[
1. Alford, J. (2014). The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the Work of Elinor Ostrom // Public Management Review. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 299–316. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.80657810.1080/14719037.2013.806578
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Algan, Y., Cahuc, P. (2014). Trust, Growth, and Well-Being: New Evidence and Policy Implications // IZA Discussion Papers. No. 7464, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Alizadeh, A., Kianfar, F. (2013). Developing a Model for Citizens’ Satisfaction with Public Sector Services Based on Rough Sets Theory: A Case Study of Tehran Municipality // Tehnički vjesnik. Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 795–802.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Álvarez-Pérez, Y., Perestelo-Pérez, L., Rivero-Santanta, A., Torres-Castaño, A., Toledo-Chávarri, A., Duarte-Díaz, A., Mahtani-Chugani, V., Marrero-Díaz, M. D., Montanari, A., Tangerini, S. et al. (2022). Co-Creation of Massive Open Online Courses to Improve Digital Health Literacy in Pregnant and Lactating Women // Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19, 913. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1902091310.3390/ijerph19020913
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Ansell, Ch., Torfing, J. (2021). Co-Creation: the New Kid on the Block in Public Governance // Policy & Politics, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 211–230, ISSN 0305-5736, Online ISSN 1470-8442, doi: 10.1332/030557321X1611595119604510.1332/030557321X16115951196045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Assiouras, I., Skourtis, G., Giannopoulos, A., Buhalis, D., Koniordos, M. (2019). Value Co-Creation and Customer Citizenship Behavior // Annals of Tourism Research. Vol. 78, 102742. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2019.10274210.1016/j.annals.2019.102742
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Benmansour, N. A. (2018). Citizens and Expatriates Satisfaction with Public Services in Qatar–Evidence from a Survey // International Journal of Social Economics. Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 326–337. doi: 10.1108/IJSE-03-2018-011810.1108/IJSE-03-2018-0118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Bentzen, T. Ø. (2022). Continuous Co-Creation: How Ongoing Involvement Impacts Outcomes of Co-Creation // Public Management Review. Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 34–54, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2020.178615010.1080/14719037.2020.1786150
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Bjerneld, M., Lindmark, G., McSpadden, L. A., Garrett, M. J. (2006). Motivations, Concerns, and Expectations of Scandinavian Health Professionals Volunteering for Humanitarian Assignments // Disaster Management & Response. Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: 10.1016/j.dmr.2006.01.00210.1016/j.dmr.2006.01.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation User and Community Co-Production of Public Services // Public Administration Review. Vol. 67, pp. 846–860. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2016.125055910.1080/01900692.2016.1250559
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E., Parrado, S. (2015). Activating Citizens to Participate in Collective Co-Production of Public Services // Journal of Social Policy. Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 1–23, doi: 10.1017/ S0047279414000567
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Brandsen, T., Honingh, M. (2018). Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction // Public Administration Review. Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 427‒35. doi: 10.1111/puar.1246510.1111/puar.12465
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Brandsen, T., Steen, T., Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-Creation and Co-Production in Public Services: Urgent. Co-Production and Co-Creation Engaging Citizens in Public Services, Edited by Taco Brandsen, Trui Steen and Bram Verschuere. Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9781315204956-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Brzustewicz, P., Escher, I., Hatami, A., Hermes, J., Keranen, A., Ulkuniemi, P. (2022). Emergence of Social Impact in Company–NGO Relationships in Corporate Volunteering // Journal of Business Research. Vol. 140, pp. 62–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.08910.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.089
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Cohen, N., Mizrahi, S., Vigoda-Gado, E. (2022). Alternative Provision of Public Health Care: The Role of Citizens’ Satisfaction with Public Services and the Social Responsibility of Government // Health Economics, Policy and Law. Vol. 17, pp.121–140. doi:10.1017/ S1744133120000201
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. De Jong, M. D., Neulen, S., Jansma, S. R. (2019). Citizens’ Intentions to Participate in Governmental Co-Creation Initiatives: Comparing Three Co-Creation Configurations // Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 490–500. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.04.00310.1016/j.giq.2019.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. De Walle, S. V. (2018). Explaining Citizen Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Public Services // The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, pp. 227–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_1110.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service // Governance, An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 55–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.0015110.1111/0952-1895.00151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Grönroos, C. (2011). Value Co-Creation in Service Logic // A Critical Analysis’, Marketing Theory. Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 279–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/147059311140817710.1177/1470593111408177
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Grönroos, C. (2018). Reforming Public Services: Does Service Logic Have Anything to Offer? // Public Management Review. Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 775–788. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.152987910.1080/14719037.2018.1529879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D., De Neve, J. E., Aknin, L. B., Wang, S. (2021). World Happiness Report 2021. Internet access: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2021/. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Hodgkinson, I., Hannibal, C., Keating, B., Buxton, R., Bateman, N. (2017). Toward a Public Service Management: Past, Present and Future Directions // Journal of Service Management. Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 998–1023. doi: 10.1108/JOSM-01-2017-002010.1108/JOSM-01-2017-0020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Hofstad, H., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J., Vedeld, T. (2022). Designing and Leading Collaborative Urban Climate Governance: Comparative Experiences of Co-Creation from Copenhagen and Oslo // Environmental Policy and Governance published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1002/eet.198410.1002/eet.1984
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Jakobsen, M. (2013). Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized in Handbook of Economic Growth // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 27–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus03610.1093/jopart/mus036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Jo, S., Nabatchi, T. (2016). Getting Back to Basics: Advancing the Study and Practice of Coproduction // International Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 36, No. 13, pp. 1101–1108. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2016.117784010.1080/01900692.2016.1177840
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Jukic, T., Pluchinotta, I., Hrzica, R., Vrbek, S. (2022). Organizational Maturity for Co-Creation: Towards a Multi-attribute Decision Support Model for Public Organizations // Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 39, No. 101623. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.10162310.1016/j.giq.2021.101623
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Jung, T. (2010). Citizens, Co-Producers, Customers, Clients, Captives? A Critical Review of Consumerism and Public Services // Public Management Review. Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 439–446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903100378794010.1080/14719031003787940
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Kitchenham, B. A., Charters, S. M. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering // EBSE Technical Report Version 2.3, Durham University: Durham, UK; Keele University: Staffordshire, UK, Vol. 1, pp. 1–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Klafke, R., De Oliveira, M. C. V. (2022). Value Co-Creation and Donation in Non-Profts: A Social Analysis Through the Service-Dominant Logic // SN Soc Sci. Vol. 2, No. 26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00328-510.1007/s43545-022-00328-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Larsen, F., Caswell, D. (2020). Co-Creation in An Era of Welfare Conditionality – Lessons from Denmark // Jnl. Soc. Pol. Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 1–19. doi:10.1017/S004727942000066510.1017/S0047279420000665
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Leino, H., Puumala, E. (2021). What Can Co-Creation Do for the Citizens? Applying Co-Creation for the Promotion of Participation in Cities // EPC: Politics and Space 2021. Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 781–799. doi: 10.1177/239965442095733710.1177/2399654420957337
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Lenz, A. (2022). Trust in Times of Crisis: Opportunities and Pitfalls of Cooperation Between Volunteers and Local Governments // Recht und Management, 15. Jg., Heft 1, S. 1–19 online first. doi: 10.3224/dms.v15i1.0910.3224/dms.v15i1.09
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Leclercq, E. M., Rijshouwer, E. A. (2022). Enabling Citizens’ Right to the Smart City Through the Co-Creation of Digital Platforms // Urban Transformations. Vol. 4, No. 2. doi: 10.1186/s42854-022-00030-y10.1186/s42854-022-00030-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Mihailova, D., Schubert., I., Burger, P., Fritz, M. M. C. (2022). Exploring Modes of Sustainable Value Co-Creation in Renewable Energy Communities // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 330, 129917. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12991710.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129917
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of Participation in Public Services // Public Administration Review. Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 766–76. doi: 10.1111/puar.1276510.1111/puar.12765
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Nguyen, T. T., Phan, D. M., Le, A. H., Nguyen, L. T. N. (2020). The Determinants of Citizens’ Satisfaction of E-Government: An Empirical Study in Vietnam // The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. Vol. 7, No. 8, pp. 519–531. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. OECD (2021). Government at a Glance 2021. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi: 10.1787/1c258f55-en.10.1787/1c258f55-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Osborne, S. P., Nasi, G., Powell, M. (2021). Beyond Co-Production: Value Creation and Public Services // Public Administration Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Vol. 99, pp. 641–657. doi: 10.1111/padm.1271810.1111/padm.12718
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Osborne, S. P., Strokosch, K. (2013). It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-Production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives // British Journal of Management. Vol. 24, S31–S47. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.1201010.1111/1467-8551.12010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Pilelienė, L. (2019). Theoretical Insights into Citizen Satisfaction Measurement.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Prokop, Ch., Tepe, M. (2021). Talk or Type? The Effect of Digital Interfaces on Citizens’ Satisfaction with Standardized Public Services // Public Administration Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Vol. 1, No. 17. doi: 10.1111/padm.1273910.1111/padm.12739
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Prastya, I. Y., Warsono, H., Herwati, A. R., Saputra, J., Bon, A. T. (2021). Exploring the Community Involvement in Smart City through a Co-creation Approach in Indones // IEOM Society International, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 3704–3712.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Puksas, A., Gudelis, D., Raišienė, A. G., Gudelienė, N. (2019). Business, Government, Society and Science Interest in Co-Production by Relative Evaluation Using Google Trends // Management of Organizations: Systematic Research. Vol. 81, pp. 57–71. doi: 10.1515/ mosr-2019-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Ramaswamya, V., Ozcanb, K. (2018). What is Co-Creation? An Interactional Creation Framework and Its Implications for Value Creation // Journal of Business Research. Vol. 84, pp. 196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.02710.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Roch, C. H., Poister, T. H (2006). Citizens, Accountability, and Service Satisfaction: The Influence of Expectations. Urban Affairs Review. Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 292–308. doi: 10.1177/107808740528112410.1177/1078087405281124
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Rubalcaba, L., Peralta, A. (2022). Value Processes and Lifecycles in Networks for Public Service Innovation // Public Management Review. Vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2022.203995210.1080/14719037.2022.2039952
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Ryzin, G. G. V. (2004). The Measurement of Overall Citizen Satisfaction // Public Performance & Management Review. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 9–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Sahamies, K., Haveri, A., Anttiroiko, A. V. (2022). Local Governance Platforms: Roles and Relations of City Governments, Citizens, and Businesses // Administration & Society, pp.1– 26, doi: 10.1177/00953997211072531 Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., Brogaard, L. (2017). The Impact of Governance on the Outcomes of Contracting Out // Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation. Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 215–233. doi: 10.1177/205556361985890910.1177/2055563619858909
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Toots, M., McBride, K., Kalvet, T., Krimmer, R. (2017). Open Data as Enabler of Public Service Co-Creation: Exploring the Drivers and Barriers / In: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM 2017), INSPEC Accession Number: 17207252, pp. 102–112, Krems, Austria: IEEE Computer Society. doi: 10.1109/CeDEM.2017.1210.1109/CeDEM.2017.12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Torre, A., Christodoulou, C. (2021). Co-Creation of Narratives for “Minor” Sites of Cultural Heritage in Euro-Mediterranean Peri-Urban Areas: Conditions of a Small Temple on the East Coast of Attica, Greece // Heritage. Vol. 4, pp. 2918–2941, doi: 10.3390/ heritage404016310.3390/heritage4040163
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Umaran, T., Perdana, T., Kurniadie, D., Parikesit, P. (2022). Co-Creation Approach in Designing a Sustainable Coffee Supply Chain (a Case in Bandung Regency,West Java, Indonesia) // Sustainability. Vol. 14, p. 476. doi: 10.3390/su1401047610.3390/su14010476
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Venesz, B., Dory, T., Raišienė, A. G. (2022). Characteristics of Lead Users in Different Stages of the New Product Development Process: A Systematic Review in the Context of Open Innovation // J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. Vol. 8, No. 24. doi: 10.3390/ joitmc801002410.3390/joitmc8010024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production // Public Management Review. Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 33–57. doi: 10.1080/ 14719037.2014.930505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Vrbek, S., Kuiper, M. (2022). Command, Control and Co-Creation: Drivers and Barriers Faced by Professionals Co-Creating in the Slovenian Public Sector // Central European Public Administration Review. Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 33–55. doi: 10.17573/cepar.2022.1.0210.17573/cepar.2022.1.02
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Wise, S., Paton, R. A., Gegenhuber, T. (2012). Value Co-Creation through Collective Intelligence in the Public Sector A Review of US and European initiatives // VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 251–276. doi: 10.1108/0305572121122727310.1108/03055721211227273
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Yang, Y. (2018). Is Transparency a Double-Edged Sword in Citizen Satisfaction with Public Service? Evidence from China’s Public Healthcare // Journal of Service Theory and Practice. Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 484–506. doi: 10.1108/JSTP-06-2017-010210.1108/JSTP-06-2017-0102
]Search in Google Scholar