[
Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alexander, J. C. (2002). On the social construction of moral universals: The 'Holocaust' from war crime to trauma drama. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(1), 05–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431002005001001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anker, E. R. (2014). Orgies of feeling: Melodrama and the politics of freedom. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aumüller, M. (2014). Text types. In P. Hühn, J. Ch. Meister, J. Pier, & W. Schmid (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Berlin: De Gruyter. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barthes, R. (1977). Introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. In R. Barthes (ed.), Image, music, text (pp. 79–124). London: Fontana Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berger, E., & Wodak, R. (2018). Kinder der Rückkehr: Geschichte einer marginalisierten Jugend. Wiesbaden: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernauer, J. W., & Mahon, M. (1994). The ethics of Michel Foucault. In G. Gutting (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Michel Foucault (pp. 141–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521403320
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calhoun, C. (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MS.: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Critchley, S. (2014). The ethics of deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Beaugrande, R. A., & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Declaration of the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust. (2000). http://www.d.dccam.org/Projects/Affinity/SIF/DATA/2000/page1192.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eder, K. (2009). Rational action, communicative action, and the narrative structure of social life. In S. O’Tuama (ed.), Critical turns in Critical Theory: New directions in social and political thought (pp. 63–80). London and New York: Tauris.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forchtner, B.(2011). Critique, the discourse-historical approach and the Frankfurt School. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.533564
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forchtner, B.(2016). Lessons from the past? Memory, narrativity and subjectivity. London: Palgrave.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forchtner, B. M., Engelken, J., & Eder, K. (2020). Towards a revised theory of collective learning processes: Argumentation, narrative and the making of the social bond. European Journal of Social Theory, 23(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1368431018814348.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forchtner, B. (2021). Critique, Habermas and narrative (genre): the discourse-historical approach in critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(3), 314-331.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forst, R. (2015). Zum Begriff eines Rechtfertigungsnarrativs. In R. Forst (ed.), Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen (pp. 85–101). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glynos, J. (2000). Thinking the ethics of the political in the context of a postfoundational world: From an ethics of desire to an ethics of the drive. Theory and Event, 4(4).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of Communicative Action. vol. 1. London: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of Communicative Action. vol. 2. London: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, J.(1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. London: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse ethics: Notes on a programme of philosophical justification. Studies in contemporary German social thought. In J. Habermas (ed.), Moral consciousness and Communicative Action (pp. 43-115). Cambridge, MS.: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, J. (1997). Modernity: an unfinished project. In M. Passerin d’Entrèves, & S. Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity (pp. 01-38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, J. (2003). Rightness versus truth: On the sense of normative validity in moral judgments and norms. In J. Habermas (ed.), Truth and justification (pp. 237–276). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, J. (2019). Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie. Band 1. Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, J., & Derrida, J. (2005). February 15, or, what binds Europeans together: Plea for a common foreign policy, beginning in core Europe. In D. Levy, M. Pensky, & J. Torpey (eds.), Old Europe, New Europe, Core Europe. Transatlantic relations after the Iraq War (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Verso. (Original work published 2003).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heer, H., Manoschek, W., Pollak, A., & Wodak, R. (2008). The discursive construction of history: remembering the Wehrmacht's War of Annihilation. London: Palgrave.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heer, H., & Wodak, R. (2008). Introduction: Collective memory, national narratives and the politics of the past–the discursive construction of history. In H. Heer, W. Manoschek, A. Pollak, & R. Wodak (eds.), The discursive construction of history: remembering the Wehrmacht's War of Annihilation (pp. 01–13). London: Palgrave.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heilman, R. B. (1969). Tragedy and melodrama: versions of experience. Washington, WAS: University of Washington Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyvärinen, M. (2015): Analysing narrative genres. In A. de Fina, & A. Georgakopoulou (eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 178–193). Wiley-Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacobs, R. N., & Smith, Ph. (1997). Romance, irony, and solidarity. Sociological Theory, 15(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacobs, R. N. (2001). The problem with tragic narratives: lessons from the Los Angeles uprising. Qualitative Sociology, 24(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010774209910
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jameson, F. (2002). The political unconscious: narrative as a socially symbolic act. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuusisto, R. (2009). Comic plots as conflict resolution strategy. European Journal of International Relations, 15(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109345052
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. A. Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 67–96). Seattle, WAS: University of Washington Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macgilchrist, F. (2016). Fissures in the discourse-scape: Critique, rationality and validity in post-foundational approaches to CDS. Discourse & Society, 27(3), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630902.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molden, F. (2003). Appeasement 2003. Die Presse. 2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mouffe, Ch. (2005). On the political. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Özvatan, Ö. (2020). The great secession: Ethno-national rebirth and the politics of Turkish–German belonging. Social Inclusion, 8(1), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i1.2437.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pfeifer, H., & Spencer, A. (2019). Once upon a time - Western genres and narrative constructions of a Romantic Jihad. Journal of Language and Politics, 18(1), 21–39. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.18005.spe.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale. Bloomington. Ind.: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: rhetorics of racism and anti-semitism. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reisigl, M. (2002). Anmerkungen zu einer Tropologie des Historischen und Politischen. In O. Panagl, & H. Sturmer (eds.), Politische Konzepte und Verbal Strategien. Brisante Worter—Begriffsfelder—Sprachbilder. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reisigl, M. (2014). Argumentation analysis and the discourse-historical approach: A methodological framework. In C. Hart, & P. Cap (eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 67–96). London: Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 23–61), London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reisigl, M. (2018). The discourse-historical approach. In J. Flowerdew, & J. E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 44–59). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rheindorf, M., & Wodak, R. (2017). It was a long, hard road: A longitudinal perspective on discourses of commemoration in Austria. 10plus1: Living Linguistics, 3, 22–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richardson, J. E. (2018). Sharing values to safeguard the future: British Holocaust Memorial Day Commemoration as epideictic rhetoric. Discourse & Communication, 12(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317745743.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ricoeur, P. (1991). Life in quest of narrative. In D. Wood (ed.), On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and interpretation (pp. 20–33) . New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Riessman, Catherine Kohler. Narrative Methods for The Human Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc., 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ringmar, Erik. Identity, Interest, and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden's Intervention in the Thirty Years War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, Philip. Why War? The Cultural Logic of Iraq, the Gulf War, and Suez. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226763910.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singh, Sharanpal and Shilpi Goyal, “Regressus ET reflexivity: Belletristic semantique problematique, ET, dissimulare,” Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 2023; 1658.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Somers, Margaret R. "The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach." Theory and Society, 23(5), 1994; 605–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992905
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. "Story comprehension: An introduction." Poetics, 9(1–3), 1980, 01–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(80)90010-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Leeuwen, Theo. The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard, eds., Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, 32–70; 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wagner-Pacifici, Robin Erica. The Moro Morality Play: Terrorism as Social Drama. Chicago, Il.: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, NC: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, Hayden "The value of narrativity in the representation of reality." Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 1980, 05–27. https://doi.org/10.1086/448086.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wodak, Ruth, P. Nowak, J. Pelikan, H. Gruber, R. De Cilia, and R. Mitten. ‘Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter’: Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wodak, R., F. Menz, R. Mitten and F. Stern. Die Sprachen der Vergangenheiten. Öffentliches Gedenken in österreichischen und deutschen Medien. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1994.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wodak, Ruth. Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman, 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wodak, Ruth. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. London: Palgrave, 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolph De Cillia, Martin Reisigl and Karin Liebhart. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wodak, Ruth. "'Timeless places': Narratives about flight, exile and belonging." Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1–3), 2018, 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.31863.
]Search in Google Scholar
