[
Alibali, M.W., 2005. Gesture in spatial cognition: expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 307–331.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Argyriou, P., Mohr, C., Kita, S., 2017. Hand matters: left-hand gestures enhance metaphor explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 874–886.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cienki, A., 1997. Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In Verspoor, M., Dong Lee, K., Sweetser, E. (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the constructions of meaning. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Publishers, pp. 3–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cienki, A., 2005. Image schemas and gesture. In Hampe, B., Grady, J.E. (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 421–441.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cienki, A., 2017. Ten lectures on Spoken language and Gesture from Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics. Issues of Dynamicity and Multimodality. Leiden, Boston, Brill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clausner, T.C., Croft, W., 1999. Domains and image-schemas. Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 1–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cook, S.W., Yip, T.K., Goldin-Meadow, S., 2010. Gesturing makes memories that last. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 465–475.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S.J., 2011. Distributed language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S.J., 2019. The Return of Languaging. Toward a new ecolinguistics. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 15(4), 483–512.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S.J., Kuhle, A., 2019. The Rise of Languaging. Biosystems, 198, 104264.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deane, P.D., 1992. Grammar in mind and brain. Explorations in cognitive syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Du Bois, J., 2007. The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse. Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139–182.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fornéz, M., Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J., 1998. Esquemas de imágenes y construcciόn del espacio. RILCE, 14(1), 23–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frick-Horbury, D., Guttentag, R.E., 1998. The Effects of restricting hand gesture production on lexical retrieval and free recall. The American Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 43-62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frick-Horbury, D., 2002. The use of hand gestures as self-generated cues for recall of verbally associated targets. The American Journal of Psychology, 115(1), 1–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, R.W., Colston, H.L., 1995. The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodwin, M.H., Cekaite, A., Goodwin, C., 2012. Emotion as stance. In Peräkylä, A., Sorjonen, M.-J. (Eds.), Emotion in interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 16–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grady, J., 1997. Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hostetter, A.B., Alibali, M.W., 2007. Raise your hand if you’re spatial: relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production. Gesture, 7, 73–95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hostetter, A.B., 2011. When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297–315.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iriskhanova, O. K., 2015. Reification as seen through mono- and multimodality of communication. Cognitive Studies of Language, 22, 62–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jensen, T.W., 2014. Emotion in languaging: Languaging as affective, adaptive, and flexible behavior in social interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, article 720.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, M., 1998. The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, reason and imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelly, S. D., Church, R. B., Alibali, M.W., 2017. Understanding gesture: Description, mechanism and function. In Kelly, S. D., Church, R. B., Alibali, M. W. (Eds.), Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating, pp. 3–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kendon, A., 1995. Gestures as illocutionary and dis- course structure markers in Southern Italian conversational. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirsh, D., Maglio, P, 1994. On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 513–549.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kok, K.I., Cienki, A., 2016. Cognitive Grammar and gesture: Points of convergence, advances and challenges. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(1), 67–100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kopp, S., Tepper, P., Cassell, J., 2004. Towards integrated microplanning of language and iconic gesture for multimodal output. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI’04), 97–104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kühnlein, P., Stegmann, J., 2003. Empirical issues in deictic gesture: referring to objects in simple identification tasks. Technical Report 2003/3, SFB 360, University of Bielefeld.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Landragin, F., Romary, L., 2003. Referring to objects through sub-contexts in multimodal human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of DiaBruck, 7th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Sept. 4–6, Wallerfangen, pp. 67–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, R., 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Descriptive application. Vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Love, N., 2004. Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26, 525–544.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Love, N., 2017. On languaging and languages. Language Sciences, 61, 113–147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H.R., 1970. Biology of Cognition. Biological Computer Laboratory Research Report BCL 9.0. Urbana IL: University of Illinois. Reprinted in: Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living. Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1980, pp. 5–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H.R., 1988. Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Conference workbook: Texts in cybernetics. American Society for Cybernetics Conference, Felton, pp. 1–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNeill, D., 2017. Gesture-speech unity. What it is, where it came from. In Kelly, S.D., Church, R.B., Alibali, M.W. (Eds.), Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating, pp. 77–101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, C., Tag, S., 2010. The dynamics of metaphor: foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 10, 85–120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peña, S., 1999. Subsidiary relationships between image-schemas: an approach to the force schema. Journal of English studies, 1, 187–207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pustejovsky, J., 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pustejovsky, J., 2005. The syntax of event structure. In Mani, I., Pustejovsky, J., Gaizauskas, R.J. (Eds.), The Language of time: a reader. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Nomikou, I., Rohlfing, K.J. et al., 2018. Language Development from an ecological perspective: ecologically valid ways to abstract symbols. Ecological Psychology, 30(1), 39–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rader, N. de Villiers, Zukow-Goldring, P., 2010. How the hands control attention during early word learning. Gesture, 10, 202–222.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santibáñez, F., 2002. The Object image-schema and other dependent schemas. ATLANTIS, 24(2), 183–201.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sinha, C., 1999. Grounding, meaning, and the acts of meaning. In Janssen, T., Redeker, G. (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics. Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 223–256.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
So, W.C., Ching, T.H.W., Lim, P.E. et al., 2014. Producing gestures facilitates route learning. PLoS One, 9:e112543, available at: < journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112543 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sowa, T., Wachsmuth, I., 2002. Interpretation of shape-related iconic gestures in virtual environments. In Wachsmuth, I., Sowa, T. (Eds.), Gesture and Sign language in human–computer interaction. International gesture workshop, London, April 18–20, 2001. Berlin: Springer, pp. 21–33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stevanoni, E., Salmon, K., 2005. Giving memory a hand: Instructing children to gesture enhances their event recall. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 217–233.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thibault, P.J., 2011. First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: the distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 210–245.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thibault, P.J., 2019. Simplex selves, functional synergies, and selving: languaging in a complex world. Language Sciences, 71, 49–67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zdrazilova, L., Sidhu, D.M., Pexman, P.M., 2018. Communicating abstract meaning: concepts revealed in words and gestures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 373(1752):20170138, available at: < pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29915006 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 