1. bookVolume 23 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1691-5534
First Published
04 May 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Role of Feedback in the Distance Learning Process

Published Online: 21 Jan 2022
Page range: 91 - 105
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1691-5534
First Published
04 May 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In the distance learning process, teachers, students, parents and institutions must continue the teaching and learning process despite the various limitations. During the face-to-face learning process, instructions, concepts and feedback can be verbally communicated within a relatively short period of time; while teachers in the distance learning process must briefly express their thoughts in written form so that every student can clearly understand what is being done. It is not always an easy task. One of the challenges of the distance learning process is to find ways how to provide feedback to students in a timely and meaningful way to help them improve their performance, actively engage in the learning process, and not to lose the link between a student and a teacher. The article, using theoretical (scientific and methodological literature analysis) research methods, analyzes the concept and theoretical models of the distance learning process, describes the preconditions for feedback and the importance of feedback in the teaching and learning process. By analysing the importance of feedback, suggestions for improving the distance learning process have been developed.

Keywords

Adcroft, A. (2011). The mythology of feedback. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.52609610.1080/07294360.2010.526096 Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251100362001910.1080/13562511003620019 Search in Google Scholar

Bangert, A. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(3), 217–232.10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.003 Search in Google Scholar

Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507100373113510.1080/03075071003731135 Search in Google Scholar

Bernard, M. R., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289.10.3102/0034654309333844 Search in Google Scholar

Bernath, U., & Vidal, M. (2007). The theories and the theorists: Why theory is important for research. Distances et savoirs, 5(3), 427–458. Search in Google Scholar

Bonnel, W., Ludwig, C., & Smith, J. (2007). Providing feedback in online courses: What do students want? How do we do that? Annual Review of Nursing Education, 6, 205–221. Search in Google Scholar

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for a learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/71369572810.1080/713695728 Search in Google Scholar

Boud, B., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712.10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 Search in Google Scholar

Canning, J. (2013). Feedback: A short academic literature review. http://blog.soton.ac.uk/gmoof/files/2013/07/Feedback-literature-review2.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.10.1080/03075070600572132 Search in Google Scholar

Chetwynd, F., & Dobbyn, C. (2011). Assessment, feedback and marking guides in distance education. Open Learning, 26(1), 67–78.10.1080/02680513.2011.538565 Search in Google Scholar

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3–7. Search in Google Scholar

Cole, S., Coates, M., & Lentell, H. (1986). Towards good teaching by correspondence. Open Learning, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/026805186001010510.1080/0268051860010105 Search in Google Scholar

Costello, J., & Crane, D. (2010). Providing learner-centered feedback using a variety of technologies. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Liberal Arts, St. Thomas University, Fredericton, New Brunswick. https://www.stu.ca/media/stu/site-content/about/publications/2010-conference-on-the-liberal-arts/Providing-Learner-centered-Feedback-Using-a-Variety-of-Technologies.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Davies, P. (2003). Closing the communications loop on the computerized peer-assessment of essays. Research in Learning Technology, 11(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v11i1.1126610.3402/rlt.v11i1.11266 Search in Google Scholar

Delling, R. (1966). Versuch der Grundlegung zu einer systematischen Theorie des Fernunterrichts [Attempt to lay the foundations for a systematic theory of distance learning]. In L. Sroka (Ed.), Fernunterricht (pp. 181–211). Hamburger Fernlehrinstitut. Search in Google Scholar

Dohmen, G. (1967). Das Fernstudium, Ein neues padagogisches Forschungsund Arbeitsfeld [Distance learning, a new pedagogical research and field of work]. DIFF. Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, M. L., Lazarus, A. D., Calvano, T. B., Matthews, K. A., Hendel, R. A., Epstein, B. B., & Brosvic, G. M. (2002). Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. The Psychological Record, 52(2), 187–201.10.1007/BF03395423 Search in Google Scholar

Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: An exploratory study. Higher Education, 59(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9247-410.1007/s10734-009-9247-4 Search in Google Scholar

Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431247435010.3102/0034654312474350 Search in Google Scholar

Garrison, D. R., & Baynton, M. (1987). Beyond independence in distance education: The concept of control. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1(3), 3–15.10.1080/08923648709526593 Search in Google Scholar

Garrison, D. R. (1989). Understanding distance education: A framework for the future. Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Garrison, D. R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2/2210.19173/irrodl.v1i1.2 Search in Google Scholar

Glover, C., & Brown, E. (2006). Written feedback for students: Too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.2006.0700000410.3108/beej.2006.07000004 Search in Google Scholar

Hanson, D., Maushak, N. J., Schlosser, C. A., Anderson, M. L., Sorenson, C. & Simonson, M. (1997). Distance education: Review of the literature (2nd ed.). Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Research Institute for Studies in Education. Search in Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487 Search in Google Scholar

Herek, G. (1995). Developing a theoretical framework and rationale for a research proposal. In W. Pequegnat & E. Stover (Eds.), How to write a successful research grant application: A guide for social and behavioral scientists (pp. 85–91). Kluwer. Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, B. (1960). On the methods of teaching by correspondence. C. W. K. Gleerup. Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, B. (1977). Distance education: A survey and bibliography. ERIC. Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, B. (1986). Growth and structure of distance education. Croom Helm. Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Howard, D. C. (1987). Designing learner feedback in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1(3), 2440.10.1080/08923648709526595 Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic writing. Written Communication, 18, 549–574.10.1177/0741088301018004005 Search in Google Scholar

Izglītības likums [Education Law]. (1998). https://likumi.lv/ta/id/50759-izglitibas-likums Search in Google Scholar

Keegan, D. (Ed.) (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Leibold, N., & Schwartz, L. M. (2015). The art of giving online feedback. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 34–46. Search in Google Scholar

Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263–275.10.1080/02602930701292548 Search in Google Scholar

Martínez Agudo, J. de D. (2018). Introduction and overview. In J. de D. Martínez Agudo (Ed.), Emotions in second language teaching. Theory, research and teacher education (pp. 1–16). Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-75438-3_1 Search in Google Scholar

Mendela, M., Puhovska, M., Zielka, S., Sagana, I., Sadovņika, A., Dimnicka, M. (...) Ridens, L. (2008). Izglītība pārmaiņām: Ilgtspējīgas attīstības mācīšanas un mācīšanās rokasgrāmata [Education for change: A Handbook for teaching and learning sustainable development]. Vides vēstis. Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning. In A. J. Kezar (Ed.), ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 29 (pp. 1–134). Jossey – Bass. Search in Google Scholar

Ministru kabineta rīkojums Nr. 103 [Cabinet Regulation No 103]. Par ārkārtējās situācijas izsludināšanu [On the declaration of a state of emergency]. Rīg‚, 2020. gada 12. martā (prot. Nr. 11 1. § ). https://www.vestnesis.lv/op/2020/51A.1 Search in Google Scholar

Mirķe, E., Cakula, S., & Tzivian, L. (2019). Measuring teachers-as-learners’ digital skills and readiness to study online for successful e-learning experience. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 21(2), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2019-001310.2478/jtes-2019-0013 Search in Google Scholar

Moore, M. G. (1972). Learner autonomy: The second dimension of independent learning. Convergence, 5(2), 76–88. Search in Google Scholar

Moore, M. (1990). Background and overview of contemporary American distance education. In M. Moore (Ed.), Contemporary issues in American distance education (pp. 12–26). Pergamon. Search in Google Scholar

Moore, M. G. (1994) Autonomy and interdependence. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 1–4. Search in Google Scholar

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Wadsworth. Search in Google Scholar

Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Waxmann. Search in Google Scholar

Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090 Search in Google Scholar

Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 238–255.10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00259.x Search in Google Scholar

Perraton, H. (1988). A theory for distance education. In D. Stewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives (pp. 34–45). Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Peters, O. (1967). Distance education and industrial production: A comparative interpretation in outline. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Otto Peters on distance education. The industrialization of teaching and learning (pp. 107–127). Routledge Studies in Distance Education. Search in Google Scholar

Peters, O. (1973). Die Didaktische Struktur des Fernunterrichts [The didactic structure of distance learning]. Beltz. Search in Google Scholar

Peters, O. (1993). Distance education in a post-industrial society. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 220–240). Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Peters, O. (1998). Learning and teaching in distance education. Analyses and interpretations from an international perspective. Kogan Page. Search in Google Scholar

Peters, O. (2000). The transformation of the university into an institution of higher learning. In T. Evans & S. Nation (Eds.), Changing university teaching: Reflections on creating educational technologies (pp. 10–23). Kogan Page. Search in Google Scholar

Portway, P., & Lane, C. (Eds.). (1994). Guide to teleconferencing and distance learning. Applied Business Communications. Search in Google Scholar

Price, B. (1997). Defining quality student feedback in distance learning. Journal of Advances Learning, 26(1), 154–160.10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026154.x Search in Google Scholar

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.10.1080/02602930903541007 Search in Google Scholar

Rodway-Dyer, S., Knight, J., & Dunne, E. (2010). A case study on audio feedback with geography undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(2), 217–231.10.1080/03098265.2010.524197 Search in Google Scholar

Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I., & Ivanova, O. (2021). Does the JTES help us create deeper personal meanings for sustainable education? Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-001210.2478/jtes-2020-0012 Search in Google Scholar

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 3–32.10.3102/0034654307313795 Search in Google Scholar

Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 33, 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.166308210.1080/08923647.2019.1663082 Search in Google Scholar

Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69–75.10.1080/03075079412331382153 Search in Google Scholar

Tsagari, D. (2013). Contact sessions in distance education: Students’ perspective. In N. Lavidas, T. Alexiou, & M. Sougari (Eds), Major trends in theoretical and applied linguistics: Selected papers from the 20th ISTAL (International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics), vol. 3 (pp. 385–405). Versita de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO. (2016). Education 2030. Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action. Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656 Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO. (2019). Framework for the implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) beyond 2019. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370215 Search in Google Scholar

USDLA (US American Distance Education Association). (2004). Definition of distance learning. http://www.usdla.org Search in Google Scholar

Weaver, M. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379–394.10.1080/02602930500353061 Search in Google Scholar

WHO. (2020). Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 11 March 2020. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo