1. bookVolume 43 (2020): Issue 2 (October 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
08 Sep 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
08 Sep 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

We hypothesized that a single dose of PGF belatedly injected on day 8 after GnRH-1 in cows receiving a 7-day Ovsynch-56 protocol (GnRH – 7 days – PGF – 56h – GnRH – 16h – timed AI) will increase the proportion of cows with complete luteolysis. At day 35±3 postpartum, 70 lactating Holstein cows from one herd were scored for body condition and pre-synchronized with PGF and GnRH (3 days apart) and 7 days later submitted to an Ovsynch-56 protocol for first AI after random assignment to two treatments: (1) OV-7 (n=35) with an injection of PGF either on day 7; or (2) OV-8 (n=35) on day 8 after G1, respectively. Blood was collected before the first PGF, at day 7 and day 8 in OV-7 and OV-8, respectively, at AI and at 7 days after AI to assess progesterone concentration. Ten cows were classified as acyclic and were excluded from the analysis resulting in 60 cows (OV-8, n=27; OV-7, n=33). In total, more (P=0.01) OV-8 cows and more (P=0.04) primiparous OV-8 cows had complete luteolysis compared with their OV-7 herd mates. In addition, more (P=0.008) OV-8 cows with BCS<2.75 had complete luteolysis compared with their OV-7 herd mates, whereas no difference was observed between treatments among cows with BCS ≥2.75. In conclusion, delaying the application of PGF by 1 day reduced the percentage of primiparous cows and cows with poorer BCS having incomplete luteal regression at the time of AI.

Keywords

1. Pursley, J.R., Kosorok, M.R., Wiltbank, M.C. (1997). Reproductive management of lactating dairy cows using synchronization of ovulation. J Dairy Sci. 80(2): 301-306. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75938-1Search in Google Scholar

2. Stevenson, J.S. (2016). Physiological predictors of ovulation and pregnancy risk in a fixed-time artificial insemination program. J Dairy Sci. 99(12): 10077-10092. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11247 PMid:27720155Search in Google Scholar

3. Vasconcelos, J.L.M., Silcox, R.W., Rosa, G.J., Pursley, J.R., Wiltbank, M.C. (1999). Synchronization rate, size of the ovulatory follicle, and pregnancy rate after synchronization of ovulation beginning on different days of the estrous cycle in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 52(6): 1067-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00195-8Search in Google Scholar

4. Santos, J.E.P. (2011). Reproductive management of lactating dairy cows for first postpartum insemination. In: Carlos A Risco; Pedro R., Retamal (Eds.), Dairy Production Medicine (pp. 81-98). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470960554.ch7Search in Google Scholar

5. Moreira, F., Orlandi, C., Risco, C.A., Mattos, R., Lopes, F., Thatcher, W.W. (2001). Effects of presynchronization and bovine somatotropin on pregnancy rates to a timed artificial insemination protocol in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 84(7): 1646-1659. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74600-0Search in Google Scholar

6. Stevenson, J.S., Pulley, S.L. (2012). Pregnancy per artificial insemination after presynchronizing estrous cycles with the Presynch-10 protocol or prostaglandin F injection followed by gonadotropin-releasing hormone before Ovsynch-56 in 4 dairy herds of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 95(11): 6513-6522. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5707 PMid:22939782Search in Google Scholar

7. Bello, N.M., Steibel, J.P. Pursley, J.R. (2006). Optimizing ovulation to first GnRH improved outcomes to each hormonal injection of Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 89(9): 3413-3424. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72378-5Search in Google Scholar

8. Wiltbank, M.C., Souza, A.H., Carvalho, P.D., Cunha, A.P., Giordano, J.O., Fricke, P.M., Baez, G.M., Diskin, M.G. (2014). Physiological and practical effects of progesterone on reproduction in dairy cattle. Animal 8 (Suppl. 1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000585 PMid:24703103Search in Google Scholar

9. Stevenson, J.S., Sauls, J.A., Mendonça, L.G.D., Voelz, B.E. (2018). Dose and frequency of PGF administration to lactating dairy cows exposed to presynchronization and either five- or seven-day Ovsynch protocols: ovulation, luteolysis, and pregnancy rates. J Dairy Sci. 101(10): 9575-9590. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14653 PMid:30100501Search in Google Scholar

10. Momont, H.W., Seguin, B.E. (1984). Treatment of unobserved estrus in lactating dairy cows with prostaglandin F products. Proc Symp Comp Cont Edu Pract Vet. pp. 28-31.Search in Google Scholar

11. Wiltbank, M.C., Pursley, J.R. (2014). The cow as an induced ovulator: Timed AI after synchronization of ovulation. Theriogenology 81(1): 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.017 PMid:24274420Search in Google Scholar

12. Atanasov, B., Hostens, M., Celeska, I., Ilieska, K., Opsomer, G., Dovenski, T. (2015). Follicular dynamics following induced luteolysis and transvaginal ultrasoundguided aspiration of the largest follicle in dairy cows. Veterinarski Arhiv 85(3): 247-260.Search in Google Scholar

13. Bisinotto, R.S., Ribeiro, E.S., Santos, J.E.P. (2014). Synchronization of ovulation for management of reproduction in dairy cows. Animal 8(Suppl. 1): 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000858 PMid:24709227Search in Google Scholar

14. Giordano, J.O., Wiltbank, M.C., Fricke, P.M., Bas, S., Pawlisch, R., Guenther, J.N., Nascimento, A.B. (2013). Effect of increasing GnRH and PGF dose during Double-Ovsynch on ovulatory response, luteal regression, and fertility of lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 80(7): 773-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.07.003 PMid:23932174Search in Google Scholar

15. Wiltbank, M.C., Baez, G.M., Cochrane, F., Barletta, R.V., Trayford, C.R., Joseph, R.T. (2015). Effect of a second treatment with prostaglandin F during the Ovsynch protocol on luteolysis and pregnancy in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 98(12): 8644-8654. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9353 PMid:26433418Search in Google Scholar

16. Brusveen, D.J., Souza, A.H., Wiltbank, M.C. (2009). Effects of additional prostaglandin F2 alpha and estradiol-17 beta during Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 92(4): 1412-1422. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1289 PMid:19307622Search in Google Scholar

17. Ferguson, J.D., Galligan, D.T., Thomsen, N. (1994). Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 77(9): 2695-2703. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77212-XSearch in Google Scholar

18. Martins, J.P.N., Policelli, R.K., Neuder, L.M., Raphael, W., Pursley, J.R. (2011). Effects of cloprostenol sodium at final prostaglandin F of Ovsynch on complete luteolysis and pregnancy per artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 94(6): 2815-2824. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3652 PMid:21605751Search in Google Scholar

19. Fricke, P.M. (2016). Fertility programs for lactating dairy cows. Dairy Herd Management. Accessed Aug. 15, 2016. Available at: http://www.dairyherd.com/advice-and-tips/reproduction/fertilityprogramslactating-dairy-cowsSearch in Google Scholar

20. Vasconcelos, J.L.M., Sartori, R., Oliveira, H.N., Guenther, J.N., Wiltbank, M.C. (2001). Reduction in size of the ovulatory follicle reduces subsequent luteal size and pregnancy rate. Theriogenology 56(2): 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00565-9Search in Google Scholar

21. Echternkamp, S.E., Cushman, R.A., Allan. M.F. (2009). Size of ovulatory follicles in cattle expressing multiple ovulations naturally and its influence on corpus luteum development and fertility. J Anim Sci. 87(11): 3556-3568. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2049 PMid:19684271Search in Google Scholar

22. Stevenson, J.S., Phatak, A.P. (2010). Rates of luteolysis and pregnancy in dairy cows after treatment with cloprostenol or dinoprost. Theriogenology 73(8): 1127-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.014 PMid:20096923Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo