Effect of central administration of indomethacin on anandamide-induced GnRH/LH secretion in the hypothalamus of anoestrous ewes
Published Online: Jul 25, 2024
Page range: 451 - 459
Received: Dec 29, 2023
Accepted: Jul 15, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2024-0039
Keywords
© 2024 Dorota Tomaszewska-Zaremba et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
It is well recognised that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) influences many reproductive functions in both females and males (37). The presence of endogenous receptors for THC in vertebrates and the availability of highly selective and potent agonists of these receptors led to the identification of a naturally occurring lipid-signalling system termed the endocannabinoid system. Endocannabinoids (ECBs) are lipid mediators isolated from brain and peripheral tissues that include amides, esters and ethers of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (2). The best-known ECBs are anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamide – AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). Endocannabinoids can activate a wide range of cannabinoid receptors (CBRs), among them cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) cloned by Matsuda in 1990 and cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2R) identified by Munro in 1993 (20). Cannabinoid receptor type 1 was mainly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) (41), while expression of CB2R was detected mainly in immune cells. However, CB2R expression was also found in neuronal microglia cells, brain stem cells, the cerebellum, striatum, midbrain and hippocampus (41). There is evidence for the presence of other CBRs that work differently to CB1R and CB2R, such as G protein-coupled receptors 55 and 119 and type 1 vanilloid receptor (28). Anandamide binds to CB1R in the brain with high affinity and mimics the behavioural actions of the exogenous cannabinoid THC when injected into rodents, while 2-AG has similar affinities for CB1R and CB2R receptors, which are comparable to but productive of more efficient bonds than those of anandamide (41). Endocannabinoids and their receptors have been identified in the central and peripheral nervous system as well as in gonads and gametes, suggesting the involvement of this system in the control of reproductive function, at both the central and local levels (2). It was shown in human marijuana smokers as well as in animal models that cannabinoids (CBs) and ECBs impair gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinising hormone (LH) secretion. In females, chronic CB exposure delays sexual maturation, disrupts the menstrual or oestrous cycle, depresses follicular maturation in the ovary, alters uterine and vaginal cytology, and may reduce the contents of LH and sex steroids in blood (36). It was shown in a study on female rats that acute THC exposure inhibited pulsatile LH secretion (35) and also blocked oestrogen or oestrogen/ progesterone-mediated positive feedback on the LH surge in ovariectomised rats (29). It was also shown that in rats that AEA inhibited GnRH release (26) and GnRH transcription (6). It was suggested that the principal site of action of CBs and ECBs to inhibit reproductive processes is the hypothalamus, but that direct action at the level of the pituitary cannot be excluded (34). It is worth mentioning that ECB binding sites and the expression of enzymes which biosynthesise and hydrolyse CBs were reported in the hypothalamus and pituitary (12). In the present authors’ earlier study on ewes (34), expression of the
Cannabinoids may influence reproduction through action on hypothalamic GnRH neurons directly or indirectly through intermediates. In ewes, regulation of GnRH/LH secretion is complex and involves many factors such as steroid hormones, γ-aminobutyric acid and biogenic amines, kisspeptin, neuropeptide Y and melatonin. Additionally the mechanism regulating GnRH/LH secretion regulation is a different one during the oestrous cycle to the mechanism in the anoestrous season. Endocannabinoids could be considered some of the factors influencing reproductive functions. The mechanism through which ECBs exert effect is not well recognised; however, it is suggested that prostaglandins may play an important role in this interaction. It is known that AEA metabolism produces arachidonic acid (AA) as a main metabolite. Arachidonic acid is a polyunsaturated fatty acid that is present in the phospholipids of cell membranes and is abundant in the brain (11). Prostaglandins, thromboxane and leukotrienes are mediators synthesised
In the present study, the hypothesis that AEA can influence GnRH/LH secretion involving prostaglandins at the hypothalamic level was tested. The research aimed to determine the influence of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of AEA alone or with the prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor indomethacin (IND) on GnRH/LH secretion. The influence of the studied substances on the
The study was performed on 24 three-year-old adult Blackhead ewes in the anoestrous season (April–May). Anoestrus was confirmed by very low LH concentrations in plasma during the experiment as well by heat testing by a vasectomised ram, and only animals which had not exhibited regular cycles for at least three weeks before the experiment were used. The animals were kept indoors in individual pens, yet exposed to natural daylight. The ewes’ body condition scores were kept at an estimated 3 points or higher on a 5-point scale. The ewes were well adapted to the experimental conditions and always had visual contact with their neighbours during the experimental period to prevent the stress of social isolation. The animals were fed a constant diet of commercial concentrates with hay and water available
The animals (n = 24) were randomly assigned to four experimental groups: a control group (n = 6) that received an i.c.v. injection of Ringer–Locke solution (RLs), an AEA group (n = 6) that received an i.c.v. injection of 30 μM/animal of AEA solution, an IND group (n = 6) that received an i.c.v. injection of 5 μM/animal of IND solution, and an AEA + IND group (n = 6) that received i.c.v. injections of 30 μM/animal of AEA and 5 μM/animal of IND solutions. The dose was chosen on the basis of a preliminary study with doses of AEA of 1 μM, 10 μM, 30 μM and 100 μM, in which the dose of 30 μM was found optimal taking into account LH release and the behaviour of the animals. Jugular blood samples were taken from each ewe for LH measurement at 15-min intervals, beginning 2 h before and continuing until 3 h after i.c.v. administration of the cannabinoids or the control solution. The experiment started at 9 am and finished at 2 pm. The animals were euthanised immediately after the experiment (3 h after i.c.v. administration of cannabinoids or only their vehicle, the Ringer–Locke solution), the brains were rapidly removed from the skulls and then the chosen hypothalamic structures, namely the preoptic area (POA), median eminence (ME) and anterior pituitary (AP), were dissected. All tissues were frozen immediately after collection in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until assay.
The LH concentration in the plasma was estimated with a double-antibody radioimmunoassay using anti-ovine-LH antibodies and standards (US National Hormone and Pituitary Program and Dr. A.F. Parlow of Harbor-UCLA Research and Education Institute c/o Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA) and anti-rabbit-ɤ-globulin antisera (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the method of Stupnicki and Madej (30). The assay sensitivity was 0.3 ng/mL and the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 8% and 11%, respectively.
The hypothalamic tissues were homogenised in 400 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (0.02 mol), and the concentrations of GnRH in the POA and ME were determined with a commercial ELISA kit purpose-made for the measurement of sheep GnRH (CUSABIO BIOTECH Co., Wuhan, China). All steps in the assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and as described by Herman
The POA and ME tissues were homogenised in liquid nitrogen, and the total RNA was extracted using a NucleoSpin RNA kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Complimentary DNA (cDNA) was synthesised and real-time PCRs were carried out according to the method earlier described by Wojtulewicz
Specific primers used in real-time PCR for determining the expression of housekeeping genes and genes of interest
GenBank accession No. | Gene | Amplicon size (base pairs) | Forward/reverse | Sequence 5’→3’ | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Housekeeping genes | NM_001034034 | 134 | forward | AGAAGGCTGGGGCTCACT | (31) | |
reverse | GGCATTGCTGACAATCTTGA | |||||
U39357 | 168 | forward | CTTCCTTCCTGGGCATGG | |||
reverse | GGGCAGTGATCTCTTTCTGC | |||||
BC108088.1 | 115 | forward | CTGGGGACCTACGGGATATT | |||
reverse | GACATGACCGGCTTGAAAAT | |||||
Genes of interest | NM_001009397 | 150 | forward | TCTTTGCTGGACCACAGTTAT | (14) | |
reverse | GGCAGCTGAAGGTGAAAAAG | |||||
U02517 | 123 | forward | GCCCTGGAGGAAAGAGAAAT | |||
reverse | GAGGAGAATGGGACTGGTGA | |||||
X52488 | 184 | forward | AGATGCTCCAGGGACTGCT | |||
reverse | TGCTTCATGCTGAGGCAGTA |
The relative gene expression was calculated using the comparative quantification option (23) in Rotor-Gene Q software (Qiagen) measuring against the mean expression of three housekeeping genes: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (
The statistical analyses were performed using Statistica software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). The blood hormone concentrations after the treatment period (from 1 to 3 h after i.c.v. administration), GnRH content in the ME and POA and expression levels of all examined genes were subjected to two-way analysis of variance and a post-hoc Fisher’s least significance test comparing groups. The results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean, and statistical significance was set at P-value ≤ 0.05.
Central injection of AEA increased
Fig. 1.
Effect of intracerebroventricular injection of anandamide (AEA) indomethacin (IND) and AEA + IND on the expression of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (

Fig. 2.
Effect of intracerebroventricular injection of anandamide (AEA) indomethacin (IND) and AEA + IND on the gene expression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR) in the median eminence (ME – A) and in the anterior pituitary (AP – B) of anoestrous ewes. The data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. The results were analysed using two-way analysis of variance with a post-hoc Fisher’s least significance test (P-value ≤ 0.05)

Intracerebroventricular administration of AEA significantly increased (P-value ≤ 0.01) the GnRH peptide concentration in both the POA and ME (Figs 3A and 3B). The injection of IND, when with AEA, significantly reduced (P-value ≤ 0.01) AEA-mediated stimulation of the GnRH peptide concentration (Figs 3A and 3B).
Fig. 3.
Effect of intracerebroventricular injection of anandamide (AEA) indomethacin (IND) and AEA + IND on the content of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the preoptic area (POA – A) and median eminence (ME – B) of anoestrous ewes. The data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. The results were analysed using two-way analysis of variance with a post-hoc Fisher’s least significance test (P-value ≤ 0.01)

Central injection of AEA and AEA + IND did not reduce LH release in the AP compared with the control animals’ LH level, while administration of IND alone decreased it (P-value ≤ 0.05) in this tissue of the experimental anoestrous ewes (Fig. 4A). However, i.c.v. injection of AEA alone as well with IND stimulated (P-value ≤ 0.05)
Fig. 4.
Effect of intracerebroventricular injection of anandamide (AEA), indomethacin (IND) and AEA + IND on the plasma concentration of luteinising hormone (LH –A) and on the expression of the

The present study demonstrates that the prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor indomethacin can effectively reverse the effect of anandamide on GnRH secretion in anoestrous ewes. Anandamide alone injected i.c.v. at a dose of 30 μM increased
In our study, we observed that i.c.v. administration of IND together with AEA reduced the stimulation of GnRH peptide expression by AEA in both the POA and ME, while it upregulated
Unexpectedly, in our study, we did not find any effect of AEA injection on the LH concentration. We only observed that i.c.v. administration of AEA stimulated LH mRNA in the AP without influencing the release of this hormone. Our results differ from those of most studies, which were performed on rats. It was shown that exogenous cannabinoids such as THC as well as endogenous ones such as AEA decreased gonadotropin release. Chronic administration of CBs to prepubertal female rats was observed to reduce the contents of LH and sex steroids in serum (36). Research also found that acute THC administration inhibited pulsatile LH secretion and also blocked oestrogen- or oestrogen/ progesterone-mediated positive feedback on the LH surge in ovariectomised rats (29). In our experiment on AP explants from anoestrous ewes, we also demonstrated the inhibitory influence of AEA on the secretion of LH (34). However, in that experiment, which was
We found that AEA alone as well as with IND increased
Our
In recent years the need to perform research on non-rodent animal models has been increasingly emphasised. Sheep are a long-lived and widely adopted animal model lending itself to investigation of the regulation of neuroendocrine processes. The increasing interest of the scientific community in research performed on animals other than laboratory rodents should be also underscored. Rodents may be possibilities among the alternative research models for testing which are to be used before clinical trials are undertaken, which is a recommendation of the Food and Drug Administration of US Department of Health and Human Services for all new drugs which are planned for therapeutic application in human medicine. A contribution to the exploration of cannabinoids for medical use may be constituted by the presented results of this alternative-research-model study, which enable the role of the endocannabinoid system in the regulation of reproductive functions to be better understood.