[
Alter, S. G., 1999. Darwinism and the linguistic image. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Andersen, H., 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language, 49(4), 765–793.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anttila, R., 1989. Historical and comparative linguistics: 2nd ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Atkinson, Q. D., Gray, R. D., 2005. Curious parallels and curious connections: Phylogenetic thinking in biology and historical linguistics. Systematic Biology, 54(4), 513–526.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, T. J., 2022. Biosemiotic aesthetics may unify general semiotics. Biosemiotics, 15(1), 23–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calude, A. S., Verkerk, A., 2016. The typology and diachrony of higher numerals in Indo-European: a phylogenetic comparative study. Journal of Language Evolution, 1(2), 91–108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Champagne, M., 2018. Consciousness and the philosophy of signs: How Peircean semiotics combines phenomenal qualia and practical effects. Cham: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corning, P. A., Kauffman, S. A., Noble, D., Shapiro, J. A., Vane-Wright, R. I., Pross, A. (Eds.), 2023. Evolution “on purpose”: Teleonomy in living systems (Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology). Boston: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croft, W., 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deely, J., 2001. Four ages of understanding: The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deely, J., 2008. From semiosis to semioethics: The full vista of the action of signs. Sign System Studies, 38(2), 437–491.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deely, J., 2009. Purely objective reality. Mouton de Gruyter. Deacon, T. W., 2003. Universal grammar and semiotic constraints. In M. Christiansen & S. Kirby, (Eds.), Language Evolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–139.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deacon, T. W., 2012. Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: W.W. Norton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Du Crest, A., Valković, M., Ariew, A., Desmond, H., Huneman, P., Reydon, T. A. C. (Eds.), 2023. Evolutionary thinking across disciplines: Problems and perspectives in generalized Darwinism (Synthese Library, Vol. 478). Cham: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M., 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Favareau, D., Velmezova, E. (Eds)., 2022. Tunne loodust! Knowing nature in the languages of Biosemiotics. Epistemologica et historiographica linguistica Lausannensia 4. Lausanne. Université de Lausanne.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenberg, J. H., 1957. Language and evolutionary theory. In J. H. Greenberg, Essays in linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 56–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffmeyer, J., 1997. Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffmeyer, J., 2008: Biosemiotics: An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hull, D. L., 1988. Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hustak, C., Myers, N., 2012. Involutionary momentum: Affective ecologies and the sciences of plant/insect encounters. Differences 23(3), 74–118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jakobson, R., 1962c. Proposition au Premier Congrès International de Linguistes: Quelles sont les méthodes les mieux appropriées à un exposé complet et pratique de la phonologie d’une langue quelconque? In Jakobson, R., Selected Writings 1, ‘s-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co, pp. 3–7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jablonka, E., Lamb, M. J., 2014. Evolution in four Dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life, revised edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, M., 2007. The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., 2020. Semiotic fitting and the nativeness of community”, in Biosemiotics, 2020, 13(1), 9-19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, K., 2022. The biosemiotic fundamentals of aesthetics: Beauty is the perfect semiotic fitting”, in Biosemiotics, 2022, 15(1): 1-22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kull, Kalevi., 2023. On the Concept of Meaning in Biology. In Peter A. Corning, Stuart A. Kauffman, Dennis Noble, James A. Shapiro, Richard I. Vane-Wright & Addy Pross (Eds.), Evolution “On Purpose”: Teleonomy in Living Systems, Boston: MIT Press, pp. 161–174.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lacková, Ľ., 2018. The Prague school, teleology and language as a dynamic system”, in Acta Structuralica, 3, 105-121.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lacková, Ľ., 2022. Participative opposition applied. Sign Systems Studies, 50(2–3), 261–285.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lacková, Ľ., 2023. Structural semiology, Peirce, and biolinguistics. Semiotica, 253, 1–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
List, Johann-Mattis., 2023. Evolutionary aspects of language change. In Agathe du Crest, Martina Valković, André Ariew, Hugh Desmond, Philippe Huneman & Thomas A. C. Reydon (Eds.), Evolutionary Thinking Across Disciplines: Problems and Perspectives in Generalized Darwinism (Synthese Library), Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 103-124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margulis, L., Fester, R., 1991. Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation: Speciation and morphogenesis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martínez, Eugenio Ramón Luján., 1999. The Indo-European system of numerals from “1” to “10.” In Jadranka Gvozdanović (Ed.), Numeral Types and Changes Worldwide, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 199-220.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McMahon, A. M. S., 1994. Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Misiewicz, R., 2020. Peirce on analogy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 56(3), 299–325.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peirce, C. S., 1866-1913 [1931-1958]: The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 1-6 (Hartshorne C., Weiss P., Eds.). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1931–1935; vol. 7-8 (Burks A.W., Ed.). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1958. Cited as CP.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peirce, C. S., 1998 [1902]. On science and natural classes. In Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The Essential Peirce, vol. 2: 1893-1913. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 115–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peirce, C. S., 2010 [1890–1892]. The Monist metaphysical project. In Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 83–205.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pelkey, J., 2013, Analogy, automation and diagrammatic causation: The evolution of Tibeto-Burman *lak. Studies in Language. 37(1). 144–195.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pelkey, J., 2015. Deep congruence between linguistic and biotic growth: Evidence for semiotic foundations. In Velmezova, E., Cowley, S. J., Kull, K. (Eds.), Biosemiotic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics. Berlin: Springer, pp. 97–119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pelkey, J., 2016. Analogy reframed: Markedness, body asymmetry, and the semiotic animal. The American Journal of Semiotics, 32(1/4), 79–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pelkey, J., 2017. The semiotics of X: Chiasmus, cognition, and extreme body memory. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pelkey, J., 2019, Peircean semiotic for language and linguistics. In Jappy, T. (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Contemporary Peircean Semiotics. London, Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 391–418.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pelkey, J., 2022. Tonal iconicity and narrative transformation: Transverse embodied chiasmus in Sylvia Plath and Dolly Parton. In S. Lenninger, O. Fischer, C. Ljungberg, & E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 135–152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pelkey, J., & Augustyn, P., 2023. Semiotics in Evolutionary Linguistics. In J. Pelkey & S. Walsh Matthews (Eds.), Semiotics in the Natural and Technical Sciences. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 93–118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pleyer, M., Hartmann, S., 2024. Cognitive linguistics and language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ritt, Nikolaus., 2004. Selfish sounds and linguistic evolution: A Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robuschi C., 2021, The importance of aesthetics for the evolution of language”, in Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 15(2), 93-103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmid, H-J., 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shapiro, M., 1985. Teleology, semeiosis, and linguistic change. Diachronica, 2(1), 1–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shapiro, M., 1991. The Sense of Change: Language as History. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shapiro, M., 2002, Aspects of a neo-Peircean linguistics: Language history as linguistic theory, in M. Shapiro. ed., The Peirce Seminar Papers: Essays in Semiotic Analysis, vol. 5. Oxford: Berghahn: 108–125.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shapiro, M., 2022. The Logic of Language: A Semiotic Study of Speech. Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sharov, A., Kull, K., 2023. Evolution and semiosis. In J. Pelkey (Ed.), History and Semiosis. Bloomsbury Semiotics, Vol.1. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 149–168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sharov, A., Tønnessen, M., 2021. Semiotic agency: Science beyond mechanism (Biosemiotics 25). Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, C. M., 1972. The aesthetics of Charles S. Peirce. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 31(1), 21–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stjernfelt, F., 2007. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Berlin: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stjernfelt, F., 2014. Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stjernfelt, F., 2022. Abduction in diagrammatical reasoning. In L. Magnani (Ed.), Handbook of Abductive Cognition. Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Švorcová, Jana, Ľudmila Lacková & Eliška Fulínová., 2023. Evolution by habit: Peirce, Lamarck, and teleology in biology. Theory in Biosciences 142(4), 411–422.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, M., 2014. The origin of ideas: Blending, creativity, and the human spark. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, Mark, Eric Leonardis, Arturs Semenuks, Seana Coulson, Jamin Pelkey, Ikuma Adachi & Deborah Forster., 2021. Conceptual Blending in Animal Cognition: A Comparative Approach. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 43(43).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wyhe, J. van, 2005. The descent of words: Evolutionary thinking 1780–1880. Endeavour, 29(3), 94–100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolterstorff, N., 1980. Art in action. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
]Search in Google Scholar
