[
Alba-Tercedor, J., & Sánchez-Ortega, A. (1988). A simple and quick method to evaluate biological quality of running freshwater based on Hellawell (1978). Limnetica, 4(5), 1–56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aleixandre, M. P. J., & Crujeiras, B. (2017). Epistemic practices and scientific practices in Science education. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education. New directions in Mathematics and Science education (pp. 69–80). SensePublishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Azevedo, H., Soares-Silva, I., Fonseca, F., Alves, P., Silva, D., & Azevedo, M. M. (2022). Impact of educational gardens and workshop activities on 8th-grade student’s perception and knowledge of plant biology. Education Sciences, 12(9), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090619
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Azevedo, M. M. (2008). Toxicity of metals in aquatic hyphomycetes: Cellular targets and defense mechanisms (PhD Doctoral Thesis, University of Minho).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Azevedo, M. M., Duarte, S., Paiva, S., & Johansson, B. (2013). Implementation of a laboratory teaching module on human physiology to Portuguese students in regular Biology classes. Educational Research Journal, 3, 180–191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Azevedo, M. M., Fonseca, F., Andrade, R. P., & Palmeirim, I. (2012). The impact of alternative science education methodologies on the motivation and acquisition of scientific concepts. Educational Research Journal, 2(5), 132–137.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Azevedo, M. M., Pinheiro, C., Dias, A., Pinto-Ribeiro, F., & Baltazar, F. (2015). Impact of an educational hands-on project on the antimicrobial, antitumor and anti-inflammatory properties of plants on Portuguese students’ awareness, knowledge, and competences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(3), 2437–2453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120302437
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Azevedo, M. M., Ricardo, E., Teixeira Dos Santos, R., Pina-Vaz, C., & Rodrigues, A. G. (2020). “Filling a gap: knowledge in health related science for middle school students in formal and informal contexts. Journal of Biological Education, 54(2), 129–146.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bedford, T. (2022). Constructing a transformative sustainability pedagogy: Teacher empowerment for a sustainable future. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berland, K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Briede, L., & Drelinga, E. (2020). Personal sustainability and sustainable employability: Perspective of vocational education students. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(2), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brockmyer, J. H., Fox, C. M., Curtiss, K. A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K. M., & Pidruzny, J. N. (2009). The development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Call for action. Environmental Conservation, 14(4), 291–294.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, Y., & Kitagawa, K. J. S. (2023). Locally based architectural construction strategies in rural China: Textual analysis of architects’ design thinking. Sustainability, 15(13), 10573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310573
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coimbra, C., Graça, M., & Cortes, R. (1996). The effects of a basic effluent on macroinver-tebrate community structure in a temporary Mediterranean river. Environmental Pollution, 94(3), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(96)00091-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Costa, M. J., & Rangachari, P. K. (2009). The power of interactive teaching. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 37, 74–76. https://doi.or/10.1002/bmb.20270
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cunha, A. E., Saraiva, E., Santos, C. A., Dinis, F., & Lopes, J. B. (2014). Teacher mediation actions and students’ productive engagement during the use of computer simulations in physical science classrooms. Procedia Technology, 13, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.02.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining” gamification”. In A. Lugmayr, H. Franssila, O. Sotamaa, C. Safran, & T. Aaltonen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). Association for Computing Machinery.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. J. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22, 2109–2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition & Instruction, 20(4), 399–483.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fardo, M. L. (2014). Gamification as a pedagogical strategy: A study of elements from games applied in teaching and learning processes (Master’s Thesis, Universidade de Caxias do Sul).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fleischman, K., & Ariel, E. (2016). Gamification in science education: Gamifying learning of microscopic processes in the laboratory. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(2), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6168
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fonseca, M. J., Santos, C. L., Costa, P., Lencastre, L., & Tavares, F. (2012). Increasing awareness about antibiotic use and resistance: A hands-on project for high school students. PloS One, 7(9), e44699. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044699
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6168
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furtak, E. M., & Kunter, M. (2012). Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 284–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.573019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graça, M. A. S., & Ferreira, R. C. F. (1995). The ability of selected aquatic hyphomycetes and terrestrial fungi to decompose leaves in freshwater. Sydowia-Horn, 47, 167-222.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hakulinen, L., & Auvinen, T. (2014). The effect of gamification on students with different achievement goal orientations. In A. Pears (Ed.), 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE) (pp. 9–16). IEEE Computer Society.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ijsselsteijn, W., De Kort, Y., Poels, K., Jurgelionis, A., & Bellotti, F. (2007). Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games. In R. Bernhaupt & M. Tscheligi (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology – ACE 2007 (pp. 1–4). Association for Computing Machinery.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ivala, E., Gachago, D., Condy, J., & Chigona, A. (2013). Enhancing student engagement with their studies: A digital storytelling approach. Creative Education, 4(10), 82–89. http://dx.doi/10.4236/ce.2013.410A012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelly, G. J., & Licona, P. (2018). Epistemic practices and science education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), History, philosophy and science teaching: New perspectives (pp. 139–165). Springer International Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khoo, H. E. (2005). Teaching biochemistry to medical students in Singapore – from organic chemistry to problem-based learning. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 34(6), 79C–83C.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lazzaro, N. (2009). Human-computer interaction: Designing for diverse users domains. In A. Sears & J. A. Jacko (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving techniques, and emerging applications (2nd ed.) (pp. 679–700). CRC Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lopes, J. B., Branco, J., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2011). ‘Learning experience’ provided by science teaching practice in a classroom and the development of students’ competences. Research in Science Education, 41(5), 787–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9190-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maimad, M. T., Dupa, H. J. P., & Villegas, J. P. (2023). Parental involvement and academic achievement: Keys to translating no poverty and quality education SDGs in Philippine peripheral communities. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 25(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2023-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marques, F., Pinto, L., Azevedo, M. M., Sampaio‐Marques, B., Areias, A. C., Salgueira, A., Costa, M. J., Rodrigues, F., & Ludovico, P. (2021). Innovative, integrative, and interactive in‐class activity on metabolic regulation: Evaluating educational impacts. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49(6), 870–881. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21569
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merian, E., & Clarkson, T. W. (1991). Metals and their compounds in the environment. VCH-Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Metcalfe‐Smith, J. (1994). Biological water‐quality assessment of rivers: use of macroinvertebrate communities. Environmental Pollution, 60, 144–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(89)90223-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morris, B., Croker, S., Zimmerman, C., Gill, D., & Romig, C. (2013). Gaming science: The “Gamification” of scientific thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 607–623. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00607
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mortimer, E. F., Quadros, A. L., Silva, A. C. A. da., Sá, E. F. de., Moro, L., Silva, P. S., Martins, R. F., & Pereira, R. R. (2014). Interactions between semiotic modes and the making of meaning in lessons oh high education. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 16(3), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172014160306
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norman, K. L. (2013). Geq (game engagement/experience questionnaire): A review of two papers. Interacting With Computers, 25(4), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00607
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parikh, A., McReelis, K., & Hodges, B. (2001). Student feedback in problem based learning: A survey of 103 final year students across five Ontario medical schools. Medical Education, 35(7), 632–636. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00994.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pires, C. (2018). The potential of gamification as a pedagogical strategy: Encouraging participation through the use of the Moodle platform. (Master Thesis, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Platts, W. S., Megahan, W. F., & Minshall, G. W. (1982). Methods for evaluating stream, riparian, and biotic conditions (Vol. 138). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poels, K., de Kort, Y., & IJsselsteijn, W. (2007). D3.3: Game Experience Questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games. Eindhoven. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prince, K. J., Van Eijs, P. W., Boshuizen, H. P., Van Der Vleuten, C. P., & Scherpbier, A. J. (2005). General competencies of problem‐based learning (PBL) and non‐PBL graduates. Medical Education, 39(4), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02107.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rieckmann, M. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenberg, D. M. (1992). Freshwater biomonitoring and Chironomidae. Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 26(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02255231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sé, A. B., Passos, R. M., Ono, A. H., & Hermes-Lima, M. (2008). The use of multiple tools for teaching medical biochemistry. Advances in physiology education, 32(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00028.2007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., Miranda Coelho, J. A., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tripp, B., Voronoff, S. A., & Shortlidge, E. E. (2020). Crossing boundaries: Steps toward measuring undergraduates’ interdisciplinary science understanding. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 19(1), ar8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-09-0168
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trusina, I., Jermolajeva, E., Abramov, V., & Gopejenko, V. (2024). World development assessment in an invariant coordinate system of energy units: The newly industrialized economies perspectives. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 8(3), 3110–3131. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i3.3110
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tvarozek, J., & Brza, T. (2014). Engaging students in online courses through Interactive badges. In M. B. Nunes & M. McPherson (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning 2014 (pp. 89–95). International Association for Development of the Information Society.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Educational and Cultural Organization of the United Nations.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yıldırım, İ., & Şen, S. (2019). The effects of gamification on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636089
]Search in Google Scholar
Orcid profile