[
1. Agarwal, R. Audretsch, D. B., Sakar, M. B. (2008). The Process of Creative Construction: Knowledge Spillovers, Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth / Jena Economic Research Papers. doi: 10.1002/sej.36.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
2. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy. McGraw-Hill, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Alavi, M., Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues // Management Information Systems Quarterly. Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 107–136. doi: 10.2307/3250961.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
4. Ashfort, B. E., Humphrey, R. H. (1997). The Ambiguity and Potency of Labelling in Organizations // Organization Science. Vol. 8, pp. 43–58. doi: 10.1287/orsc.8.1.43.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
5. Bamel, U. K., Bamel, N. (2018) Organizational Resources, KM Process Capability and Strategic Flexibility: a Dynamic Resource-Capability Perspective // Journal of Knowledge Management. doi: 10.1108/JSBED-11-2017-0361.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
6. Bandeira-de-Mello, R. (2007). External Dependencies, Relational Resources and Performance Heterogeneity in Emerging Economies / In: Encontro da Associacao Nacional dos Programas de Pos-Graduacao em Administracao-Enanpad, 31, 2007. Rio de Janeiro: ANPAD.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck and Business Strategy // Management Science. Vol. 32, pp. 1231–1241. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
8. Benneworth, P., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., Asheim, B. (2009). Exlporing Multiple Roles of Lund University in Strengthening Scania’s Regional Innovation System: Towards Institutional Learning // European Planning Studies. Vol. 17, pp. 1654–1664. doi: 10.1080/09654310903230582.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
9. Bezanilla, M. J., García-Olalla, A., Paños-Castro, J., & Arruti, A. (2020). Developing the Entrepreneurial University: Factors of Influence // Sustainability. Vol. 12, Issue 3, pp. 842. doi: 10.3390/su12030842.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
10. Burvill, S. M., Jones-Evans, D., & Rowlands, H. (2018). Reconceptualising the Principles of Penrose’s (1959) Theory and the Resource Based View of the Firm: The Generation of a New Conceptual Framework // Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. doi: 10.1108/JSBED-11-2017-0361.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
11. Chaganti, R., Brush, C. G., Heksever, C., Cook, R. G. (2002). Stakeholder Influence Strategies and Value Creation by New Ventures // Journal of Small Business Strategy. Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Chen, W. H., Kang, M. P., Butler, B. (2019). How Does Top Management Team Composition Matter for Continual Crowth? Reinvestigating Penrose’s Growth Theory Through the Lens of Upper Echelons Theory // Management Decision. Vol. 57, Issue 1. doi: 10.1108/MD-02-2017-0147.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
14. Clauss, T., Moussa, A., & Kesting, T. (2018). Entrepreneurial University: a Stakeholder-Based Conceptualisation of the Current State and an Agenda for Future Research // International Journal of Technology Management. Vol. 77, Issue 1-3, pp. 109–144.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Mudambi, R., & Pedersen, T. (2019). Subsidiary Power: Loaned or Owned? The Lenses of Agency Theory and Resource Dependence Theory // Global Strategy Journal. Vol. 9, Issue 4, pp. 491–501. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1362.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
16. Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge Management, Innovation and Firm Performance // Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 101–115. doi: 10.1108/13673270510602809.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
17. Davidsson, P., Honing, B. (2003). The Role of Social and Human Capital Among Nascent Entrepreneurs // Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 18, Issue 3, pp. 301–331. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
18. Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource Dependence Theory: Past and Future. Stanford’s Organization Theory Renaissance, 1970–2000. doi: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000028006.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
19. De Sousa, P. H. R., Junior, E. R., da Costa, C. C. B., & Reis, A. L. N. (2021). A Model of Innovation Process in Light of the Theory of The Growth of the Firm, by Edith Penrose, and of Resource-Based View // Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia. Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 19041. doi: 10.5585/riae.v20i1.19041.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
20. Drnevich, P. L., Mahoney, J. T., & Schendel, D. (2020). Has Strategic Management Research Lost its Way // Strategic Management Review. Vol. 1, Issue 9, pp. 1119–1127. doi: 10.1561/111.00000004.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
21. D’Este, P., Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do Academics Engage with Industry? The Entrepreneurial University and Industry Motivations // Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 26, pp. 316–339. doi: 10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
22. Diin Fitri, S. E., Dahlan, R. M., & Sukardi, S. (2018). From Penrose to Sirmon: The Evolution of Resource Based Theory // Journal of Management and Leadership. Vol. 1, Issue 2. doi: 10.1007/s11846-021-00474-9.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
23. Edwards, M. G. (2021). The Growth Paradox, Sustainable Development, and Business Strategy // Business Strategy and the Environment. Vol. 30, Issue 7, pp. 3079–3094. doi: 10.1002/bse.2790.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
24. Etzkowitz, H., Dzisah, J., & Clouser, M. (2021). Shaping the Entrepreneurial University: Two Experiments and a Proposal for Innovation in Higher Education // Industry and Higher Education. doi: 10.1177/0950422221993421.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
25. Etzkowitz, H., Germain-Alamartine, E., Keel, J., Kumar, C., Smith, K. N., & Albats, E. (2018). Entrepreneurial University Dynamics: Structured Ambivalence, Relative Deprivation and Institution-Formation in the Stanford Innovation System. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.019.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
26. Feola, R., Parente, R., & Cucino, V. (2021). The Entrepreneurial University: How to Develop the Entrepreneurial Orientation of Academia // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Vol. 12, Issue 4, pp. 1787–1808. doi: 10.1007/s13132-020-00675-9.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
27. Foss, N. S., Klein, P. G., Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T. (2008). Entrepreneurship, Subjectivism and the Resource-Based View: Toward a New Synthesis // Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. Vol. 2, pp. 73–94. doi: 10.1002/sej.41.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
28. Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., & Bjørnskov, C. (2019). The context of entrepreneurial judgment: organizations, markets, and institutions // Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 56, Issue 6, pp. 1197–1213. doi: 10.1111/joms.12428.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
29. Gellweiler, C. (2018). Cohesion of RBV and Industry View for Competitive Positioning // Strategic Management-International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management. Vol. 23, Issue 2, pp. 003–012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Gianiodis, P. T., & Meek, W. R. (2020). Entrepreneurial Education for the Entrepreneurial University: a Stakeholder Perspective // The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 45, Issue 4, pp. 1167–1195. doi: 10.1007/s10961-019-09742-z.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
31. Graf, H., & Menter, M. (2021). Public Research and the Quality of Inventions: the Role and Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities and Regional Network Embeddedness // Small Business Economics. Vol. 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11187-021-00465-w.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
32. Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., Salerno, C. (2008). Higher Education and its Communities: Interconnections, Interdependencies and a Research Agenda // Higher Education. Vol. 56, pp. 303–324. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
33. Jucevičius, G., Grumadaitė, K., & Staniulienė, S. (2021). Knowledge Ecosystems as Complex Adaptive Systems: Between Myth and Reality / In ECKM 2021 22nd European Conference on Knowledge Management (p. 397). Academic Conferences limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2000). Penrose’s Resource-Based Approach: The Process and Product of Research Creativity // Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 37, Issue 1, pp. 99–139. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00174.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
35. Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. (2019). The Entrepreneurial Eniversity as Driver for Economic Growth and Social Change-Key Strategic Shallenges // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 141, pp. 149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.004.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
36. Lamont, B. T., King, D. R., Maslach, D. J., Schwerdtfeger, M., & Tienari, J. (2019). Integration Capacity and Knowledge-Based Acquisition Performance // R&D Management. Vol. 49, Issue 1, pp. 103–114. doi: 10.1111/radm.12336.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
37. Landström, H., Harirchi, G. Aström, G. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Knowledge Base // Research Policy. Vol. 41, Issue 7, pp. 1154–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.009.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
38. Lind, J. K. (2020). Resource Environment and Hierarchy in Universities // Science and Public Policy. Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 184–193. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scz057.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
39. Macpherson, A. (2005). Learning How to Grow: Resolving the Crisis of Knowing // Technoinnovation. Vol. 25, pp. 1129–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.04.002.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
40. Mahoney, J. T., Michael, S. (2005). A Subjectivist Theory of Entrepreneurship / In: Alvarez S. A., Agarwal R., Sorenson O. (eds.) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship. Vol. 2. Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 33–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Michael, S., Storey, D., Thomas, H. (2017). Discovery and Coordination in Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship // Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset. Chapter 3, pp. 45–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.-Prentice-Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Medcof, J. W. (2001). Resource-Based Strategy and Managerial Power in Networks of Internationally Dispersed Technology Units // Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 22, Issue 11, pp. 999–1012. doi: 10.1002/smj.192.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
44. Nason, R. S., Wiklund, J. (2015). An Assessment of Resource-Based Theorizing on Firm Growth and Suggestions for the Future // Journal of Management, Vol. 44, Issue 1, pp. 32–60. doi: 10.1177/0149206315610635.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
45. O’Driscoll, G. P. O, Rizzo, M. J. (1996). The Economics of Time and Ignorance. 2nd ed. Routledge. London and New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. O’Reilly, N. M., Robbins, P., & Scanlan, J. (2019). Dynamic Capabilities and the Entrepreneurial University: a Perspective on the Knowledge Transfer Capabilities of Universities // Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. Vol. 31, Issue 3, pp. 243–263. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2018.1490510b.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
47. Ozturk, O. (2021). Bibliometric Review of Resource Dependence Theory Literature: an Overview // Management Review Quarterly. Vol. 71, Issue 3, pp. 525–552. doi: 10.1007/s11301-020-00192-8.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
48. Penrose, E. (1959/2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. 4th ed. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Pfeffer, J. (2003). Introduction to the Classical Edition. / In J. Pfeffer and. G. R. Salancik, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. XI–XXX. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. R. (1974). Organizational Decision-Making as Political Process: The Case of University // Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 19, pp. 135–151. doi: 10.2307/2393885.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
51. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. R. (1978/2003). The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective. 2nd ed. Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Pitelis, N. C. (2002). The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Prencipe, A. et al. (2020). Influence of the Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystem and its Knowledge Spillovers in Developing Successful University Spin-offs // Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. Vol. 72, pp. 100814. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100814.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
54. Redford, D., Fayolle, A. (2014). Stakeholder Management and the Entrepreneurial University / Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Rohenkohl, J. E., da Rosa, A. C., Ruffoni, J., & Martinelli, O. (2021). Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the Absorptive Capacity of Firms that Interact with Universities // International Review of Applied Economics. Vol. 1–19. doi: 10.1080/02692171.2021.1957783.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
56. Roundy, P. T., & Bayer, M. A. (2019). To Bridge or Buffer? A Resource Dependence Theory of Nascent Entrepreneurial Ecosystems // Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. doi: 10.1108/JEEE-06-2018-0064.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
57. Secundo, G., Dumay, J., Sciuma, G., Passiante, G. (2016). Managing Intellectual Capital through a Collective Intelligence Approach / Journal of Intellectual Capital. Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 298–319. doi: 10.1108/JIC-05-2015-0046.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
58. Shane, S., Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research // Academy of Management Review. Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 217–226. doi: 10.2307/259271.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
59. Steen, J. T., & Leisch, P. W. (2007). A Note on Penrosean Growth, Resource Bundles and the Uppsala Model of Internationalisation // Management International Review. Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 193–206. doi: 10.1007/s11575-007-0011-7.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
60. Santos, F. M., Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009). Constructing Markets and Sharping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields // Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 52, Issue 4, pp. 643–671. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.43669892.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
61. Spender, J. C. (1994). Organizational Knowledge, Collective Practice, and Penrose Rents // International Business Review. Vol. 3, pp. 353–367. doi: 10.1016/0969-5931(94)90028-0.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
62. Tan, L. N. Ch., Noor, Sh. (2013). Knowledge Management Enablers, Knwolegde Sharing and Research Collaboration: A Study of Knowledge Management at Research Universities in Malaysia // Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 251–276. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2013.866314.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
63. Verbeke, A., Yuan, W. (2007). Entrepreneurship in the Multinational Enterprises: A Penrosean perspective // Management International Review. Vol. 71, Issue 2, pp. 241–258. doi: 40658171.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
64. Zahra, Sh. A. Sapienza, H. J., Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda // Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 43, Issue 4, pp. 917–955. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
65. Zhang, Q., MacKinzie, N., Jones-Evans, D., Huggins, R. (2016). Leveraging Knowledge as a Competitive Asset? The Intensity, Performance and Structure of Universities‘Entrepreneurial Knwoledge Exchange Activities at a Regional Level // Small Business Economy. Vol. 47, pp. 657–675. doi: 10.1007/s11187-016-9759-0
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar