254/an13.20230078 Search in Google Scholar

5 Betts, K., Gutierrez-Franco, E., Ponce-Cueto, E. (2022). Key Metrics to Measure the Performance and Impact of Reusable Packaging in Circular Supply Chains // Frontiers in Sustainability. Vol. 3, No. 910215. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2022.910215 Search in Google Scholar

6 Bocken, N. M. P., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product Design and Business Model Strategies for a Circular Economy // Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering. Vol. 33, No. (5), pp. 308–320. doi: 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 Search in Google Scholar

7 Coelho, P. M., Corona, B., Ten Klooster, R., Worrell, E. (2020). Sustainability of Reusable Packaging: Current Situation and Trends // Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X. Vol. 6, No. 100037. doi: 10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100037 Search in Google Scholar

8 DiMaggio, P. J., Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields // American Sociological Review. Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101 Search in Google Scholar

9 Dolci, G., Puricelli, S., Cecere, G., Pognani, M., Rossi, A. (2024). How does Plastic Compare with Alternative Materials in the Packaging Sector? A Systematic Review of LCA Studies // Waste Management & Research. Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 339–357. doi: 10.1177/0734242X241241606 Search in Google Scholar

10 Domenech, T., Bahn-Walkowiak, B. (2019). Transition towards a Resource Efficient Circular Economy in Europe: Policy Lessons from the EU and the Member States // Ecological Economics. Vol. 155, pp. 7–19. doi: 10.1016/j. ecolecon.2017.11.001 Search in Google Scholar

11 Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). Completing the Picture: How the Circular Economy Tackles Climate Change. Internet access: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/completing-the-picture Search in Google Scholar

12 Euro Pool System. (2024). Sustainable Packaging Solutions for Fresh Supply Chains. Internet access: https://www.europoolsystem.com/ [accessed: April 6, 2025]. Search in Google Scholar

13 European Commission. (2018). A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy. Brussels: European Commission. Internet access: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018AR0925&qid=1746634691201 Search in Google Scholar

14 European Commission. (2019). Directive on Packaging and Packaging Waste (94/62/ EC). Internet access: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:0199 4L0062-20180704 Search in Google Scholar

15 European Commission. (2022). Proposal for a Regulation on Packaging and Packaging Waste. Internet access: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal - content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022PC0677 Search in Google Scholar

16 Fayol, H. (1949). General and Industrial Management. / C. Storrs, Trans. Pitman. Original work published 1916. Search in Google Scholar

17 Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A New Sustainability Paradigm? // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 143, pp. 757–768.doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 Search in Google Scholar

18 GIZ. (2024). Good Practices for Reusable Packaging Systems // Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). Internet access: https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/giz2024-en-good-practices-reusable-packaging-systems.pdf Search in Google Scholar

19 Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism // Academy of Management Review. Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 1022–1054. Search in Google Scholar

20 IFCO Systems. (2024, March 4). IFCO releases ESG report 2024. Blue Book Services. Internet access: https://www.bluebookservices.com/ifco-releases-esg-report-2024 Search in Google Scholar

21 Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Gawankar, S. A. (2020). Achieving Sustainable Performance in a Data-Driven Agriculture Supply Chain: A Review for Research and Applications // International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 219, pp. 179–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.022 Search in Google Scholar

22 Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M. (2018). Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions // Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Vol. 127, pp. 221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 Search in Google Scholar

23 Kudrenko, I., Hall, L. (2024). Adoption of Reusable Transit Packaging in U.S. Industries: A Framework for Enhanced Sustainability // Review of Managerial Science. doi: 10.1007/s11846-024-00826-1 Search in Google Scholar

24 Lawrence, P. R., Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Harvard Business School Press. Search in Google Scholar

25 Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing The Business Models for Circular Economy – Towards the Conceptual Framework // Sustainability. Vol. 8, No. 1, P. 43. doi: 10.3390/Su8010043 Search in Google Scholar

26 Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG. (2023). Responsibility: A Better Tomorrow – Sustainability Report 2021/2022. Internet access: https://www.abettertomorrow - Lidl.Ie/Wp-Content/Uploads/2024/04/Sustainability-Report-2021-2022.Pdf Search in Google Scholar

27 Mahmoudi, M., Parviziomran, I. (2020). Reusable Packaging in Supply Chains: A Review of Environmental and Economic Impacts, Logistics System Designs, and Operations Management // International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 229, No. 107730. doi: 10.1016/J.Ijpe.2020.107730 Search in Google Scholar

28 Mani, V., Delgado, C., Hazen, B., Patel, P. (2017). Mitigating Supply Chain Risk Via Sustainability Using Big Data Analytics: Evidence from the Manufacturing Supply Chain // Sustainability. Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 608. doi: 10.3390/Su9040608 Search in Google Scholar

29 Meyer, J. W., Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony // American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 340–363. Search in Google Scholar

30 Morley Et Al., (2016). Food Waste Reduction Alliance (FWRA). (2016). Analysis Of U.S. Food Waste Among Food Manufacturers, Retailers, and Restaurants. Internet access: https://foodwastealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/fwra-food-waste-survey-2016-report_final.pdf Search in Google Scholar

31 Pajula, T., Sundqvist-Andberg, H. (2022). A Critical View on Packaging Recycling and Reuse in the European Circular Economy. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. Internet access: https://www.fefco.org/sites/default/files/files/white%20paper_final%20draft%20040422%20update%2015102022(1).pdf Search in Google Scholar

32 Pålsson, H., Olsson, J. (2023). Current State and Research Directions for Disposable Versus Reusable Packaging: A Systematic Literature Review of Comparative Studies // Packaging Technology and Science. Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 391–409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2722 Search in Google Scholar

33 Plastics Europe. (2021). Plastics – The Facts 2021. Internet access: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2021/ Search in Google Scholar

34 Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization // Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 12, pp. 295–336. Search in Google Scholar

35 Raible, I. M., Holweg, C., Reiner, G., Teller, C. (2024). Returnable Packaging Systems and Store Operations: Processes, Costs, and Benefits // Journal of Industrial Ecology. Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 115–130. doi: 10.1111/jiec.13477 Search in Google Scholar

36 Ratay, C., Barthel, F., Mohnen, A. (2024). Geographic Network Effects in a Circular Economy: A Field Data Analysis of Reusable Packaging Services // Journal of Industrial Ecology. Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 482–495. doi: 10.1111/jiec.13478 Search in Google Scholar

37 RIMI Packaging Revolution. (2024, May 14). Rimi Utilizes IFCO RPC System, Saves 3,500 Tons of CO2. Internet access: https://packagingrevolution.net/rimi-utilizes-ifco-rpc-system-saves-3500-tons-of-co2/ Search in Google Scholar

38 Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain Technology and its Relationships to Sustainable Supply Chain Management // International Journal of Production Research. Vol. 57, No. 7, pp. 2117–2135. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 Search in Google Scholar

39 Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests (3rd ed.). – SAGE Publications. Search in Google Scholar

40 Sun, H. (2024). Inventory Control for Reusable Express Packaging with under Sharing Policy // Managerial and Decision Economics. Vol. 45, No. 6, pp. 3677–3689. doi: 10.1002/mde.4213 Search in Google Scholar

41 Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. – Harper & Brothers. Search in Google Scholar

42 Weber, M. (1922). Economy and Society: An Outline of interpretive Sociology. – University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar

43 Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. / A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans. Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

44 Zambujal-Oliveira, J., Fernandes, C. (2024). The Contribution of Sustainable Packaging to the Circular Food Supply Chain // Packaging Technology and Science. Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 443–456. doi: 10.1002/pts.2802 Search in Google Scholar

45 Zimmermann, T., Hauschke, F. (2024). Assessing Reusable Packaging: The Importance of Methodological Choices in Carbon Footprint Calculation // Sustainability. Vol. 16, No. 11, p. 4723. doi: 10.3390/su16114723 Search in Google Scholar