1. bookVolume 42 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2353-8414
First Published
30 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

A Survey on Polish Consumers’ Perceptions of Meat Produced from Stem Cells in Vitro

Published Online: 02 Feb 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 42 (2021) - Issue 4 (December 2021)
Page range: 61 - 74
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2353-8414
First Published
30 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

1. Alexander, P., Brown, C., Arneth, A., Dias, C., Finnigan, J., Moran, D., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2017). Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use? Global Food Security, 15, 22–32.10.1016/j.gfs.2017.04.001 Search in Google Scholar

2. Apostolidis, C., & McLeay, F. (2016). Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution. Food Policy, 65, 74–89.10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.002 Search in Google Scholar

3. Arshad, M. S., Javed, M., Sohaib, M., Saeed, F., Imran, A., & Amjad, Z. (2017). Tissue engineering approaches to develop cultured meat from cells: A mini review. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 3(1), 1320814.10.1080/23311932.2017.1320814 Search in Google Scholar

4. Asioli, D., Bazzani, C., & Nayga, R. M. (2018). Consumers’ valuation for lab produced meat: an investigation of naming effects. American Agricultural Economics Association (AAEA) Annual Meeting. Washington, DC. Search in Google Scholar

5. Bhat, Z. F., Kumar, S., & Fayaz, H., (2015). in vitro meat production: Challenges and benefits over conventional meat production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 241–248.10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60887-X Search in Google Scholar

6. Bryant, C., Szejda, K., Parekh, N., Desphande, V., & Tse, B. (2019). A survey of consumer perceptions of plant-based and clean meat in the USA, India, and China. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3, 11.10.3389/fsufs.2019.00011 Search in Google Scholar

7. Bueschke, M., Kulczyński, A., Gramza-Michałowska, & A., Kubiak, T. (2017). Alternatywne źródła białka w żywieniu człowieka [Alterantive sources of protein in human nutrition]. Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie — Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 17(3), 49–59.10.22630/PRS.2017.17.3.52 Search in Google Scholar

8. Chriki, S., & Hocquette, J-F. (2020). The Myth of Cultured Meat: A Review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 7, 7.10.3389/fnut.2020.00007 Search in Google Scholar

9. de Boer, J., Schösler, H., & Aiking H. (2014). “Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges. Appetite, 76, 120–128.10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.002 Search in Google Scholar

10. Edelman, P. D., McFarland, D. M, Mironov, V. A., & Matheny, J. G. (2005). in vitro-cultured meat production. Tissue Engineering, 11(5–6), 659–662.10.1089/ten.2005.11.659 Search in Google Scholar

11. Fernandes, A. M., Fantinel, A. L, de Souza, A. R. L., & Révillion, J. P. P. (2019). Trends in cultured meat: a bibliometric and sociometric analysis of publication. Brazilian Journal of Information Science, 13(3), 56–67.10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n3.06.p56 Search in Google Scholar

12. Florek, A. (2014). Analogi mięsa — charakterystyka i perspektywy [Meat Analogues — Characteristics and Prospects]. Przemysł Spożywczy, 68(1), 25–28. Search in Google Scholar

13. Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., & Falcucci, A. (2013). Tackling Climate Change through Livestock — A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Search in Google Scholar

14. Hocquette, A, Lambert, C., Sinquin, C., Peterolff, L., Wagner, Z., Bonny, S. P. F., Lebert, A., & Hocquette, J.-F. (2015). Educated consumers don’t believe artificial meat is the solution to the problems with the meat industry. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 273–284.10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60886-8 Search in Google Scholar

15. Hocquette, J.-F. (2016). Is in vitro meat the solution for the future? Meat Science, 120, 167–176.10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.036 Search in Google Scholar

16. Jakubczyk, E. (2017). Drukowanie żywności w 3D. Nowe technologie [Printing food in 3D — New Technologies]. Przemysł Spożywczy, 71(1), 2–7.10.15199/65.2017.1.1 Search in Google Scholar

17. Jeżewska-Zychowicz, M. (2014). Uwarunkowania akceptacji konsumenckiej innowacyjnych produktów żywnościowych [Conditions for Consumer Acceptance of Innovative Food Products]. ŻYWNOŚĆ. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość, 21(6), 5–17. Search in Google Scholar

18. Lynch, J., & Pierrehumbert, R. (2019). Climate impacts of cultured meat and beef cattle. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3, 5.10.3389/fsufs.2019.00005 Search in Google Scholar

19. MacLeod, M., Gerber, P., Mottet, A., Tempio, G., Falcucci, A., Opio, C., Vellinga, T., Henderson, B., & Steinfeld, H. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from pig and chicken supply chains — A global life cycle assessment. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Search in Google Scholar

20. Mattick, C. S., Landis, A. E., Allenby, B. R., & Genovese, N. J. (2015). Anticipatory life cycle analysis of in vitro biomass cultivation for cultured meat production in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(19), 11941–11949.10.1021/acs.est.5b01614 Search in Google Scholar

21. Ostaszewski, J. (2020). Mięso hodowane komórkowo zatwierdzone w Singapurze [Cell Cultured Meat Approved in Singapore]. Food Fakty. https://foodfakty.pl/miesohodowane-komorkowo-zatwierdzone-w-singapurze (17.09.2021) Search in Google Scholar

22. Siegrist, M., Sütterlin, B., & Hartmann, C. (2018). Perceived naturalness and evoked disgust influence acceptance of cultured meat. Meat Science, 139, 213–219.10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.02.007 Search in Google Scholar

23. Specht, E. A., Welch, D. R, Rees Clayton, & E. M., Lagally, C. D. (2018). Opportunities for applying biomedical production and manufacturing methods to the development of the clean meat industry. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 132, 161–168.10.1016/j.bej.2018.01.015 Search in Google Scholar

24. Tuomisto, H. L. & de Mattos, M. J. T. (2011). Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(14), 6117–6123.10.1021/es200130u Search in Google Scholar

25. Verbeke, W., Marcu, A., Rutsaert, P., Gaspar, R., Seibt, B., Fletcher, D., & Barnett, J. (2015). “Would you eat cultured meat?”: Consumers’ reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat Science, 102, 49–58.10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013 Search in Google Scholar

26. Verbeke, W., Pérez-Cueto, F. J., Barcellos, M. D. D., Krystalli, A., & Grunert, K. G. (2010). European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Science, 84(2), 284–292.10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.05.001 Search in Google Scholar

27. Woll, S. & Böhm, I. (2018). In-vitro meat: A solution for problems of meat production and meat consumption? Ernaehrungs Umschau International, 65(1), 12–21. Search in Google Scholar

28. Zabielski, R. & Zarzyńska, J. (2020). Wyzwania związane z produkcją sztucznego mięsa [Challenges related to the production of artificial meat]. Życie Weterynaryjne, 95(2), 74–80. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo