Drivers Fostering Citizens to Participate in Co-Creation Process for Public Service Quality

1. Alford, J. (2014). The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the Work of Elinor Ostrom // Public Management Review. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 299–316. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.80657810.1080/14719037.2013.806578 Search in Google Scholar

2. Algan, Y., Cahuc, P. (2014). Trust, Growth, and Well-Being: New Evidence and Policy Implications // IZA Discussion Papers. No. 7464, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. Search in Google Scholar

3. Alizadeh, A., Kianfar, F. (2013). Developing a Model for Citizens’ Satisfaction with Public Sector Services Based on Rough Sets Theory: A Case Study of Tehran Municipality // Tehnički vjesnik. Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 795–802. Search in Google Scholar

4. Álvarez-Pérez, Y., Perestelo-Pérez, L., Rivero-Santanta, A., Torres-Castaño, A., Toledo-Chávarri, A., Duarte-Díaz, A., Mahtani-Chugani, V., Marrero-Díaz, M. D., Montanari, A., Tangerini, S. et al. (2022). Co-Creation of Massive Open Online Courses to Improve Digital Health Literacy in Pregnant and Lactating Women // Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19, 913. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1902091310.3390/ijerph19020913 Search in Google Scholar

5. Ansell, Ch., Torfing, J. (2021). Co-Creation: the New Kid on the Block in Public Governance // Policy & Politics, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 211–230, ISSN 0305-5736, Online ISSN 1470-8442, doi: 10.1332/030557321X1611595119604510.1332/030557321X16115951196045 Search in Google Scholar

6. Assiouras, I., Skourtis, G., Giannopoulos, A., Buhalis, D., Koniordos, M. (2019). Value Co-Creation and Customer Citizenship Behavior // Annals of Tourism Research. Vol. 78, 102742. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2019.10274210.1016/j.annals.2019.102742 Search in Google Scholar

7. Benmansour, N. A. (2018). Citizens and Expatriates Satisfaction with Public Services in Qatar–Evidence from a Survey // International Journal of Social Economics. Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 326–337. doi: 10.1108/IJSE-03-2018-011810.1108/IJSE-03-2018-0118 Search in Google Scholar

8. Bentzen, T. Ø. (2022). Continuous Co-Creation: How Ongoing Involvement Impacts Outcomes of Co-Creation // Public Management Review. Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 34–54, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2020.178615010.1080/14719037.2020.1786150 Search in Google Scholar

9. Bjerneld, M., Lindmark, G., McSpadden, L. A., Garrett, M. J. (2006). Motivations, Concerns, and Expectations of Scandinavian Health Professionals Volunteering for Humanitarian Assignments // Disaster Management & Response. Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: 10.1016/j.dmr.2006.01.00210.1016/j.dmr.2006.01.002 Search in Google Scholar

10. Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation User and Community Co-Production of Public Services // Public Administration Review. Vol. 67, pp. 846–860. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2016.125055910.1080/01900692.2016.1250559 Search in Google Scholar

11. Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E., Parrado, S. (2015). Activating Citizens to Participate in Collective Co-Production of Public Services // Journal of Social Policy. Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 1–23, doi: 10.1017/ S0047279414000567 Search in Google Scholar

12. Brandsen, T., Honingh, M. (2018). Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction // Public Administration Review. Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 427‒35. doi: 10.1111/puar.1246510.1111/puar.12465 Search in Google Scholar

13. Brandsen, T., Steen, T., Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-Creation and Co-Production in Public Services: Urgent. Co-Production and Co-Creation Engaging Citizens in Public Services, Edited by Taco Brandsen, Trui Steen and Bram Verschuere. Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9781315204956-1 Search in Google Scholar

14. Brzustewicz, P., Escher, I., Hatami, A., Hermes, J., Keranen, A., Ulkuniemi, P. (2022). Emergence of Social Impact in Company–NGO Relationships in Corporate Volunteering // Journal of Business Research. Vol. 140, pp. 62–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.08910.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.089 Search in Google Scholar

15. Cohen, N., Mizrahi, S., Vigoda-Gado, E. (2022). Alternative Provision of Public Health Care: The Role of Citizens’ Satisfaction with Public Services and the Social Responsibility of Government // Health Economics, Policy and Law. Vol. 17, pp.121–140. doi:10.1017/ S1744133120000201 Search in Google Scholar

16. De Jong, M. D., Neulen, S., Jansma, S. R. (2019). Citizens’ Intentions to Participate in Governmental Co-Creation Initiatives: Comparing Three Co-Creation Configurations // Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 490–500. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.04.00310.1016/j.giq.2019.04.003 Search in Google Scholar

17. De Walle, S. V. (2018). Explaining Citizen Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Public Services // The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, pp. 227–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_1110.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_11 Search in Google Scholar

18. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service // Governance, An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 55–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.0015110.1111/0952-1895.00151 Search in Google Scholar

19. Grönroos, C. (2011). Value Co-Creation in Service Logic // A Critical Analysis’, Marketing Theory. Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 279–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/147059311140817710.1177/1470593111408177 Search in Google Scholar

20. Grönroos, C. (2018). Reforming Public Services: Does Service Logic Have Anything to Offer? // Public Management Review. Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 775–788. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.152987910.1080/14719037.2018.1529879 Search in Google Scholar

21. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D., De Neve, J. E., Aknin, L. B., Wang, S. (2021). World Happiness Report 2021. Internet access: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2021/. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 8. Search in Google Scholar

22. Hodgkinson, I., Hannibal, C., Keating, B., Buxton, R., Bateman, N. (2017). Toward a Public Service Management: Past, Present and Future Directions // Journal of Service Management. Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 998–1023. doi: 10.1108/JOSM-01-2017-002010.1108/JOSM-01-2017-0020 Search in Google Scholar

23. Hofstad, H., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J., Vedeld, T. (2022). Designing and Leading Collaborative Urban Climate Governance: Comparative Experiences of Co-Creation from Copenhagen and Oslo // Environmental Policy and Governance published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1002/eet.198410.1002/eet.1984 Search in Google Scholar

24. Jakobsen, M. (2013). Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized in Handbook of Economic Growth // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 27–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus03610.1093/jopart/mus036 Search in Google Scholar

25. Jo, S., Nabatchi, T. (2016). Getting Back to Basics: Advancing the Study and Practice of Coproduction // International Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 36, No. 13, pp. 1101–1108. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2016.117784010.1080/01900692.2016.1177840 Search in Google Scholar

26. Jukic, T., Pluchinotta, I., Hrzica, R., Vrbek, S. (2022). Organizational Maturity for Co-Creation: Towards a Multi-attribute Decision Support Model for Public Organizations // Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 39, No. 101623. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.10162310.1016/j.giq.2021.101623 Search in Google Scholar

27. Jung, T. (2010). Citizens, Co-Producers, Customers, Clients, Captives? A Critical Review of Consumerism and Public Services // Public Management Review. Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 439–446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903100378794010.1080/14719031003787940 Search in Google Scholar

28. Kitchenham, B. A., Charters, S. M. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering // EBSE Technical Report Version 2.3, Durham University: Durham, UK; Keele University: Staffordshire, UK, Vol. 1, pp. 1–54. Search in Google Scholar

29. Klafke, R., De Oliveira, M. C. V. (2022). Value Co-Creation and Donation in Non-Profts: A Social Analysis Through the Service-Dominant Logic // SN Soc Sci. Vol. 2, No. 26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00328-510.1007/s43545-022-00328-5 Search in Google Scholar

30. Larsen, F., Caswell, D. (2020). Co-Creation in An Era of Welfare Conditionality – Lessons from Denmark // Jnl. Soc. Pol. Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 1–19. doi:10.1017/S004727942000066510.1017/S0047279420000665 Search in Google Scholar

31. Leino, H., Puumala, E. (2021). What Can Co-Creation Do for the Citizens? Applying Co-Creation for the Promotion of Participation in Cities // EPC: Politics and Space 2021. Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 781–799. doi: 10.1177/239965442095733710.1177/2399654420957337 Search in Google Scholar

32. Lenz, A. (2022). Trust in Times of Crisis: Opportunities and Pitfalls of Cooperation Between Volunteers and Local Governments // Recht und Management, 15. Jg., Heft 1, S. 1–19 online first. doi: 10.3224/dms.v15i1.0910.3224/dms.v15i1.09 Search in Google Scholar

33. Leclercq, E. M., Rijshouwer, E. A. (2022). Enabling Citizens’ Right to the Smart City Through the Co-Creation of Digital Platforms // Urban Transformations. Vol. 4, No. 2. doi: 10.1186/s42854-022-00030-y10.1186/s42854-022-00030-y Search in Google Scholar

34. Mihailova, D., Schubert., I., Burger, P., Fritz, M. M. C. (2022). Exploring Modes of Sustainable Value Co-Creation in Renewable Energy Communities // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 330, 129917. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12991710.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129917 Search in Google Scholar

35. Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of Participation in Public Services // Public Administration Review. Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 766–76. doi: 10.1111/puar.1276510.1111/puar.12765 Search in Google Scholar

36. Nguyen, T. T., Phan, D. M., Le, A. H., Nguyen, L. T. N. (2020). The Determinants of Citizens’ Satisfaction of E-Government: An Empirical Study in Vietnam // The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. Vol. 7, No. 8, pp. 519–531. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020 Search in Google Scholar

37. OECD (2021). Government at a Glance 2021. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi: 10.1787/1c258f55-en.10.1787/1c258f55-en Search in Google Scholar

38. Osborne, S. P., Nasi, G., Powell, M. (2021). Beyond Co-Production: Value Creation and Public Services // Public Administration Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Vol. 99, pp. 641–657. doi: 10.1111/padm.1271810.1111/padm.12718 Search in Google Scholar

39. Osborne, S. P., Strokosch, K. (2013). It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-Production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives // British Journal of Management. Vol. 24, S31–S47. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.1201010.1111/1467-8551.12010 Search in Google Scholar

40. Pilelienė, L. (2019). Theoretical Insights into Citizen Satisfaction Measurement. Search in Google Scholar

41. Prokop, Ch., Tepe, M. (2021). Talk or Type? The Effect of Digital Interfaces on Citizens’ Satisfaction with Standardized Public Services // Public Administration Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Vol. 1, No. 17. doi: 10.1111/padm.1273910.1111/padm.12739 Search in Google Scholar

42. Prastya, I. Y., Warsono, H., Herwati, A. R., Saputra, J., Bon, A. T. (2021). Exploring the Community Involvement in Smart City through a Co-creation Approach in Indones // IEOM Society International, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 3704–3712. Search in Google Scholar

43. Puksas, A., Gudelis, D., Raišienė, A. G., Gudelienė, N. (2019). Business, Government, Society and Science Interest in Co-Production by Relative Evaluation Using Google Trends // Management of Organizations: Systematic Research. Vol. 81, pp. 57–71. doi: 10.1515/ mosr-2019-0004 Search in Google Scholar

44. Ramaswamya, V., Ozcanb, K. (2018). What is Co-Creation? An Interactional Creation Framework and Its Implications for Value Creation // Journal of Business Research. Vol. 84, pp. 196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.02710.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027 Search in Google Scholar

45. Roch, C. H., Poister, T. H (2006). Citizens, Accountability, and Service Satisfaction: The Influence of Expectations. Urban Affairs Review. Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 292–308. doi: 10.1177/107808740528112410.1177/1078087405281124 Search in Google Scholar

46. Rubalcaba, L., Peralta, A. (2022). Value Processes and Lifecycles in Networks for Public Service Innovation // Public Management Review. Vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2022.203995210.1080/14719037.2022.2039952 Search in Google Scholar

47. Ryzin, G. G. V. (2004). The Measurement of Overall Citizen Satisfaction // Public Performance & Management Review. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 9–28. Search in Google Scholar

48. Sahamies, K., Haveri, A., Anttiroiko, A. V. (2022). Local Governance Platforms: Roles and Relations of City Governments, Citizens, and Businesses // Administration & Society, pp.1– 26, doi: 10.1177/00953997211072531 Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., Brogaard, L. (2017). The Impact of Governance on the Outcomes of Contracting Out // Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation. Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 215–233. doi: 10.1177/205556361985890910.1177/2055563619858909 Search in Google Scholar

49. Toots, M., McBride, K., Kalvet, T., Krimmer, R. (2017). Open Data as Enabler of Public Service Co-Creation: Exploring the Drivers and Barriers / In: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM 2017), INSPEC Accession Number: 17207252, pp. 102–112, Krems, Austria: IEEE Computer Society. doi: 10.1109/CeDEM.2017.1210.1109/CeDEM.2017.12 Search in Google Scholar

50. Torre, A., Christodoulou, C. (2021). Co-Creation of Narratives for “Minor” Sites of Cultural Heritage in Euro-Mediterranean Peri-Urban Areas: Conditions of a Small Temple on the East Coast of Attica, Greece // Heritage. Vol. 4, pp. 2918–2941, doi: 10.3390/ heritage404016310.3390/heritage4040163 Search in Google Scholar

51. Umaran, T., Perdana, T., Kurniadie, D., Parikesit, P. (2022). Co-Creation Approach in Designing a Sustainable Coffee Supply Chain (a Case in Bandung Regency,West Java, Indonesia) // Sustainability. Vol. 14, p. 476. doi: 10.3390/su1401047610.3390/su14010476 Search in Google Scholar

52. Venesz, B., Dory, T., Raišienė, A. G. (2022). Characteristics of Lead Users in Different Stages of the New Product Development Process: A Systematic Review in the Context of Open Innovation // J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. Vol. 8, No. 24. doi: 10.3390/ joitmc801002410.3390/joitmc8010024 Search in Google Scholar

53. Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production // Public Management Review. Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 33–57. doi: 10.1080/ 14719037.2014.930505 Search in Google Scholar

54. Vrbek, S., Kuiper, M. (2022). Command, Control and Co-Creation: Drivers and Barriers Faced by Professionals Co-Creating in the Slovenian Public Sector // Central European Public Administration Review. Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 33–55. doi: 10.17573/cepar.2022.1.0210.17573/cepar.2022.1.02 Search in Google Scholar

55. Wise, S., Paton, R. A., Gegenhuber, T. (2012). Value Co-Creation through Collective Intelligence in the Public Sector A Review of US and European initiatives // VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 251–276. doi: 10.1108/0305572121122727310.1108/03055721211227273 Search in Google Scholar

56. Yang, Y. (2018). Is Transparency a Double-Edged Sword in Citizen Satisfaction with Public Service? Evidence from China’s Public Healthcare // Journal of Service Theory and Practice. Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 484–506. doi: 10.1108/JSTP-06-2017-010210.1108/JSTP-06-2017-0102 Search in Google Scholar